State by State
 

270 electoral votes needed to win it.

These 4 states are close: CO(9) OH(20) VA(13) NV(5)



I'll call the other 46 (because I can easily handle such a task.)



Pro-Obama States (TOTAL: 264 electoral votes)

PA CA DE HI MI NH OR NJ WA IA WI NM
CT MN IL ME MD MA NY RI VT...don't forget D.C.(3 ELEC. VOTES....BELIEVE IT OR NOT.)

Pro-McCain States (total:227 electoral votes...of course...the predominant thing in common is most of the states that had slavery ain't having OBAMA.)

AL AZ AR FL SD AK
GA NC ND ID IN KS MO
KY LA MS MT NE OK
SC TN UT WV WY TX



NH,AND NM could be soft,but I think Obama will take them. Florida could be soft, but I expect it's McCain's. If Florida or Ohio go for Obama, then JohnnyCat, you are dead. Funny how 2 states that are normally battleground states(Missouri,and Arkansas) aren't even close when a brotha is involved.

Don't be so sure about MA.. Right now it's McCain-44%, Obama-45%, and undecided-11%.
I would have sworn Obama would be way ahead in my extremely liberal state.
Then again, I don't have much faith in polls.

that's probably a good snapshot if the vote was held today.

but it could change in 2 months. obama has a ground war where he just needs to grind it out and hope the economy and unpopular war carry him. but he can't make any mistakes.

i think the republican's nominated the only candidate they had that wouldn't get swamped. he's a moderate who has significant policy differences with the disastrously incompetent leadership in the white house.

it could still be a close republican win. but it could also be a close democratic win or a significant one. absent another terrorist attack there's no chance for a sweeping republican win.

Keep dreaming on this one. I'm being objective. I have given Johnboy everything he has been close to taking. Like I said, NH, and possibly NM could slip away from Obama, but I think all the others I listed are gunna stay his. Michigan, Minnesota, Wisconsin etc...all gunna stay with him. Johnny n' Ranger Gal could take all 4 of the close ones I mentioned.

where are you getting those numbers? i haven't seen any poll that has mccain that close. the idea mccain would be competitive in mass is off the rails.

mccain won't spend any more effort campaigning there than obama will in alaska. and for the same reason.

No, it's not drastic( he agreed with Geedubbya 90% of the time.) Fact is there aren't that many states in play. The Electoral College is not that hard to figure out. States vote about the same way each time they vote for Pres. There are states in play, but not as many as people think. Seriously, maybe these 11 are even close. FL ND NC MI NH MN CO OH NV VA NM

Wisconsin will be tougher than it looks

McCain will win comfortably. i said it as soon as he won New Hampshire, and nothing has changed. in fact, the situation vastly improved for him this week.

you mean like, massachusetts?

i know the partisans have to paint everything in black and white and i understand the dems have to make this about another bush term.

but there's a reason mccain has been held at arms length by his own party for so long. he really has taken principled position's that have cost him politically.

he's likely the best candidate for president i will ever vote against.

^
afterglow.

Really, as a proud graduate of public high school in Salem Mass., the State University in Amherst and a life long Red Sox fan who grew up with but a few absolutes of life in Massachusetts........we have Democrats and Catholics in Boston and the surrounding Rte 128 area......JFK was both and although close to 50 years ago, I would be shocked if this Obama guy did not receive the electoral backing of the Commonwealth the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November 2008.

Keary carried it. He is up by about 4%, and I doubt that goes all the way away, and he is probably even more popular in Madison than is showing up in polling. I think he has a solid 264 with
PA CA DE HI MI NH OR NJ WA IA WI NM
CT MN IL ME MD MA NY RI VT District of Columbia, but there certainly is no other state that he can rely on. My guess is he loses Nevada, Colorado, and Ohio, and barely gets home by winning Virginia. For some reason, Virginia is pretty consistently polling for him by a sliver. It's going to be a very close election. He needs one more state, and he is gunna have to work very hard to get it. I think he gave up on Florida, and went for a V.P. that would help solidify Michigan, and give him an outside shot of winning Ohio.

not a chance in hell he carries VA.

http://www.usaelectionpolls.com/2008/virginia.html

Poll after poll shows that state is virgin tight. Don't you have a Democrat running away with the senate race? This is the one state where the "Black vote" could make a difference, because it is (for sure) very close.

