Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Horse of the Year? (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=26861)

RollerDoc 12-29-2008 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious
Just because you said it in April didn't mean it was true then. I said Galloping Grocer was going to win the TC after his first couple of races. After a few more, I realized he was garbage and admitted as much. If you can't learn to adjust your opinion as more and more evidence pours in, your arguments really will have no merit because you will always be speaking from the perspective of trying to prove yourself right instead of objectively looking at things.

I understand your points. I can still be correct in my statement based on when I was referring too. Hey Bern was very good in April and stunk by June. That happens to many horses including GG. Ilysium Fields got injured and we will never know but he was a very good horse in April.

brianwspencer 12-29-2008 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RollerDoc
Jazil was underrated and not a slouch by any stretch.

Strangely enough, I kind of agree.

But I'm willing to freely admit that my thinking may be a product of the fact that I always liked Jazil from the beginning, rather than a rational, evidence-based conclusion...

...since he kind of wasn't actually that good in the big picture.

He was a neat horse who was good for what he was good for, and he was fortunate to have run a couple of decent races and to mostly inherit a Belmont Stakes in which it seemed like he was the only 12-furlong runner in the field anyway. I liked his Derby better.

RollerDoc 12-29-2008 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
You're digging yourself into a real deep hole now.

As a three year old Jazil won the Belmont, placed 4th in one of the most KY Derbys in this decade, and finished 2nd in the Wood Memorial. He also was 2nd in an Allowance race. How is that a slouch?

RollerDoc 12-29-2008 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brianwspencer
Strangely enough, I kind of agree.

.

How is agreeing with me strange? :)

brianwspencer 12-29-2008 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RollerDoc
How is agreeing with me strange? :)

Less to do with you than the fact that I made a Jazil joke and actually didn't mean it.

Though I do disagree with your entire premise in this thread, but I don't have anything to add.

RollerDoc 12-29-2008 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
I have no energy for a discussion about jazil's overall quality, but in my opinion, he stunk. Where he his good race?

Hey Bern sunk in April also. And Elysium Fields ran a good race a bad one and we haven't seen him since. You're extremely biased in regards to Big brown, which makes discussing stuff about him nearly impossible. But, he has no chance at winning the award. Zero..

Ouch! I'd like to think I bring a high level of energy to the Big Brown discussion.

TheSpyder 12-29-2008 06:10 PM

I for one cannot wait until this discussion is over. So much time and print wasted about a bunch of bad horses. Frankly, who cares. The all sucked. I just hope to God that 2009 will bring something special.

brianwspencer 12-29-2008 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSpyder
I for one cannot wait until this discussion is over. So much time and print wasted about a bunch of bad horses. Frankly, who cares. The all sucked. I just hope to God that 2009 will bring something special.

I'VE GOT A GOOD FEELING!

RollerDoc 12-29-2008 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSpyder
I for one cannot wait until this discussion is over. So much time and print wasted about a bunch of bad horses. Frankly, who cares. The all sucked. I just hope to God that 2009 will bring something special.

"They all sucked" Nice contribuition. Hardly!

RollerDoc 12-29-2008 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
You do bring a high level of energy to a discussion. But I don't have the energy to dissect jazil's career with you.


No need to and I certainly am not a Jazil expert, just the opposite. I only said he wasn't a slouch. I just thought he ran well in a very good derby field and had a fairly decent showing as 3 yr old including winning the grueling Belmont.

Danzig 12-29-2008 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RollerDoc
Jazil was underrated and not a slouch by any stretch.


this makes me embarrassed that i have ever come close to agreeing with you on anything.
at any rate, i think hoy is curlins, but certainly i can't fault anyone for voting for brown.

RollerDoc 12-29-2008 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig
this makes me embarrassed that i have ever come close to agreeing with you on anything.
at any rate, i think hoy is curlins, but certainly i can't fault anyone for voting for brown.

There is no need to be embarassed. Plenty of other people have anonymously agreed with some of my opinions. :)

Danzig 12-29-2008 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RollerDoc
There is no need to be embarassed. Plenty of other people have anonymously agreed with some of my opinions. :)

well, for what it's worth, i'd take jazil over da tara.

