Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=41025)

Riot 02-23-2011 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell (Post 755718)
I believe what he is saying is that the teachers are paid with taxpayer money AND before they get paid, their union dues are taken out of their checks involuntarily because they are forced currently to be in the union.

But that's not true. The employee's pay is determined - and the union dues are taken out of the employees gross pay (just like taxes) before the paycheck is handed to them. No work, no pay, no union dues.

Nobody is making the claim that an employees federal and state tax withholdings are "my taxpayer's money". They can't. That's absurd.

Employees are not forced into anything. They are free to take a teaching job where they don't have to be in a union. That's known up front, before the employee signs their hiring contract.

Look: Wiphan appears not to like (and he can correct me if it's wrong) that unions donate to Democratic candidates. But the argument "that is my taxpayer's money!" is completely and obviously false. It's the employee's money.

The Koch brothers don't like that either - hence the concerted, across the country word was handed out at the Republican Governors Association meeting to bust the unions. And meanwhile, back in Congress, we have Republican congressmen trying to loosen rules governing workplace safety, trying to lowering the minimum wage, etc. Look like unions shouldn't go anywhere soon. Unions don't get a hold in places where workers feel fairly treated by their employers.

Cannon Shell 02-23-2011 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 755723)
But that's not true. The employee's pay is determined - and the union dues are taken out of the employees gross pay (just like taxes) before the paycheck is handed to them. No work, no pay, no union dues.

Nobody is making the claim that an employees federal and state tax withholdings are "my taxpayer's money". They can't. That's absurd.

Employees are not forced into anything. They are free to take a teaching job where they don't have to be in a union. That's known up front, before the employee signs their hiring contract.

Look: Wiphan appears not to like (and he can correct me if it's wrong) that unions donate to Democratic candidates. But the argument "that is my taxpayer's money!" is completely and obviously false. It's the employee's money.

The Koch brothers don't like that either - hence the concerted, across the country word was handed out at the Republican Governors Association meeting to bust the unions. And meanwhile, back in Congress, we have Republican congressmen trying to loosen rules governing workplace safety, trying to lowering the minimum wage, etc. Look like unions shouldn't go anywhere soon. Unions don't get a hold in places where workers feel fairly treated by their employers.

Union dues are not taxes. They are taken out of their paychecks, they are involuntary. Saying that they can teach somewhere else is laughable. Techers teach where they can get a job. And since the vast majority of jobs are public school aka union jobs that is where they work. Unions dont want teachers or any other members the right to opt out or not be in the union.

Riot 02-23-2011 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell (Post 755730)
Union dues are not taxes. They are taken out of their paychecks, they are involuntary. Saying that they can teach somewhere else is laughable. Techers teach where they can get a job. And since the vast majority of jobs are public school aka union jobs that is where they work. Unions dont want teachers or any other members the right to opt out or not be in the union.

Teacher works.
Teacher earns money.
Teacher gets paycheck.
That money belongs to the teacher.

Union dues come out of that paycheck.

Taxpayers thinking they have a right to say what union dues money is spent upon is ... beyond absurd. They have zero claim to that. Just like they have zero claim on the employee choosing to send $1 of their tax money to a wildlife fund.

Teachers are free agents. They have every right not to take a job where they have to join a teachers union. Private schools pay about 5% more in pay and benefits than Wisconsin public schools.

Trying to make the argument that union-busting is for the benefit of the employees is touching, but completely unbelievable :rolleyes:

Although it is nice to see, now that the union has agreed to all Walkers demands regarding pension contribution, pay cut, etc., yet Walker is going forward with his main concern, being busting the unions (as verified by his unbelievable silliness in sharing his plan for threatening workers with the imaginary "David Koch") - that it's crystal clear the whole point of this has less to do with budget deficits (like maybe caused by Walker giving $140 million in unfunded tax credits to business, oh wow, that's a huge deficit hole that could be filled by ... teacher pensions and pay cuts! But the damn unions are standing in the way ... hummmmm) and everything to do with typical Republican demagogary.

Riot 02-23-2011 07:31 PM

And there's more about power-hungry Gov. Walker and his bills
 
This gets better and better every hour. God, I love politics :p

I thought the highlight was Walkers tape today, revealing how he planned to trick Democrats under the false ruse of them coming back and "talking to them", so the Republicans could vote for the legislation withhout the Dems.

