Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Declan's Moon...Turf on Thursday (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=23508)

jcs11204 06-23-2008 10:48 PM

Declan's Moon...Turf on Thursday
 
he's trying turf for the first time on thursday. he is now 6 and all indications are he is all done.
he has not run a credible race since... 7/5/07, and that was against a weak 5 horse field... and before that it was 7/16/06 and that was vs a weak 4 horse field.
i am not knocking the horse, but the fact that he's a gelding does not mean you have to run him forever, hopefully i am wrong and the turf works out for him... i think Tall Texan is a serious horse and declan will have his hands full beating him.

Danzig 06-23-2008 10:54 PM

said the guy using perfect drift in his pick 3/4's...

seriously tho, would like to see him show something of what he used to have-but i doubt it happens.

jcs11204 06-23-2008 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig
said the guy using perfect drift in his pick 3/4's...

seriously tho, would like to see him show something of what he used to have-but i doubt it happens.

i am glad you also said seriously though...
as for the top comment, i know ppl around here were impressed with perfect drifts comeback,not just me

Danzig 06-23-2008 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jcs11204
i am glad you also said seriously though...
as for the top comment, i know ppl around here were impressed with perfect drifts comeback,not just me

impressed to the point of spedning money on his next out vs these horses?

jcs11204 06-23-2008 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig
impressed to the point of spedning money on his next out vs these horses?

i get your point, loud and clear... i will not bet him to win, but since i dont see a single in that race, i will be spreading and not leaving him out... 3-4 deep
heetseeker
go between
p drift

Rupert Pupkin 06-24-2008 02:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jcs11204
he's trying turf for the first time on thursday. he is now 6 and all indications are he is all done.
he has not run a credible race since... 7/5/07, and that was against a weak 5 horse field... and before that it was 7/16/06 and that was vs a weak 4 horse field.
i am not knocking the horse, but the fact that he's a gelding does not mean you have to run him forever, hopefully i am wrong and the turf works out for him... i think Tall Texan is a serious horse and declan will have his hands full beating him.

Declan's Moon's race on Thursday is not on the grass. It's on the cushion track. I think the only reason they haven't retired him is because he still works like his old self in the morning. As good as he works, they can't believe that he won't run better. If he doesn't step up with a good effort soon, I think they are going to retire him very soon. They won't run him forever if he continues running like this, and they won't run him for a tag. He was too good to them.

Indian Charlie 06-24-2008 03:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin
Declan's Moon's race on Thursday is not on the grass. It's on the cushion track. I think the only reason they haven't retired him is because he still works like his old self in the morning. As good as he works, they can't believe that he won't run better. If he doesn't step up with a good effort soon, I think they are going to retire him very soon. They won't run him forever if he continues running like this, and they won't run him for a tag. He was too good to them.

It doesn't help that his trainer is incompetent.

zippyneedsawin 06-24-2008 04:53 AM

Since he's a gelding, I think they'll keep trying.. for now.

ddthetide 06-24-2008 05:34 AM

he's not run a decent race since he was injured at 3 and missed the TC. kinda sad.

Rupert Pupkin 06-24-2008 06:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Indian Charlie
It doesn't help that his trainer is incompetent.

Why would you say that? He consistently has one of the highest win percentages of any trainer. Win percentage is certainly not the only metric to use when evaluating a trainer's ability, but I don't think there are too many incompetent trainers out there with really high win percentages.

Ellis' win percentages is slightly lower than normal this year, but that's only because he has an unusually high number of 2nd place finishes this year. He is at 17% this year. He has 15 wins from 90 starts but he has run second about 23 or 24 times. His win percentage was 29% in 2006 and it was 19% in 2007. He can't be too incompetent with numbers like that.

In addition, look at the way he moves horses up off the claim. He does it very consistently. The one I can think of most recently is the one that ran on Saturday. The horse's name is Quick Enough. He claimed that horse off Carla Gaines for $25,000 back in December. He got the horse to win a starter allowance race, then a $54,000 nwx1 state bred allowance race, and then a $52,000 nwx1 open allowance race. They paid $25,000 for the horse 6 months ago. He's already made $90,000 and his value has gone up by 3x. Those owners have made about 6x their money.

2Hot4TV 06-24-2008 06:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ddthetide
he's not run a decent race since he was injured at 3 and missed the TC. kinda sad.

