Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Thank You Mine That Bird (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=29440)

justindew 05-03-2009 06:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
It's not about Jon White. He has earned the right to have a strong opinion and he was hardly embarrassed today.

The bottom line is that Hold That Bird saved us from enduring a lot of falsehoods about what would have been a dramatically misunderstood result.

It wouldn't have been misunderstood for long, what with you setting the record straight for us and all.

docicu3 05-03-2009 06:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS
The ride by Borel was totally epic anyway.

He had him back so far behind the next to last horse early on that even the mud kicked up probably couldn't reach him.

Watching Calvin's interview again and thinking about what he meant reveals a few possible reasons for his gelding's success.

1) The track took the heart out of almost all of them over 10F's except his horse whom he saved til the last quarter as he was so far back after the initial half he was out of the picture but his horse hadn't started the race yet. Classic tortise and hare stuff....

2) The time, though slow, is irrelevant as this Derby was won by racing strategy not speed but stamina over a last 1/4 while MTB must have run ridiculous time for the 1/4, 1/2 and 6f's splits showing how occasionally over rated ES is on tiring tracks and poly quick sand.

3) "Fatigue makes cowards of us all" doesn't just apply to football player's

4) Calvin was right on the money when he said his was the only one running at he end......an obvious strategy the "slow minded" southern connections used to the detriment of faster smarter more expensive colts in the race.

"Intelligence is taking the same information available to everyone else and doing something different with it than most to achieve an outcome nobody else could attain"......

Travis Stone 05-03-2009 06:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ELA
He did. I think that the PP's will still show a fast track. It didn't start pouring until after the race, but I think the track was off before and during. After the race, I saw an ark float by.

Eric

I was fortunate enough to watch this race from the winners circle... I was dry until immediately after the race.

SOREHOOF 05-03-2009 06:31 AM

Birdstone is 23% with mud starters. My sister was looking for a longshot, when she mentioned MTB I told her he should be a million to one. I should have kept my mouth shut.

Travis Stone 05-03-2009 06:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid
He should've been 500-1. People who bet him to win got jipped majorly.

I think the Giacomo syndrome is still hanging around. And next year will be no different after this result.

Sightseek 05-03-2009 08:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by docicu3
Watching Calvin's interview again and thinking about what he meant reveals a few possible reasons for his gelding's success.

1) The track took the heart out of almost all of them over 10F's except his horse whom he saved til the last quarter as he was so far back after the initial half he was out of the picture but his horse hadn't started the race yet. Classic tortise and hare stuff....

2) The time, though slow, is irrelevant as this Derby was won by racing strategy not speed but stamina over a last 1/4 while MTB must have run ridiculous time for the 1/4, 1/2 and 6f's splits showing how occasionally over rated ES is on tiring tracks and poly quick sand.

3) "Fatigue makes cowards of us all" doesn't just apply to football player's

4) Calvin was right on the money when he said his was the only one running at he end......an obvious strategy the "slow minded" southern connections used to the detriment of faster smarter more expensive colts in the race.

"Intelligence is taking the same information available to everyone else and doing something different with it than most to achieve an outcome nobody else could attain"......

Photo of Mine That Bird on the turn:

http://sports.yahoo.com/rah/gallery;...th_kentuck%3A1

basement bob 05-03-2009 08:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious
Anyone that mentions a bias as the reason this horse won should never be allowed to watch a race again. Any bias there may have been only added to his margin of victory. He would have won that race had he gone around the grandstand. He was much the best today.

i could not agree more. well said.

basement bob 05-03-2009 08:23 AM

:p i can't wait to hear what john white has to say?

JJP 05-03-2009 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CSC
A bigger mystery is how he went off at only 50-1, as if we had enough of derby myths, no dirt wins, gelding, 81 beyer top, no name trainer(never heard of the guy until today), obviously someone bet him, should have been 100-1.

Would have thrown in the 2 prep rule but that has long been debunked.