Indian Charlie 12-30-2008 12:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cardus
Gun to your head, who wins: Da' Tara, or Commendable?

sarava

CSC 12-30-2008 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
I have no energy for a discussion about jazil's overall quality, but in my opinion, he stunk. Where he his good race?

I never thought much of Jazil either, perhaps his reputation comes from being one of Better Than Honour's offspring.

Hasili's Cacique and Personal Ensign's Our Emblem were perhaps also more well known for being famous sons rather than what they did on the racetrack.

CSC 12-30-2008 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 10 pnt move up
One last thing on the HOY

In 10 years you think they are going to be saying "remember the brilliant year Curlin had in 08'".....doubt it, what they are going to say is Curlin was a good horse but much better as a three year old in 07'

while in 10 years they will be saying remember the year Zenyatta had in 08' never challenged and undefeated.

just saying

They also said the same thing or something simlilar about Azeri before she tried the colts, it's really easy to look good when you are racing against a subpar bunch of horses.

CSC 12-30-2008 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cardus
She might have travelled the same path as that of Raven's Pass and it would have been very interesting late in the stretch. She would have had a fair chance to win the race.

And with a win in that race, this thread might not have existed.

She may have, that is the dilemma here. Her connections decided to take the safe route and she never had a chance to try. I give Curlin's connections more credit because they did go out on a limb after all the indecision of starting in the Classic. I said this before the Classic, Curlin had nothing to lose running in it. Win he's a hero, lose you can blame it on the track. It did nothing to hurt his legacy in the end. By the way I am no huge Curlin fan, I think he's a very good horse, however the overused great tag that alot of the media and some fans used in describing him I thought was just a bunch of hyperbole.

10 pnt move up 12-30-2008 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CSC
She may have, that is the dilemma here. Her connections decided to take the safe route and she never had a chance to try. I give Curlin's connections more credit because they did go out on a limb after all the indecision of starting in the Classic. I said this before the Classic, Curlin had nothing to lose running in it. Win he's a hero, lose you can blame it on the track. It did nothing to hurt his legacy in the end. By the way I am no huge Curlin fan, I think he's a very good horse, however the overused great tag that alot of the media and some fans used in describing him I thought was just a bunch of hyperbole.

what makes a horse great?

CSC 12-30-2008 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 10 pnt move up
what makes a horse great?

For me it's a horse that can capture one's imagination, a horse who can overcome unfavorable odds, who can obviously run fast under most if not all conditions, someone that wins in extraordinary manner in the highest competition. That's just off the top of my head, I may add to the list. If you look at the dictionary meaning of great the list is too long to be that precise. Everyone probably has their own interpretation.

cakes44 12-30-2008 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RollerDoc
He also was 2nd in an Allowance race.

Am I the only one who laughed reading this?

RollerDoc 12-30-2008 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cakes44
Am I the only one who laughed reading this?

What makes you laugh? How many good horses have finished second or higher in an Allowance Race? The answer is MANY!

See a doctor and get that laugh fixed.

10 pnt move up 12-30-2008 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CSC
For me it's a horse that can capture one's imagination, a horse who can overcome unfavorable odds, who can obviously run fast under most if not all conditions, someone that wins in extraordinary manner in the highest competition. That's just off the top of my head, I may add to the list. If you look at the dictionary meaning of great the list is too long to be that precise. Everyone probably has their own interpretation.

who fits that list better, Curlin or Zenyatta?

letswastemoney 12-30-2008 12:23 PM

Curlin faced the highest competition, therefore he fits it better

10 pnt move up 12-30-2008 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by letswastemoney
Curlin faced the highest competition, therefore he fits it better

what competition? who was the best horse Curlin faced this year in a race he won?

cakes44 12-30-2008 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RollerDoc
What makes you laugh? How many good horses have finished second or higher in an Allowance Race? The answer is MANY!

