Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Can you really make money in this game ? (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=9538)

blackthroatedwind 02-06-2007 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid
So the trainer of a class dropper doesn't know better than the handicapper whether or not he's trying to get rid of the horse or just get the horse a confidence-builder? That's gotta be one clueless trainer.

And the jockey aboard a lame horse just in a race to get claimed doesn't know more than the handicapper?

And the exercise riders who are aboard a horse every morning don't know better than the handicapper how well one of their horses is training?

Here's the bottom line: You can be the best handicapper on the planet.. If the trainer of a horse you like isn't in the race to win it, you're cooked. Period.

I'm in no way suggesting there is no validity to what you are saying, and certainly specific instances you give can be helpful, but in order for it to be at all helpful you have to know how good the opinions are that you are getting.

As DrugS pointed out earlier, the connections you describe are too close to their horses, and their opinions are stilted. A good handicapper, while he may not have specific information, knows how to make reasonable judgements, at least generally, about the information you are referring to. And, as he will have an even and unbiased view of the ENTIRE field, he can weigh everything together. Will he make mistakes? Of course, but over time he will have a far fairer and more balanced judgement of the races.

Believe me, I have had MANY people of the categories you describe give me poor and inaccurate insights. I have been successful trusting my judgement in the past and I will continue to do so. I will be wrong more often than I am right....but it seems to work out in the end.

blackthroatedwind 02-06-2007 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
I don't remember what he was saying about the rails. But if he was saying when the rails are out farther speed carries better I think he is right. but I also heard that years ago. I found during the fall Belmont meet when the rail was way out speed was very good, or at least I thought. I remember hitting a nice Amy Tarrant turf firster that outfinished a chalky Mott horse. made the lead and seemed to carry her speed real well. now was it the rail or did the turf wake her up? Who knows but I think the rail thing might have some validity.


I bet Hopes and Dreams in that race. She won back next out at Calder and did OK in a subsequent Gulfstream race. I believe the Amy Tarrant horse came back to run poorly at Gulfstream. She ran like it was more than any rail placement was helping her that day at Belmont.

I will have to ask some people smarter than me about this. Won't be hard to find them.

blackthroatedwind 02-06-2007 11:05 PM

Let me add that for much of the meet so far the rails have been out at Gulfstream and it wasn't until the turf got really hard that speed was particularly holding and there were a number of very deep closers that won.

To me turf racing is very fair and for the most part pace is not nearly the factor it is in dirt racing. That is the reason sound handicapping holds up better. For me, extensive trip handicapping is the most important thing someone can do to be successful betting turf races.

blackthroatedwind 02-06-2007 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
Yeah I agree. Question, with the new turf course at Gulfstream do they ever not have the rail out that far? I can't remember last year.


I thought the Sunshine Millions race was on the inside rail...as was the Canadian. I can't really remember any other days but the rail has been pretty far out.

blackthroatedwind 02-06-2007 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
I thought it was out pretty far for the Canadian because I couldn't tell where the wire was because the rail was out so far.

You are correct...and I was wrong about the Sunshine Millions race also.

Perhaps the rails have always been up. I will try to find out. I guess they will move inside for the second half of the meeting.

ateamstupid 02-06-2007 11:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
I'm in no way suggesting there is no validity to what you are saying, and certainly specific instances you give can be helpful, but in order for it to be at all helpful you have to know how good the opinions are that you are getting.

As DrugS pointed out earlier, the connections you describe are too close to their horses, and their opinions are stilted. A good handicapper, while he may not have specific information, knows how to make reasonable judgements, at least generally, about the information you are referring to. And, as he will have an even and unbiased view of the ENTIRE field, he can weigh everything together. Will he make mistakes? Of course, but over time he will have a far fairer and more balanced judgement of the races.

Believe me, I have had MANY people of the categories you describe give me poor and inaccurate insights. I have been successful trusting my judgement in the past and I will continue to do so. I will be wrong more often than I am right....but it seems to work out in the end.

Fair enough. But I'm afraid that what I'm saying is being misinterpreted as "bet every horse you hear something about".. And that's not what I'm saying. I'm just making the point that if you take someone who handicaps the race versus someone who personally KNOWS connections in the race AND handicaps the race.. I think the latter has the former beaten far more often than not.

blackthroatedwind 02-06-2007 11:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid
Fair enough. But I'm afraid that what I'm saying is being misinterpreted as "bet every horse you hear something about".. And that's not what I'm saying. I'm just making the point that if you take someone who handicaps the race versus someone who personally KNOWS connections in the race AND handicaps the race.. I think the latter has the former beaten far more often than not.


It may be being misinterpreted by some but I know what you're saying.

No doubt reliable information can be helpful, especially if you get it after you have fully handicapped the race, as then it won't affect your judgement. I have just never had the inclination to seek out information. To me, these people work their butts off and I think it is unfair of me to even ask them. They go to work when I go to bed for God's sake.

When I do the shows in Saratoga I basically beg people not to give me info prior to the shows as I feel obligated to repeat anything I know or heard.

The Indomitable DrugS 02-06-2007 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid
I'm just making the point that if you take someone who handicaps the race versus someone who personally KNOWS connections in the race AND handicaps the race.. I think the latter has the former beaten far more often than not.

As logical as what you are saying may sound on the surface.....I totally disagree with it.

blackthroatedwind 02-06-2007 11:36 PM

As an example, I often repeated DrugS's brilliant insights on the shows...giving him credit of course.

I guess I just figured out why there was so much more hatred directed towards me at Saratoga last summer.

The Indomitable DrugS 02-06-2007 11:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
giving him credit of course.

I believe he reffered to me as "the lunatic living in the appartment above me."

And....that is honestly not accurate at all. I'm a soft spoken, humble, level-headed, 100% normal in all ways, Western Pennsylvania boy.

blackthroatedwind 02-06-2007 11:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS
I believe he reffered to me as "the lunatic living in the appartment above me."

And....that is honestly not accurate at all. I'm a soft spoken, humble, level-headed, 100% normal in all ways, Western Pennsylvania boy.


Shockingly, the soft spoken part is actually true.

Mike_79 02-07-2007 12:06 AM

GP Turf rail settings
 
For anyone curious as to the settings of the turf rail at Gulfstream this meet here they are:

Week 1: Rail at 84 ft.

Week 2: Rail at 60 ft.

Week 3 Rail at 36 ft.

Week 4: Rail was down

Exception was on Sunshine Millions day 1/27 for the Filly and Mare Turf only the rail was set at 72 ft.

Week 5: Rail at 72 Ft. (Including the Canadian this past Sat.)

Tomorrow starts week 6 and the turf rail is set at 48 ft. for the 3 turf races carded.

Hope this helps for anyone that was curious about the settings.

blackthroatedwind 02-07-2007 12:07 AM

Thanks.

horseofcourse 02-07-2007 05:37 AM

I'm sure some people who really study it can make money...I think it could be done. Me personally, I never could and have no desire to take the time to study it, which is why I don't bet.

Cajungator26 02-07-2007 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
I guess I just figured out why there was so much more hatred directed towards me at Saratoga last summer.

It's your cat like moves and chiseled good looks, Andy.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.