Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Summer Bird pointed for The BC (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=31499)

parsixfarms 09-03-2009 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
Everyone was hurt, no one chose to not go.

Holy Bull passed the BC as a 3YO. If I remember correctly, he was not BC-nominated and Jimmy Croll wasn't going to pay the supplement. He was hurt in the Donn as a 4YO.

King Glorious 09-03-2009 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CSC
He was a good horse but I would never call him great.

I'll never understand how he got HOY. That year, the top older males in the country were, in no order:

Candy Ride
Medaglia d'Oro
Pleasantly Perfect
Congaree
Milwaukee Brew
Mineshaft
Perfect Drift

Mineshaft only faced one of the others (Perfect Drift) and he only faced him once. And he lost.

King Glorious 09-03-2009 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parsixfarms
Holy Bull passed the BC as a 3YO. If I remember correctly, he was not BC-nominated and Jimmy Croll wasn't going to pay the supplement. He was hurt in the Donn as a 4YO.

That's exactly the way it went.

Sightseek 09-03-2009 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious
You can see x-rays of any horse and see something. Mineshaft wasn't hurt. His owner had no intention of sending him to the BC. How is it that you can say you horse's last race will be the JCGC and then after that, say you want to go to the BC but then you come up with an injury that you say was actually there before the BC? Just like Frankel with Sightseek in 2004.

I've spoken with Frankel about Sightseek and you really can't believe how much admiration and love he had for her so I can understand that he'd want to end her career on a brilliant note than possibly recreate her lack of efforts in California. That kind of approach isn't going to win Eclipse awards, but he did what he thought was right for such a wonderful horse.

CSC 09-03-2009 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious
I'll never understand how he got HOY. That year, the top older males in the country were, in no order:

Candy Ride
Medaglia d'Oro
Pleasantly Perfect
Congaree
Milwaukee Brew
Mineshaft
Perfect Drift

Mineshaft only faced one of the others (Perfect Drift) and he only faced him once. And he lost.

Obviously he would have been exposed at SA in the Classic that yr, I never really thought he was anything special. I'm sure some will disagree but his sire career is matching Point Given's to this point, both never participated in the BC. Coincidence...You make the call...

King Glorious 09-03-2009 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sightseek
I've spoken with Frankel about Sightseek and you really can't believe how much admiration and love he had for her so I can understand that he'd want to end her career on a brilliant note than possibly recreate her lack of efforts in California. That kind of approach isn't going to win Eclipse awards, but he did what he thought was right for such a wonderful horse.

Yeah, I know he loved her but he still wasn't honest about things. He had said plenty of times that he wanted to skip the BC with her because of the makeup of the track. I can respect that. If you think it's a situation that won't allow her to do her best, don't put her in it. But what bothered me was how at the end, he started saying he would run her there but then he ran her in the Beldame. Running her in the Beldame wasn't the problem. It was saying afterwards that before the race, he knew she only had one more race in here. Well, if you knew that, then why go in the Beldame instead of the BC? All of this wasn't that big a deal but for me, it just came off disingenious (sp) all of his talk about really considering the BC. Same feeling I got with Mineshaft.

King Glorious 09-03-2009 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CSC
Obviously he would have been exposed at SA in the Classic that yr, I never really thought he was anything special. I'm sure some will disagree but his sire career is matching Point Given's to this point, both never participated in the BC. Coincidence...You make the call...

I never pay any attention to what a horse does after they retire from the track. To me, it has no bearing whatsover on what kind of horse they were.

Cannon Shell 09-03-2009 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dalakhani
Did he injure himself in the JCGC?

He had a spot on the bottom of his cannon bone. No way to determine exactly when it occured, probably a combo of things. He had really bad feet.

CSC 09-03-2009 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious
I never pay any attention to what a horse does after they retire from the track. To me, it has no bearing whatsover on what kind of horse they were.

In some cases it has no bearing, but Medaglia D'oro ran the best race in the Classic that year duelling Congaree who was no slouch through testing fractions to only miss to P Perfect who was a very formidable horse when he was on his game. If we use this race as a snapshot, it wouldn't be a stretch to notice who has become the most prolific sire of the bunch.

Sightseek 09-03-2009 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious
Yeah, I know he loved her but he still wasn't honest about things. He had said plenty of times that he wanted to skip the BC with her because of the makeup of the track. I can respect that. If you think it's a situation that won't allow her to do her best, don't put her in it. But what bothered me was how at the end, he started saying he would run her there but then he ran her in the Beldame. Running her in the Beldame wasn't the problem. It was saying afterwards that before the race, he knew she only had one more race in here. Well, if you knew that, then why go in the Beldame instead of the BC? All of this wasn't that big a deal but for me, it just came off disingenious (sp) all of his talk about really considering the BC. Same feeling I got with Mineshaft.

