Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   hard spun ..impressed..not really (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=11171)

jpops757 03-25-2007 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sightseek
I don't think people are knocking SS for his trips and resulting victories, but rather are saying that he got the edge over Any Given Saturday. Having the edge of being willing to cut inside horses is a positive in my mind...but it doesn't always mean you were the best horse in the race.

A lot of the so called better horses arent good enough to take advantage of the inside holes. What I cant understand is why cant a horse that makes a good trip cant be the best horse. AGS was in front of SS but chose to go outside so why say he got the worse trip. Maybe his rider didnt have the horse to take the inside.

Sightseek 03-25-2007 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jpops757
A lot of the so called better horses arent good enough to take advantage of the inside holes. What I cant understand is why cant a horse that makes a good trip cant be the best horse. AGS was in front of SS but chose to go outside so why say he got the worse trip. Maybe his rider didnt have the horse to take the inside.

I guess if you believe Borel that he had a lot more horse under him that could very well be the case. I don't mean to sound as if I am personally knocking Street, both horses ran tremendously.

Danzig 03-25-2007 07:12 PM

so glad to see hard spun came back with a win. was hoping his first loss a few weeks ago was an anomaly.

slotdirt 03-26-2007 08:56 AM

Glad to see the insight on Hard Spun here. This has been my personal Derby favorite from the get-go, so from that stand point I'm glad to see he's probably going to have the earnings to get in the race. I'll be interested to see how he runs in the Blue Grass against what looks to be a loaded field. If he runs well, that will be one short price on Derby day.

philcski 03-26-2007 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
The post is not a bad one at Turfway and the being 3 wide in routes is not bad either. The track plays almost opposite of a regular dirt track.

Cannon, recheck your stats on this one. The outside posts (10,11,12) in routes are something like 6 for 100 this year... not GP bad but pretty tough. In sprints, outside seems to be better, or at least fair, however.

I was super impressed by this performance. I know the Polytrack throws a lot of indifference into people's analysis, but it's not like he hasn't run well on traditional dirt. No matter what the surface, he was 3 wide on a solid pace and ran away when asked. The field was spread out behind him- it was a good 10-12 lengths back to 4th place... the mark of a REALLY good performance.

I couldn't kill Pino for being 3-4 wide at Oaklawn. There was nowhere to go, and why sacrifice the horse in that race when there are bigger and better objectives down the road? Take it as a learning experience, pick up a small check, and try again.

slotdirt 03-26-2007 10:40 AM

I always think it's funny this time of the year to see how high or how low folks get on particular horses based on single performances.

I will say this: we haven't had a Derby winner from the Blue Grass in forever (or so it at least seems that way); this year's edition could certainly break that trend.

jjf1031 03-26-2007 10:47 AM

I was in the boat of throwing out the Arkansas race just based on it being one poor effort. However by the same token Saturdays race also needs to be taken with a grain of salt because of the fact that it was over Polytrack and I still hold the belief this horses future is on grass. And as we have seen the correlation between turf horses running strongly on Polytack has proven true (Sedgefield in the same race)

Cajungator26 03-26-2007 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jjf1031
I was in the boat of throwing out the Arkansas race just based on it being one poor effort. However by the same token Saturdays race also needs to be taken with a grain of salt because of the fact that it was over Polytrack and I still hold the belief this horses future is on grass. And as we have seen the correlation between turf horses running strongly on Polytack has proven true (Sedgefield in the same race)

Hard Spun has done well on dirt as well, though.

