Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Pletcher BC positive; Hearing pending (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=26576)

Riot 12-08-2008 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Linny
The fact is that testing is always one step behind. They cannot test for what they don't know and the chemists are always cooking something up.

Tests are not a matter of taking the sample and seeing what's in it. They test for specific chemicals and reactions indicating the presence or absence of a chemical. By definition, the testing industry is always reactive, not pro-active. Unless tyey have reason to suspect a certain compound is turning up in samples, it wont be found because they wont look for it. They only find what they look for and they only look for what they know.

Did you listen, last week I think it was, to Steve's ATR discussion with the head of RMTC? The level of proactivity was exactly what was discussed. It most certainly can be done.

Riot 12-08-2008 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scav
I think you read that wrong. The drop in purses means there is less money to earn, regardless of the way he is doing it.

Naw, you read what I wrote wrong. I said stopped doping ... ;)

Linny 12-08-2008 11:46 AM

Riot, I missed the show. What day was it? I'll go listen.

I don't doubt that it CAN be done, but it will require alot of the testing labs involved in terms of taking a look for suspicious reactions etc.

Antitrust32 12-08-2008 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
It's real tough to give an opinion huh?

lol.... kind of like somer with the 'how could they punish OJ like that'

CSC 12-08-2008 12:51 PM

Lukas hasn't done much since Pletcher left the assistant's role.

Coach Pants 12-08-2008 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot
STOP IT, 'Zig. This is a runaway jury, and you, like me, are now just standing in the way, impeding the rush to judgment.

Yeah right. You'd already be in the gas chamber.

Cannon Shell 12-08-2008 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GBBob
This is something that I have always thought about as well..I mean..How much does he really "train"? Maybe it's just me, but the appeal of having Pletcher as your trainer would fade quickly if you are just a number to him. Maybe he runs a very hands on barn and is consistantly in touch with ALL his owners, but that seems unrealistic

He is on top of the horses in the NY loop pretty well I would believe. But as is the case with other trainers with large divisions spread out all over the country he can only be in so many places at once. I think like any other business the more important clients get more attention though his communication outlets with his owners seem modern (website, email), some people prefer to actually talk to the trainer himself.

CSC 12-08-2008 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach Pants
Yeah right. You'd already be in the gas chamber.

And I'm sure there are still some people out there that think OJ is still innocent. Damn circumstantial evidence...:zz:

CSC 12-08-2008 01:00 PM

Correction the Lukas stable hasn't been the same since Simon left. ;)

Coach Pants 12-08-2008 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CSC
And I'm sure there are still some people out there that think OJ is still innocent. Damn circumstantial evidence...:zz:

There are a few on here who think he's innocent.

Cannon Shell 12-08-2008 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot
The day we start using a drop in purse winnings as great evidence that a trainer "stopped doping", is ... well, today, on the internet.

That, and knowing, "No horse can make a 20-point Beyer improvement without illegal means" is all we need to know about you horse trainer guys.

:rolleyes:

I was responding to Reese who was wondering why we were saying Pletchers numbers were so down when he was still the second leading trainer in the country. When an outfit's purses earning drop from the $25 million dollar range to the $11 million dollar range obviously there are a lot of factors in play. Anyone who thinks that Pletchers outfit isnt having an off year is missing the point, is related to Todd or simply doesnt want to see it. I pointed out today that the glory years for him were preceded by an unbelievable strong buying spree by his clients the previous years. Others like the fat man and Phil have pointed out that his horses havent been able to overcome tough trips like they once did. Several others have pointed out he has lost some big owners like Melynk. Others have mentioned his positives and other drug related things. It is a distinct possibility that all of thse factors along with others that we have overlookd or dont know about are to blame.

Cannon Shell 12-08-2008 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CSC
Lukas hasn't done much since Pletcher left the assistant's role.

Pletcher was not his main NY assistant for that long. Losing Jeff Lukas is probably far more to blame in that area.

Cannon Shell 12-08-2008 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CSC
Correction the Lukas stable hasn't been the same since Simon left. ;)

It was going the wrong way while i was there

CSC 12-08-2008 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot
But the tiny level found in Pletcher's horse wasn't enough to be able to affect performance. Today that same level is an allowable level under NY racing rules. See post 57.

Todd Pletcher could possibly be the biggest juicer in the business. But, as the guy has a completely inconsequential drug record to date, I'll reserve awarding him that title until he earns it.

Other trainers are currently far, far more deserving.

I don't know if I'd call a 45 day suspension inconsequential, I understand where you are coming from, you need to see the smoking gun in the hand before you can convict so to speak...I for one think it's beneficial to look at all the factors as they have been cited here numerous times already, to ignore them I believe one is not completely looking at the entire picture here.

CSC 12-08-2008 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
Pletcher was not his main NY assistant for that long. Losing Jeff Lukas is probably far more to blame in that area.

Jeff Lukas almost died when he was kicked by Tabasco Cat, remember that.

Really? Todd got more credit than he probably deserved. One thing is for sure he had some good people work for him. Stewart, Bradshaw, Pletch...

reese 12-08-2008 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot
Did you listen, last week I think it was, to Steve's ATR discussion with the head of RMTC? The level of proactivity was exactly what was discussed. It most certainly can be done.

I heard the program and that guy left out a MAJOR consideration...not once did I hear him mention COSTS...who is going to pay for all this drug testing?

Most tracks cannot even afford to keep the track in good shape. Who is going to pay for all the drug testing? No answer to that question was broached when I was listening.

CSC 12-08-2008 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by reese
I heard the program and that guy left out a MAJOR consideration...not once did I hear him mention COSTS...who is going to pay for all this drug testing?

Most tracks cannot even afford to keep the track in good shape. Who is going to pay for all the drug testing? No answer to that question was broached when I was listening.

I'm all for testing, but to be cynical for a moment will it work? The cheaters always seem to be a few steps ahead of the testers, if something is flagged they will go to something else less detectable. Other sports have had simular problems catching the cheaters, horseracing is no different I surmise. The only way to level the playing field is to let them all cheat, and the chance of that happening is O.

dalakhani 12-08-2008 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
It was going the wrong way while i was there

Why do you think that was Chuck?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.