![]() |
Quote:
|
http://nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news...-speeches?lite
They have Hickenlooper on here if anyone wants to see it. Says things that aren't the platform, hence no TV. |
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/201...lan/?mobile=nc
just saw the above, and figured this was as good a place as any to put it. another example of fantasy vs reality. NORQUIST: You do two things. You reduce spending, and you have stronger economic growth. This is one of the weakest recoveries we’ve had – ZAKARIA: You can as a practical matter, this is a wish, not a plan. I would like stronger economic growth, too….This is all rhetoric, Grover. You’ve got a plan as a practical matter. As I said, Clinton raised taxes, he got growth. Bush had the biggest tax cuts in a generation, and he got the weakest growth in 30 years. All I’m saying is as a matter of practical planning for the fiscal future of the United States your answer can’t be, well we’ll have stronger growth. Yeah, if we grow at 6%, we don’t need to do anything. Everything is solvent, right? But I can’t wish for that. We’ve got to plan realistically. |
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
![]() |
Quote:
I thought this was cute. |
Quote:
check out my health care thread, the second link is to an article about the growing number of things people want health care to cover. personally, i'm amazed that bc isn't covered by some health plans. then again, when you read that article, it does make you go hmmmm. because if we keep adding more and more items, what does that do to the cost? we may need to reassess just what health insurance should encompass. now, i don't care for the hysterical ravings of the roman catholic church on the issue; it shouldn't enter into it at all. especially when you get to the statistic in the article i mention that says 95% of adults use bc. that's a large number, not just a minority group of sex maniacs running around. |
http://news.yahoo.com/steelworker-fe...-politics.html
The Democratic National Convention on Wednesday featured three speakers billed as "former employees of companies controlled by Bain Capital." They each told compelling stories about jobs lost, allegedly because of the actions of Bain under Romney's leadership. But it turns out one of those employees never actually worked for a company controlled by Bain Capital. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Rocking and rolling has started for the DNC final night - Mary J Blige singing now. Stadium packed, thousands outside.
Earth Wind and Fire had to be cancelled due to stage size, but other acts will go on. It's nice to see artists participating and wanting their songs used, and not sending the DNC injunctions to immediately stop using their music, as many send to the RNC and Romney campaign :D Democrats are definitely far cooler and more fun than Republicans. Current Republicans are angry all the time. |
Quote:
True - Bain didn't pay his salary. The union did. But he worked at GST Steel, didn't he? Not much of a fib at all, when the point of the story is the jobs and pensions lost by those steelworkers due to Bain Capital. The guy in charge of negotiating that would know all about that. In painful detail, in the suffering of the employees that lost their pensions and jobs. And, in fact, he said he worked for the union when he told the story. So the problem is ... ? Quote:
|
|
Quote:
I wonder when Obama is going to deport himself indefinitely to Guantanamo for violating the NDAA? http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/...incl-al-qaeda/ |
This is the moment at the family reunion where the out of touch drunk degenerate f.ucktard corporate shill that you see once a decade comes in and busts balls and pisses in the pool.
Joe. |
Pretty clear many are better off now than 4 years ago.
![]() |
Looks like a fellow Nerdy Trailer possessed this woman...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EKux363Dg64 |
|
Quote:
i wonder what the math will end up being on that situation. a million jobs saved-at what cost? we all know that it will be a losing proposition for the feds (i.e. we the people, since the fed runs on our dough) with stock prices continuing to be too low to get us out at anything other than a big loss. why is it thought better to throw good money after bad, then to take the hit and then get up, dust off, and move on? same with the ppuca-they're trying to build a large home on a horrible foundation. we'll end up with a crooked house that will eventually be condemned. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:22 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.