Or how he's trying to find out if he can charge the Dems with a felony regarding who could be paying for their hotel rooms (as he withholds their paychecks to be picked up personally in Wisconsin to try and get them back to the state) but wait, there's more fun here! :D

Gov. Walker tried to ram this bill through quickly, with little exam of the 144-page bill, little debate and scrutiny. Now we have a third reason why:

1. Hidden union-busting provisions
2. Hidden proviso allowing state government to sell off their state-owned electrical utilities to any chosen private company with no competitive bidding (like Koch brothers electric)

And number three hidden in the bill (reported today courtesy Amanda Turkel):

3. "The bill would grant the Wisconsin Department of Health Services (DHS) sweeping authority to making changes to the state's Medicaid program -- which covers one in five residents -- with virtually no public scrutiny. According to an analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Fiscal Bureau, Walker's plan would use "emergency" powers to allow DHS to restrict eligibility, raise premiums and change reimbursements -- all moves traditionally controlled by the legislature."

Walker is all about the power of doing it all himself, isn't he? He doesn't need any steenkin' legislature to enact laws!

Thank you, Wisconsin voters - Sarah Palin may be gone, but now we have this guy for our entertainment pleasure :-)

wiphan 02-23-2011 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 755734)
Teacher works.
Teacher earns money.
Teacher gets paycheck.
That money belongs to the teacher.

Union dues come out of that paycheck.

Taxpayers thinking they have a right to say what union dues money is spent upon is ... beyond absurd. They have zero claim to that. Just like they have zero claim on the employee choosing to send $1 of their tax money to a wildlife fund.

Teachers are free agents. They have every right not to take a job where they have to join a teachers union. Private schools pay about 5% more in pay and benefits than Wisconsin public schools.

Trying to make the argument that union-busting is for the benefit of the employees is touching, but completely unbelievable :rolleyes:

Although it is nice to see, now that the union has agreed to all Walkers demands regarding pension contribution, pay cut, etc., yet Walker is going forward with his main concern, being busting the unions (as verified by his unbelievable silliness in sharing his plan for threatening workers with the imaginary "David Koch") - that it's crystal clear the whole point of this has less to do with budget deficits (like maybe caused by Walker giving $140 million in unfunded tax credits to business, oh wow, that's a huge deficit hole that could be filled by ... teacher pensions and pay cuts! But the damn unions are standing in the way ... hummmmm) and everything to do with typical Republican demagogary.

Can you outline to me the demands that the teachers union has agreed to and please give me specifics?

Riot 02-23-2011 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wiphan (Post 755750)
Can you outline to me the demands that the teachers union has agreed to and please give me specifics?

Just read any detailed news reports, or view any video of the union leaders, from the past week not labeled "Fox". I'm sure you'd rather do your own investigative digging on this story, so you have the true facts, and not rely upon my interpretation relaying it to you :-)

wiphan 02-23-2011 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 755752)
Just read any detailed news reports, or view any video of the union leaders, from the past week not labeled "Fox". I'm sure you'd rather do your own investigative digging on this story, so you have the true facts, and not rely upon my interpretation relaying it to you :-)

No I want to know from you specifically what demands of Scott Walker have the teachers union specifically agreed to? You seem to know so much about the topic and have so much information I want to know from you since you stated that the teachers union have agreed to his demands other than collective bargaining. What have they agreed to?

Riot 02-23-2011 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wiphan (Post 755765)
No I want to know from you specifically what demands of Scott Walker have the teachers union specifically agreed to? You seem to know so much about the topic and have so much information I want to know from you since you stated that the teachers union have agreed to his demands other than collective bargaining. What have they agreed to?

Oh, then go read your own post back at the start of this thread, where you outlined them :)

joeydb 02-24-2011 07:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell (Post 755730)
Union dues are not taxes. They are taken out of their paychecks, they are involuntary. Saying that they can teach somewhere else is laughable. Techers teach where they can get a job. And since the vast majority of jobs are public school aka union jobs that is where they work. Unions dont want teachers or any other members the right to opt out or not be in the union.

Taxes are also involuntary...

