Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   NY (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=11900)

Cannon Shell 04-12-2007 11:29 AM

NY
 
http://news.bloodhorse.com/viewstory.asp?id=38388

Some highlights

Wynn stating that cameras on jockeys helmets will attract big crowds

A "towering" hotel built at Aqueduct (I guess forgetting about the planes that fly over the track on a regular basis)

Capital Play said that they will expand the races from 8 horses to 12 (I guess they think short fields in NY are due to limits)

They will also "simplify" betting ( maybe you wont have to handicap anymore)

And this article does not even talk about the "beautiful fence" that Capital Play wants to put up around Saratoga. (Like it's Berlin??)

whodey17 04-12-2007 11:35 AM

Hey Cannon - help me out here. What is the history of Aqueduct? I mean, why was it ever built when there was Belmont?

Cannon Shell 04-12-2007 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whodey17
Hey Cannon - help me out here. What is the history of Aqueduct? I mean, why was it ever built when there was Belmont?

You want the cliffnotes version?

whodey17 04-12-2007 11:37 AM

Yes please.

Cannon Shell 04-12-2007 11:43 AM

There were other tracks in NY earlier in the century that were all competitors. Jamiaca, Empire, Belmont and a few others that I dont recall. Nyra was formed in the 50's to have all the NY tracks under one organization. Aqueduct was a very popular track in the 60's and I believe that the Belmont was even held there while Belmont was being renovated. Aqu is located in Queens not too far from Brooklyn and is on the subway lines from Manhattan and as such was easier for people in these area to reach. Dont forget there was no simulcasting or OTb's and Belmont was a long ways away from the city.

slotdirt 04-12-2007 11:45 AM

Belmont and Aqueduct are pretty darn close to eachother.

whodey17 04-12-2007 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
There were other tracks in NY earlier in the century that were all competitors. Jamiaca, Empire, Belmont and a few others that I dont recall. Nyra was formed in the 50's to have all the NY tracks under one organization. Aqueduct was a very popular track in the 60's and I believe that the Belmont was even held there while Belmont was being renovated. Aqu is located in Queens not too far from Brooklyn and is on the subway lines from Manhattan and as such was easier for people in these area to reach. Dont forget there was no simulcasting or OTb's and Belmont was a long ways away from the city.

Gotcha. I often forget how big New York is. But in todays world is it silly to have both of the tracks? Or is Belmont not suited for winter racing?

Cannon Shell 04-12-2007 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whodey17
Gotcha. I often forget how big New York is. But in todays world is it silly to have both of the tracks? Or is Belmont not suited for winter racing?

There are a lot of politics in play. Aqu is a NYC track but Belmont is not and I'm sure that NYC would lose a lot of revenue were Aqu be shut down and turned into another parking lot for JFK. But it (NYC) will rake in money if the slots are put there.

Cannon Shell 04-12-2007 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slotdirt
Belmont and Aqueduct are pretty darn close to eachother.

Not if you dont own a car like many of the residents of NYC

Sightseek 04-12-2007 11:56 AM

The short write-up about NYRA & Empire's speeches:

http://news.bloodhorse.com/viewstory.asp?id=38373

whodey17 04-12-2007 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
There are a lot of politics in play. Aqu is a NYC track but Belmont is not and I'm sure that NYC would lose a lot of revenue were Aqu be shut down and turned into another parking lot for JFK. But it (NYC) will rake in money if the slots are put there.

Makes sense to me. Cannon if you were in charge what would you do with the 2 tracks?

slotdirt 04-12-2007 12:00 PM

Belmont is actually half in the five boroughs and half in Nassau County.

Cannon Shell 04-12-2007 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whodey17
Makes sense to me. Cannon if you were in charge what would you do with the 2 tracks?

There are so many factors that are beyond my comprehension of the situation that I really dont know what can be done. I suppose if I could have a free rein and the political types would do what I wanted I would continue to operate both tracks with slots. A northern winter track is never going to draw much and you can use most of AQUeducts grandstand for a slots parlor. However I would signifigantly upgrade the area that is used by the horse players. Pretty much the same plan for Belmont which only gets large crowds for the Belmont when a TC is on the line.