Not true. His first two come back races were very good, then he seemed to stop trying. He has been a hell of a work horse in the morning.

Rupert Pupkin 06-24-2008 06:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
In this day and age, is winning at a 17% clip really high?

His win percentage over the last few years is about is about 22% not 17%. As I said, the 17% this year is very misleading because he has 15 wins but about 23 or 24 seconds. That's an aberration. He's basically a 20% trainer. That is very high on the Southern California circuit.

ArlJim78 06-24-2008 07:04 AM

I cant imagine what the knock is on Ellis. He seems like a solid trainer to me.

Rupert Pupkin 06-24-2008 07:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
Doesn't he train for you? So maybe you are a bit biased?

It doesn't matter whether he trains for me or not. I'm just talking about the facts. He has strengths and weaknesses like every trainer. I recognize that win percentage is not everything, but over the last few years he has consistently had one of the highest win percentages on this circuit. When horses move into his barn, they usually improve.

He can't be completely incompetent.

miraja2 06-24-2008 07:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jcs11204
he has not run a credible race since... 7/5/07.

While true, didn't they discover a throat issue after his race at Del Mar last year? He had some sort of surgery if I remember correctly.

I've actually never been a big fan of this horse, and I never really thought much of him, even as a 2yo. That being said, I see no problem with the connections continuing to race him. Why wouldn't they?

The Bid 06-24-2008 08:52 AM

There are a lot of trainers who are incompetant who have won at 20%

philcski 06-24-2008 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bid
There are a lot of trainers who are incompetant who have won at 20%

half the guys at delaware

The Bid 06-24-2008 09:03 AM

There are a lot of guys who are good trainers who hit at 10-15%, and a lot of guys who are clowns that hit at 20+%.

The difference between the real good guys and the mediocre guys is vetting. How how much owners are willing to spend for vetting has a lot to do with how these horses run. There are only so many ways to bring a horse into a race, and some guys are better at doing that than others, however I do not think a win % is a fair gauge for rating a trainer.

Indian Charlie 06-24-2008 12:47 PM

I've heard the man speak and the dude is frickin clueless.

I left socal five years ago and don't follow the circuit like I used to, but what I remember is that he clearly got very nice stock from his owners and constantly underachieved with them.

He kind of reminds me of Gary Jones (except that Jones had no concerns about a horse's welfare). Year in and year out they would get well bred and talented horses that always seemed to underachieve.

He also sort of fits the mold used to cast Alex Hassinger, Simon Bray and that former Lukas assistant that trained Artax. Granted, he's not as bad as they all were but he definitely underachieves with what he's received.

Do I even need to bring up the Declan's Moon aiming for the Malibu thing?



Quote:

Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin
Why would you say that? He consistently has one of the highest win percentages of any trainer. Win percentage is certainly not the only metric to use when evaluating a trainer's ability, but I don't think there are too many incompetent trainers out there with really high win percentages.

Ellis' win percentages is slightly lower than normal this year, but that's only because he has an unusually high number of 2nd place finishes this year. He is at 17% this year. He has 15 wins from 90 starts but he has run second about 23 or 24 times. His win percentage was 29% in 2006 and it was 19% in 2007. He can't be too incompetent with numbers like that.

In addition, look at the way he moves horses up off the claim. He does it very consistently. The one I can think of most recently is the one that ran on Saturday. The horse's name is Quick Enough. He claimed that horse off Carla Gaines for $25,000 back in December. He got the horse to win a starter allowance race, then a $54,000 nwx1 state bred allowance race, and then a $52,000 nwx1 open allowance race. They paid $25,000 for the horse 6 months ago. He's already made $90,000 and his value has gone up by 3x. Those owners have made about 6x their money.


The Indomitable DrugS 06-24-2008 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Indian Charlie

Do I even need to bring up the Declan's Moon aiming for the Malibu thing?

Rupert insists that it was the reporters mistake and not RE's.

Indian Charlie 06-24-2008 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS
Rupert insists that it was the reporters mistake and not RE's.


It wouldn't be the first time a reporter messed things up, but after years of hearing and reading Ellis quotes, it seems entirely plausible to me that the reporter got it right.