SOREHOOF 02-24-2011 08:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 755734)
Teacher works.
Teacher earns money.
Teacher gets paycheck.
That money belongs to the teacher.

Union dues come out of that paycheck.

Taxpayers thinking they have a right to say what union dues money is spent upon is ... beyond absurd. They have zero claim to that. Just like they have zero claim on the employee choosing to send $1 of their tax money to a wildlife fund.

Teachers are free agents. They have every right not to take a job where they have to join a teachers union. Private schools pay about 5% more in pay and benefits than Wisconsin public schools.

Trying to make the argument that union-busting is for the benefit of the employees is touching, but completely unbelievable :rolleyes:

Although it is nice to see, now that the union has agreed to all Walkers demands regarding pension contribution, pay cut, etc., yet Walker is going forward with his main concern, being busting the unions (as verified by his unbelievable silliness in sharing his plan for threatening workers with the imaginary "David Koch") - that it's crystal clear the whole point of this has less to do with budget deficits (like maybe caused by Walker giving $140 million in unfunded tax credits to business, oh wow, that's a huge deficit hole that could be filled by ... teacher pensions and pay cuts! But the damn unions are standing in the way ... hummmmm) and everything to do with typical Republican demagogary.

Is it absurd to think that the taxpayers should have some say in how much the teachers are paid in the first place? You mention the public teachers make 5% less than what private schools teachers make. Does that include benefits? That is what this is about. Are the public teachers not free to get a job at a private school?

wiphan 02-24-2011 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 755779)
Oh, then go read your own post back at the start of this thread, where you outlined them :)

Since you don't want to answer my first question I will try another one. What would be the reaction of the federal employees if President Obama proposed the same changes to federal employees that Scott Walker is proposing to WI state employees? Would there be as much outrage?

Riot 02-24-2011 09:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SOREHOOF (Post 755821)
Is it absurd to think that the taxpayers should have some say in how much the teachers are paid in the first place?

You do. You always have. It's called collective bargaining.

Quote:

You mention the public teachers make 5% less than what private schools teachers make. Does that include benefits?
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezr...and_local.html

Quote:

Consider this analysis the Economic Policy Institute conducted comparing total compensation -- that is to say, wages and health-care benefits and pensions -- among public and private workers in Wisconsin. To get an apples-to-apples comparison, the study's author controlled for experience, organizational size, gender, race, ethnicity, citizenship and disability, and then sorted the results by education. Here's what he got:



If you prefer it in non-graph form: "Wisconsin public-sector workers face an annual compensation penalty of 11%. Adjusting for the slightly fewer hours worked per week on average, these public workers still face a compensation penalty of 5% for choosing to work in the public sector."

Riot 02-24-2011 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wiphan (Post 755853)
Since you don't want to answer my first question I will try another one. What would be the reaction of the federal employees if President Obama proposed the same changes to federal employees that Scott Walker is proposing to WI state employees? Would there be as much outrage?

I'm happy to answer your first question, except your deliberate and silly obtuseness is a waste of time - go read your own post where you accurately outlined what was in the Walker package regarding benefit and pension cuts. You know what they are. The unions have repeatedly, publicly agreed to those. They have agreed to everything but removal of collective bargaining rights. Walker refuses to compromise with them. He has stated so publicly when directly confronted by reporters asking about the union compromises.

Does it bother you, the other significant and important things hidden within that 144-page bill? That Walker is legally taking supervision and responsibility away from the legislature and consolidating them, without supervision, within the governors' office?

Such as the "emergency measures" regarding a new unilateral right of only himself to determine public aid qualifications, amounts paid outside the public or legislature?

The new singular ability of only himself to lease or sell, for whatever amount he wants, your state utility companies?

Do you think that is a good thing, that Walker is taking those activities away from current control by the legislature? That a Governor is trying to pass law to decrease the normal Legislative branch representation and control over major, expensive, important programs and income for your state, and place all of it, unsupervised and unaccountable, in the hands of one person who has to answer to no one else?

I'm shocked that everyone in Wisconsin, from any and all political persuasions, isn't angrily marching on the state capital and telling Walker he wasn't elected dictator, over the other secret hidden stuff, above, in that falsely alleged "fiscal" bill.

