Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Crist: The great distaffers.. (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=36737)

Cannon Shell 06-22-2010 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32 (Post 660645)
but isnt that normal?? :wf

Not for old school trainers. 7 weeks was an eternity.

10 pnt move up 06-22-2010 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell (Post 660643)
Jerkens didnt want to run her in either BC. Both years she was tailing off (especially in her 4 year old year) and wasnt doing that well but Mrs. Hoffman and her team of advisors wouldn't hear any of it. Smith said that she didnt handle the CD track and that was why she wasn't closer to the pace as usual. But jockeys pretty much always say that after a bad race so who knows. In the SA race she never ran a step and considering she came into the race off of a 7 week layoff he was telling you something.

She had some physical issues and if you notice that after each campaign she didnt run again for 6 months which is out of character for a Jerkens horse.

I dont listen to that Smith guy, theres better info than what some jockey has to say.

The Indomitable DrugS 06-22-2010 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell (Post 660649)
Babe Ruth is so far the greatest player in his sport that it is laughable. His numbers dwarf his competition.

Have you ever looked at him before? He's fat and doesn't appear to have any black in him.

Cannon Shell 06-22-2010 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HomerS (Post 660651)
I guess the point I am trying to bring out here in Sky Beauty discussion is people who like Sky Beauty will come up with reasons and excuses to justify a preconceived opinion, not to form an opinion. Which is human nature. Just like people who for whatever reason dont like Zenyetta will always be able to come up with something, some angle to diminish.

Not saying that we can't be unbiased and treat each horse on its own, but just seen this too many times. If someone likes something or somebody they will give every benefit of the doubt to their preconceived opinion, making it almost impossible to pierce it. If anything people have a stronger tendency to dig their heels in more. To up the ante. The more Zenyetta wins the higher the ante will be. With more reasons why she isn't what she appears to be. Should she lose then all prior criticism automatically becomes "fact" now that she has lost.

Of course this is true. But my issue with Zenyatta is that if she had lost by a nose last year at Delmar we wouldn't be having this discussion. Winning the Classic was a great feat yet when you consider the quality of the field you can't maintain that she should be declared the equal(or greater) of all prior BC Classic winners. The streak is great yet when taken into the context of the surface issue and race selection it isn't exactly the equal of Cigar's winning streak (I'd say Citation as well but I can't say that I am familiar enough with the period to really comment on it accurately). These aren't criticisms of the horse. They are a sober critique of her qualifications.

I said last year that Jackson's "sportingness" was being overrated because of the fact that RA was an overwhelming fav in every spot that she ran in. That isn't saying that it wasn't a great accomplishment to run in and win the Preakness, Haskell and Woodward. It was. But I severely doubt that had the competition been merely average for those races that he would have been nearly as "sporting". He was taking advantage of the situation that was presented to him and that is fine. But it doesn't make her the greatest horse to ever look through a bridle. It made her a great horse with a willing owner that took advantage of some weak fields in races that are traditionally strong. Her races this year are proof that the modern way of campaigning horses makes it nearly impossible for the horses of today to ever compare to the horses of years past. The abbreviated, "managed" campaigns simply dont allow us to get a true measure of a horse.

Cannon Shell 06-22-2010 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS (Post 660657)
Have you ever looked at him before? He's fat and doesn't appear to have any black in him.

He looks blacker than our current president

Cannon Shell 06-22-2010 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HomerS (Post 660674)
I wouldnt Zenyetta with the all time classic horses (and I woudlnt put Cigar in either but thats another discussion ha ha) but within her own sex for sure. Not even saying superior to those but in the discussion. One of the reasons I think Rachel did deserve HOY since it was so close, is because she won grade ones on several different tracks under differing conditions. What made is so close was winning the Classic, weak field or not. That was a historic win from the mare angle.

I too thought RA deserved the HoY because the sum of her accomplishments were greater than Zenyatta's which were almost all tied into one race. The closeness of the vote was probably due to the fact that many of the voters are witless and the fact that Zenyatta's race was much more recent when they cast their votes. If you unemotionally look at the pp's for the 2 horses last year it is hard to make a case that Zenyatta had a better year or accomplished more than RA did.

