AP or Sagarin?

Use whatever you want. Post them here. Show that right to work states have better economic ratings (state GDP, growth, etc.) than non-right to work states. I'll be interested to see what answer you come up with.

I have no point to prove, you were the one who made the statement without facts. You may not have been an economic major but you aren't really going to use unionization or lack thereof as the sole basis of the economic health of a state are you? That would be like rating an NFL team based on the long snapper.

http://www.businessinsider.com/top-t...11-6#10-iowa-1

Business Insider ranked the top 10 states in terms of Economic Growth.
8 were right to work states and of the 2 that were not 1 was Alaska which hardly has any people. LOL

I'm sure that the source will be criticized...but she did say use whatever I want

I said: Yes, there are other states, in fact many more states, that are economically doing better than the above "right to work" states. They do not have right to work laws, however.

You can agree to that statement, or dismiss it out of hand, or disprove it, or prove it. Your choice.

Very nice.

This isnt a court case. If you make a statement w/o supporting data than your statement is usually dismissed. Of course the link I just provided may shed some light on your "theory" and the sad truth that you are probably wrong again.

Yes, feel free to dismiss my statement out of hand, or prove it wrong. Go for it! :tro:

I tried to trade you to paceadvantage.com for the bananas guy and a poster to be named later but David Stern overruled the deal as bad for the internet. True story. Try to prove it isnt true.

What are you mentally, five? :D Now you're just embarrassing yourself.

Did you read what you wrote in post #168?

What is embarrassing is your inference that right to work states weren't seeing economic growth and your insistence that we "disprove" your bullshit as opposed to you supplying supporting evidence.

Another Derby Trailer e-mailed me this about you and your buddies here:

LOL

So it is ok for you and the mystery PM'er to make assumptions...LOL!

The hypocrisy in here is getting thick...

Yes, like you and your "we" friends :D

Funny I always thought PM's were called private messages...I try to keep them that way.

You still havent addressed the fact that your hypothesis was seemingly in error considering right to work states. But I guess it is better to distract from that.

Nice distraction segue :D I already said your post about right to work was, and I quote, "very nice".

And I said e-mail, not PM. Try to keep up. The other Derby Trailer said this about you and your buddies on these threads tonight:

And yes, I sure agree with that.

Damn it you got me! I said PM when it was an email.

So it is a distraction to bring up an actual topic (brought up by you btw) AND it is ok for you and the mystery emailer to make assumptions about me and my buddies (laughable by the way) but we can't make those same things about you?

Sometimes I think this is like a Jedi mind trick or something...

No. Just your big amygdala reacting as you always do :D

I had to sign in to comment on this gem.

First off, if whatever the annon poster said is true, than Riot must be the most fearful and insecure person on the planet.

and also, said annon poster is out of his/her mind.

It's probably Bent My Pud trying to get in her pants with effeminate gossip.