Because you knew she would absolutely demolish everyone - why have that one last effort be a questionable one?

Cannon Shell 09-03-2009 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious
You can see x-rays of any horse and see something. Mineshaft wasn't hurt. His owner had no intention of sending him to the BC. How is it that you can say you horse's last race will be the JCGC and then after that, say you want to go to the BC but then you come up with an injury that you say was actually there before the BC? Just like Frankel with Sightseek in 2004.

Dude The horse had a totally legit injury. I am vouching for it personally. Call me a liar if you'd like but it was legit.

Cannon Shell 09-03-2009 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CSC
He was a good horse but I would never call him great.

Neither would I

Cannon Shell 09-03-2009 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parsixfarms
Holy Bull passed the BC as a 3YO. If I remember correctly, he was not BC-nominated and Jimmy Croll wasn't going to pay the supplement. He was hurt in the Donn as a 4YO.

He wasnt going to pay but he was very sore. If you saw him train that Winter you would have thought he was a 10 claimer.

randallscott35 09-03-2009 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
Dude The horse had a totally legit injury. I am vouching for it personally. Call me a liar if you'd like but it was legit.

Thank you. Love the stones that people throw at Mineshaft. Fact is, he was the one who was ducked all along that year. And his loss to Perfect Drift in the SF was the fastest race ever run up to that point on Thorograph for a trainer in Howard I have the utmost respect for and believe is clean.

Cannon Shell 09-03-2009 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by randallscott35
Thank you. Love the stones that people throw at Mineshaft. Fact is, he was the one who was ducked all along that year. And his loss to Perfect Drift in the SF was the fastest race ever run up to that point on Thorograph for a trainer in Howard I have the utmost respect for and believe is clean.

That was a horrific ride by Albarado I believe.

King Glorious 09-03-2009 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
Dude The horse had a totally legit injury. I am vouching for it personally. Call me a liar if you'd like but it was legit.

I don't think that disagreeing with you is calling you a liar. You know what you know and I know what I think. I didn't believe it then and I don't believe it now. Well, let me amend that some. I do believe that he had physical issues that were present. But the knee stuff was there several races before the last one and they knew it and said it. That's why they said ahead of time that he would not be running in the Classic. Then they all of a sudden start saying he will run in the Classic and then bow out due to an injury......that they said he had been running with all along. What I'm saying is not that I don't think he had it but that it's something they could have dealt with because they had been dealing with it.

Cannon Shell 09-03-2009 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious
I don't think that disagreeing with you is calling you a liar. You know what you know and I know what I think. I didn't believe it then and I don't believe it now. Well, let me amend that some. I do believe that he had physical issues that were present. But the knee stuff was there several races before the last one and they knew it and said it. That's why they said ahead of time that he would not be running in the Classic. Then they all of a sudden start saying he will run in the Classic and then bow out due to an injury......that they said he had been running with all along. What I'm saying is not that I don't think he had it but that it's something they could have dealt with because they had been dealing with it.

You are basing your theory on hypothetical things reported in the media. I am basing it on what I actually saw with my own eyes, heard with my own ears and based upon my own experience with similar injuries. It really doesnt matter what we think but you are wrong to assume that this wasnt a totally legitimate decision based on a real injury. It was.

King Glorious 09-03-2009 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
That was a horrific ride by Albarado I believe.

Albarado certainly didn't do him any favors in that race and I don't think it was a bad effort by Mineshaft at all. I think Randall makes a good point about him being ducked. When you run in races like the JCGC and the Woodward and Foster, you can't be accused of ducking anyone. BUT.......BUT.........that doesn't change the fact and the fact is that all of the others faced each other and most of them did so several times and the fact is that Mineshaft only faced one of the others that would be considered in the top seven and bad ride or not, he lost his only matchup with an elite horse that year.

King Glorious 09-03-2009 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
You are basing your theory on hypothetical things reported in the media. I am basing it on what I actually saw with my own eyes, heard with my own ears and based upon my own experience with similar injuries. It really doesnt matter what we think but you are wrong to assume that this wasnt a totally legitimate decision based on a real injury. It was.

Why then, was he able to run in the Woodward and the JCGC with the chips but couldn't run in the BC?

Cannon Shell 09-03-2009 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious
Why then, was he able to run in the Woodward and the JCGC with the chips but couldn't run in the BC?

The horse had a possible stress fracture. The chips werent the only issues he had


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:09 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.