I'm sure if federal employees faced the sudden and complete loss of their right to collectively bargain, they'd behave exactly as union members in Wisconsin, Ohio and Indiana are acting right now.

wiphan 02-24-2011 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 756038)
I'm happy to answer your first question, except your deliberate and silly obtuseness is a waste of time - go read your own post where you accurately outlined what was in the Walker package regarding benefit and pension cuts. You know what they are. The unions have repeatedly, publicly agreed to those. They have agreed to everything but removal of collective bargaining rights. Walker refuses to compromise with them. He has stated so publicly.

I'm sure if federal employees faced the sudden and complete loss of their right to collectively bargain, they'd act exactly as union members in Wisconsin, Ohio and Indiana are acting right now.

Since federal employees don't have the right to collective bargain for wages, benefits, etc. they would be elated if they had the benefits Scott walker is proposing for state workers. If collective bargaining doesn't exist on the federal level why does it need to exist on the state level? Actually in Walker's proposal the union still has the right to collective bargain for wages. I don't see federal workers complaining about their jobs, benefits, heallthcare premiums, working conditions, etc.

Riot 02-24-2011 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wiphan (Post 756039)
Since federal employees don't have the right to collective bargain for wages, benefits, etc. they would be elated if they had the benefits Scott walker is proposing for state workers.

The TSA doesn't have collective bargaining? I believe they do (but may be wrong). The rest of the federal government is indeed highly unionized in some sectors, although the Federal Government is "right to work"

Quote:

If collective bargaining doesn't exist on the federal level why does it need to exist on the state level?
Why shouldn't it exist on a state level? It's the states that entered into these agreements, too. The states gain by collective bargaining, that's shown by how their workers tend to get less than the private sector in nearly every case.

State workers have every right to collectively bargain. What are the reasons NOT to allow it? Especially when the current Republican House is trying to decrease minimum wage, decrease workplace protections (EPA and OSHA) Looks like unions may become more necessary if the GOP has their way with the current law.


Quote:

Actually in Walker's proposal the union still has the right to collective bargain for wages.
No. They only have the ability to collectively bargain for wages only up to the CPI, which makes the value of that pennies.

Why are you ignoring the rest of what is in the Walker bill? That's some damn important stuff he's trying to sneak on through.

Danzig 02-24-2011 10:12 PM

tsa has limited bargaining rights. treasury has a union-not sure who else is covered.

Riot 02-24-2011 10:29 PM

Wisconsin State Senator Tim Carpenter sends a letter to Walker, calls for his resignation:

http://wispolitics.com/1006/large/11...ter_letter.pdf

Quote:

Dear Governor Walker,

I am informed that a tape recording has been released in which you apparently held an extensive discussion with someone you believed to be your campaign supporter, David Koch. The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel states that the caller was actually a reporter, pretending to be David Koch, and it has posted a transcript of the recording. It appears that you admit the call occurred, and have not contested the authenticity of transcript.

David Koch is the billionaire businessman who reportedly contributed thousands to your campaign and who the media claims is a key source of funding for shadowy political groups that spend hundreds of thousands of dollars attacking your political adversaries in our state.

At a historic moment in our State’s history, brought on by your refusal to compromise with elected officials regarding the elimination of worker’s rights, you still refuse to talk with Democratic legislators. However, you apparently have no problem taking a phone call from “Mr. Koch” and to:

• Discuss your strategy to lay off public workers to seek partisan advantage to pass
your agenda;
• Discuss your plan to lure Democratic legislators to the Capitol on the pretext of
negotiation, but then state that you would never actually negotiate;
• Discuss your plan to use the pretext of negotiation to get a quorum for legislative
fiscal action that Republicans so far have not been able to do;
• Discuss that you considered the “planting” of paid troublemakers into the
peaceful protests at our Capitol; and to
• Give your enthusiastic acceptance to an offer from “Koch” to fly you out on a vacation to show you a “good time” once you “crush these bastards.” Your response was “That would be outstanding…” Given that Koch’s businesses could reap vast rewards with the ‘no bid’ sale of the Wisconsin’s power plants that you propose in your budget repair bill, this response is severely troubling.

Governor Walker, this tape would make Richard Nixon blush. If the recording and the items discussed by you are indeed your plans, you have no business being in public office in our State, and should resign.

