Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Obama Gets 2009 Nobel Peace Prize (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=32166)

timmgirvan 10-11-2009 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot
Yeah, there's only dead Americans in Iraq.

Yeah, and all the world squeaked until the US stepped in.....
Funny how the meece try to bully us into capitulating to their judgement, but we have Mr Appeaser ready to accomodate those timid souls who don't have the heuvos to start their own fight. What about the 2 million purged in Iraq?
I don't hear you whining about them!

timmgirvan 10-11-2009 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Honu
Im all for isolationism. Let the rest of the mongrels sort their own crap out ....they dont want our interference anyway. They would like to continue to slaughter their own people and wage war among themselves and as long as they dont attack us again we should just let them carry on.

I'm all for isolationism...right after all the mongrels pay their debts to us.

Riot 10-12-2009 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timmgirvan
Cry me a river.....Both Kyoto and UN are broken mechanisms. We don't need a vote of confidence from Europe....We're the one's always bailing their asses out!

Originally Posted by Riot
Yeah, there's only dead Americans in Iraq.

Originally Posted by timmgirvan
Yeah, and all the world squeaked until the US stepped in.....
Funny how the meece try to bully us into capitulating to their judgement, but we have Mr Appeaser ready to accomodate those timid souls who don't have the heuvos to start their own fight. What about the 2 million purged in Iraq?
I don't hear you whining about them!
I was speaking of the dead of our supporting allies in Iraq.

I assume you don't think we need allies in the world?

timmgirvan 10-12-2009 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot
I was speaking of the dead of our supporting allies in Iraq.

I assume you don't think we need allies in the world?

Just for chuckles, why don't you add up the decades of support that the US has given to almost every country on earth, and then weigh it against the condemnation we receive from the impotent UN, and every other mouse that has it's mouth yapping and hand out for aid! Its a sickening thought!

Riot 10-12-2009 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timmgirvan
Just for chuckles, why don't you add up the decades of support that the US has given to almost every country on earth, and then weigh it against the condemnation we receive from the impotent UN, and every other mouse that has it's mouth yapping and hand out for aid! Its a sickening thought!

Yeah, we're the big dog. So what? No dispute there.

"Sickening"?? Clearly your attitude is, screw everyone else in the world, friends and allies included.

:tro:

timmgirvan 10-12-2009 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot
Yeah, we're the big dog. So what? No dispute there.

"Sickening"?? Clearly your attitude is, screw everyone else in the world, friends and allies included.

:tro:

There comes a time when circumstances dictate that you walk alone...but our govt doesn't have the guts to do it anyway. My attitude is if giving aid to the world isn't working out for us.....then we need to help our own. Clearly, there are many needs in our country that should be addressed soon.

Cannon Shell 10-12-2009 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hi_im_god
the honduran supreme court didn't remove zelaya from office. that took a few men with guns kicking in his door and flying him out of the country.

if obama is found to be acting beyond his authority by our supreme court, is the proper remedy a military coup?

it's a rhetorical question.

i hope.

btw: the "honduran people" that removed him from office is actually the same 25 families that have run the country the last 100 years. and the same 25 families that put him in power.

they made a mistake and took out the knife to cure the problem.

Better than Venezuela II. Dont play it like this was some chaotic military scene. The guy was a bad guy who needed to go before he used that same military to protect his new dictatorship.

Cannon Shell 10-12-2009 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot
Huh? I'm not the one trying to straddle that fence. Thanks for reiterating my point :tro:

I think the next thing the far right ultra-con crazies have to screech about is what Obama is going to do with the $1.4 million he recieved from the Nobel committee, that he is going to give to charity. No way he'll win with this.

If he gives it to international charities, he will be crucified for putting aid to foreign needs above starving Americans (you know, like folks still homeless from Katrina ...)

If any international charity recipient does work in Africa or a Muslim country, I think Rush Limbaugh may physically, actually explode, and the birthers will say, "I told you so".