Unless Rupert (and I respect his opinion more than most people's on here) was a witness, my guess is that Ellis indeed did say what was attributed to him and then blamed the reporter later.

freddymo 06-24-2008 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin
Why would you say that? He consistently has one of the highest win percentages of any trainer. Win percentage is certainly not the only metric to use when evaluating a trainer's ability, but I don't think there are too many incompetent trainers out there with really high win percentages.

Ellis' win percentages is slightly lower than normal this year, but that's only because he has an unusually high number of 2nd place finishes this year. He is at 17% this year. He has 15 wins from 90 starts but he has run second about 23 or 24 times. His win percentage was 29% in 2006 and it was 19% in 2007. He can't be too incompetent with numbers like that.

In addition, look at the way he moves horses up off the claim. He does it very consistently. The one I can think of most recently is the one that ran on Saturday. The horse's name is Quick Enough. He claimed that horse off Carla Gaines for $25,000 back in December. He got the horse to win a starter allowance race, then a $54,000 nwx1 state bred allowance race, and then a $52,000 nwx1 open allowance race. They paid $25,000 for the horse 6 months ago. He's already made $90,000 and his value has gone up by 3x. Those owners have made about 6x their money.

And how has his value increased he is running out of conditions and he is a juice horse.. Are you suggesting that someone would be willing to pay 75k or 3x for this chemical wonder?

Rupert Pupkin 06-24-2008 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Indian Charlie
It wouldn't be the first time a reporter messed things up, but after years of hearing and reading Ellis quotes, it seems entirely plausible to me that the reporter got it right.

Unless Rupert (and I respect his opinion more than most people's on here) was a witness, my guess is that Ellis indeed did say what was attributed to him and then blamed the reporter later.

I've never talkd to Ron about the issue and I didn't even know about it until I read it on here. But I knew it wasn't true because I talk to the guy practically every day and we used to talk about Declan's Moon all the time and he never mentioned the Strub Series. So when I heard the story on this board, I asked to see the article because I knew there was no way it was true. I read the article and nowhere in the article did Ellis mention the Strub Series or any of the races in the Strub Series. The only thing he said is, We're point the horse to the big races at Santa Anita." He was referring to the San Antonio, Santa Anita Handicap, etc.

Rupert Pupkin 06-24-2008 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freddymo
And how has his value increased he is running out of conditions and he is a juice horse.. Are you suggesting that someone would be willing to pay 75k or 3x for this chemical wonder?

There are horses that show big improvement that are not juiced. He didn't improve this horse 10 lengths overnight. He didn't even run the horse for about 6 weeks after he claimed him. I have never heard anyone accuse Ellis of being a juice trainer.

The horse is easily worth $75,000 right now. They could run him for $62,500 and he would win and he would get claimed. So he is really worth quite a bit more than $75,000. He would be 3-5 if he ran for $62,500.

Rupert Pupkin 06-24-2008 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Indian Charlie
I've heard the man speak and the dude is frickin clueless.

I left socal five years ago and don't follow the circuit like I used to, but what I remember is that he clearly got very nice stock from his owners and constantly underachieved with them.

He kind of reminds me of Gary Jones (except that Jones had no concerns about a horse's welfare). Year in and year out they would get well bred and talented horses that always seemed to underachieve.

He also sort of fits the mold used to cast Alex Hassinger, Simon Bray and that former Lukas assistant that trained Artax. Granted, he's not as bad as they all were but he definitely underachieves with what he's received.

Do I even need to bring up the Declan's Moon aiming for the Malibu thing?

I have heard people say that they think he underporms with some of the good young horses he gets. That is debatable but it is a fair argument.

Rupert Pupkin 06-24-2008 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
I never said he was.

It wasn't you who called him incompetent. It was Indian Charlie.

Indian Charlie 06-24-2008 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin
It wasn't you who called him incompetent. It was Indian Charlie.

Actually, I called him incompetent. Not completely incompetent.

I do like about him that he seems to take care of his horses better than alot of other trainers.

jcs11204 06-24-2008 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Indian Charlie
Actually, I called him incompetent. Not completely incompetent.

I do like about him that he seems to take care of his horses better than alot of other trainers.

you are calling a lot of ppl names latley, i did not realize your the new man around here.

Rupert Pupkin 06-24-2008 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bid
There are a lot of guys who are good trainers who hit at 10-15%, and a lot of guys who are clowns that hit at 20+%.

