And yet ... and yet ... and yet ...

... you and all your leftist buddies have demonstrated to this entire forum ... that you're completely incapable of directly addressing any of my posts ... or any of my questions ... and/or responding to them ... much less ... much less putting together a cogent thought of your own.

But hey ... that's OK ... 'cause this is a horse racing forum ... and all of you guys are very knowledgable when it comes to the ponies ... and I love and admire you for it.

So stick to the horse racing forums ... because when it comes to this one ... the conclusion is abundantly clear ...

Bold Brooklynite ... Grand Master of the Off Topic-General Forum !!!

More LOL Grand Master, twister of words, ducker of questions, poster of insults, and user of Sowell to "put together thoughts" of "your own".


LOL!!!!!!

See ... you figured it out ... you've discovered the four secrets to being a Grand Master.

But ... don't try to do it at home.

Oh tell me please Grand Master Baiter,
Where do you do it? On the subway, on the bus, in the White House, or in Dixie's ear?

Here is the classic post Bold B.
You might want to take the time to read it.
I'll probably repost it here another twenty five times in case you missed it.

No ... that's not me ...

... that's your hero ... Willie Jeff Clinton ... the White House Sinkmaster ... and Phone-Sex Maniac.

Understandable though ... once you've seen and/or heard his gracious consort ... Madame Thunderthighs.

Latest Washington gossip is that she maybe isn't using a "battery"-- could it be true? Who knows; even as a liberal who can't stand GW, I'm pretty skeptical of this particular rumor. But, scroll down and check out the photos; they're awfully funny in this context...

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread210355/pg1

Hmmm ... but it's always you guys who resort to personal attacks, name-calling, and vulgarity.

Is that your way of demonstrating the intellectual content of your arguments?

Wayne: you are joined at the hip with that commondreams rag! dont throw any stones.....I still like you....but you're a FLAMER

Genuine Risk,
Those are very interesting photos. I wonder which one will make the first denials. And poor Barbara, sitting all alone at the Mayflower.
For sure things will get "swept under the rug".
I hope the "love birds" find happiness, but that pic of Condie with her thumb about an inch and a half away from her index finger doesn't leave much room for hope. Oh well.

Yup Timm,
I like you.
I really am a flamer. Just my way.
btw, I haven't posted a commondreams link in a while...but if you're interested.....

naw...go there and take your pick. Some good ones today.

Bold B,
If YOu dish it out, don't be the least bit surprised if you get it back...
and if you didn't get a chance to read the classic post...here it is again (no.2, 23 to go):

Truly a legend in your own mind...as I believe I said in response somewhere to a post by Scuds...arrogance isn't a bad thing until paired with stupidity! When you've been shown to be a narrow-minded fool and still think you've won the argument, you are beyond help...and a complete waste of time to respond to anymore. Concrete thinking, robotic echolalia...a true credit to the American right! You remind me of the joke about the ant floating downstream on it's back yelling, "raise the drawbridge boys, I got a hard-on!" Sorry to tell you guy, but like that ant, the logic and "evidence" behind your arguments simply doesn't come close!

I'm not going to nitpick...but you posted a link on this very thread, you rascal!

Dude I salute u. This was a great post.

As I said, I'm skeptical (Dubya seems very determined to be different than his dad and his dad had his, ahem, outside interests), but it would be nice to think 'ol Condi is getting some. Even if it is a small pleasure. Heeheeheeheehee. But the pictures made me laugh.

Cogent thought of your own? Holy crickies. The guy is joined at the skull with Sowell. And BB only got the neurons attached to lower brain stem functions. Go back to my last post to you and your 50's black family. You completely ignored them. And you should cause there really is no way out.

Dixie Porter. Why dont you disassociate yourself with the Bold one. I have a sense that you know your ponies. And there must be some reason you post here, so why not join in the good stuff? To hell with the silly politics.

Well, 3 days now and you never answered any of my reasnable questions nor have you responded to my kindly worded PM.

That's ok, it's to be expected. Is it cowardly? You tell me. Just interesting you never can think long and hard enough to create and express a cogent thought of your own.

There's nothing wrong with being a far-right zealot. It's just the lack of courage to respond that is unseemly.

I enjoy talking to others who share views other than mine. You, on the other hand, probably go to the same places every day and lament about the world as it is with others of your similar deign.

If I want to hear what you have to say, I can buy a cheap bird and train it to say, "Sowell. Sowell. Sowell."

I have wasted too much time on you, though you are fortunate to have learned from me.

Reach one. Teach one.

Schmendrik, pachdn, narisch, fargleibter. Take your pick. They all are you.

But Grant and Eisenhower were the superheroes of the two biggest wars we ever fought ... G1 contests both. The Gulf War was G3 at best.

In any case ... Grant was a pretty bad president ... Eisenhower was OK ... I liked him!

And Old Tippecanoe's presidency was shorter than Barbaro's Preakness.

It's interesting that you consider a post which consists of name-calling, personal attacks, and sophomoric vulgarity to be a "classic."

Please ... please ... continue to use it as your signature. It reveals a great deal more about you than you're smart enough to realize.

Very revealing ... yes, indeed ... very revealing.

As always ... your wisdom exceeds amazing.

You handle the pony-picking ... and I'll smack down the leftist gnats.

As this thread has amply demonstrated ... I can devastate all of them without even working out between posts.

Again, you are lame and useless in terms of ever responding.

Schmendrik.

Fairly obvious what you are. You reveal so very easily. Actually, laughable.

