Originally Posted by justindew

I think if you had been able to make this argument to Anderson and Gomez, they likely would have landed on Dunkirk. I doubt they considered any of the above.

Originally Posted by stonegossard

Justin,

You cemented yourself in the idiot hall of fame last year. After you came out of hiding (that was impressive on your part, really...you were wrong , so you high tailed it........reather gutless on your part) you still have not lost your lock on moronic commentary on here.

The fact that you have some kind of horse racing blog on here shows just have far the internet has gone. Scary.

Keep up the good work.

Originally Posted by stonegossard

Please....he barely lost to Quality Road on a speed favoring track. QR had a MUCH easier trip that day, and Dunkirk still gave him a run for his money. POTN beat IWR, who is a very nice horse, no doubt. Is he better than Quality Road, not so sure. Papa Clem beat an injured horse who was not gonna get the distance at OP, and behind that a bunch of real bad horses.

In my opinion Gomez chose a horse who is unproven on dirt and will be a question mark getting the distance. That's where I believe he made the mistake.


Hey, I hope the betting public hammers POTN,IWR, and Papa Clem. That way I will get a good price on Dunkirk.

Originally Posted by stonegossard

Ok genius. Where does Gomez plan on riding most of the year? If you can figure that out then the next question. Who has a bigger presence in that area ?

Ya think that had something to do with his decision ?

Originally Posted by ezgoerbaby

Dunkirk is going to take a ton of money and he is going to need EVERYTHING to go perfectly. I question Dunkirk's ability to get 1 1/4, especially with the way he looked after the FL derby...looked like he was going to collapse. I will admit though...he's a game SOB...he kept on trying.

Originally Posted by stonegossard

How do you figure Dunkirk will take a lot of money? Based on Pletcher's record in the derby ?

While will he need everything to go perfectly? Not sure what you are getting at. I think the other 19 horses would also need things to go their way to win.

Originally Posted by justindew

So, the fact that I was wrong about the state of the American economy is somehow an indictment on the entire internet because I have a blog that people read? Interesting logic.

And yes, as soon as I realized the economy was heading south, I said to myself "Ya know, I probably should stay away from DerbyTrail.com for a while."

Also, you are an idiot.

Originally Posted by stonegossard

Apparently you did because you were nowhere to be seen. You wouldn't shut up about how wrong I was. Your argument about the DJIA was HYSTERICALLY wrong. But that isn't an area you have a clue about so I shouldn't be tough on you with that I guess.


My point is, with the freedom of the internet, any idiot like yourself can start a blog.

Your little horsey bog is cute.....really.

Originally Posted by King Glorious

None of this changes the fact that Dunkirk has not come close to beating a better field of horses than Pioneer has. The one horse of quality that he faced, he lost to. The horses behind him that day and in his first two wins weren't better than what Pioneer has faced. Now, if you wanted to compare what Pioneer has defeated to what Quality Road has defeated, your argument would have more relevance. But to compare it to what Dunkirk has beaten is kinda....no, very.....stupid.

Originally Posted by justindew

I think my work is done here.

Originally Posted by justindew

Who cares? The point is that you said POTN had beaten "horrendous" fields this year. A statement you later retracted.

As usual, the longer you run your mouth, the more you confuse yourself.

Originally Posted by stonegossard

Back into hiding already?

That didn't take too long.

Originally Posted by justindew

I think my work is done here.

Originally Posted by justindew

True. Any idiot can start a blog. But it takes a special kind of idiot to question whether or not Dunkirk will take money, especially considering his Pool 3 odds, when his Derby status was questionable at best.

Originally Posted by justindew

Oh, I won't be hiding. I have a blog on KentuckyDerby.com that's really cute. Remember?

Originally Posted by stonegossard

I was being sarcastic you moron I am sorry you didn't catch on. I have to dumb things down when posting to you I guess.

Originally Posted by stonegossard

What are the qualifications to have a "blog" on there besides a keyboard and a pulse rate?

Originally Posted by stonegossard

Who will offer better value? Dunkirk or POTN ?

Originally Posted by stonegossard

How do you figure Dunkirk will take a lot of money? Based on Pletcher's record in the derby ?

While will he need everything to go perfectly? Not sure what you are getting at. I think the other 19 horses would also need things to go their way to win.