The difference between the real good guys and the mediocre guys is vetting. How how much owners are willing to spend for vetting has a lot to do with how these horses run. There are only so many ways to bring a horse into a race, and some guys are better at doing that than others, however I do not think a win % is a fair gauge for rating a trainer.

You are right that vetting has alot to with it. Whether we like it or not, vetting is a huge part of the business.

When I talk about a competent trainer, I am not simply talking about his training abilities. There is much more to it than that. They have to know how to tie verything together including diet, the vet, running their horses in the righ spots, etc.

I will agree that there have been some guys out there who were totally clueless that got their hands on some type of juice and started winning at a really high clip. Some of those illegal, undetectable drugs are really strong and they can move horses way up.

But you can make a good educated guess as to who those guys are.

Take a guy like Doug O'Neil. I have no first hand knowledge that he cheats except for his bicarbonate positives, etc. I can tell you that nobody thinks the guys has any idea what he's doing. His barn is completely disorganized. He hardly even watches his horses train. He just sits in his office. He worked for lousy trainers, so it's not like he learned from anyone that could have taught him much. So obviously he is a guy that everyone wonders about.

Now a guy like Jeff Mullins is a different story. He may take an edge if he can get it. I don't think anyone would argue with that. But he also is an excellent trainer and an excellent horseman. If everyone was forced to use nothing but oats and water, I think Mullins would still win at close to a 20% clip. I would bet that O'Neil's win percenatge would drop to below 10% if he only used oats and water.

This is pure speculation on my part. I'm just giving you my best guess.

Indian Charlie 06-24-2008 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jcs11204
you are calling a lot of ppl names latley, i did not realize your the new man around here.


I pretty much call them like I see them, so as far as being the new man around here, well, I went awhile without posting, so not much has changed.

Also, I don't ever remember calling you a twit, so besides Ellis, who have I called names?

Rupert Pupkin 06-24-2008 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Indian Charlie
Actually, I called him incompetent. Not completely incompetent.

I do like about him that he seems to take care of his horses better than alot of other trainers.

Yes, he is very conscientious. He is probably in the top 5% when it comes to that. He is very quick to turn horses out to the farm if they develop a problem.

Some of these guys will just keep running them no matter what. They will run them until the horse is so lame that they have no choice but to turn them out. It's usually too late by then. At that point, permanent damage has been done and the horse will never come back the same.

outofthebox 06-26-2008 07:20 PM

Declan got an uncontested lead through soft fractions for the level and had no response whatsoever,, infact in the final furlong he really shut it down. I dont know the reason why they bring him back, does he not enjoy the time off at the farm. Maybe they can turn him into a lead pony like Kona Gold and Funny Cide. They absolutely love staying on the track and performing their barn duties.

jcs11204 06-26-2008 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by outofthebox
Declan got an uncontested lead through soft fractions for the level and had no response whatsoever,, infact in the final furlong he really shut it down. I dont know the reason why they bring him back, does he not enjoy the time off at the farm. Maybe they can turn him into a lead pony like Kona Gold and Funny Cide. They absolutely love staying on the track and performing their barn duties.

he should be retired, that was the point of me starting this thread. why push ? if he was not a gelding he'd be done a long time ago, its unfair to the horse he does not want to run anymore, obviously

Rupert Pupkin 06-26-2008 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jcs11204
he should be retired, that was the point of me starting this thread. why push ? if he was not a gelding he'd be done a long time ago, its unfair to the horse he does not want to run anymore, obviously

That will be his last race. They tried everything they could. He got the throat surgery. They gave him 6 months off. He came back and has run poorly 3 times in a row, so they are going to retire him.

2Hot4TV 06-26-2008 08:21 PM

Now what are they going to do with his work mate? Buzzards Bay?

Rupert Pupkin 06-26-2008 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2Hot4TV
Now what are they going to do with his work mate? Buzzards Bay?

Buzzard's Bay has been turned out. He will probably be retired but a definitive decision has not been made yet.

You were probably kidding about those two horses being workmates, but in case you weren't, those two horses have never worked together.

2Hot4TV 06-27-2008 06:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin
Buzzard's Bay has been turned out. He will probably be retired but a definitive decision has not been made yet.

You were probably kidding about those two horses being workmates, but in case you weren't, those two horses have never worked together.

I was kidding, but for some strange reason both of them seemed to stop trying around the same time. BB was on top of my list as a older hcp horse.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:43 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.