:tro::tro::tro:

that was great Dell.. and spot on

I would like to know Riot... the great judger of all people..

What category did you say I am in?

The bigoted Muslim hater category??

or the disrespectful towards women category?

since Riot is throwing out all sorts of inflammitory labels at people today

I'm naming Riot the Bigot of America.

I'm sick of the whole bigoted America hate thing going on from Riot. It's appalling, shameful and stupid, and shouldn't be tolerated. It makes Riot look ignorant. She thinks Christians and Conservatives and Americans must be struck down.

Riot throwing all sorts of inflammitory labels at people today. This is a new thing I didnt know about. Riot would that? Hmmmmm. Riot will now label you also as a hateful person. Welcome to the club. Lots of people are hateful according to Riot.
Instead of Bigot of America maybe Bimbo of America suits Riot.

Obama hasnt had a clue since January 2009.

[quote=dellinger63;752320]Too bad "Muslims" don't do all that on a regular basis in the real world.

Yes, I did see where you changed your answer to "some". :tro:

But how did you arrive at your figure of the number of jihadists? Was there a census?

I never changed or edited any of my answers.

I posted how I came up with that figure in another thread from months ago. It was just through researching on the internet.. Most of the info prob came from Wiki.

Its estimated that there are 1 billion Muslims in the world. Its estimated that 10% support the jihad agenda (might not all be violent, but support those actions). 10% of 1 billion is 100,000,000.

I am referring to your "Disclaimer" post.

I wonder who did that estimating? And how would they do it? It's not like there's a "Club Jihad" folks can join, where membership could be counted ...

There was an instance, a little over a year ago, where Glenn Beck just pulled a number out of his ass, and said it on his radio show. That number was 10%.

The amazing thing is that, if there are really 100 million terrorists out there, why are we wasting time trying to fight 200-400 Al Quaeda in Afghanistan, Yemen, and Pakistan? Puzzling ....

It was certainly not Glenn Beck who gave me that number.

You are welcome to search through threads if you want to find my sources.

And it was not any right wing leaning sites either.

I did a brief search and could not find the post I was referring too.

I believe most of the research was from Wiki.

And its not 100,000,000 violent Terrorits. That number includes terrorists, supporters of Sharia Law (the people who treat women like dog crap), and the Muslims that support the jihad.

I dont differenciate between the violent ones and the people who support the violent terrorists.

Luckily for this world, only 10% of Muslims support a radical view of Islam. That leaves 900,000,000 fairly peaceful Muslims.

If all 100% supported extremism.. this world would be fucl<ed.


Am I a bigot?? or did you mean I was a woman hater when you said that "i am one of them"?

I think she shares the self-loathing being an American as Obama & Co. does. She and they think we made our bones not by capitalism but by taking advantage of others.

BTW Don't tap the glass, they (being Riot & Co.) think they'll win in a landslide. With the new recreation of Obama as Reagan? :zz:

Can't make a Ford Pinto into a GMC C4500 ever!

When she can post the "find a husband for a spinster Christian site. (where only brothers and fathers speak for the potential bride) she will finally make some progress.

Or at least serve her what I'm buying, a STFU shot!

wow that did not take long....What's strange is under Mubarak the Egyptian Constitution did not allow for political parties to be formed on a religious basis. Under the new, freer Egypt they will be allowed. I suppose if enough vote for a theocracy in a open election that is what they deserve. :zz:

Egypt's long banned Muslim Brotherhood said Tuesday it intends to form a political party once democracy is established, as the country's new military rulers launched a panel of experts to amend the country's constitution enough to allow democratic elections later this year.

The panel is to draw up changes at a breakneck pace - within 10 days - to end the monopoly that ousted President Hosni Mubarak's ruling party once held, which it ensured through widespread election rigging. The initial changes may not be enough for many in Egypt calling for the current constitution, now suspended by the military, to be thrown out completely and rewritten to ensure no one can once again establish autocratic rule. Two members on the panel said the next elected government could further change the document if it choses.

The military's choices for the panel's makeup were a sign of the new political legitimacy of the Muslim Brotherhood, the fundamentalist group that was the most bitter rival of Mubarak's regime. Among the panel's members is Sobhi Saleh, a former lawmaker from the Brotherhood seen as part of its reformist wing.

"The Muslim Brotherhood group believes in the freedom of the formation of political parties. They are eager to have a political party," spokesman Mohammed Mursi said in a statement on the Brotherhood website.

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20110215/D9LD6CPG0.html

"Self-loathing". Seriously? Are you looking the mirror or something?

I've started a company from scratch, made a profit and sold it, and now own another. Love that capitalism ;)

Who do you work for?

Dell opines:
Friday, January 21, 2011
Obama doing well in key states
http://publicpolicypolling.blogspot....ey-states.html

There's been a lot of good news for Barack Obama in the national polls lately and certainly that's important. But we still have this funny little electoral college so what's going to be most vital for his reelection prospects is how he does in the key swing states. And there's good news for him there as well.

So far we've done 2012 Presidential polls in 6 of the 9 states that George W. Bush won in 2004 but that Obama won in 2008. Obama leads 23 out of 24 hypothetical match ups that we've tested in those states.

