Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   Triple Crown Topics/Archive.. (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=9)
-   -   For Blackthroat & Big Brown (104 BSF) fans (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=20558)

freddymo 03-06-2008 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kentuckyrosesinmay
He obviously wasn't a big deal based on his purchase price at that sale. My connections at the time certaintly weren't raving over him because they didn't bid on him to my knowledge. (I'm sure they didn't because they would have been able to get him for that price). Of course, something could have come up on the X-rays. I want to see his preview again.

He wasn't ever asked to run, and he had more in the tank. Certaintly he wasn't idling along, but the jockey was holding him back down the stretch. The horse could have given him a lot more. I don't think anyone would argue with that.

This horse is a monster. My record in these things on this board speak for itself. I have never been wrong about a horse's talent on this board. Every horse that I have said was extremely talented off their maiden win has gone on to be multiple stakes winners except for Indyanne and Zada Belle. Hopefully, both will have their chance.


Please let us know how much faster a colt runs when whipped slashed and urged? A tired horse can be urged to extend himself for a few more yards beyond his mental and physical make up a fresh colt loaded with run isnt going to sprout wings because some yahoo jock cracks him on the ass or finishes him out.. Perhap you and or your connections should review less Xrays and watch more race replays....

King Glorious 03-06-2008 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kentuckyrosesinmay
This horse is a monster. My record in these things on this board speak for itself. I have never been wrong about a horse's talent on this board. Every horse that I have said was extremely talented off their maiden win has gone on to be multiple stakes winners except for Indyanne and Zada Belle. Hopefully, both will have their chance.

I am absolutely sure that if I live to be 1000 years old, I will never read anything funnier than this post here.











Unless she decides to post again.

freddymo 03-06-2008 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
And you wonder why you are the board laughingstock.


You know if she gets together with the 9 for 9 guy they would as FMO likes to say be "perfect together"

philcski 03-06-2008 11:58 AM

104 Beyer for yesterday's performance.

kentuckyrosesinmay 03-06-2008 12:02 PM

Here are horses that I have put up on the board that I picked off of their maiden wins to be good/great horses.

Lady Joanne
Welcome Inn (stakes winner)
Day Pass (stakes winner)
Rags to Riches (only had one reply to that post)(said she was the best filly that I had ever seen off maiden win)
Curlin(said that he was one of the best horses that I had ever seen off maiden win)
Ravel
Zada Belle
Indyanne

You can find all of this information in various posts throughout the years.

I haven't given out that many. Just a few. I don't like to give the horses out anymore because my knowledge in this area isn't appreciated. Now, I only throw one out there every once in awhile. Big Brown=monster. Now watch it all unfold in the next couple of months. Call me a novice all you want to. Just because you say it, doesn't mean it's true. I'm not the one that was completely wrong about Lawyer Ron. I have never been wrong like that about a horse's talent. Winning particular races...yes. But, not with overall talent.

blackthroatedwind 03-06-2008 12:10 PM

Any idiot can see a horse run a fast race and declare " this is a good horse. " That kind of insight is useless.

the_fat_man 03-06-2008 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
It's always funny to hear this stuff. What's even funnier is when you hear it from the same nitwits who mistakenly thought that about Bernardini, even though they were repeatedly told they were wrong, only to find out he did in fact run as fast as he could in all his races.

What it really shows is how little they really pay attention to everyday racing where you constantly see horses that appear to be being restrained and yet have nothing when they are theoretically asked to run.

Now, I'm confused. How did we find that Bernie did in fact run as fast as he could in all his races? Based on some of your previous comments that Bernie got a horrendous trip in the BC, I assumed that it would follow that he was good enough to have won with a better timed trip.

freddymo 03-06-2008 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kentuckyrosesinmay
Here are horses that I have put up on the board that I picked off of their maiden wins to be good/great horses.

Lady Joanne
Welcome Inn (stakes winner)
Day Pass (stakes winner)
Rags to Riches (only had one reply to that post)(said she was the best filly that I had ever seen off maiden win)
Curlin(said that he was one of the best horses that I had ever seen off maiden win)
Ravel
Zada Belle
Indyanne

You can find all of this information in various posts throughout the years.

I haven't given out that many. Just a few. I don't like to give the horses out anymore because my knowledge in this area isn't appreciated. Now, I only throw one out there every once in awhile. Big Brown=monster. Now watch it all unfold in the next couple of months. Call me a novice all you want to. Just because you say it, doesn't mean it's true. I'm not the one that was completely wrong about Lawyer Ron. I have never been wrong like that about a horse's talent. Winning particular races...yes. But, not with overall talent.


You would be my hero if you were able to post maiden winners who BSF are 95 or greater and who are going to be Frogs.. Then I could trim your roses with pleasure...

miraja2 03-06-2008 12:19 PM

Were there a lot of people that were NOT impressed by Curlin's debut?

This is crazy. I am pretty sure that I thought Discreet Cat was going to be good after his debut too. Same with Artie Schiller.

When horses run really fast, you can sometimes recognize that they did so? Congratulations.