Sincerely,

Tim Carpenter
http://host.madison.com/wsj/news/loc...cc4c002e0.html

Quote:

Madison's mayor and police chief Thursday called on Gov. Scott Walker to explain statements he made in a secretly recorded phone conversation that he "thought about" planting troublemakers among the thousands of demonstrators at the Capitol.

"Someone in his inner circle raised seriously the possibility of hiring people to come in and apparently create violence in my city," Mayor Dave Cieslewicz said. "I find it appalling, and I want to know who that was."

wiphan 02-24-2011 11:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig (Post 756042)
tsa has limited bargaining rights. treasury has a union-not sure who else is covered.

TSA does not have collective bargaining rights

wiphan 02-24-2011 11:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 756041)
The TSA doesn't have collective bargaining? I believe they do (but may be wrong). The rest of the federal government is indeed highly unionized in some sectors, although the Federal Government is "right to work"



Why shouldn't it exist on a state level? It's the states that entered into these agreements, too. The states gain by collective bargaining, that's shown by how their workers tend to get less than the private sector in nearly every case.

State workers have every right to collectively bargain. What are the reasons NOT to allow it? Especially when the current Republican House is trying to decrease minimum wage, decrease workplace protections (EPA and OSHA) Looks like unions may become more necessary if the GOP has their way with the current law.




No. They only have the ability to collectively bargain for wages only up to the CPI, which makes the value of that pennies.

Why are you ignoring the rest of what is in the Walker bill? That's some damn important stuff he's trying to sneak on through.

What is your solution to the budget deficit in WI? Do u borrow more $ or raise taxes like IL just did. Do u end up like CA begging for donations to keep schools running? Please offer me your solutions and by saying that you just agree to the contributions to pension and healthcare is not a viable solution. What do u propose?

wiphan 02-25-2011 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 756041)

Why shouldn't it exist on a state level? It's the states that entered into these agreements, too. The states gain by collective bargaining, that's shown by how their workers tend to get less than the private sector in nearly every case.

State workers have every right to collectively bargain. What are the reasons NOT to allow it? Especially when the current Republican House is trying to decrease minimum wage, decrease workplace protections (EPA and OSHA) Looks like unions may become more necessary if the GOP has their way with the current law..[/b]


If you do not limit collective bargaining with the teachers union then there is no negiotiating with them. If the teachers union had in the last 30 yrs actually given on some items we would not be in this situation. They have a monopoly. Do you know who the healthcare provider is for the teachers in WI? It is WEAT trust ie.- the teachers union plan. If you government were allowed to shop this plan with the same benefits they could save millions of dollars to the tax payers. The teachers union would not allow it. The average time to negotiate a contract with the teachers union is 15 months. Since Gov Doyle and the democrats put us in this situation and used Pres Obama's stimulus $ to fill the holes of the budget instead of create stimulus/jobs we do not have 15 months unless you would like to see mass layoffs. It is your choice either pass the bill or people lose jobs.

The people of WI voted last November. Our state is a tax hell. Most teachers when they retire (which they get the average of their last 3 yrs pay for lifetime and if they die their surving spoust gets it) move out of state because of the tax issues. WI people are tired of paying taxes, seeing corporations move large portions of their operations (Harley, Miller/Coors, etc.). Increases taxes does not create revenue and is not a viable long term solution since it is a never ending cycle since no revenue is created. Gov Walker is not a dictator. He is doing what he was elected to do by the people of WI. He won easily and ran on the very campaign items that he is doing today. Unlike most politicians he puts his $ where his mouth is. Elections have consequences as we all know.

Just to give you an example of the taxes a typical home married tax payer who owns a $200k house in Milwaukee and makes $75k annually pays in WI taxes not including federal taxes

Sales tax 5.1%
$5200 annual property taxes
$6318 state income tax

WI is a great state, but a tax hell and things need to change otherwise we will end up like MI

geeker2 02-25-2011 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wiphan (Post 756049)
What is your solution to the budget deficit in WI? Do u borrow more $ or raise taxes like IL just did. Do u end up like CA begging for donations to keep schools running? Please offer me your solutions and by saying that you just agree to the contributions to pension and healthcare is not a viable solution. What do u propose?