I agree. He was 99-1 at William Hill in the U.K. But lets not forget the makeup of the crowd on Derby Day; many of whom cannot read a DRF or track program past performance. Let's not forget Rick's Natural Star was only 50-1 in the BC Turf a few years ago and actually had more win money than a Grade 1 winning Marlin.

MaTH716 05-03-2009 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJP
I agree. He was 99-1 at William Hill in the U.K. But lets not forget the makeup of the crowd on Derby Day; many of whom cannot read a DRF or track program past performance. Let's not forget Rick's Natural Star was only 50-1 in the BC Turf a few years ago and actually had more win money than a Grade 1 winning Marlin.

Funny you mention BC, 4/6 on synthetics, can anyone say HELLO SANTA ANITA.

:rolleyes:

oh boy!

Bobby Fischer 05-03-2009 08:30 AM

race shape, and set up too fast/too forward....

combined with a lone horse running a separate optimal race and winning a gamble on a fortunate rail trip.

and the much-the-best horse running a no-show while supposedly injured

and the 3 other possibly good 10 furlong horses (dunkirk,desert party,chocolate candy) turned out to be mediocre or worse

herkhorse 05-03-2009 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bobby Fischer
race shape, and set up too fast/too forward....

combined with a lone horse running a separate optimal race and winning a gamble on a fortunate rail trip.

and the much-the-best horse running a no-show while supposedly injured

and the 3 other possibly good 10 furlong horses (dunkirk,desert party,chocolate candy) turned out to be mediocre or worse

Somebody paid them off?

Travis Stone 05-03-2009 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by herkhorse
Somebody paid them off?

I hope they paid them off AND bet Mine That Bird...

Bobby Fischer 05-03-2009 08:40 AM

it was a handicappers nightmare and the type of race that some fan hits...

anyone who knew anything about wagering would play against pioneer in most tickets other than the coverage tickets.

I had Calvin's horse and Join in the Dance (the speed) grouped 3rd or 4th in a superfecta each, but that is the highest I could envision him running to.


One of the hardest things about trying to make money at the horses, is that if you want to safely build your bankroll, you can't bet a lot more on the fun races then on any other good valued race. That can be damn near impossible when you handicap a race for so long, and have been so accurate for the last two years, and have such a strong opinion. :wf

cowgirlintexas 05-03-2009 08:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious
But then if they would have lost too, somebody would be saying that they didn't run their race either. Why is it that when the track is off, people like to say that ONLY the winner ran their race? They did the same thing in 2004 with Smarty.

Facts.
The winner kicked ass today. Simple as that.

Some people said that Pioneer COULD NOT run on dirt. Not that they didn't think he'd be as effective on dirt as on synthetic but that he was a slow turf horse that COULD NOT run on it. They even suggested that anyone that asked the question "how do we know since he's never tried it" were idiots or insane and that the question was crap.

Now the question is whether or not he can run on a fast dirt track and the answer is the same. We still don't know.

Some people hate to be wrong. Instead of giving the winner credit, they'll find all kinds of ways to disparage a horse that obviously ran better than they thought they would. Even if it was in a seven length loss and the 10 best 3yos all scratched out, it was better than he was thought to run. It shouldn't matter if all of the top horses scratched out. If he was a slow turf horse that can't run on it, he shouldn't have finished second at all.

We won't mention any names :D

Bobby Fischer 05-03-2009 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by herkhorse
Somebody paid them off?

WTF are you talking about

Danzig 05-03-2009 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by westcoastinvader
Maybe I missed something in the story along the way, but I don't understand why brisnet.com had Richard Mandella
listed as the trainer of Mine That Bird the day prior to the post position draw.

Here's the link, in case it still works:

http://www.kentuckyderby.com/2009/si...es/dby4-23.pdf

he was the trainer at one point in the geldings career.

herkhorse 05-03-2009 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bobby Fischer
WTF are you talking about

I guess I was asking WTF you were talking about, implying that I Want Revenge was scratched for a reason other than an injury.

geeker2 05-03-2009 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
WTF are you talking about?


