Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   Sports Bar & Grill (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   usc (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=27006)

timmgirvan 01-02-2009 11:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philcski
...and got rolled by the MWC in the regular season.

Don't have the stats on that....but the bowls are the big deal,right? Cash driven bowl insanity...but there it is....

Smooth Operator 01-02-2009 11:27 PM

Lol, Pants ... Bama was overrated. Great fun watching them get exposed by Yutes.








Trojans RULE!!! :cool:

Coach Pants 01-02-2009 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SniperSB23
The fact is their secondary got diced and they were victimized by a bunch of well timed blitzes that Smith would have had nothing to do with picking up. He certainly would have helped but I don't think he makes the difference.

:rolleyes:

Again you and Phil underestimate offensive lineman. They aren't easy to come by and with a game manager at QB instead of a game maker losing a great offensive lineman makes an absolutely tremendous difference.

philcski 01-02-2009 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach Pants
His presence would've made all the difference, punchy. They couldn't establish a solid run game without him.

You're so quick to throw stats around. Take a look back at the Bama-Tulane game. Smith didn't play.

Now try to weasel your way out of that one and say his presence wouldn't have mattered tonight.

JP Wilson sucked in that game too. Shocker there.

OK, so let me ask you this, because I respect your handicapping opinions.... if you thought it was such a big deal before the game that he wasn't playing,



why the fu.ck did you make your biggest bet of the year on them?????? you're smarter than that.

SniperSB23 01-02-2009 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach Pants
:rolleyes:

Again you and Phil underestimate offensive lineman. They aren't easy to come by and with a game manager at QB instead of a game maker losing a great offensive lineman makes an absolutely tremendous difference.

I'm not arguing that he would have helped, but most of the key sacks came from well timed blitzes that the QB did not see coming rather than someone beating the replacement so I don't see him being the difference.

ddthetide 01-02-2009 11:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SniperSB23
The fact is their secondary got diced and they were victimized by a bunch of well timed blitzes that Smith would have had nothing to do with picking up. He certainly would have helped but I don't think he makes the difference.

smith not playing was bigger than you guys are making it out. without smith, the line was shuffled. johnson goes down and it's over. finished the game with 2 OL's in thier regular spots. i said yesterday depth was a problem and it showed. utah played well, i give them credit but to say smith wouldn't made a difference is wrong.

Coach Pants 01-02-2009 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smooth Operator
Lol, Pants ... Bama was overrated. Great fun watching them get exposed by Yutes.








Trojans RULE!!! :cool:

It was a home game for the Trojans against the crypt keeper.

Maybe next year.

SniperSB23 01-02-2009 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ddthetide
smith not playing was bigger than you guys are making it out. without smith, the line was shuffled. johnson goes down and it's over. finished the game with 2 OL's in thier regular spots. i said yesterday depth was a problem and it showed. utah played well, i give them credit but to say smith wouldn't made a difference is wrong.

A difference or the difference? I think he helps but I think Utah wins that game even if he plays.

Coach Pants 01-02-2009 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philcski
JP Wilson sucked in that game too. Shocker there.

OK, so let me ask you this, because I respect your handicapping opinions.... if you thought it was such a big deal before the game that he wasn't playing,



why the fu.ck did you make your biggest bet of the year on them?????? you're smarter than that.

That wasn't my biggest bet of the year.

And quite frankly the only reason why Bama didn't cover is because of the 21 point fluke in the 1st quarter. That was a fluke. It hardly ever happens and I don't want to hear otherwise.

I bet my team. I root for Bama and bleed Crimson. I could give a **** about the money. I'm royally pissed about them losing. I'd be happy as hell if they won by 1.

ddthetide 01-02-2009 11:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SniperSB23
A difference or the difference? I think he helps but I think Utah wins that game even if he plays.

easy to say that now. :wf

Coach Pants 01-02-2009 11:39 PM

Yeah Utah won. It will be lame if they are named AP champs because of this game though.

Bama will be back and hopefully better. The offense is a big concern next year but the schedule isn't too bad.

Might be two years away from another BCS bowl.

philcski 01-02-2009 11:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach Pants
That wasn't my biggest bet of the year.

And quite frankly the only reason why Bama didn't cover is because of the 21 point fluke in the 1st quarter. That was a fluke. It hardly ever happens and I don't want to hear otherwise.

I bet my team. I root for Bama and bleed Crimson. I could give a **** about the money. I'm royally pissed about them losing. I'd be happy as hell if they won by 1.

I know you do. That's cool. I bet my team in their bowl too, they won but didn't cover.



I WAS FUC|<ING PISSED!!!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach Pants
Yeah Utah won. It will be lame if they are named AP champs because of this game though.

Bama will be back and hopefully better. The offense is a big concern next year but the schedule isn't too bad.

Might be two years away from another BCS bowl
.

I actually disagree with you here. Bama will be tough again next year, like you said more Saban less Shula.

Side note... Houston Nutt can coach my team any day. Arkansas are fuc.king morons for running him out of town.

Coach Pants 01-02-2009 11:43 PM

Now we join Oklahoma in being beat by a bunk conference team.

Ugh this sucks.

Coach Pants 01-02-2009 11:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philcski



I actually disagree with you here. Bama will be tough again next year, like you said more Saban less Shula.

Side note... Houston Nutt can coach my team any day. Arkansas are fuc.king morons for running him out of town.

Heh lets give Nutt 3 more years to let Orgeron's recruits roll off the roster.

SniperSB23 01-02-2009 11:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach Pants
Now we join Oklahoma in being beat by a bunk conference team.

Ugh this sucks.

Better than being beat by Cincinnati, Virginia Tech, Penn St, or Ohio St. Alabama would have rolled over any of them with or without Smith.

philcski 01-02-2009 11:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SniperSB23
Better than being beat by Cincinnati, Virginia Tech, Penn St, or Ohio St. Alabama would have rolled over any of them with or without Smith.

Agree

Cincy/VT was a disgrace. It'd be the equivalent of having 3 legged horses run in the Kentucky Derby.

SniperSB23 01-02-2009 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philcski
Agree

Cincy/VT was a disgrace. It'd be the equivalent of having 3 legged horses run in the Kentucky Derby.

Is that better or worse than Cowtown Cat?

Coach Pants 01-02-2009 11:50 PM

Virginia Tech would've beat the s.hit out of us tonight.

SniperSB23 01-02-2009 11:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach Pants
Virginia Tech would've beat the s.hit out of us tonight.

The same VT that couldn't beat Boston College?

Edit - OK, so they split with them, either way BC lost to Vandy.

Coach Pants 01-02-2009 11:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SniperSB23
The same VT that couldn't beat Boston College?

They beat them when it really mattered.

JPW's favorite target would be Macho Harris.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.