Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   Esoteric Central (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   Baseball And Football!! (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=17137)

Mortimer 10-04-2007 10:51 AM

Baseball And Football!!
 
Time we talk about this here.......right?


Someone say something basebally or footbally.

Mortimer 10-04-2007 11:02 AM

Mr. Pants!


Where is my report on the Ohio State/Purdue game!?

Coach Pants 10-04-2007 11:50 AM

I'm all about the Kentucky-South Carolina game tonight.

Take the Buckeyes -7, but note that I don't keep up with the Big Eleven.

Mortimer 10-04-2007 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pillow Pants
I'm all about the Kentucky-South Carolina game tonight.

Take the Buckeyes -7, but note that I don't keep up with the Big Eleven.


Good deal sir...my feelings as well.





I'm dropping 25 large on them..wish me luck.

Coach Pants 10-04-2007 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mortimer
Good deal sir...my feelings as well.





I'm dropping 25 large on them..wish me luck.

I heard BentMuhPud is putting 100 dimes on it.

Mortimer 10-04-2007 12:10 PM

!!



On Purdure I'm sure.

skippy3481 10-04-2007 12:36 PM

Ohio state is the better team by far. But purdue has always played OSU close esp at home. I personally would not bet on the game, but if you must i would bet purdue because of the home field and the better offensive team.

Mortimer 10-04-2007 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skippy3481
Ohio state is the better team by far. But purdue has always played OSU close esp at home. I personally would not bet on the game, but if you must i would bet purdue because of the home field and the better offensive team.


But Purdue has played all cuppy cakes..and even against them give up a lot of points.

NW and Minn. had high number offenses,too...until......



Ohio State 42-14.

skippy3481 10-04-2007 12:56 PM

Like i said, This has happened every year. Purdudes defense has not been good since 2003. But painter has the ability to put up big numbers on suspect ohio state pass defense. OSU has not played an offense with prolific upper classman like purdue has at the skill positions. That's why i said i wouldnt bet. I could see ohio state winning by 21, but i could also see it coming down to a field goal.

Mortimer 10-04-2007 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skippy3481
Like i said, This has happened every year. Purdudes defense has not been good since 2003. But painter has the ability to put up big numbers on suspect ohio state pass defense. OSU has not played an offense with prolific upper classman like purdue has at the skill positions. That's why i said i wouldnt bet. I could see ohio state winning by 21, but i could also see it coming down to a field goal.

-----------------

What is your primary malfunction here ,sir?

Aside from the delusion you suffer with regard to this game...you seem to want to argue about betting what should be bet...or shouldn't be bet.



Did I say I was betting on this or any other game?

skippy3481 10-04-2007 01:15 PM

I was pointing out your flawed thinking. I could care less if you bet the game. You asked for posts on football and I gave you two.

Mortimer 10-04-2007 01:15 PM

Skippy got a good strong taste of the long knuckle.







He doesn't want anymore of that noise.

Mortimer 10-04-2007 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skippy3481
I was pointing out your flawed thinking. I could care less if you bet the game. You asked for posts on football and I gave you two.




Oh..you did come back....you have guts...stupid...but gutty.


There was no flaw...you have the flaw. You think exprienced players will do Ohio in?




They are up against one of the very tippy-top defenses in the country.But you did comment...which is good. I don't believe I saw a baseball comment...which is not good.

And you do care whether or not I really bet this game or any game...you know you do.








And do you know why?







It's because you are nosy....yes I said nosy.

That's what you are ,sir.

skippy3481 10-04-2007 01:20 PM

Uh-huh mortimer, I'm so scared of you.........

Mortimer 10-04-2007 01:23 PM

...uh...did I say you were scared of me?...I said you were nosy....








...and you do fear me.....but I never said that....you just do........you want to run for cover right now...but you are afraid you will look like a big sissy.......so you must choose....






....r u a big sissy?....or do you desire to be fresh kill???...