LMAO :tro: :$:

Left Bank 05-03-2009 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig
i agree with that. i was more excited about game one between the caps/pens then i was about the race.

What was the score,by the way?

Danzig 05-03-2009 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Left Bank
What was the score,by the way?


3-2 caps! i was so mad about having to leave, about half an hour before the faceoff. thank god for sirius. people were looking at me kind of funny driving down the road, slapping the dashboard and yelling 'steckelllllllll!!". got home in time to see the last five minutes or so on t.v. watched the whole thing again last night when my son got home.

3kings 05-03-2009 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bobby Fischer
it was a handicappers nightmare and the type of race that some fan hits...

anyone who knew anything about wagering would play against pioneer in most tickets other than the coverage tickets.

I had Calvin's horse and Join in the Dance (the speed) grouped 3rd or 4th in a superfecta each, but that is the highest I could envision him running to.


One of the hardest things about trying to make money at the horses, is that if you want to safely build your bankroll, you can't bet a lot more on the fun races then on any other good valued race. That can be damn near impossible when you handicap a race for so long, and have been so accurate for the last two years, and have such a strong opinion. :wf

How was your price on Fresian Fire?:rolleyes: All you did was say how your price was getting ruined by all the scratches, now your taking shots at people who supported POTN. What did FF pay for 16th? or 18th?

Danzig 05-03-2009 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3kings
How was your price on Fresian Fire?:rolleyes: All you did is say how your price was getting ruined by all the scratches, now your taking shots at people who supported POTN. What did FF pay for 16th?


he finished 18th, beat only flying private. larry jones was bitching after-this is why i'm retiring. oh, shut up and retire already.

byalip 05-03-2009 09:07 AM

Is anyone ready to concede that jockeys DO make a difference? If so, would you confess to including them in your handicapping strategy?

I seem to recall them being compared to trained monkeys who are just along for the ride, they can screw up a horse's chances and make them lose but they can't factor into a win or a robot could do the job.

Now what?

Danzig 05-03-2009 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by byalip
Is anyone ready to concede that jockeys DO make a difference? If so, would you confess to including them in your handicapping strategy?

I seem to recall them being compared to trained monkeys who are just along for the ride, they can screw up a horse's chances and make them lose but they can't factor into a win or a robot could do the job.

Now what?

many times i don't even look at who's riding.
bill shoemaker could have risen from the dead to ride mine that bird, he'd have still been 50-1-and rightfully so.

calvin doesn't win every race with that ride you know. he has to have the horse to pull it off. it worked yesterday. everything came together for him and he got the brass ring.

parsixfarms 05-03-2009 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
What bias....one that helped overmatched horses?

I generally think track bias is overrated, but it seemed that the inside paths were clearly the place to be at Churchill yesterday.

golfer 05-03-2009 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parsixfarms
I generally think track bias is overrated, but it seemed that the inside paths were clearly the place to be at Churchill yesterday.

Completely agree, it wasn't inside speed, just inside.

parsixfarms 05-03-2009 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by golfer
Completely agree, it wasn't inside speed, just inside.

Kind of the way the old Keeneland played.

Bobby Fischer 05-03-2009 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by herkhorse
I guess I was asking WTF you were talking about, implying that I Want Revenge was scratched for a reason other than an injury.


what are you even talking about?
I Want Revenge was scratched. He didn't run.
you are way off in a different ballpark

Bobby Fischer 05-03-2009 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by byalip
Is anyone ready to concede that jockeys DO make a difference? If so, would you confess to including them in your handicapping strategy?

I seem to recall them being compared to trained monkeys who are just along for the ride, they can screw up a horse's chances and make them lose but they can't factor into a win or a robot could do the job.

Now what?

Well anyone with a realistic perception and a knowledge of how set ups, and race-shapes affect outcomes, can see that Borel won that race.