Why do you insist on making every thread you participate in about you and your "record?" It is really tiresome and no longer even entertaining.

kentuckyrosesinmay 03-06-2008 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
Any idiot can see a horse run a fast race and declare " this is a good horse. " That kind of insight is useless.

That is true. But, not very many can do it when the horses don't run fast times or have that great of Beyers first time out...at least, not that I have ever seen.

This was the case with some of the horses that I named. I threw them out there, and you won't find one horse that I picked out off their maiden win and posted on this board where that horse didn't turn out to be really good.

Where was everyone else saying that Rags to Riches was a great filly off of her maiden win? I had just one reply to that thread. Just one. No one else was even talking about her at the time.

And sometimes good Beyers and fast times don't mean anything first time out. Beyers are often wrong, and tracks often play faster sometimes than others.

blackthroatedwind 03-06-2008 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freddymo
You would be my hero if you were able to post maiden winners who BSF are 95 or greater and who are going to be Frogs.. Then I could trim your roses with pleasure...

Or like when I said on my show after Cool Coal Man finished fourth in his debut that he could go on to be a stakes winner.

It is only in seeing what isn't obvious that is useful.

kentuckyrosesinmay 03-06-2008 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
Any idiot can see a horse run a fast race and declare " this is a good horse. " That kind of insight is useless.

Who is better in your opinion. Who would you take...Big Brown or War Pass?

Coach Pants 03-06-2008 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kentuckyrosesinmay
Who is better in your opinion. Who would you take...Big Brown or War Pass?

Jesustapdancingcrist

kentuckyrosesinmay 03-06-2008 12:36 PM

Come on, BTW, who is going to end up being the better horse in your opinion? It's not that hard...just two horses...War Pass or Big Brown? Take a stand.

freddymo 03-06-2008 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kentuckyrosesinmay
Who is better in your opinion. Who would you take...Big Brown or War Pass?

OMFG.. Rosie the FN colt won a 7f comeback in stylish fashion and you are mentioning him with WP? Can he beat a graded winner first or how about a two turn race?

Coach Pants 03-06-2008 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kentuckyrosesinmay
Come on, BTW, who is going to end up being the better horse in your opinion? It's not that hard...just two horses...War Pass or Big Brown?

War Pass.


I'm a shark...

freddymo 03-06-2008 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach Pants
War Pass.


I'm a shark...

Chicken of the Sea

kentuckyrosesinmay 03-06-2008 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freddymo
OMFG.. Rosie the FN colt won a 7f comeback in stylish fashion and you are mentioning him with WP? Can he beat a graded winner first or how about a two turn race?

The best handicappers can do it quite easily, and BTW is one of the best. It is not that hard to compare horses like these.

And it wasn't a 7f race. It was a mile.

I am challenging him. Let's see who is right.

kentuckyrosesinmay 03-06-2008 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sightseek
Wouldn't a pudding wrestling contest between the two of you be much more fair?

Huh?

brianwspencer 03-06-2008 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kentuckyrosesinmay
The best handicappers can do it quite easily, and BTW is one of the best. It is not that hard to compare horses like these.

And it wasn't a 7f race. It was a mile.

I am challenging him. Let's see who is right.

Sweet Jesus you're insufferable.

However, I commend those who have the energy to actually respond to all this nonsense, I tend to not even be able to gather the gusto to have a go at it.

freddymo 03-06-2008 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kentuckyrosesinmay
The best handicappers can do it quite easily, and BTW is one of the best. It is not that hard to compare horses like these.

And it wasn't a 7f race. It was a mile.

I am challenging him. Let's see who is right.

You are right about the mile...No accuses should have realized that..I had his 7f split on my brain which was around the same as the other two nice colts that ran earlier on the card...nobody is suggesting he isn't any good... we are suggesting that you keep your panties on a little longer before you build a statue of the BB and mount it at GP

brianwspencer 03-06-2008 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freddymo
we are suggesting that you keep your panties on a little longer before you build a statue of the BB and mount it at GP

Oh my god, this is amazing in so many ways.

kentuckyrosesinmay 03-06-2008 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brianwspencer
Sweet Jesus you're insufferable.

However, I commend those who have the energy to actually respond to all this nonsense, I tend to not even be able to gather the gusto to have a go at it.

I am relentless and competitive. I put my opinions out there. I am not afraid to take a stand. I am very confident about this. I find it funny that he won't. It's just comparing two horses' abilities.

Come on BTW, if I'm such a novice at this, if I'm so wrong and bad with this, why won't you take a stand?

blackthroatedwind 03-06-2008 12:58 PM

You don't take a stand.

You regurgitate the obvious.

kentuckyrosesinmay 03-06-2008 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freddymo
You are right about the mile...No accuses should have realized that..I had his 7f split on my brain which was around the same as the other two nice colts that ran earlier on the card...nobody is suggesting he isn't any good... we are suggesting that you keep your panties on a little longer before you build a statue of the BB and mount it at GP

It's okay. It happens to everyone.

