Originally Posted by Antitrust32 (Post 744642)

Hossy's post was great

Originally Posted by notyep59 (Post 744532)

since he is in the penalty box, i don't know if he can read this or not, but i would like to say that i think he's lucky for not being banned since he called you the "dumbest person in the history of human beings".
oh, wait.....


was that him?

Originally Posted by ateamstupid (Post 744718)

:rolleyes: this is not the cause you want to take up.

Every post of his is exactly the same:

A.) I won this bet the other day.
B.) I'm an awesome gambler and have paid for my kids' college through gambling.
C.) If you don't believe me, you must be some pathetic sissy liberal elite.
D.) LISTEN TO ME, I'M GREAT AT GAMBLING YOU LEFT-WING CLOWNS!!
E.) What's a redboard?

Sorry, you have to bring something more than redboarding and starting political flame wars in The Paddock.

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind (Post 744754)

Your incredibly thin skin has led to, I don't know, three bannings in like six years?

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind (Post 744754)

It's probably your prodigious banning of posters that has gotten everybody this upset. Your incredibly thin skin has led to, I don't know, three bannings in like six years? You really need to take your finger off the trigger.

Originally Posted by DaTruth (Post 744755)

I believe that RHT accounted for two of those three bannings.

Originally Posted by merasmag (Post 744768)

r u still wearin
de baggy pants?

Originally Posted by GPK (Post 744784)

I think he sent Scuds all his old "outfits"

Originally Posted by nebrady (Post 744543)

Congrats Zenyatta you deserve it! She might have loss to blame by a nose, but you socalled experts don't see what she did for horse racing in general. She was the one everyone came to see that breeders cup not blame! Sure he won but he only had 5 races all year! As much as you want to poo hoo her accomplishments, she had a great winning streak and was great for the industry! Good for you girl! Now stupid you banning someone for what they post are you kidding me! You ever look at what you call people. Trolls for example, you shouldn't be a moderator. A moderator is not suppose to be extreme. Look at some:rolleyes: of your posts sometime. Your suppose to value everyones judgement and not be biased against the people who don't agree with you! Fair and impartial! I ask does that sound like ateamstupid? Comeon man!

Originally Posted by ateamstupid (Post 744718)

:rolleyes: this is not the cause you want to take up.

Every post of his is exactly the same:

A.) I won this bet the other day.
B.) I'm an awesome gambler and have paid for my kids' college through gambling.
C.) If you don't believe me, you must be some pathetic sissy liberal elite.
D.) LISTEN TO ME, I'M GREAT AT GAMBLING YOU LEFT-WING CLOWNS!!
E.) What's a redboard?

Sorry, you have to bring something more than redboarding and starting political flame wars in The Paddock.

Originally Posted by notyep59 (Post 744854)

i promise, i was not taking up a cause here. i think people should be left on their own to either ignore or argue with the "fools" here. if i make a statement like, "i'm an awesome gambler, sexy and very handsome", you can choose to ignore or.....well, you can't really argue with that! bad choice for comparison. i also think about 83.6% of those on here just like arguing for arguings sake. let the guy boast and beat his chest. ignore him if you want, i find it amusing.

Originally Posted by Dahoss (Post 744575)

Seriously, who cares how many tracks someone has been to? What does it have to do with the discussion or the obvious error in the post? but he's right, Blame's year wasn't all that special. Neither was Zenyatta's if you look at the races, who she faced and what they ended up doing. There is no way someone can be honest and say Zenyatta faced better competition than Blame did in 2010. There is no way someone can say Zenyatta beat better competition than Blame did. It's just not possible. The only arguement we hear is she did more for the game. That's a chickenshit cop out. I have yet to see someone put forth an arguement that what Zenyatta did on track was better than Blame...because you can't.

I think awarding Zenyatta HOY sets a bad precedent. Her connections knew that by running in the campaign they chose, they needed to win the Classic in order to be deserving of HOY. She didn't. She ran well, but in a game where inches separates millions of dollars, she fell inches short, to a horse that had a better year on track than she did. i don't like seeing the sport turn into a popularity contest. It isn't American Idol. it's better than that and we should expect better than that. It's not about who has more fans on Facebook. It's about what you do on the track.

She didn't have to travel or beat males every race. But there were races in her backyard that she was eligible for, that would have tested her and they avoided them. The funny thing is I'm almost positive she would have won them. But they didn't try. They avoided top competition to protect a streak and were rewarded for it. Had she just ran in one of those races against males during the year, I would think she is deserving. but she didn't.

If people think that she had was deserving of HOY based on what she did on track this year, fine. But I urge you to go through the history of the award and tell me how her year stacks up with other winners. I'll save you the time....it doesn't stack up well. She was a fantastic horse. She was an amazingly consistent horse. Her run in the BC this year was exciting and made for a great race. But she didn't deserve HOY. The horse that beat her...that beat better, that faced better deserved the award.

Originally Posted by Dunbar (Post 744949)

I agree with a lot of what you said here, and yet I'm still glad Zenyatta got HOY. I don't feel it's either sad or terrible to take "body of work" into consideration. There's plenty to NOT like about Zenyatta's 2010 campaign. But, Zenyatta's connections DID bring her back and they DID run in the Apple Blossom, announcing it early enough for any mare in the country to challenge her. They DID run in the BC Classic, finishing a close enough second to take nearly everyone's breath away who watched the race.

If Blame had run more than 5 races, I might feel differently. But his campaign did not not blow me away.

All this lamenting the future meaning of the awards is an over-reaction, IMO. The award was given to a charismatic 19-1 mare with a 1st and a (close) 2nd in successive BC Classics, I don't think we will have to face a similar situation again in our lifetime.

--Dunbar

Originally Posted by AeWingnut (Post 745063)

Originally Posted by Dunbar (Post 744949)

I agree with a lot of what you said here, and yet I'm still glad Zenyatta got HOY. I don't feel it's either sad or terrible to take "body of work" into consideration. There's plenty to NOT like about Zenyatta's 2010 campaign. But, Zenyatta's connections DID bring her back and they DID run in the Apple Blossom, announcing it early enough for any mare in the country to challenge her. They DID run in the BC Classic, finishing a close enough second to take nearly everyone's breath away who watched the race.

If Blame had run more than 5 races, I might feel differently. But his campaign did not not blow me away.

All this lamenting the future meaning of the awards is an over-reaction, IMO. The award was given to a charismatic 19-1 mare with a 1st and a (close) 2nd in successive BC Classics, I don't think we will have to face a similar situation again in our lifetime.

--Dunbar