Cannon Shell 04-12-2007 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slotdirt
Belmont is actually half in the five boroughs and half in Nassau County.

true

whodey17 04-12-2007 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
There are so many factors that are beyond my comprehension of the situation that I really dont know what can be done. I suppose if I could have a free rein and the political types would do what I wanted I would continue to operate both tracks with slots. A northern winter track is never going to draw much and you can use most of AQUeducts grandstand for a slots parlor. However I would signifigantly upgrade the area that is used by the horse players. Pretty much the same plan for Belmont which only gets large crowds for the Belmont when a TC is on the line.

So basically take the grandstands and make create a slots parlor. I like this idea. But are slots the cure all for racing?

Cannon Shell 04-12-2007 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whodey17
So basically take the grandstands and make create a slots parlor. I like this idea. But are slots the cure all for racing?

Who asked them to be a cure? If we are getting a piece of the action and it is put toward making our sport better aren't we better off than if we get nothing but unfair competition?

whodey17 04-12-2007 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
Who asked them to be a cure? If we are getting a piece of the action and it is put toward making our sport better aren't we better off than if we get nothing but unfair competition?

I agree with you. Let me rephrase the question...other than slots, what else can be done to help make horse racing better?

Sightseek 04-12-2007 12:29 PM

I'd love to know Capital Play's plan to draw women to Aqueduct and in turn drawing men..have they actually been there?! I love horses and racing and only a day like the Wood Memorial is going to get me to step foot in the place. I don't see slots being that big of a draw for most woman either and if you were going to go shopping you'd do so in the City where the best stores in the world are. There is just way too much competion with the City to put anythign there that would be remotely appealing to the woman who is not interested in racing in the first place.

SniperSB23 04-12-2007 12:31 PM

OK, no clue how this might work but what do people think about requiring people to buy a betting voucher for the track in order to enter the slots area? Not sure what amount would be appropriate ($20-$100) but it would have to be set to not discourage people from playing the slots but to encourage them to play the races in addition to the slots. Anyone think something along those lines could ever work?

philcski 04-12-2007 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sightseek
I'd love to know Capital Play's plan to draw women to Aqueduct and in turn drawing men..have they actually been there?! I love horses and racing and only a day like the Wood Memorial is going to get me to step foot in the place. I don't see slots being that big of a draw for most woman either and if you were going to go shopping you'd do so in the City where the best stores in the world are. There is just way too much competion with the City to put anythign there that would be remotely appealing to the woman who is not interested in racing in the first place.

Even that's questionable at this point.

I had a great time this weekend because I was with friends but honestly... I wouldn't have gone by myself. Aqueduct sucks.

Payson Dave 04-12-2007 12:36 PM

It is hard to imagine that if NYRA does not get an extension, that racing in NY will not be thrown into worse chaos and confusion that it already is...time is running very short for a new entity to take over and operate effectively in the short term

Sightseek 04-12-2007 12:41 PM

I also like how Empire says that they will be able to effectively promote the Triple Crown because they would then own all the tracks....hell-o, it's not the Triple Crown series that needs help, it's the rest of the year and I don't see a whole lot of growth at those tracks they already own.

Storm Cadet 04-12-2007 12:41 PM

Belmont can not hold winter racing as it's facility has NO HEAT. They said in a study a few years back that it would be exorbitant to heat the facility and enclose major portions of the grandstand.

It's racing surface is not suitable for winter racing.

AQU USED to have 2 turf courses, just like SAR and BEL. But they ripped out the outer turf course and made it a winter inner track.

Holland Hacker 04-12-2007 12:44 PM

Steve Wynn is a Visionary!! NOT
 
Sorry this will probably be a longer post than most will care to read. For you I will provide an "Executive Summary" at the end.


Here are some of Mr. Wynns ideas:

High Rise Parking Garage at Belmont beacuse it is a long walk from the parking lot.