I just recognize him for what he is....

Not getting my panties in a bunch, and certaintly not ready to build any statue. He's even been having issues as suggested by the long layoff.

kentuckyrosesinmay 03-06-2008 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
You don't take a stand.

You regurgitate the obvious.

I have taken a stand, just as I did a year ago with you concerning another horse. Now, what is yours? Do you agree with me or disagree? Who is the better horse?

freddymo 03-06-2008 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kentuckyrosesinmay
I am relentless and competitive. I put my opinions out there. I am not afraid to take a stand. I am very confident about this. I find it funny that he won't. It's just comparing two horses' abilities.

Come on BTW, if I'm such a novice at this, if I'm so wrong and bad with this, why won't you take a stand?

So if WP develops a quarter crack tomorrow and misses 6 months you are a genius? It's Fn horses .. WP hasn't done anything wrong as is extremely fast how the heck do you know what he is...he could be SSlew for all we know.. shut up and cheer for them both to be great. Why does anyone have to guess who will be better? As for who is better so far its a ridiculous question WP has been AWESOME

kentuckyrosesinmay 03-06-2008 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freddymo
So if WP develops a quarter crack tomorrow and misses 6 months you are a genius? It's Fn horses .. WP hasn't done anything wrong as is extremely fast how the heck do you know what he is...he could be SSlew for all we know.. shut up and cheer for them both to be great. Why does anyone have to guess who will be better? As for who is better so far its a ridiculous question WP has been AWESOME

No, it's only if they race each other.

It isn't who has been better so far. It is who is the more talented horse. When they meet up, who will win. What handicapper doesn't have to make decisions like this all the time?

easy goer 03-06-2008 01:09 PM

From Dick DOwney site:

Ramon said that this horse is very unique because he feels like he’s falling asleep on you down the backside. ...”--Richard Schosberg

“He’s very unique; as big as he is, he does as little as he has to. He is very responsive, though, when you ask him to go. He’ll give you one big stride and then turn himself off."--Ramon Dominguez

DOes this sound like a horse that...What the heck did Kentucky say? He runs on his own?

freddymo 03-06-2008 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kentuckyrosesinmay
No, it's only if they race each other.

I once asked Clint Glaibraith trainer of the one greatest Standard breds Niatross who was the better of the two colts he trained Niatross or Call for Rain... he laughed at me said "Niatross was way faster but he would have loved to take Call for Rain a long side and challenge him because he was the toughest SOB he had ever ridden" in other words he had no clue who would win on any given day..

Yet you seem to know who is better from watching a colt for the second time.. congrats

freddymo 03-06-2008 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by easy goer
From Dick DOwney site:

Ramon said that this horse is very unique because he feels like he’s falling asleep on you down the backside. ...”--Richard Schosberg

“He’s very unique; as big as he is, he does as little as he has to. He is very responsive, though, when you ask him to go. He’ll give you one big stride and then turn himself off."--Ramon Dominguez

DOes this sound like a horse that...What the heck did Kentucky say? He runs on his own?

Is this the same idiot who had Champ EL 45 lengths off the pace and cost the horse any chance of winning?

kentuckyrosesinmay 03-06-2008 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by easy goer
From Dick DOwney site:

Ramon said that this horse is very unique because he feels like he’s falling asleep on you down the backside. ...”--Richard Schosberg

“He’s very unique; as big as he is, he does as little as he has to. He is very responsive, though, when you ask him to go. He’ll give you one big stride and then turn himself off."--Ramon Dominguez

DOes this sound like a horse that...What the heck did Kentucky say? He runs on his own?

I didn't say that. Everyone else said that. Not me. This excerpt says exactly what I said. The horse wasn't all out down the stretch because the jock didn't ask him. He never asked him. He was holding him back.

kentuckyrosesinmay 03-06-2008 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
Handicappers bet their hard earned money betting on their opinions. That is what is important to them. Who cares who's more talented besides you?

Um, what about Derby futures?

How about handicapping in general? When isn't a handicapper trying to assess and analyze one horse's talent and ability from another when they are entered in the same race?

kentuckyrosesinmay 03-06-2008 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
You are talking about apples and oranges and as usual have no clue what you are talking about.

Apples and oranges? I think not. I don't have a clue what I am talking about...oh, how odd, that's all I ever get on this board, and I think it is very funny coming from someone who says that we are talking about apples and oranges. Analyzing ability and talent is a large part of handicapping, and that is what comparing War Pass and Big Brown is all about. How is it not? What about the Derby future wagers?

My questions won't get answered.

SniperSB23 03-06-2008 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kentuckyrosesinmay
Um, what about Derby futures?

How about handicapping in general? When isn't a handicapper trying to assess and analyze one horse's talent and ability from another when they are entered in the same race?

Big Brown is in the increasingly appetizing "All other 3yo" option in the Derby future pool.

You haven't set a distance for the race or said who else would be in the field. Without that info there is absolutely no handicapping you can do. Plus we are comparing a runaway winner in an off the turfer to a proven stakes horse.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:23 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.