Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Trying To Make Money On Big Brown Today... (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=24320)

Cannon Shell 08-06-2008 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dunbar
But Big Brown's 3 race run from the Florida Derby through the Preakness was impressive in its own right.

--Dunbar

Is that really all it takes now days?

RollerDoc 08-06-2008 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dunbar
Giacomo, and possibly others.

Would Street Sense or Hard Spun have had a problem? We can only guess, but probably not. I doubt either would have shown that explosive move that Big Brown demonstrated when he spurted away from the field, though.

Winning from the outside at Gulfstream was considered near impossible before this year's Florida Derby. Despite that, when Big Brown drew the outside at Churchill, many cappers (including some here) were ecstatic that they would be able to bet against him while the "clueless" would bet him regardless of post.

Here are some very good recent horses that didn't win the Derby from better post positions than Big Brown's: Cat Thief, Point Given, Medagia d'Oro, Came Home, Empire Maker, Afleet Alex. Granted, these horses faced more solid competition than Big Brown (though Point Given finished behind Invisible Ink and Thunder Blitz), but my point is that the Derby is not a 'gimme'.

There's no question that Curlin has run against significantly better horses than Big Brown. I, too, think he is the better horse and has by far the greater accomplishments. Dutrow's comments were idiotic. But Big Brown's 3 race run from the Florida Derby through the Preakness was impressive in its own right.

--Dunbar

Very well crafted post. I agree with just about everything. Good job.

RollerDoc 08-06-2008 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
Is that really all it takes now days?


It does if you factor in the degree of difficulty (post positions) in at least two of those races. Yes correct!

Cannon Shell 08-06-2008 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RollerDoc
It does if you factor in the degree of difficulty (post positions) in at least two of those races. Yes correct!

Dr. Fager just rolled over in his grave

RollerDoc 08-06-2008 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
Doesn't the incredibly poor level of competition sort of offset that?

And what you say seems to be the sentiment of many. Would you be willing to say that on any given race, anything is possible (by any horse)?

I just think all of Big Brown's wins were impressive. I wish we really knew what happened at The Belmont? The Haskell was a comeback race for Big Brown and an impressive final furlong. He showed something he never had to before.

Alfleet Alex is my favorite horse of all time. But who did he really beat in the Preakness and Belmont other than Giacomo (a 50-1 KD winner). And don't say Scrappy T :) Yet most agree that Alex was a great horse. This is one example of why I don't buy into the lousy competition vs. Big Brown argument.

RollerDoc 08-06-2008 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
Dr. Fager just rolled over in his grave

It sounds like a clever retort. Jokes on me because I don't know who Dr. Fager is. Will you complete the joke for my purpose?

hockey2315 08-06-2008 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RollerDoc
And what you say seems to be the sentiment of many. Would you be willing to say that on any given race, anything is possible (by any horse)?

I just think all of Big Brown's wins were impressive. I wish we really knew what happened at The Belmont? The Haskell was a comeback race for Big Brown and an impressive final furlong. He showed something he never had to before.

Alfleet Alex is my favorite horse of all time. But who did he really beat in the Preakness and Belmont other than Giacomo (a 50-1 KD winner). And don't say Scrappy T :) Yet most agree that Alex was a great horse. This is one example of why I don't buy into the lousy competition vs. Big Brown argument.

Really?

Cannon Shell 08-06-2008 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hockey2315
Really?

See the post above yours...

Cannon Shell 08-06-2008 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RollerDoc
It sounds like a clever retort. Jokes on me because I don't know who Dr. Fager is. Will you complete the joke for my purpose?

Do you follow any sports or movies?

RollerDoc 08-06-2008 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hockey2315
Really?

Afleet Alex doesn't leave a leagcy as a great horse? When did this happen?

RollerDoc 08-06-2008 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
Do you follow any sports or movies?

I guess not close enough to catch this hidden gem. C'mon who is he?

ateamstupid 08-06-2008 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RollerDoc
It sounds like a clever retort. Jokes on me because I don't know who Dr. Fager is. Will you complete the joke for my purpose?

http://www.pedigreequery.com/dr+fager

Quote:

Originally Posted by RollerDoc
Alfleet Alex is my favorite horse of all time. But who did he really beat in the Preakness and Belmont other than Giacomo (a 50-1 KD winner). And don't say Scrappy T Yet most agree that Alex was a great horse.

I don't think Afleet Alex was anywhere close to great, though the comparison with Big Brown is a good one.

Cannon Shell 08-06-2008 12:25 PM

You dont know who Dr Fager is but you can determine the greatness of a horse? Who did you measure him against? Cat Thief?

SniperSB23 08-06-2008 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RollerDoc
Afleet Alex doesn't leave a leagcy as a great horse? When did this happen?

Please tell me you're kidding.

Cannon Shell 08-06-2008 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RollerDoc
I guess not close enough to catch this hidden gem. C'mon who is he?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dr._Fager

Not knowing who Dr Fager is is like being a baseball fan who never heard of Willie mays

ateamstupid 08-06-2008 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RollerDoc
Afleet Alex doesn't leave a leagcy as a great horse? When did this happen?