Fact - The current shuttle bus systmes seems to work OK for me. Even on big days at Belmont I don't mind waiting for the bus or taking the walk, I don't mind the exercise.

What Wynn is really saying: After we destroy the parking lots to build a "High-End" hotel we will need to provide a high rise parking garage for the rich Manhattanites that will be attracted to the Hotel / Casino, and oh yea the degenerates that will be going to the track will also need somewhere to park their cars.

Get VLTs & Slots at Aqueduct & Belmont.

What a novel concept, it's not like NYRA hasn't been trying to do this for oh say two - three years.

Lets get 12 horse fields. How do you propose doing this? Assuming the horse population remains constant horse will either have to race more frequently or have fewer races and racing days. Maybe he will talk the Jockey Club into allowing cloning of horses that way there will be an unending supply of horses to fill each race with 12 horses. He could also card more NYB MSW races (Not that I have a problem with NYBs in fact I own a small percentage of 2 of them)

"The racing industry here is no different than what it is in Australia. The key will be attracting younger bettors and especially women."

Really Steve we need to attract younger bettors. How do you propose doing that? Oh I get you'll get young women to come to the track. Problem is that NY Law prohibits give aways (ie free admission passes, free drinks etc. There goes "ladies day at the races")

Convert Aqueduct to an upscale lounge for JFK.

This will certainly attract new people to the game. I'm sorry ladies & gentelmen your flight to Paris has been cancelled but feel free to check into the High Rise Hotel & Casino at the "Big A" we have a free shuttle bus. Oh and while you're there why not bet on some live night racing (We will have full 12 horse fields.) This will be a great idea. Can't wait to book a room there so I can wave to the pilots as they pass by on their final approach to JFK.

My Favorite is the Helmut Cam. It worked so long and well for ESPN that he is going to bring it back and put it up on the TV in the infield. I know that alone will entice me to go to the track.

Enough has already been said about Mr. Bailey and his input about the squalor on the back side.


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

For those of you who don't have time to read my entire diatribe just read the paragraph below:

If NY awards the franchise to Excelsior than all of the horseplayers from the NY metropolitan area better get used to traveling out of state to go to the track. Philly Park and Monmouth aren't really that bad are they?

Bystander 04-12-2007 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sightseek
I'd love to know Capital Play's plan to draw women to Aqueduct and in turn drawing men..have they actually been there?! I love horses and racing and only a day like the Wood Memorial is going to get me to step foot in the place.


Really? I had a completely different impression. I recently went to AQ for the first time, not Wood-day, and I thought it was great. I've been to a lot of different tracks, yet I came away feeling that Aqueduct really gets a bad rep. I felt 100% comfortable, safe, went all over the facility, and I'd go back in a second.

saratoga guy 04-12-2007 12:57 PM

Hear some actual audio from Wynn and Excelsior's presentation [including the helmet-cam idea]:

http://www.equidaily.com/

Sightseek 04-12-2007 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bystander
Really? I had a completely different impression. I recently went to AQ for the first time, not Wood-day, and I thought it was great. I've been to a lot of different tracks, yet I came away feeling that Aqueduct really gets a bad rep. I felt 100% comfortable, safe, went all over the facility, and I'd go back in a second.

Were you in the dining area or the general admission area? The dining area is nice, but I don't see the rest of the track being any better than Suffolk Downs as a comfortable place where a woman would want to hang out.

pmacdaddy 04-12-2007 12:59 PM

I'm certainly not an Authority, but sure seems like the structure of simulcast revenues is the real elephant in the room. To me, the tracks get stuck with all the heavy lifting (facilities maintenance, production of racing product) and off track outlets get big cut of handle for doing very little.

I don't understand why NYRA has not taken a seriously aggressive approach to internet wagering. I was disturbed to see them advertising Internet wagering on the starting gate with a PHONE NUMBER and no web address. Are they that clueless?

I would give the Slots crowd what they want, take our share and leave them be. They are generally not horse players. IMO a Sportsbook Atmosphere for horse players with video poker and a few slots are about as good as you are going to get as far as integrating the two.

