![]() |
Especially To The Critics Of Big Brown
More disappointed I could not be with yesterday's outcome. For me a fan of mostly TCs and BC, I realize I probably don't belong here starting several threads like I have over the past few weeks. But I do enjoy the pageantry of it all. Big Brown gave me a fun few months since I first noticed him in the FLA Derby and after that win, made him my favorite for the KD and forward.
I will not accept that this was the same horse I saw yesterday as in the other races, regardless of all the reasons many of you detail quite articulately why he lost. I never said he was in the class of a Secretariat, Seattle Slew, or Affirmed. So here are my two questions, and of course they are hypothetical. 1. If (big if) Big Brown enters the Travers and wins, combined with a Win, Place, or Show in the BCC, is he vindicated for yesterday? I say vindicated because I have seen too many "Big Bum" references which are highly unfair. 2. If yesterday was Big Brown's last race, will he still win Top 3 year old award for 2008? Or can any late entry for the rest of this year over take that title? |
Quote:
|
1. If (big if) Big Brown enters the Travers and wins, combined with a Win, Place, or Show in the BCC, is he vindicated for yesterday? I say vindicated because I have seen too many "Big Bum" references which are highly unfair.
Obviously if he returns to his old self he's vindicated for yesterday's clunker . . . but I don't think anyone is arguing that he was exposed for what he really is yesterday - it's obvious that he didn't fire. It is possible, however, that he could win the Travers and even BCC and still be looked at as an ok horse in a terrible crop. 2. If yesterday was Big Brown's last race, will he still win Top 3 year old award for 2008? Or can any late entry for the rest of this year over take that title? He's still obviously the favorite for the eclipse award at this point - but someone could definitely step up and take it. |
Quote:
|
I agree - I don't think he can win. . . I'd like to see him go back to turf but that'll never happen.
|
Obviously if he returns to his old self he's vindicated for yesterday's clunker . . . but I don't think anyone is arguing that he was exposed for what he really is yesterday - it's obvious that he didn't fire.
I have a hard time with your quote "exposed for what he really is." I think we saw a lot of what he really is in the Preakness, Belmont, and FL Derby. Something wasn't right yesterday. Da' Tara lost to Big Brown by 20 something lengths in FL. No other horse raced as much as he did in the past five weeks, and no other horse in the history of the Triple Crown races went against as many horses as Big Brown did (based on a stat ABC showed prior to the race). The thing I agree with the most that somebody said on another thread is that if Big Brown was a real TC winner, he would have beaten the adversity and won the race. I just feel it was unfortunate that we didn't see the real Big Brown yesterday. |
1. Big Brown doesn't need to be vindicated. He's a very good colt who had a lousy day. Anybody writing off Big Brown because of yesterday is never going to give the horse his due anyway.
2. Depends on whether or not any three-year-olds can sweep some summer/fall races. A Travers/BCC double would definitely get it done, and probably a Travers/BCC placing with a JCGC win in between would as well. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
What is JCGC and do you or anybody see a 3 yr old out there that could get on a streak like that? |
There are several 3 year olds out there right now that are capable of winning big races - but most of their future's are up in the air right now.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Right now, there's no three-year-old that looks good enough to run the table this fall, but before the Florida Derby, I wouldn't have banked on a horse blowing the doors off the competition in the first two legs of the Triple Crown, either. |
Quote:
|
i don't think i've seen anyone say that big brown was exposed, or the 'real' big brown showed up yesterday. i'd say it's a given that at this point big brown is the cream of the crop. but then, that's not saying a whole hell of a lot this year.
as for the classic, i'll be shocked if he is still around for it-curlin as well. i don't see big brown staying in training, and i don't see curlin going on AWT. now, if big brown and curlin both go (and we see pigs flying at the same time) i would actually think big brown could give curlin a run for his money. it'd be late in the year, big brown would be presumably bigger, stronger, more mature-but the plus for him is his ability on turf, which often translates to ability on AWT. that combined with assmans woeful poly abilities, and curlin having had all his starts on dirt--i'd say it's a crap shoot wether curlin could run on the stuff at the same level as on dirt. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Here is my two cents.
1) There has only been a hand full of horses that went undefeated in their career. These great atheletes are not machines and they can run a bad race from time to time. One loss does not mean that a horse doesnt deserve to be considered extremely good. What irritated me yesterday was people saying that BB had to how a showing like that of Secretariate. I think that it crap. Since when isnt winning enough? I think BB will be champion three year old. 2) Two horses come to mind that cna sweep the Jim Dandy, Travers, and BCC and those two are Dennis of Cork and Harlem Rocker. This is assuming that Curlin does race in the BCC. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I wonder if Larry Jones will enter his other filly in the big races. That would be interesting. |
Quote:
His biggest problem is that he is a plodder that gives the visual impression of being a closer because he is passing dying horses. And no, he isnt going to win a travers or a jim dandy for that matter and it doesnt really matter how weak the cast is. |
Quote:
My guess at this point is that he never runs again. My disclaimer is that I've not checked the particulars on his insurance policies. |
Quote:
|
Why blame BB. Kent lost the race
:rolleyes: |
Quote:
|
He will not be running on the turf unless he wins a handful more of important Grade 1s on the dirt. At this point, running Big Brown on the turf will devalue, and marginalize, him even further.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
what happened to biker boy?
|
It seemed that the conditioning and lack of "bottom' put into this horse by not running in the fall, and not even going to the track in January, finally caught up to him. I still don't think he's anything close to a bum, or a fraud.
He ran well fresh in his allowance win and Fla. derby win, and again on 5 weeks rest in the KY derby. The 3 triple crown races in 5 weeks would have taken it's toll on any 3-yo this year, with or without the sweltering heat at Belmont last Saturday. BB was the only horse that did run in all 3 triple crown races, so I give the horse credit for trying. He was just out of gas. |
Lots of other horses in that race had run just as often as Big Brown had, so I don't think the fact that he was the only competitor to run in all three Triple Crown races should be an excuse. Macho Again rain in the Derby Trial on April 26th, the Preakness, and the Belmont. Da' Tara ran the same schedule as Macho Again, but instead ran in the Barbaro on the Preakness undercard. Icabad Crane was on his third race in seven weeks as well.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:50 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.