LOL.

Quote:

Originally Posted by RollerDoc
I guess not close enough to catch this hidden gem. C'mon who is he?

LOL again.

SniperSB23 08-06-2008 12:29 PM

Next we'll hear how Big Brown's Derby was a tougher field than the 67 Woodward cause he's never heard of any of the horses that ran in it.

RollerDoc 08-06-2008 12:29 PM

I don't think Afleet Alex was anywhere close to great, though the comparison with Big Brown is a good one.[/quote]

Afleet Alex (1 1/2 lengths from winning Triple Crown) + amazing recovery at Preakness + Top 3 yr old 2005 = Great Horse IMHO

ateamstupid 08-06-2008 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RollerDoc
Afleet Alex (1 1/2 lengths from winning Triple Crown) + amazing recovery at Preakness + Top 3 yr old 2005 = Great Horse IMHO

So again, you don't take level of competition into consideration. I can see we're making progress.

SniperSB23 08-06-2008 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RollerDoc
Afleet Alex (1 1/2 lengths from winning Triple Crown) + amazing recovery at Preakness + Top 3 yr old 2005 = Great Horse IMHO

So barely cracking the top 100 3yos of the past 50 years is great to you?

RollerDoc 08-06-2008 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dr._Fager

Not knowing who Dr Fager is is like being a baseball fan who never heard of Willie mays


Who is Willie Mays :)

Cannon Shell 08-06-2008 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RollerDoc
Who is Willie Mays :)

1/2 brother to Dr. Fager

RollerDoc 08-06-2008 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SniperSB23
So barely cracking the top 100 3yos of the past 50 years is great to you?

Top 100 over the past 50 years, possibly top 60 in the past 50 years. So yes Great but not Tony the Tiger Grrrrrrrrrrrrreat!

Cannon Shell 08-06-2008 12:44 PM

One of the things that makes it hard to debate things is that some of the newer fans dont have even a cursory idea about the history of the game and the great horses that have come before. That is why dopes like sdjcom are "depressed" when I talk about BB's race in a far from glowing fashion.

The sport of horseracing does a horrible injustice to itself when we proclaim greatness on horses like BB or even Curlin. The adoration process fuels egos like Jess Jacksons to the point where they actually believe their horse has done something wonderful by winning a few handicap races and beating a bunch of turf horses in Dubai. Big deal. The Arc thing was actually one of the few really unique things that Curlin could have done. The rest of the year figures to be a great big bore yet some in the media will continue to heap praise on Jackson for racing a horse that was virtually impossible to retire because of legal issues. Am i happy that the horse of the year returned? Sure. But that in itself and a couple of wins over overmatched listed type horses is hardly the thing that legends are made of.

ArlJim78 08-06-2008 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dunbar
Giacomo, and possibly others.

Would Street Sense or Hard Spun have had a problem? We can only guess, but probably not. I doubt either would have shown that explosive move that Big Brown demonstrated when he spurted away from the field, though.

Winning from the outside at Gulfstream was considered near impossible before this year's Florida Derby. Despite that, when Big Brown drew the outside at Churchill, many cappers (including some here) were ecstatic that they would be able to bet against him while the "clueless" would bet him regardless of post.

Here are some very good recent horses that didn't win the Derby from better post positions than Big Brown's: Cat Thief, Point Given, Medagia d'Oro, Came Home, Empire Maker, Afleet Alex. Granted, these horses faced more solid competition than Big Brown (though Point Given finished behind Invisible Ink and Thunder Blitz), but my point is that the Derby is not a 'gimme'.

There's no question that Curlin has run against significantly better horses than Big Brown. I, too, think he is the better horse and has by far the greater accomplishments. Dutrow's comments were idiotic. But Big Brown's 3 race run from the Florida Derby through the Preakness was impressive in its own right.

--Dunbar

in hindsight we now know how incredibly weak the fields were that Big Brown beat in the derbies. i went against him in the FD because of the post and expecting one of the others to step up. the thing about this year is that no one else has stepped up leaving it a one horse show so far in terms of 3yo's. How often does that happen? His moves are considered "explosive" because they were made against a backdrop of inferior horses who were backpedaling. put him in the 07 derby or Preakness or any previous year that had competition at the top end and I wonder how explosive his moves would look.
there was certainly nothing explosive about the last two races. He got the job down in the Haskell but I saw the whip come out before they had straightened for home. what the last races shows me is that its a different scenario when there is at least one other horse that can run on the front end with Big Brown that is capable of running in the 100 plus beyer range for 9 furlongs. He never faced that situation before and now that he has it doesn't look so easy anymore.

that 3 race run was impressive, I have said that over and over. what I will ask you and anyone else on the Big Brown bandwagon is, based on those 3 impressive races, would you say Big Brown is better than Curlin or that Big Brown is a great horse by historical standards. those are the types of claims being made and the ones I take exception to, not that he hasn't by far put in the most impressive races of any 3yo this year. Like I said previously I don't know how a knowledgeable person answers yes to either of those questions.