Gaining Ground 06-22-2010 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HomerS (Post 660634)
Maybe I am missing the obvious here. Is the argument that Zenyetta cant be considered one of the all time great mares strictly because she has run the majority of her races on synthetics? Is that really it? And that overrules all else?

no that really isnt it. it is part of the discussion i think though. im not sure how you can ignore it.

Smooth Operator 06-23-2010 09:03 AM

Cannon ... you must've backed FT for '97 HotY ... right?

Cannon Shell 06-23-2010 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smooth Operator (Post 660929)
Cannon ... you must've backed FT for '97 HotY ... right?

I dont remember caring much

johnny pinwheel 06-23-2010 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell (Post 660681)
I too thought RA deserved the HoY because the sum of her accomplishments were greater than Zenyatta's which were almost all tied into one race. The closeness of the vote was probably due to the fact that many of the voters are witless and the fact that Zenyatta's race was much more recent when they cast their votes. If you unemotionally look at the pp's for the 2 horses last year it is hard to make a case that Zenyatta had a better year or accomplished more than RA did.

i agree, rachel did more and shes paying a price for it. she deserved HOY for pushing the envelope to the limit. but, these people are ruled by emotions and don't even see the weakness in that when gambling. the best horses rachel beat were chump change to zenyatta. someone said zenyatta beat a weak field in the classic...those horses were way better than macho again and bullsbay and she did it at 10 furlongs. this year theres no comparison, so far, rachel lost to zenyatta's sparring partner. a horse thats not even in her league as she rolled past her last sunday. the other horse that beat rachel comes back and loses convincingly at belmont. meanwhile, zenyatta wins and wins dirt or poly. comparing this years pp's is like apples and oranges. the emotions coming out are people crying over the obvious.......lol

Cannon Shell 06-23-2010 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnny pinwheel (Post 660949)
i agree, rachel did more and shes paying a price for it. she deserved HOY for pushing the envelope to the limit. but, these people are ruled by emotions and don't even see the weakness in that when gambling. the best horses rachel beat were chump change to zenyatta. someone said zenyatta beat a weak field in the classic...those horses were way better than macho again and bullsbay and she did it at 10 furlongs. this year theres no comparison, so far, rachel lost to zenyatta's sparring partner. a horse thats not even in her league as she rolled past her last sunday. the other horse that beat rachel comes back and loses convincingly at belmont. meanwhile, zenyatta wins and wins dirt or poly. comparing this years pp's is like apples and oranges. the emotions coming out are people crying over the obvious.......lol

I dispute that RA is paying any price for anything. If both horses competition is considered soft, does it really matter whose was softer? It is still not up to par when you compare these horses to other great horses. I can't find much fault in RA's campaign last year because even though the fields she faced were at least below average for those races, she competed in races that really matter. The Preakness, Haskell, and Woodward are far more prestigious that anything that Zenyatta ever ran in besides a BC race. Sadly that remains true and looks like it wont change.

Sightseek 06-23-2010 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HomerS (Post 660966)
So do we take that to next "logical" place and discount sprinters and turf horses? Is greatness only granted to routers on real dirt?

Safely Kept was a great horse nowhere on Crists list- she should have been.

She was on the honorable mentions list:

Honorable mention among the more than 100 female champions of this era who are not listed above include, at the very least, these 10: Estrapade, Hollywood Wildcat, It's In The Air, Landaluce, Pebbles, Royal Heroine, Safely Kept, Turkish Trousers, What a Summer and Xtra Heat.

Gaining Ground 06-23-2010 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HomerS (Post 660966)
So do we take that to next "logical" place and discount sprinters and turf horses? Is greatness only granted to routers on real dirt?

Safely Kept was a great horse nowhere on Crists list- she should have been.



no, why would you do that? did we just start running sprints and turf races less than 5 years ago?