Here's how it breaks down:

Obama vs. Gingrich
Florida +5
Iowa +13
Nevada +11
North Carolina +6
Ohio +6
Virginia +11

Obama vs. Huckabee
Florida +5
Iowa +4
Nevada +10
North Carolina -1
Ohio +1
Virginia +5

Obama vs. Palin
Florida +14
Iowa +16
Nevada +13
North Carolina +14
Ohio +7
Virgina +11

Obama vs Romney
Florida +2
Iowa +6
Nevada +1
North Carolina +3
Ohio +2
Virginia +5

Obama also wins Colorado.

Still a long way to Nov 2012. In case you forgot when Nov 2012 is.

obama is a sure winner vs palin, huckabee or newt. republicans better come up with something better-a lot better. the three stooges sure won't get my vote.

Im fairly confident the Republicans will come up with something better. Im thinking they will if they take over the Senate in November's voting.

they could scope the local ymca and come up with better.

Maybe. Im sure the Dems could of come with something better than Obama. They still got the job done with Obama. Im waiting to see if anyone tries to go against Obama. Realyy havent heard any talk about it yet. Have you heard of any names yet?

seeing that they won, i'm not sure about that one.

i give exhibit A, why i would never vote for sarah palin:


Palinisms
Did Sarah Palin really say that?
By Jacob Weisberg
Posted Tuesday, Feb. 15, 2011, at 10:09 AM ET


"But when it comes to, and David, perhaps what it is that you're suggesting in the question is should the GOP, should conservatives not reach out to others, not participate in events or forums that perhaps are rising within those forums are issues that maybe we don't personally agree with?"—on the inclusion of pro-gay groups in the CPAC conference, in an interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network, Feb. 4, 2011


all i can say to that bit, is....huh? thanks to slate for that tidbit of goo.

or, here's this one, on egypt and mubarak.

"And nobody yet has, no body yet has explained to the American public what they know, and surely they know more than the rest of us know who it is who will be taking the place of Mubarak, and I'm not real enthused about what it is that that's being done on a national level and from D.C. in regards to understanding all the situation there in Egypt."—on President Obama's response to the turmoil in Egypt, in an interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network, Feb. 4, 2011

from slate...

And Obama is praising the protesters TODAY!!!! Way to go! The ignorance of hope and change strikes again?

CBS News correspondent Lara Logan was recovering in a U.S. hospital Tuesday from a sexual attack and beating she suffered while reporting on the tumultuous events in Cairo.

Logan was in the city’s Tahrir Square on Friday after Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak stepped down when she, her team and their security “were surrounded by a dangerous element amidst the celebration,” CBS said in a statement Tuesday. The network described a mob of more than 200 people “whipped into a frenzy.” Separated from her crew in the crush of the violent pack, she suffered what CBS called “a brutal and sustained sexual assault and beating.” She was saved by a group of women and an estimated 20 Egyptian soldiers, the network said. AP

You know who I work for. And I think you have capitalism and socialism all mixed up. I know you praised Clinton for furnishing you a educational loan and you hate your insurance co (at least your former ins. co.) hopefully. You want the government to offer you as well as anyone else even those who can't afford and those who have to be supplemented a health policy. You agreed with every bailout program ever imagined by Obama GM, Fannie/Freddie etc etc government involvement and now you love capitalism? That's about as funny as your christians v. muslims arguements.

No. I don't. That must be why I asked. Ya think?

And I think you are superficial and shallow in your political thinking, with no ability to realize nuance or try to resolve apparent contradiction, with little true understanding of the meaning of the words you use. The best you can do is pigeonhole into broad categories, on the most superficial and simplistic level.

Wont suprise me if Obama decides to give Egypt more aid. Very good possibility if the Muslim Brotherhood takes over.

And your not superficial and shallow in your political thinking? LMAO.

One huge positve to come out of Egypt.

He didn't have the balls this guy does?

http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/C...6/01/id/398484

How democracy and freedom will function or even exist in a country where its citizens voted for a theocracy should be telling. The Muslim Brotherhood, who publicly stated it would not be running candidates in the election, recently took 45% of Parliament. Other theocratic based parties took an additional 15% of seats, ensuring a solid majority.

In hindsight was the U.S. involvement and assistance in facilitating the formation of yet another theocracy in the mid-east a mistake? Considering Egypt’s more than capable military, should the U.S. now be concerned with a religiously based ruling political party, whose initial move into politics was a lie?

Whether or not the evolvement of Egypt into a theocracy would have taken place without U.S. assistance will never be known. More than likely but what is known is $3 billion plus would have been saved remaining on the sidelines.

The fact this administration so easily dispensed with the cash is a much truer indication of the concern they have for ‘taxpayer money’ than the false words pleading for the opportunity to streamline government.

i thought the u.s. got a lot of criticism for backing mubarek, even after it was evident he was going to be deposed? now we were supporters??

sloppy thing, democracy. the voters spoke; if they voted in the muslim brotherhood, so be it.
as for foreign aid, one of the favorite whipping boys of fans of smaller government-that amount is a drop in the bucket. again, the biggest drains on our treasury are defense and then medicare/aid/ss. you can add up every other budget item, every other department-the totals don't add up to what those two albatrosses equal.

so is bringing a sack lunch to work when compared to mortgage/insurance payments but many of us do it.

And when considering

To put it more into perspective the money we would have saved simply by not assisting Egypt is equal to the total amount Obama plans to save consolidating OVER TEN YEARS!