Tax the Rich - they need to pay more ! They "earned" it on the backs of the poor working middle class and come on let's face it they really didn't earn it,so it's not really theirs anyway.

Tax the Corporations - they are making too much money and there is proof that they are just stock piling their profits. It's really the peoples money, we just need to get our hands on it and get it into the government agencies so they can use it to the betterment of the middle class.



:rolleyes:

Riot 02-25-2011 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wiphan (Post 756069)
If the teachers union had in the last 30 yrs actually given on some items we would not be in this situation.

:zz: You're not saying that the unions have caused the budget deficits, I hope. That's certainly not true.

Wisconsin had a $136 million surplus this year, until Walker gave $140 million of unfunded tax incentives to corporations in his first month of office.

There is a 3.6 billion deficit projected over the next few years, which is far less than the 5.something billion deficit the last governor dealt with. In other words, there is no drastic or acute emergency right now as Walker maintains. That's a lie.

Walker has instituted this "budget repair bill", but there isn't enough deficit to trigger the need for a "repair bill" according to Wisconsin's own independent office of budget that consults to the state assemblies (repair bill is a technical term)

Since 1981, 2/3 of Wisconsin's corporations no longer pay any taxes at all.

Think that could be affecting state finances?

Maybe corporations could start paying some taxes. Rather than putting all taxes on working people.

This bill isn't about the deficit at all. It's just about union busting, and everyone knows it, even the Republicans now say that (as revealed on Walkers tape with "Koch" - will is leading to ethics violation charges for him)

Riot 02-25-2011 01:05 PM

Republican Assembly sneaks through vote - unbelievable
 
The Wisconsin Senators are still refusing to come home so a vote can be held (especially as Walker revealed on the phone call with "Koch" that he intended to trick them by lying to them about talking of compromise) So this bill is not yet passed, as it needs the Senate to pass it.

But the Republicans in the Assembly, late last night, while debate was literally going on on the floor quickly sneaked and gaveled a voice vote and passed the bill literally in seconds The Dems were not told a vote would be called, the GOP was. Most Dems didn't even get to vote, although they were all in attendance literally standing on the floor waiting to speak.

While they were still debating amendments, the speaker literally and suddenly out of nowhere gaveled and called for the vote: the GOP were prepped so they all immediately called out "aye". The speaker then said, "the ayes have it" and gaveled the vote to a close.

Quote:

Dave Weigel, Slate:
Video: Assembly GOP Passes Budget Repair Bill

MADISON, Wisc. -- The debate in the Assembly appeared to be a few hours away from ending when Speaker Pro Tem Bill Kramer interrupted their speeches and called the vote. It was gaveled in with lightning speed, less than the standard 15 seconds -- it was so fast that 28 members did not even vote on it, some out of protest but some failing to reach their buzzers. There were 51 ayes and 17 nays, and the nays included Republicans Dean Kaufert, Lee Nerison, Richard Spanbauer, and Travis Tranel.

Democrats exploded as soon as the vote was called, yelling "Cowards!" and "Shame!" at the Republicans filing out of the room.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/wei...pair-bill.aspx

The above includes a cool video of it happening, the Democrats, some Republicans and gallery yelling at the Republicans, being escorted safely out by state troopers.

wiphan 02-25-2011 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 756106)
:zz: You're not saying that the unions have caused the budget deficits, I hope. That's certainly not true.

your right the pension benefits to teachers which they made zero contributions to and receive the average of their 3 highest years for the rest of their lifetime has nothing to do with the budget deficit. Not to mention the amount of baby boom retirees coming in the near future. Coupled with the rising health care costs that most pay zero dollars in premiums. However I am not blaming this entirely on them, our lovely governor doyle should take a lot of the blame for the last 8 yrs of disaster.

If you had your way we would have taken Obama's $800 million for "SLOW RAIL" (yes it would have been slower than a car) from Madison to Milwaukee that would have caused the state more budget deficits in operating profits because no public transportation systems pay for themselves.

In the end our Governor will not back down and this bill will pass. This is why he was elected.

wiphan 02-25-2011 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 756108)

While they were still debating amendments, the speaker literally and suddenly out of nowhere gaveled and called for the vote: the GOP were prepped so they all immediately called out "aye". The speaker then said, "the ayes have it" and gaveled the vote to a close.



http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/wei...pair-bill.aspx

The above includes a cool video of it happening, the Democrats, some Republicans and gallery yelling at the Republicans, being escorted safely out by state troopers.