There was more than just one horse in the Lane's End with a turfy pedigree and most didn't run a lick. Why do you think that Hard Spun has a future on the turf?

jjf1031 03-26-2007 11:00 AM

Love Danzigs on turf. And did not mean that he was a Polytrack Wonder so to speak, just that the effort doe snot mean he once again steps to the upper echelon of 3YO class anymore than one poor effort in Arkansas would move him down. I have maintained him in the 6 or 7 slot in my Top 10 since day one and he remains there still

saucon17 03-26-2007 11:05 AM

Gotta love those a Pa. Breds:D :D
If I'm not mistaken I think Danzig was also a Pa. Bred

Cajungator26 03-26-2007 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saucon17
Gotta love those a Pa. Breds:D :D
If I'm not mistaken I think Danzig was also a Pa. Bred

So is Great Hunter. :D

Those are two horses that actually have very legit chances in the derby. Wouldn't it be interesting if another PA bred won the derby? :eek:

declansharbor 03-26-2007 11:46 AM

Pennsylvania has become the haven for derby horses... NOt really ,but i would love to think so myself... I'm actually shocked to see Hard Spun bounce back like that...I for one tried to beat him Saturday. Couldnt care less about the money i lost on him, just glad to see him back in the big picture... QUICK QUESTION.. If John Servis was still conditioning, would they have left Oaklawn for Turfway???

Samarta 03-26-2007 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by declansharbor
Pennsylvania has become the haven for derby horses... NOt really ,but i would love to think so myself... I'm actually shocked to see Hard Spun bounce back like that...I for one tried to beat him Saturday. Couldnt care less about the money i lost on him, just glad to see him back in the big picture... QUICK QUESTION.. If John Servis was still conditioning, would they have left Oaklawn for Turfway???

based on the reason of Hard Spun not liking the surface....sure he would have left....

smartyalex 03-26-2007 07:02 PM

The horse seemed to work just fine at Oaklawn before his loss. So he wins on the poly at Turfway and all the sudden Jones is a friggin genius. Come on!

whodey17 03-26-2007 07:09 PM

I think hard Spun had a very impressive performance. We saw the horse rate which is fantastic. This is something that I have been waiting to see from this horse. Quay and Sense come from the clouds. Hard Spun will get a nice trip in the Derby right behind all the speed. There are only a couple of horses that have his running style this year. I really like Hard Spun's chances in the Derby.

horseofcourse 03-27-2007 06:45 AM

I liked the race by Hard Spun. He is a legitimate contender. It's not a requirement to win every Derby prep for the most part. He is a top 10 3 yr old without question in my opinion. Based on what I've seen, there is no way I could rate him below a horse like Nobiz Like Shobiz for example. And that one sits high on most lists. Sets up the Blue Grass nicely, which may be a better race than the Ky Derby. It is one of the strongest Derby preps I remember in recent years. Made more interesting by the fact that Any Given Saturday probably needs a top 2 finish to get the required earnings to earn a spot in the Ky Derby. Any prep with 4 of the top 8 3 yr olds is certainly a must see. And I think that's what you got that race.

Danzig 03-27-2007 07:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smartyalex
The horse seemed to work just fine at Oaklawn before his loss. So he wins on the poly at Turfway and all the sudden Jones is a friggin genius. Come on!

well, since he came out of the race healthy, the trip wasn't bad, he didn't entrap, didn't bobble the start--what excuse is left but he didn't like the track?
besides, horses work well quite often and then stink on race day. who knows, maybe the surface changed between work and race.
at any rate, he only ever lost at oaklawn--so i'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt.
altho, there's always the oh so truthful we don't know what happened, he just lost line...

JJP 03-27-2007 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jpops757
A lot of the so called better horses arent good enough to take advantage of the inside holes. What I cant understand is why cant a horse that makes a good trip cant be the best horse. AGS was in front of SS but chose to go outside so why say he got the worse trip. Maybe his rider didnt have the horse to take the inside.

If SS ran the better race than AGS, he would've won by more than 1 inch. When two horses finish an inch apart, one closing on a fast pace while saving every inch of ground while the other is closer to the fast pace and goes wide on the second turn, I don't think its hard to see why most feel AGS ran the superior race.

jpops757 03-27-2007 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJP
If SS ran the better race than AGS, he would've won by more than 1 inch. When two horses finish an inch apart, one closing on a fast pace while saving every inch of ground while the other is closer to the fast pace and goes wide on the second turn, I don't think its hard to see why most feel AGS ran the superior race.

Did you see the race? The inside was there but he chose to go outside. AGS was ahead of SS and chose to go outside. How can you say AGS was better mthan SS.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.