Bold B,
If you go back to page 5 of this "thread that never ends" and reread what I said there, that you seem to have ignored, you'll see what has been revealed.
Some of the things that have been directed at you come from the fact that you've ducked answering direct questions, used Sowell to speak your thoughts (even though no substantiation of his "facts" have been given, and twisted the responses I've offered to make it sound like I said something that I clearly didn't. Others have voiced their frustrations with your "debating tactics" as well. Your gloating is "gasoline on the fire".

From my view, I'll never cause you to think outside your box, though I have gone to your townhall site in an effort to understand. Not much there for me to agree with, but at least I made the effort.
At this point, S2S, Pgardn, Somerfrost, and Irishtrekker may wish to continue this diologue. I'm a bit frustrated by your nonsense.
DTS

Hey Schmendrik!

You called me a liar about my reference to the TownHall.com link regarding "How to Buy A Semi-Automatic Handgun."

Well, here it is, listed, of course, under the "most popular articles" section, written by one of your beloved authors. Naturally, at the end of the article, he notes the best use of semi-automatic handguns would be to expel the U.N. from America.

http://townhall.com/columnists/MikeS...omatic_handgun

Yeah, very intelligent there, BB, very sharp. Uh-huh.

You are a liar, and an uninformed one at that. You are just as willing to recklessly sling libelous comments as you are unwilling to open your mind.

And here's the bottom line ...

All of the leftist arguments have been about process ... not about results. The fact is that all of us have been safe and secure at our keyboards for the past five years ... not because there aren't savages who would gladly murder us all ... but because our armed forces and police forces and intelligence agencies have been doing a terrific job of killing and capturing the terrorists ... and foiling their plots to attack us ... even right now as we view this post.

And who has been overall in charge of this amazingly successful security effort? Who is the one person who would be taking a barrage of hateful invective had there been additional attacks ... but who instead deserves the highest accolades in their absence?

I'll give you a few seconds to come up with the answer. Let's play the "Jeopardy" theme song while you tax your brains to come up with the answer ...

Dern-da-doo ... dern-dern-dern-da-doo ... dern-dern-dern-dern-da-doo-di-da-da ... dern-dern-dern-dern-dern-dern-dern-dern ... doo-di-da-da ...doo-doo-doo.

OK ... let's see what you've come up with.

Somerfrost says ... "Al Gore." Ummm ... no ... sorry ... Al Gore really wasn't elected president ... he was the loser ... that's not correct.

Downthestretch says ... "Kofi Annan." Gee ... sorry ... Kofi is just a corrupt, bumbling, tyrant-loving bureaucrat who'd actually be happy to see us murdered.

Pgardn says ... "Barney Frank." Nope ... also not correct ... Mr. Frank is an outstanding congressman and a very attractive man ... especially when he drools out of the right side of his mouth ... but no that's not correct either.

The correct answer is ... "George W. Bush" ... yes, George W. Bush has been the president of the United States for the past five years ... and has the overall responsibility for securing the safety and freedom of American citizens ... and has fulfilled that responsibility with great success ... George W. Bush is the correct answer.

There you go again! Bold B puts words that he "thought" he heard into others' mouths.... go back and find where I said "Kofi Anan" in this thread...

Thsi just reveals your skilled debating tactics...NOT!

Forget it a s s wipe. You are exposed. Liar, fraud, bigot, fool.

Here, again is your article.

http://townhall.com/columnists/MikeS...omatic_handgun

You have zero credibility. In fact it's doubtful you've done any reading at all. Most likely just repeating what you see on TV and hear on the radio.

You called me a liar.

there's the link.

You're not just a far-right bigoted zealot. You're uneducated.

Sorry. You're exposed and done.

Schmendrick.

You have several posts on page 5 ... not one of which contains a question I didn't answer ... or an assertion I didn't respond to.

What exactly are you referring to?

OK ... ignore the words which I humorously and deviously put into your mouth ...

... what's your actual answer to the question?

It really does not matter what he's referring to. You're obviously willing to liee your a s s off.

Here's the link I referenced. You called me a liar and said it never was on Townhall.com.

http://townhall.com/columnists/MikeS...omatic_handgun

What a fool you are. That's not a surprise.

Schmendrik.

Now do some of u see why BB was banned from other forums?
This is only half of it.

Bold B,
This one.

It's over.

He's exposed for what he is.

The worst part? He wasn't even entertaining. Not at all.

For that he should be tortured.

What a schmendrik.

He'll disappear now.

No. He is expressing and defending his postitions, as are others.
He has actually made far fewer personal attacks than others.
Does he come across as ****y? Yes, but I don't think that is grounds for banishment.

wow I guess I used a dirty word, let's substitute overly confident.

That was a very thoughtful post ... and it seems that just about everyone ... with one glaring exception ... has lived up to it.

This has been a lively and respectful debate ... absent some silly name-calling and vulgarities ... and several posters who haven't participated in the debate have commented positively on it.

So ... what's the question?

It is on another forum.

On that one ... you must follow the party line or be banished.

Except when he finds your position disagreeable, or when he does not like it when you reference an existing column on his beloved website, he labels you a j.. hater or a liar.

Bigot, uninformed, willing to lie. That's what I call him. 'Nuff said. Make some $$ today all.

Sidebar memo to everyone:

SentToStud is on my "ignore" list ... not because of his puerile cursing and name-calling ... but because he is a consummate bore. His posts are excruciatingly painful to read ... and I enjoy being headache-free.

So ... any message you see here from him ... I don't.

That's what I assumed.

S2S, I will admit that I haven't followed all of the twists and turns of this debate, and the name calling or labeling on either side is really a turnoff for me because it sidesteps what were some good arguements on both sides on some substantial issues.


Anyway, it's coming up on race time folks. later i'm sure. Good luck!