How long did they debate? Really? The video shows how idiotic and unprofessional the democrats are. Try not showing up for your job for a week when you disagree with your boss or co-workers and see what happens.

Cannon Shell 02-25-2011 05:10 PM

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...022406520.html

wiphan 02-25-2011 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell (Post 756198)

I thought Chris Farley overdosed on Coke with a hooker years ago. It looks like he has been reincarnated as an assembly democrat.

geeker2 02-25-2011 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell (Post 756198)



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QiZdY9rw-uo

Riot 02-25-2011 07:18 PM

Quote:

In the end our Governor will not back down and this bill will pass. This is why he was elected.
The other GOP govs have already started jumping ship yesterday and today on supporting Walker. Enjoy him before the ethics violation hearings start, the state AG starts investigating him, and next January's recall.

Riot 02-25-2011 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wiphan (Post 756127)
How long did they debate? Really? The video shows how idiotic and unprofessional the democrats are. Try not showing up for your job for a week when you disagree with your boss or co-workers and see what happens.

No. The video shows how Assembly Republicans deceive and put politics before you and your fellow citizens, and their oath of office. A pre-planned secret vote? In literally seconds? Purposely not informing the other party? Yeah, that's democracy in action. Do you support that action in a democracy? Seriously?

And you support your governor kicking out the legislature, and taking single control, with no accountability, for selling or leasing your state utilities for whatever price he wants? That doesn't worry you?

And your governor kicking out legislative oversight, and taking complete control over who qualifies for Badgercare and public aid, and how much? With no oversight?

Wasn't Walker supposed to be a Tea-Party backed conservative? Why is he executing a Big Government Takeover? By the Governors office? Wasn't this supposed to be an "emergency" fiscal bill?

Let's go back to picking on those evil teachers (and prison guards and nurses) that have "ruined" Wisconsin's budget (while cutting taxes for corporations, so that most don't even pay any taxes, somehow magically hasn't made any negative revenue impact on the budget at all, over the past 30 years, apparently).

Those teachers and nurses that have exactly the pay and benefits that the State of Wisconsin has chosen to give them over the years. After all, these guys didn't steal it - they have exactly what Wisconsin agreed to give them. Let me share someone else's thoughts:

Quote:

With regard to teachers, let's get one thing clear: you get what you pay for. But in Wisconsin, that's not quite true. In Wisconsin, you get *much more* than you pay for.

In cost-of-li­ving adjusted terms, Wisconsin teachers' pay ranks 28th of the 50 states. That's right: 28th. (http://tea­cherportal­.com/teach­er-salarie­s-by-state)

High school graduation rate in Wisconsin is 89.6%. That puts them in position #1 among the 50 states. (http://eco­nomix.blog­s.ny...173;-and-race/)

So, we have Wisconsin teachers ranking 28th in pay, but achieving the highest graduation rate.

You get what you pay for.

Except in Wisconsin, where you get far more than you pay for.

Danzig 02-25-2011 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wiphan (Post 756047)
TSA does not have collective bargaining rights

i dont make up stuff. they were given limited bargaining rights by the obama admin according to the feb 4 washington post article by joe davidson. would love to post a link, but im on my phone. google it, youll see what i read

Cannon Shell 02-26-2011 04:01 PM

http://yesbuthowever.com/dissecting-...claim-5000677/

hoovesupsideyourhead 02-26-2011 04:14 PM

wis won the superbowl so they can do what they want.,:mad:

dellinger63 02-27-2011 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoovesupsideyourhead (Post 756454)
wis won the superbowl so they can do what they want.,:mad:

and specifically Green Bay! Hold on Gov. Walker the PEOPLE are with you.

BTW Not sure if anyone is aware of this but WI people in general don't like and resent IL especially along the border. They fondly call them FIBS (f'n IL bastaards) recently updated to FIBTABS (f'n IL bastaards towing a boat). With IL and Chicago seemingly now baby-sitting the Dems at the Clocktower in Rockford (nice place to be held up in) many people now consider it a fight between IL and WI and you know how that will go.