Mortimer 10-04-2007 01:23 PM

By the way...are you part of the famous peanut butter family?

skippy3481 10-04-2007 01:25 PM

Most defenses are predicated on speed and blitzes. Ohio state is not going to sit back in a zone and wait for painter to make his mistake. They are going to blitz and blitz often. Blitzing against a QB and Wr's who are quite familiar with each other is setting yourself up to beat deep. Giving up 7 at home to a team that can score is always a dangerous idea. I think a bettor can find better value for their money this game.

Morty, As much as would like to think I am nosy, It's just not the case.

I think the red sox will win the world series.

skippy3481 10-04-2007 01:25 PM

I am in fact part of that family, My mother was Shirly my father was Bob, or as you may know them, creamy and crunchy.

Mortimer 10-04-2007 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skippy3481
Most defenses are predicated on speed and blitzes. Ohio state is not going to sit back in a zone and wait for painter to make his mistake. They are going to blitz and blitz often. Blitzing against a QB and Wr's who are quite familiar with each other is setting yourself up to beat deep. Giving up 7 at home to a team that can score is always a dangerous idea. I think a bettor can find better value for their money this game.

Morty, As much as would like to think I am nosy, It's just not the case.

I think the red sox will win the world series.




Gee..I didn't know you had developed the def. game plan for Ohio State.

They will see plenty of mixed zone and man to man....there is a lot of speed on this defense...they will most likely force Purdue to play their puny little nickle dime pass game....and then when they least expect it....






...SPSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!




They shall strike like the viper.




Oh yes.....just like the Washington game....we were giving 4 I think to a team that could score at home.....and won by 19.


Purdue could only beat the Noddles 33-19....abyssmal.

You have strange fb thoughts...but I agree on the Red Soz...fine work.

Mortimer 10-04-2007 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skippy3481
I am in fact part of that family, My mother was Shirly my father was Bob, or as you may know them, creamy and crunchy.


!!!!OOOOOOOOOO!!!!

skippy3481 10-04-2007 01:44 PM

Morty, the diffrence is Washington had a frosh at qb. Granted, he has some physical talents but still young none the less. Very difficult going from high school football to playing a top big ten team(that does not mean much this year) I already stated that ohio state is a better team. But purdues offense can score in bunches. If ohio state plays man to man for more then 50% of the game purdue, will win. For OSU to win they need to be able to help deep with their safeties and allow their line and backers to control the run and get pressure on painter. If that happens, Painter will force throws and OSU will be fine.

Thank you for the accolades on the baseball pick. That conclusion of course was the result of many man hours of work.

Mortimer 10-04-2007 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skippy3481
Morty, the diffrence is Washington had a frosh at qb. Granted, he has some physical talents but still young none the less. Very difficult going from high school football to playing a top big ten team(that does not mean much this year) I already stated that ohio state is a better team. But purdues offense can score in bunches. If ohio state plays man to man for more then 50% of the game purdue, will win. For OSU to win they need to be able to help deep with their safeties and allow their line and backers to control the run and get pressure on painter. If that happens, Painter will force throws and OSU will be fine.

Thank you for the accolades on the baseball pick. That conclusion of course was the result of many man hours of work.


God you're really pissing me off.






You also COMPLETELY forget the fact Purdue has a poopie defense and Ohio State will control the ball on these goofy guys.

They will get behind early and panic.




Ohios defense will eat them alive...anyway they want to.



No problem on the compliment...anytime.

Mortimer 10-04-2007 01:58 PM

I sniff 0-6 coming up for all you Noodle fans.

You'll be right on target at the halfway mark.

skippy3481 10-04-2007 02:00 PM

Why do you think they have been dominant. They have played exactly one team in the top 90 and that was washington. Not exactly offensive juggarnauts there. Have you actually seen a purdue game this season. The first halfs of all the games have been great. Then the fat defense gets lazy and everyone throws up td's in the second half. I think its going to be a good game. Its a battle of two untesteds. Purdues offense has run over weak competition and ohio states defense has run over weak competition.