Yeah...no kidding. Finishing 2nd in an allowance is certainly not a qualification for a horse being good though.

RollerDoc 12-30-2008 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cakes44
Yeah...no kidding. Finishing 2nd in an allowance is certainly not a qualification for a horse being good though.

My original comment about Jazil was that he was "not a slouch."

cakes44 12-31-2008 07:25 AM

The Dirt Marathon would have been right up his alley. He was just born a couple years too early.

letswastemoney 12-31-2008 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 10 pnt move up
what competition? who was the best horse Curlin faced this year in a race he won?

Einstein, Wanderin Boy, Well Armed, Asiatic Boy, Divine Park, Out of Control...

There's no evidence that Zenyatta's competition was better, so you have to assume these horses are just as good or better as the females Zenyatta faced.

10 pnt move up 12-31-2008 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by letswastemoney
Einstein, Wanderin Boy, Well Armed, Asiatic Boy, Divine Park, Out of Control...

There's no evidence that Zenyatta's competition was better, so you have to assume these horses are just as good or better as the females Zenyatta faced.

I can only go on the records and none of those are legit grade 1 horses, Einstein on turf, maybe Well Armed at a mile.

RollerDoc 12-31-2008 01:30 PM

Isn't it fair to say that Big Brown beat better horses than Curlin or Zenyatta? Here are just a few:

Colonel John
Proudinski
Cool Coal Man
Shakis
Macho Again
Visionaire
Da'Tara
Eight Belles
Denis of Cork
Tale of Ekati
Elysium Fields
Gayego
Anak Nakal
Dr. Cal
Coal Play
Hey Bern
Z Fortune
Ichabod Crane
Tomcito
Nistle's Crunch
Globalization
Silver Tree
Atoned
Crimsom Comic

King Glorious 12-31-2008 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RollerDoc
Isn't it fair to say that Big Brown beat better horses than Curlin or Zenyatta? Here are just a few:

Colonel John
Proudinski
Cool Coal Man
Shakis
Macho Again
Visionaire
Da'Tara
Eight Belles
Denis of Cork Tale of Ekati
Elysium Fields
Gayego
Anak Nakal
Dr. Cal
Coal Play
Hey Bern
Z Fortune
Ichabod Crane
Tomcito
Nistle's Crunch
Globalization
Silver Tree
Atoned
Crimsom Comic

This confirms what I believed to be true. Roller Doc is not serious. He's been playing with us this whole time. This list of the good horses the Big Brown beat confirms it 100%. All this time, I really believed he was campaigning on BEHALF of Big Brown but now I see he's against the horse. You had me going pal.

RollerDoc 12-31-2008 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious
This confirms what I believed to be true. Roller Doc is not serious. He's been playing with us this whole time. This list of the good horses the Big Brown beat confirms it 100%. All this time, I really believed he was campaigning on BEHALF of Big Brown but now I see he's against the horse. You had me going pal.

You can stop being condescending right now. I'm just saying this group as a whole were better than those faced by Curlin or Zenyatta. You are spinning it as this group is made up of "good horses" and those were not my words.

RollerDoc 12-31-2008 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
No

Can you just give me your short list of who either have beaten that compares with my list? After all I provided some names.

RollerDoc 12-31-2008 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious
This confirms what I believed to be true. Roller Doc is not serious. He's been playing with us this whole time. This list of the good horses the Big Brown beat confirms it 100%. All this time, I really believed he was campaigning on BEHALF of Big Brown but now I see he's against the horse. You had me going pal.

King Glorious, how about you respond with four horses beaten by Zenyatta and Curlin combined this year that would be better horses than these four:

Colonel John
Denis of Cork
Eight Belles
Tale of Akati

letswastemoney 12-31-2008 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RollerDoc
You can stop being condescending right now. I'm just saying this group as a whole were better than those faced by Curlin or Zenyatta. You are spinning it as this group is made up of "good horses" and those were not my words.

Those horses faced restricted company for most of the year. Under what evidence are they better? Colonel John is about as good as most of those 3 year olds, and he still finished midpack in the Classic.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.