Originally Posted by Thepaindispenser (Post 890945)

Dahoss, I am not sure why you are equating the unemployment rate with freeloaders. The unemployment rate only counts people who are actively looking for work. Lazy, freeloaders don't look for work.

Originally Posted by Danzig (Post 890976)

i have an issue with someone saying that every voter for his opponent is on the govt teat. it's completely incorrect. and it shows his lack of understanding of the country in general, and the population in particular.

a lot of people who 'depend' on the govt are actually largely republican voters. the man was kowtowing to his audience. he already said in the past he's not worried about the poor, now he's not worried about anyone who he feels would vote for obama.
that doesn't leave very many people for him to worry about, does it?
personally, i don't think many politicians really give a damn about any of us. they only care about themselves.
i'm not anti mitt because of that speech. i won't vote for him because of his stance on things, which i've already posted about.
and i have no doubt everyone has seen my take on obama...so like i said elsewhere, i will be voting for a third party candidate.

Originally Posted by Dahoss (Post 890987)

For a supposedly smart guy, you sure are playing dumb here.

One more time, even slower. You said ALL of the lazy freeloaders are voting for Obama.

That is false. So do you want to keep talking around it, or are you just going to admit you're talking out of your ass?

Originally Posted by Thepaindispenser (Post 891041)

I stand by my statement, what incentive does a lazy, freeloader have to vote for Romney? Are you going to admit that you were unaware of what the unemployment number means? It only counts people actively looking for work.

Originally Posted by Danzig (Post 890926)

yeah, he just said 'it's not my job to worry about them'.


and mitt romney doesn't give a rats ass about you or anyone. he wants to be president-the only people he will worry about helping are those like him. and that doesn't include you, or me, or anyone else who isn't a rich guy like him.

Originally Posted by Thepaindispenser (Post 891043)

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ack-Obama.html

Romney was only a point behind so let's see what affect his comments have. I say nothing.

Originally Posted by jms62 (Post 891047)

And never has someone used so many words to do so.

Originally Posted by Clip-Clop (Post 891048)

I don't care who you are or where you stand, that is funny.

Originally Posted by Thepaindispenser (Post 891046)

Now we learn that mysteriously one to two minutes of the video are missing, coincidentally right after Romney said 47%. How pathetic is that Mother Jones has to edit a video to alter the meaning of what Romey really said? Does the liberal media have no shame?

Originally Posted by Dahoss (Post 891045)

I know what the number means. It's irrelevant to my point.

As if your whole act was embarrassing enough...now you're going to pretend that people on the right don't take advantage of the system also?

Like I said, much, much worse than Riot.

Originally Posted by Thepaindispenser (Post 891064)

If you knew what the number meant then why didn't you use it correctly?

Originally Posted by Dahoss (Post 891069)

It's pretty funny to watch you unable to answer the simplest of questions, while deflecting every chance you get.

Crawl back in your hole.

Originally Posted by Thepaindispenser (Post 891075)

I stand by my statement, the deflecting sounds like projecting on your part, please answer my simple question which is did you intentionally use the unempolyment rate incorrectly or did you not know who the unemployment rate represents?

Originally Posted by Dahoss (Post 891078)

You stand by your statement that ZERO people who will vote for Romney are freeloaders?

And people are supposed to have intelligent discourse with (one of) you? How is that possible when you're so brainwashed?

Originally Posted by Thepaindispenser (Post 891084)

Ok, I will clarify, a large majority of the freeloaders will vote for Obama. Since you are such a stickler for exact words, then please answer my question. Did you intentionally misuse the unemployment rate or did you not know who is represented in the unemployment rate?

Originally Posted by Dahoss (Post 891089)

I didn't misuse anything and I'm not going to let you squirm your way out of this. I was showing you that "red" states have some of the highest unemployment rates in the country. So, unless you're a total idiot in complete denial (possible in your case) there are A LOT of people in those states taking advantage of the system. Which negates your whole premise.

How exactly do you know a large majority of freeloaders are voting for Obama? What is the basis for your assumption?

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 891092)

Mitt Romney's Vision For Amercia

Originally Posted by Thepaindispenser (Post 891111)

Riot you are such a racist. Just like the rest of your failed ideology you are stuck in last century. Join the 21st century.