If Obama divvies it up to American domestic charities, he can be pilliored for violating and insulting the world-wide, international scope of the Nobel award.

And any American charity recipients, of course, will be tied, by six degrees Kevin Bacon, to Acorn.

I just dont understand w=where you come up with this stuff? How does that question which is a legit question. You can be partners in an international coalition AND an isolationist country. But somehow I have made your point for you? By asking a question? Arent there rules on a sitting President taking money or gifts? Just asking.

Cannon Shell 10-12-2009 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot
As opposed to our conservative intellectuals, or our conservative non-intellectuals? :rolleyes:

Which are you?

Cannon Shell 10-12-2009 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot
Yeah, we're the big dog. So what? No dispute there.

"Sickening"?? Clearly your attitude is, screw everyone else in the world, friends and allies included.

:tro:

I dont see where he said anything about screwing our allies. That is Obama's mode. See Poland and Israel.

Cannon Shell 10-12-2009 11:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cardus
I am not bothering to read the entire thread, but to the poster who believes that Barrack Hussein Obama's aunt is not here illegally: her asylum application was denied and her appeals were exhausted.

She is here illegally.

Also: every year the prize is given, I wonder: when will the U.S. soldier win the Nobel Peace Prize? No individual (or individual unit of men) has freed more people in history than has the United States soldier.

The Nobel peace prize is a booby prize.

timmgirvan 10-13-2009 12:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
The Nobel peace prize is a booby prize.

True....in order to return it to its' former glory it would have to be given 'en
masse' to the US troops!....Thank you,Cardus:)

Cannon Shell 10-13-2009 10:06 AM

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091013/...el_peace_obama

Jagland singled out Obama's efforts to heal the divide between the West and the Muslim world and scale down a Bush-era proposal for an anti-missile shield in Europe.
"All these things have contributed to — I wouldn't say a safer world — but a world with less tension," Jagland said by phone from Strasbourg, where he was attending meetings in his other role as secretary-general of the Council of Europe.
Aagot Valle, a left-wing Norwegian politician who joined the Nobel panel this year, also dismissed suggestions that the decision to award Obama was without merit.


So missile defense is now a bad thing?

Left wing Norwegian politician's need to remember who protects them from the big, bad wolves of the world.


The left-leaning committee whose members are appointed by the Norwegian Parliament lauded the change in global mood wrought by Obama's calls for peace and cooperation, and praised his pledges to reduce the world stock of nuclear arms, ease U.S. conflicts with Muslim nations and strengthen the country's role in combating climate change

Pretty ironic for a guy who is the leader of a country involved with 2 wars with Muslim countries.

And I still dont know how exactly "climate change" has anything to do with peace.

Riot 10-13-2009 11:46 AM

Quote:

So missile defense is now a bad thing?
Blame the US military, not Obama. Our military are the ones advising Obama to drop it, and shift emphasis on other shortrange missile defense.

Riot 10-13-2009 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
Which are you?

Not someone who is as into insulting other posters here as you are.

Quote:

Ah, a liberal intellectual who doesnt have the necessary components to understand logic, reason or quotations. Pretty common around here.

Cannon Shell 10-13-2009 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot
Blame the US military, not Obama. Our military are the ones advising Obama to drop it, and shift emphasis on other shortrange missile defense.

Funny how the military didnt object till Obama took over. And since when does Obama listen to Military comanders?

Coach Pants 10-13-2009 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot
Not someone who is as into insulting other posters here as you are.

Your mere presence is insulting.

Cannon Shell 10-13-2009 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot
Not someone who is as into insulting other posters here as you are.

Ah, another reference that being called a liberal represents an insult.

Riot 10-13-2009 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
Funny how the military didnt object till Obama took over. And since when does Obama listen to Military comanders?

No, the military has objected since Bush-Cheney.

Obama listened to the military commanders when he gave the order to kill the pirate hijackers.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.