Originally Posted by Riot (Post 866837)

Sorry. The Democrats have nothing at all to do with the multiple arrests out of Walker's office. That's the FBI.

BTW: Walker publicly has always said he called in the FBI and asked for the investigation. Walker is a stone cold liar. The release of memos this past weekend prove that Walker stonewalled the investigation as long as he could.

Maybe Walker can get a prison cell with Blagoevitch? Or maybe just with his multiple former employees. It's hard to tell, so many have been charged with felonies, so many have plea-bargained.

The people have indeed spoken and re-elected this lying, deceitful man. Hard to explain what uneducated voters do, but it's their right to be idiots. Hopefully the indictment will come down soon, and Wisconsin can move on from this disaster of this man's participation in politics a the local and state level.

Originally Posted by wiphan (Post 867156)

Walker called for the John Doe investigation. That is a fact

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 867160)

Not according to the e-mails from within Walkers' office that were published last Friday, and the FBI. They say Walker lied when he said he called for the investigation.

Originally Posted by wiphan (Post 867166)

please provide proof of this

Originally Posted by wiphan (Post 867166)

please provide proof of this

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 867170)

See David Schusters articles and appearances from last Friday. It got buried in the election runup. Just google David Schuster and Scott Walker.

Walker's campaign asked the FBI to publicly clear his name as a subject of the investigation before the election. They have to, by law, if Walker isn't the subject of the investigation. They refused to clear Walker's name. Walker is John Doe.

Walker now apparently has two problems: the campaign lawbreaking that occurred in his office in Milwaukee, and a federal probe now centering on his actions as Governor.

Some of what came out last Friday:

"Sources inside the Department of Justice’s public integrity unit, reported that Walker is indeed a target of a federal criminal probe. He pointed to the fact that the DA has not cleared Walker’s name, as they would be obligated to do if he requested it and he was not the target."

Originally Posted by wiphan (Post 867174)

emails please no more bs, etc speculation. Why don't you actually follow what your signature line states. PROOF please

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 867176)

Look in my post, above, I found it and added links for you to click on.

Here, from Daily Beast earlier this week: http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...in-on-him.html

http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepo...138686104.html

http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepo...138686104.html

You will have to read them yourself, however.

Originally Posted by wiphan (Post 867177)

The MJS article is from Feb and has no emails in it

The other article has no emails in it either.

Do you have the emails please

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 867184)

Too lazy to click on links within the articles, huh? Have you simply not read any of the articles that have been published about your governor during his term? This is all new information for you, that you deliberately choose to ignore?

Yes, click on the third one. You will have to click on additional links, yourself, on the court documents, however, to read it yourself. And again, David Schuster published copies of the document last Friday, I'm still trying to find it.

"Document suggests Walker stalled inquiry"
http://m.jsonline.com/topstories/156065645.htm

Here, I'll copy part of it, so you don't have to click on a key

Originally Posted by wiphan (Post 867193)

I am an idiot remember. Can you show me one email released from Walker's office? I still don't see it

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 867194)

Yes, I said you'd have to, you know, actually follow the links in the articles yourself. Here, because you were too stupid to figure out how to click in the article above, is a direct link to what you want.

Now, you will have to move your hand over to your mouse, and click on this. And read it.

http://webcache.googleusercontent.co...f+&hl=en&gl=us

Originally Posted by bigrun (Post 867203)

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 867212)

Hey, I'm just agreeing with Wiphan. Wiphan was the one that said he was an idiot.

After all, I have posted, multiple times, the very document he wanted to see. He just, you know, keeps saying he can't "see" it.

Sounds pretty stupid to me.

Originally Posted by wiphan (Post 867220)

I still don't see a single email from Scott Walker released or published in any of the information.

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 867225)

Yeah. They probably have it wrong in the copy of the actual criminal complaint I gave you the link to.

I said new documents show Walker lied. He didn't aid the criminal complaint, he stalled it. You said you wanted proof. I gave you the link to the actual legal court documents.

Keep denying it exists.