I really love NY racing and hope things improve...

Sightseek 04-12-2007 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pmacdaddy
I'm certainly not an Authority, but sure seems like the structure of simulcast revenues is the real elephant in the room. To me, the tracks get stuck with all the heavy lifting (facilities maintenance, production of racing product) and off track outlets get big cut of handle for doing very little.

I don't understand why NYRA has not taken a seriously aggressive approach to internet wagering. I was disturbed to see them advertising Internet wagering on the starting gate with a PHONE NUMBER and no web address. Are they that clueless?

I would give the Slots crowd what they want, take our share and leave them be. They are generally not horse players. IMO a Sportsbook Atmosphere for horse players with video poker and a few slots are about as good as you are going to get as far as integrating the two.

I really love NY racing and hope things improve...

ha, ha! I pointed that out the other day.

Byebyemermaid 04-12-2007 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
There were other tracks in NY earlier in the century that were all competitors. Jamiaca, Empire, Belmont and a few others that I dont recall. Nyra was formed in the 50's to have all the NY tracks under one organization. Aqueduct was a very popular track in the 60's and I believe that the Belmont was even held there while Belmont was being renovated. Aqu is located in Queens not too far from Brooklyn and is on the subway lines from Manhattan and as such was easier for people in these area to reach. Dont forget there was no simulcasting or OTb's and Belmont was a long ways away from the city.

Lets not forget Sheepshead Bay and Jerome.

Bystander 04-12-2007 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sightseek
Were you in the dining area or the general admission area? The dining area is nice, but I don't see the rest of the track being any better than Suffolk Downs as a comfortable place where a woman would want to hang out.

I was sitting in Equestris, but I went all over. I thought the outside near the paddock was particularly nice, and there were families all around the place.

Then again I've spent many many solo hours at Suffolk, hung out during the race card and for simo before Boston got TVG, even been there relatively early morning to watch races from Dubai a few years ago. I've always felt safe, too, but I guess I really do feel safe at any track because it's where I want to be.

Aqueduct is A LOT nicer than Suffolk IMO.

SniperSB23 04-12-2007 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bystander
I was sitting in Equestris, but I went all over. I thought the outside near the paddock was particularly nice, and there were families all around the place.

Then again I've spent many many solo hours at Suffolk, hung out during the race card and for simo before Boston got TVG, even been there relatively early morning to watch races from Dubai a few years ago. I've always felt safe, too, but I guess I really do feel safe at any track because it's where I want to be.

Aqueduct is A LOT nicer than Suffolk IMO.

Downstairs at Aqueduct is just plain disgusting, and I'm not one that is easily disgusted. The upstairs is fine but that first floor could use a good flooding.

Sightseek 04-12-2007 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bystander
I was sitting in Equestris, but I went all over. I thought the outside near the paddock was particularly nice, and there were families all around the place.

Then again I've spent many many solo hours at Suffolk, hung out during the race card and for simo before Boston got TVG, even been there relatively early morning to watch races from Dubai a few years ago. I've always felt safe, too, but I guess I really do feel safe at any track because it's where I want to be.

Aqueduct is A LOT nicer than Suffolk IMO.

See I think that is the key...the track is where you want to be to begin with. I'm interested in seeing how they plan to draw the person who isn't following racing day to day. From the little I've read of their proposals I don't see any of my non-racing friends calling me up and asking me if I'd take them to the track.

I've only gone to Suffolk on MassCap day which had perfect weather and a big crowd that probably wouldn't have been there had Funny Cide not...so I might be a little forgiving of Suffolk.

pointman 04-12-2007 01:22 PM

I think Aqueduct gets a bad rap as well, it is not that bad, especially in the dining room. Wynn's ideas are ridiculous and are all suited to the casino portion, not racing. Clearly he wants a parking garage at Belmont to build on the existing parking lots, not because it is a long walk. Heck, the parking lot is empty most days anyway. I have no problem with parking at Belmont, usually I park on the opposite side of Hempstead Turnpike and get in and out very quickly. To me OTB has had a huge hand in creating small crowds, why go to the track when you can go locally to bet? Getting on-track attendance is not the most important issue, it is attracting more people to the game. I can't understand why NYRA or OTB has not had internet wagering, and if it has been added, than their advertising sucks. Also, Belmont is accesible from Manhattan by the LIRR, so one does not need to have a car. Shopping facilities have and will work anywhere in the Queens area, in fact, the big problem would be the traffic on the Belt parkway as JFK already makes that area bad enough.