Mortimer 10-04-2007 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skippy3481
Why do you think they have been dominant. They have played exactly one team in the top 90 and that was washington. Not exactly offensive juggarnauts there. Have you actually seen a purdue game this season. The first halfs of all the games have been great. Then the fat defense gets lazy and everyone throws up td's in the second half. I think its going to be a good game. Its a battle of two untesteds. Purdues offense has run over weak competition and ohio states defense has run over weak competition.


May I remind you....you massive mountebank...you.....that Washington barely escaped victory against USC?


Essentially you are saying good offense is going to beat very good defense.







Are you insane!!!?

Mortimer 10-04-2007 02:06 PM

And don't forget that good off. has a poopie def. and that very good def. has a pretty good off.





Rookies.

Mortimer 10-04-2007 02:10 PM

Look...before you say another word...and boy I hope you don't...




..I realize it's a night game at Purdue....Ohio wil face a benzedrene inspired crowd by kick off as well as a Purdue team high on every steroid known to man......




...it ain't gonna help.

skippy3481 10-04-2007 02:13 PM

I'm not saying purdue will win at all. But with the pointspread at 7, your saying a very good offense will get beat by at least 8. This is purdues season right here. Can't underestimate the home field advantage.

As for the cheap shot with washington. Yes, they only lost to Southern Cal by 4 points. But lets look at the week before, where they lost by 13 to UCLA who lost by a huge amount to the winless utah. In college football you can't use the, well we beat them and they beat them arguement. Every game is such a diffrent dynamic.

skippy3481 10-04-2007 02:18 PM

Morty a question if I may sir..... Are you an Ohio State fan?

Mortimer 10-04-2007 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skippy3481
I'm not saying purdue will win at all. But with the pointspread at 7, your saying a very good offense will get beat by at least 8. This is purdues season right here. Can't underestimate the home field advantage.

As for the cheap shot with washington. Yes, they only lost to Southern Cal by 4 points. But lets look at the week before, where they lost by 13 to UCLA who lost by a huge amount to the winless utah. In college football you can't use the, well we beat them and they beat them arguement. Every game is such a diffrent dynamic.




I am thoroughly at a loss now for what you are trying to say.


And you can use comparatives when they are used as I did. You said neither team had played anyone of value. Wash. is a team of some value...they are better by a good margin than any team Purdue has played.



I wish you would stop skimming my posts.


And you give too much to this homefield nonsense.


Ohio State caught Iowa in this almost exact same situation and time last year.......need I remind you what happened to the oh so EXPERIENCED AT THE SKILL positions team?

Mortimer 10-04-2007 02:22 PM

He's going to say something stupid again...I just know it.

skippy3481 10-04-2007 02:23 PM

Mortimer i asked you a question.... Are you an Ohio State fan.

Coach Pants 10-04-2007 02:24 PM

SEC > Big 11

Cajungator26 10-04-2007 02:29 PM


Mortimer 10-04-2007 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skippy3481
Mortimer i asked you a question.... Are you an Ohio State fan.

God what is your problem here sir!








YES.



But they don't part the sea for me......I like the Indians,too, but you don't see me predicting they will beat anyone in the playoffs.



It's simple.....you think Ohio is not a good pick at 7 giving.

I do.

You offer jibbersih in support of your hysteria.




I offer fine work in supprt of my sage assertion.

Again...NW and MINN were clipping away at 487 and 457 yards a game before playing Ohio.Neither came close to their averages.

MINN was AT MINN. and at night.


Purdue ain't gonna be a whole lot different....you can through go all the nonsense you want.....but Purdue has yet to play even an acceptable def.


You still try to say a perceived good off. will beat a proven VERY GOOD def....given the skinny 7 point head start.






You truly are insane.

Mortimer 10-04-2007 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pillow Pants
SEC > Big 11

This year....so far so good....as a whole.

Mortimer 10-04-2007 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cajungator26

The dummy just whacked his toe with that sledge.

Mortimer 10-04-2007 02:36 PM

Skippy...are you a cumquat?

Mortimer 10-04-2007 02:39 PM

Oh...lest I forget....Arnold Rothstein who you look to guidance for...ya might say....has agreed Ohio State is the team to take with the spread.


Now let's see your wiggleworm man to man defense disaster get out of that one.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.