Yes. I do think the 53% of people that voted for the clearly lying, under-investigation Scott Walker are idiots.

Here's one reason why: you might contact the Journal-Sentinel, and tell them that you think their story about Scott Walker lying about asking for the criminal investigation, rather actually blocking the criminal investigation, and the copies of the proof they published with the story (that you have been given the link to, but continue to deny it exists), is wrong.

Originally Posted by wiphan (Post 867253)

What can be asserted without proof, can be dismissed without proof.

Originally Posted by wiphan (Post 867234)

Fortunately you are in the minority

You specifically stated that there were released published emails from Scott Walker's office yet you can not produce a single one. Please provide just 1 email

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 867278)

They are the attachments to the court documents you are ignoring the existence of.

Let's go back:

Riot says that it turns out Scott Walker lied. He did not ask for the criminal investigation, Walker stonewalled it.
Wiphan says, "Give me proof" that Scott Walker lied, and did not ask for the criminal investigation, but stonewalled it.
Riot provides the proof - in the form of the newspaper article outlining it, with the attachment of the original court complaint proving it.

Wiphan and Clip Clop pretend it doesn't exist.

Wiphan says, "Walker called for the John Doe investigation. That is a fact". No, Wiphan. Scott Walker lied about that, and the proof is right in front of your eyes.

Originally Posted by Clip-Clop (Post 867281)

http://webcache.googleusercontent.co...f+&hl=en&gl=us

Copy and paste from this document an email please.

Originally Posted by Clip-Clop (Post 867281)

http://webcache.googleusercontent.co...f+&hl=en&gl=us

Copy and paste from this document an email please.

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 867288)

The document isn't in a form that can be copy and pasted. So I assume you didn't even bother to open the link.

Once again, for the slow:

Riot says that it turns out Scott Walker lied. He did not ask for the criminal investigation, Walker stonewalled it.

Wiphan says, "Give me proof".

Riot provides the proof - in the form of the newspaper article outlining Walker's lies, with the attachment of the original court complaint proving it.

Wiphan and Clip Clop pretend it doesn't exist.

Wiphan says, "Walker called for the John Doe investigation. That is a fact".

No, Wiphan. Scott Walker lied about that, and the proof came out last Friday, and is right in front of your eyes in the link I provided.

Scott Walker lied to the public and the citizens of Wisconsin about asking for the John Doe investigation. He did not. He stonewalled it.

Scott Walker lied to Wisconsin about his criminal defense fund not being for himself. It is.

Scott Walker lied to Wisconsin about himself not being the subject of the investigation. He is. Walker is John Doe.

Originally Posted by Clip-Clop (Post 867292)

THE ABOVE NAMED COMPLAINING WITNESS BEENG DULY SWORN, ON ENFORMATION
AND BELIEF STATES THAT:
COUNT 1: THEFT (EMBEZZLEMENT) (VALUE EXCEEDING $10,000)
The above-named defendant between 2006 and 2009, at 3949 East Mallory Ave., in the City of
Cudahy, and other locations within Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, as trustee, having
possession of money of the Military Order of Purple Heart, Inc., Michelle Witmer Chapter 96,
having a value exceeding $10,000, did use such money without the owner's consent, contrary to
the defendant's authority, and with intent to convert said property to his own use or to the use of
any other person except the owner, contrary to sec. 943.20(1)(b) and (3)(c), 971 336(3)

Copied and pasted.

Originally Posted by witchdoctor (Post 867882)

Originally Posted by Danzig (Post 867887)

that was hilarious. well done by whoever put that together (whether you believe it all or not!).

Originally Posted by Clip-Clop (Post 866839)

As an owner of two companies and an employer of a great many folks, I am entitled to as many slow days as I can get. See I am non-union and therefore have to often work more than 40 hours a week!! Sometimes even on weekends.

Originally Posted by Alabama Stakes (Post 872010)

maybe if you had enough staff, you wouldn't have to work weekends. Maybe if your workers had a union, they would be more productive and you could be playin hosses on the weekends