CSC 06-23-2010 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sightseek (Post 660968)
She was on the honorable mentions list:

Honorable mention among the more than 100 female champions of this era who are not listed above include, at the very least, these 10: Estrapade, Hollywood Wildcat, It's In The Air, Landaluce, Pebbles, Royal Heroine, Safely Kept, Turkish Trousers, What a Summer and Xtra Heat.

Eddie D mentioned Hollywood Wildcat didn't like Churchill downs, otherwise she might have been on that list.

CSC 06-23-2010 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sightseek (Post 660968)
She was on the honorable mentions list:

Honorable mention among the more than 100 female champions of this era who are not listed above include, at the very least, these 10: Estrapade, Hollywood Wildcat, It's In The Air, Landaluce, Pebbles, Royal Heroine, Safely Kept, Turkish Trousers, What a Summer and Xtra Heat.

By the way would Safetly Kept still have won the BC sprint, had the euro sprinter Dayjur not jumped his tracks with the win just yds away in his grasp? I don't know I thought Meafara was more impressive in her 2 BC Sprint races.

CSC 06-23-2010 01:18 PM

How about Meadow Star? Honorable mention? Hard to think of a more impressive 2 yr old season than hers.

CSC 06-23-2010 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell (Post 660613)
Assuming that he didnt start taking hgh before he was a Yankee, no doubt his best years were pre HGH.

I think he was linked to a Toronto Trainer when he was with the Blue Jays, he definitely was bulkier post Boston Red Sox. The guy is also a big time azz that would rival Ben Roethlisberger.

The Indomitable DrugS 06-23-2010 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HomerS (Post 660966)
So do we take that to next "logical" place and discount sprinters and turf horses? Is greatness only granted to routers on real dirt?

Safely Kept was a great horse nowhere on Crists list- she should have been.

Female sprinters and female turf horses don't get their due because people don't care as much for for those divisions and because there are fewer Grade 1's out there to pile up the resume with.

randallscott35 06-23-2010 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS (Post 661050)
Female sprinters and female turf horses don't get their due because people don't care as much for for those divisions and because there are fewer Grade 1's out there to pile up the resume with.

Which is a shame. Grade 1s are not the only determination to greatness.

Revidere 06-23-2010 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985 (Post 660386)
THanks for posting this, I tryed 2 LOL.
Im kinda suprised a throwback like Serling would say Rachel and Z would have destroyed this one... I have a list of about 15 more just in the last 15 years... A thread is coming tomorrow.


Jersey Girl toyed with Banshee Breeze

Revidere 06-23-2010 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind (Post 660585)
I know....I was just joking around.

And he did beat Gulch and Precisionist in the Tom Fool.

Indian Charlie 06-23-2010 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CSC (Post 661008)
How about Meadow Star? Honorable mention? Hard to think of a more impressive 2 yr old season than hers.

I can think of several.

CSC 06-24-2010 06:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Indian Charlie (Post 661239)
I can think of several.

Let's examine her stakes win as a 2 yr old, those among she beat were Hall of Famers Dance Smartly and Flawlessly. She was pretty prolific as a 2 yr old.

1990 G1 BREEDERS CUP JUVENILE FILLIES
1990 G3 ASTORIA STAKES
1990 G1 SPINAWAY STAKES
1990 G1 MATRON STAKES
1990 G1 FRIZETTE STAKES
1990 G2 SCHUYLERVILLE STAKES


As a 3 yr old, defeated Lite Lite, Versailles Treaty and Do it in Style, before fizzling out to end her career.

Here's one of her more memorable races The Mother Goose duel with Lite Lite: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efSTvXN98A0
1991 G2 COMELY STAKES
1991 G1 MOTHER GOOSE STAKES
1991 G1 ACORN STAKES

Indian Charlie 06-24-2010 07:45 AM

Landaluce and Go for Wand come to mind.

I could make a case for Halfbridled.

Gaining Ground 06-24-2010 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Indian Charlie (Post 661316)
Landaluce and Go for Wand come to mind.

I could make a case for Halfbridled.

flanders was a pretty good 2 year old. maybe not as good as landaluce or go for wand, but she did outgame serenas song while injured.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:09 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.