Still disagree with you there.

kev-

you can keep posting that but poll after poll shows it's a toss up. i haven't seen anything the last 3 months that had either ahead by more than the margin of error.

watch how many trips mccain and palin make to va the next 2 months and then tell me there's no chance.

Biden was in Manassas on wednesday.

with Palin as McCain's running mate, no way does he carry OH. Obama will carry downtown Cleveland, Columbus and maybe Cincy (unions and black vote)... no way does he carry any rural county. He'll lose the veteran (which Ohio has a ton of) and male vote by a wide margin and with a pro-life woman on the ticket, will lose the women vote too.

If they chose Hillary, Obama could have won it (the rural women would vote for Hillary over Obama... as they did in the primary or over McCain), but will now almost all vote for McCain since there's a pro-life woman on the ticket. They would have looked past the pro-life part for Hillary, but with them not taking her, the democrats will lose the state... probably by a wider margin than most will expect too.

Grew up there and know the area and the way the people will vote.

I will say one thing for Obama though... he's better off in Ohio by himself, because the type of person that Biden is... is exactly what they cannot stand.

so like i said to kev...

if there's no way mccain wins ohio, why are the dems campaigning so hard there?

McCain will win Ohio easily, since he picked Palin. Obama's campaigning there, as he doesn't want to lose by as wide a margin as it will probably be (so that it doesn't look to the west coast, CA, OR, etc that he doesn't have a chance before their polls close... also holds true for the mountain/central time zones, whose polls close after Ohio's). That will help all the local dems in those areas, as it'll make more of their base go to the polls west of Ohio (could easily get deterred if he's already predicted the loser). Actually smart on their behalf (I hope it doesn't work!!!), as the dems want to have the congress if McCain gets elected... to try to counter him.

If Dean and the democrats think they can win OH without Hillary, they're way out of touch with reality. The republican women vote could have gone to Obama if they picked Hillary (which probably would have been enough for Obama to win about 52-48), but without a woman on the ticket, they're sunk as any of the rural areas will not vote for a black guy. I'd say McCain wins OH 55-44 (always have to throw a percent or 2 for some crazy 3rd party).

I lived in rural OH for 24 years... trust me, I know the area and their voting habits well.

still a lot of racism down here, but i doubt i'm telling anyone something they don't know. they painted the picture today in the paper that this state is solidly behind mccain/palin due to the vp pick, but i doubt that's the case. altho we are a mainly democratic state, there are many who won't vote for obama based on his race, and a lot of misinformation.

Want to bet? Thankfully a good portion of Ohio isn't in the rural areas. McCain could win the state (and still the election) but I can't see him getting 50% of the vote and 55% is completely impossible.

9.4 million of the 11.5 million people in Ohio live in urban areas.
Thankfully, statistics overrule poorly devised opinion when properly researched.

Was about a 3% loss by Keary in Ohio in 2004. OBAMA is a better candidate, but it's one thing to make it closer, and another to win it. Cincy doesn't have the greatest race relations etc. I think much of the state is a little racist, and it's an uphill fight for Obama to actually win it. I think he might barely win Virginia(instead.) I think he will hold these states he has small leads in(like MN, AND NM, WI,) and he will then only need to win eitherColorado, Ohio, or Virginia to get the 270. Winning just Nevada would get him a tie(269-269.) I do think McCain has to win all these states, and he very well may do that.

Yeah....Mark Warner is killing Jim Gilmore in the polls here. Gilmore (Rep) was one of the more inept Gov's in the history of the Commonwealth. Warner (Dem) suprised me and turned out to be a great leader for Virginia during his term.