GREEN BAY, Wis. (AP) — Hundreds gathered in Green Bay in an effort to recall state Sen. Dave Hansen.


Hansen, from Green Bay, is one of 14 Democratic senators who left the state Feb. 17 to block a vote on Republican Gov. Scott Walker’s budget repair bill that would discontinue collective bargaining for public-sector employees.


The Saturday meeting was organized by Green Bay resident David VanderLeest, who filed the recall effort. VanderLeest says nearly 14,000 district residents will need to sign petitions within 60 days to force a recall election.

Hansen, who was at an undisclosed Illinois location Saturday, told the Green Bay Press-Gazette that they have a right to push the recall but he’s not worried because he’s trying to protect the American dream.


http://www.gazettextra.com/weblogs/l...n-bay-senator/

Riot 02-27-2011 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dellinger63 (Post 756654)
and specifically Green Bay! Hold on Gov. Walker the PEOPLE are with you.

That doesn't appear to be true:

Quote:

February 25, 2011
Another day, another conservative poll has bad news for Scott Walker

A day after a conservative poll of Wisconsin showed voters there overwhelmingly opposed to Gov. Scott Walker's (R) plan to eliminate collective bargaining for thousands of state workers, conservative stalwart Dick Morris dropped his own poll of the state showing a similar result.

Fifty-four percent of the respondents to Morris' poll said they were opposed to eliminating collective bargaining. Just 41% said they favored it.

The voters Morris polled did want some changes made to the union worker's compensation plan. Basically the same ones the union has already offered.

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2...ott-walker.php

Quote:

GREEN BAY, Wis. (AP) — Hundreds gathered in Green Bay in an effort to recall state Sen. Dave Hansen.
One hundred thousand gathered Saturday in Madison, in support of Wisconsin unions, the largest demonstration yet, with supporting rallies held in all 50 states.

Russ Feingold has formed a PAC, and is reporting 71,000 signatures to put him on the gubnatorial ballot when the Walker recall occurs.

Danzig 02-27-2011 12:47 PM

new book offering:

'how not to run a state', by the governor and legislature of wisconsin.

SCUDSBROTHER 02-27-2011 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dellinger63 (Post 756654)
and specifically Green Bay! Hold on Gov. Walker the PEOPLE are with you.

BTW Not sure if anyone is aware of this but WI people in general don't like and resent IL especially along the border. They fondly call them FIBS (f'n IL bastaards) recently updated to FIBTABS (f'n IL bastaards towing a boat). With IL and Chicago seemingly now baby-sitting the Dems at the Clocktower in Rockford (nice place to be held up in) many people now consider it a fight between IL and WI and you know how that will go.

GREEN BAY, Wis. (AP) — Hundreds gathered in Green Bay in an effort to recall state Sen. Dave Hansen.


Hansen, from Green Bay, is one of 14 Democratic senators who left the state Feb. 17 to block a vote on Republican Gov. Scott Walker’s budget repair bill that would discontinue collective bargaining for public-sector employees.


The Saturday meeting was organized by Green Bay resident David VanderLeest, who filed the recall effort. VanderLeest says nearly 14,000 district residents will need to sign petitions within 60 days to force a recall election.

Hansen, who was at an undisclosed Illinois location Saturday, told the Green Bay Press-Gazette that they have a right to push the recall but he’s not worried because he’s trying to protect the American dream.


http://www.gazettextra.com/weblogs/l...n-bay-senator/


"Hundreds"

Riot 02-27-2011 06:37 PM

Reporting that police, who were supposed to close down the Madison capital at 4:00pm CST, and indeed ask people to leave at that time, are NOT forcing protesters who stayed to leave. In fact, there are off-duty police protesting there. All are risking arrest for peacefully refusing the request to leave, but apparently it's not gonna happen.

Riot 02-27-2011 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig (Post 756693)
new book offering:

'how not to run a state', by the governor and legislature of wisconsin.

Another: "You get exactly what you vote for. By everyone. Buyer beware. Not voting = not a good idea."

Riot 02-27-2011 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER (Post 756744)
"Hundreds"

I think that any Democrats who are threatened with recall will be alot safer in their districts within Wisconsin at the recall election, than the Republicans.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.