The problem with changing your handicapping strategy to revolve around jockeys is that this was one of the all-time greatest jockey influenced examples in the history of stakes races. The vast majority of races have much less if any influence from jockeys.

I think jockeys do have strengths and weaknesses and that it is illogical to preach race shapes and set ups and ignore jockeys altogether, but they don't deserve more than a small consideration.

dalakhani 05-03-2009 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bobby Fischer
Well anyone with a realistic perception and a knowledge of how set ups, and race-shapes affect outcomes, can see that Borel won that race.
The problem with changing your handicapping strategy to revolve around jockeys is that this was one of the all-time greatest jockey influenced examples in the history of stakes races. The vast majority of races have much less if any influence from jockeys.

I think jockeys do have strengths and weaknesses and that it is illogical to preach race shapes and set ups and ignore jockeys altogether, but they don't deserve more than a small consideration.

It was a great trip no doubt and the ride was probably up there in greatest in derby history.

But does the horse get any credit? Sure...he freaked on a rail favoring sloppy track but he still freaked. That horse was much the best yesterday and it seemed to my eye that he wins with just an average trip and not the amazing one that he got. No?

Bobby Fischer 05-03-2009 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dalakhani
It was a great trip no doubt and the ride was probably up there in greatest in derby history.

But does the horse get any credit? Sure...he freaked on a rail favoring sloppy track but he still freaked. That horse was much the best yesterday and it seemed to my eye that he wins with just an average trip and not the amazing one that he got. No?

No, he didn't freak.
With an Average trip he could have gotten anywhere from 10th- 4th

CSC 05-03-2009 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by westcoastinvader
Maybe I missed something in the story along the way, but I don't understand why brisnet.com had Richard Mandella
listed as the trainer of Mine That Bird the day prior to the post position draw.

Here's the link, in case it still works:

http://www.kentuckyderby.com/2009/si...es/dby4-23.pdf

This horse is almost a complete unknown, it would be interesting to see if it was an Owner's decision to change Trainer's or Mandella's decision to not train him any further. Numbers aside, he was good in Canada last year, though not much to hang your hat on if you were a backer of the horse. Certainly not as low as 50-1.

blackthroatedwind 05-03-2009 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by golfer
Completely agree, it wasn't inside speed, just inside.


Just curious, what about the other horses on the inside that Mine That Bird catapulted by on his way to victory.....why weren't they helped by the rail?

The winner got a 105 Beyer. If a healthy Quality Road and a healthy I Want Revenge had shown up, DrugS would have cashed his exacta, and only been whining that an impossible horse sucked up for third to cost him the tri and super.

The winner saved us from the most mediocre result in, at least, modern Derby history. But, relatively speaking, he still didn't run THAT well. He looked visually impressive, no doubt, but in many ways it was an illusion.

dalakhani 05-03-2009 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bobby Fischer
No, he didn't freak.
With an Average trip he could have gotten anywhere from 10th- 4th

Well i will have to watch it again. Maybe i missed something. Looked to me like a horse won the derby yesterday by open lengths and it looked to me like he ran the best race of his life by at least 20 beyer points...but he didnt freak.

And you say with an average trip that he could have been...10th?

:wf :wf

sdjcom 05-03-2009 09:52 AM

Derby is over
 
turn the page next race!!

Bobby Fischer 05-03-2009 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3kings
How was your price on Fresian Fire?:rolleyes: All you did was say how your price was getting ruined by all the scratches, now your taking shots at people who supported POTN. What did FF pay for 16th? or 18th?

The race was an anamoly.

Calvin Borel took a risky gamble and it worked out into a hall of fame ride.
Friesan Fire was injured out of the gate and had a rough trip.

Friesan Fire's price sucked with underlays Pamplemousse, Quality Road and IWR all defecting, but obviously your post was meant to be a rhetorical snide remark, and you probably care/know little about a price.

Glad you liked the obvious underlay POTN, that pretty much says all that needs to be said about your horseplaying acumen.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.