All that is fine and dandy, but I still don't see Obama carrying Virginia. There is too big of a rural vote throughout the Commonwealth and many of those people are gonna have a VERY hard time punching that ticket on election day for a black man. It's the same thing when Doug Wilder (black man) was elected Gov of Virginia. Every poll from here to eternity had him with an insurmountable lead...it was a given he was gonna win. He only ended up winning by a few thousand votes. So what people tell pollsters and what ticket they end up punching when noone else is looking does not always jive.

McCain picking Palin will carry him a long way in Virginia. A woman that hunts and that has a son and nephew getting ready to be deployed to Iraq...the men and women throughout the rural areas will identify with her and cling to her as someone that will look out for things that mean the most to them. They resist change a great deal and there is not alot for them to identify with when it comes to a Ivy League black man and a pompous know it all from the Northeast.

not smoking anything, trust me on this. since predicting presidential elections i've only been wrong once.

I will be interested to see how the southeast corner of Virginia is voting, more specifically the military personnel. Every branch of the military has a huge presence down there and the local economy relies heavily upon that presence and the jobs it creates, both directly and indirectly.

I think the Southeast is going to be pivotal as neither side has picked candates to really capture this area. VA, NC, SC, GA, FL. I have not seen the polls but whoever gets this area will win.

Still a lot of time to see changes and with little attention thus far I say it's wide open. Can't wait until the debates. I think that will settle this election and see the biggest shifts in votes.

I think there is more racism down here than people realize. The rural areas of the Southeast are incredibly racist.

I agree, there are many that won't vote for Obama based on race....they just won't admit it publicly in the primary exit polls or any of the current polls. It is easy for a person to say they'd vote for him and race doesn't matter, but when they go behind that curtain, will they really pull the lever?

8/22 polling...hard to believe things have gotten worse for the RED team :)

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ...college_update

Then you are risking a mediocre record.
I will assume you did not predict Ike, due to age concerns.
1960- Kennedy (good job it was close)
1964 -Johnson (landslide, very easy)
1968 -Nixon (easy with wallace pulling from Humphrey)
1972 - Nixon (If you missed this, your prognostication was severly retarded)
1976 - Carter (great job, very close)
1980 - Reagan (If you missed this, your prognostication was severly retarded)
1984 - Reagan (ditto)
1988 - Bush (ditto)
1992 - Clinton (you had to get this one also)
1996 - Clinton (ditto)
2000- Bush (good job)
2004 - Bush (not as good as 2000 but good)

So you are 3-1. Now you risk going 3-2 in elections that actually required
some thought. Dont do it man.



This could easily swing either way.

Look back at the electoral map.

Those states that are contested
could swing either way in the next two
months, very easily.

My point I was trying to make.

It happened in NYC and it happened in Los Angeles.... Bradley Affect (or is it Effect)

You probably did not predict Kennedy? way back...

That would make you 2-1.
Take it back.

I think its Effect...
Cause I think you used in as a noun.

Forget it. What the hell do I know about
the English language...

what was the one you missed?

i remember people complaining about jeremiah wrights comments that there is rampant racism still in this country. i disagreed with him, as i didn't think that was the case (people tend to think everyone feels as they do, and i'm not racist)...then i go to work, and elsewhere, and listen to others who are upset. then you listen more, and they prove his point, as they are the racists he was talking about. it was shocking to me...this is the bible belt, these people go to church three times a week and listen to 'love your brother', 'god created us all in his image', and then my ex(thankfully) coworker tells me she thinks 'blacks should go to their own church, whites to theirs'. it's CRAZY!!! and scary. she also believed that bullsh!t email that made it's way all over the country that said obama was a muslim. so i had to explain to her that not everything people forwards you is TRUE. hello!!
we've come a long way, but still a ways to go. but my kids and their friends make me hopeful, as most are so much more accepting then their parents.