Byebyemermaid 04-12-2007 01:25 PM

Let me try to understand this.Aqueduct where Linden and Rockaway boulevard meet,a place where they sold off half the parking lot where Home Depot stands,and 3 blocks away you have Liberty avenue and the elevated train and most of the business around there are bodegas,hub cap and body and fender shops,annndd then on the other side you have a residential area not too mention the already stated JFK airport,this is where they want to do this.I think they should look elsewhere.

Bigsmc 04-12-2007 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philcski
Even that's questionable at this point.

I had a great time this weekend because I was with friends but honestly... I wouldn't have gone by myself. Aqueduct sucks.

Hard to imagine they actually held a Breeders Cup there.

Bystander 04-12-2007 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sightseek
See I think that is the key...the track is where you want to be to begin with. I'm interested in seeing how they plan to draw the person who isn't following racing day to day. From the little I've read of their proposals I don't see any of my non-racing friends calling me up and asking me if I'd take them to the track.

I've only gone to Suffolk on MassCap day which had perfect weather and a big crowd that probably wouldn't have been there had Funny Cide not...so I might be a little forgiving of Suffolk.

I do see your point.
I've always felt that where track publicity falls short, it's up to me as a fan of live racing to drag non-racing friends with me. I think I have a 90% success rate converting them into at least part-time fans.

But that is probably just my winning personality. Or a couple of winning tickets.

I was at that Masscap- warm day, big crowd, and the magic of Dutrow.

Linny 04-12-2007 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sightseek
I'd love to know Capital Play's plan to draw women to Aqueduct and in turn drawing men..have they actually been there?! I love horses and racing and only a day like the Wood Memorial is going to get me to step foot in the place. I don't see slots being that big of a draw for most woman either and if you were going to go shopping you'd do so in the City where the best stores in the world are. There is just way too much competion with the City to put anythign there that would be remotely appealing to the woman who is not interested in racing in the first place.

I'm female and go to AQU a few times a year. I live in Albany so it's a hike but if I lived in the greater NYC area, I'd go alot. It is not Saratoga but it is not nearly as horrible a place as it's portrayed. I have never even considered going to a slot room (never been to the Spa slots) nor would shopping (which I do love!) draw me to the track. If I wanna shop I shop, I prefer going tot he races to play the horses and socialize.

paisjpq 04-12-2007 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bystander
I do see your point.
I've always felt that where track publicity falls short, it's up to me as a fan of live racing to drag non-racing friends with me. I think I have a 90% success rate converting them into at least part-time fans.

But that is probably just my winning personality. Or a couple of winning tickets.

I was at that Masscap- warm day, big crowd, and the magic of Dutrow.

impressive statistics...much better than mine...the last time I got a non-racing friend to watch with me Barbaro broke down...not such a crowd pleaser.

Sightseek 04-12-2007 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bystander
I do see your point.
I've always felt that where track publicity falls short, it's up to me as a fan of live racing to drag non-racing friends with me. I think I have a 90% success rate converting them into at least part-time fans.

But that is probably just my winning personality. Or a couple of winning tickets.

I was at that Masscap- warm day, big crowd, and the magic of Dutrow.

I can't understand why it sticks with some and doesn't with others.

I do an office pool for the Derby each year complete with a large poster of the 'contenders' with little bits of information and photos of each horse. In the end, the only thing people care about is who won the money and no one actually watches the race. So maybe you're right..winning tickets speak more than any high-rise hotel or clean restroom.

magic of Dutrow...lol Hopefully Suffolk can get together another card like that, it was a good day.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.