Damascus '67 08-06-2008 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RollerDoc
It sounds like a clever retort. Jokes on me because I don't know who Dr. Fager is. Will you complete the joke for my purpose?

Go pick up DRF's "The Lives, Times & Past Performances of America's Greatest Thorougbreds". In it you will see GREAT horses of the past...

RollerDoc 08-06-2008 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid
So again, you don't take level of competition into consideration. I can see we're making progress.

Yes I do take level of competition into consideration. I am just getting frustrated that so many of you dilute the accomplishments of Big Brown because of the dismay you all have for his connections (which I am disappointed as well). The Jackson's, Michael Matz, and Edgar Prado they sure are not.

Take them out of the equation and I think we have had a really talented 3 year old to be treated to this year in Big Brown. If the BCC were to be held today, you can take to the bank that I will bet the $400.00 plus that I am up on betting Big Brown this year TO WIN and beat old man Curlin. Uh oh....I know I am really going to get slammed for that one. Just kidding about Curlin.

SniperSB23 08-06-2008 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RollerDoc
Yes I do take level of competition into consideration. I am just getting frustrated that so many of you dilute the accomplishments of Big Brown because of the dismay you all have for his connections (which I am disappointed as well). The Jackson's, Michael Matz, and Edgar Prado they sure are not.

Take them out of the equation and I think we have had a really talented 3 year old to be treated to this year in Big Brown. If the BCC were to be held today, you can take to the bank that I will bet the $400.00 plus that I am up on betting Big Brown this year TO WIN and beat old man Curlin. Uh oh....I know I am really going to get slammed for that one. Just kidding about Curlin.

Barbaro wasn't great either! It has nothing to do with the connections, it has to do with a complete disconnect from the history of the game.

RollerDoc 08-06-2008 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SniperSB23
Barbaro wasn't great either! It has nothing to do with the connections, it has to do with a complete disconnect from the history of the game.

Barbaro only was not yet great because of the tragedy at the Preakness. He might have been great, maybe he wouldn't have. Would have loved to seen that match up against Bernardini. Personally I think Barbaro would have had more heart than Bernardini at the wire of the BCC vs. Invasor.

Regarding history, I am not qualified to compare Alex, Big Brown, Barbaro, et all with the great horses before them. The real problem with me saying great horse in Afleet Alex's case is because somebody created the category of "super horse." So if that is an actual category that I frequently see on this Board, then no Afleet Alex was not a Super Horse but yes, he was a "great" horse.

Damascus '67 08-06-2008 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RollerDoc
Barbaro only was not yet great because of the tragedy at the Preakness. He might have been great, maybe he wouldn't have. Would have loved to seen that match up against Bernardini. Personally I think Barbaro would have had more heart than Bernardini at the wire of the BCC vs. Invasor.

Regarding history, I am not qualified to compare Alex, Big Brown, Barbaro, et all with the great horses before them. The real problem with me saying great horse in Afleet Alex's case is because somebody created the category of "super horse." So if that is an actual category that I frequently see on this Board, then no Afleet Alex was not a Super Horse but yes, he was a "great" horse.

As much as I liked Afleet Alex, I wouldn't put him in the category of a "great horse'..maybe one of the best horses this decade, but if you want the definition of a great horse, I would include some of these, Bold Ruler, Native Dancer, Buckpasser, Damascus, Kelso, Citation, Secretariat and Spectacular Bid to name a few and those are only a few...

ateamstupid 08-06-2008 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RollerDoc
Personally I think Barbaro would have had more heart than Bernardini at the wire of the BCC vs. Invasor.

And you say this based on what, his life and death win over Sharp Humor?

RollerDoc 08-06-2008 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid
And you say this based on what, his life and death win over Sharp Humor?

Umm Yes, are you serious? You didn't think the 2006 Kentucky Derby was a loaded field of talented three year olds. Barbaro won by seven lengths blowing out notables like Bluegrass Cat, Lawyer Ron, Brother Derek, Sweetnorthernsaint, Jazil, and Steppenwolfer......not to mention a nifty move he put on A.P. Warrior early in the race.

SniperSB23 08-06-2008 01:45 PM

This thread just keeps getting more amusing. AP Warrior!

RollerDoc 08-06-2008 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SniperSB23
This thread just keeps getting more amusing. AP Warrior!

All I'm saying is Barbaro saw to it that A.P Warrior was one less to compete against early on. Why do you discount the other mentions. I didn't include A.P Warrior in the list of others. Only as a "not to mention."

I'm glad I can amuse you.

ateamstupid 08-06-2008 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RollerDoc
Umm Yes, are you serious? You didn't think the 2006 Kentucky Derby was a loaded field of talented three year olds. Barbaro won by seven lengths blowing out notables like Bluegrass Cat, Lawyer Ron, Brother Derek, Sweetnorthernsaint, Jazil, and Steppenwolfer......not to mention a nifty move he put on A.P. Warrior early in the race.

LOL, you're either a troll or clueless. Either way, I'm done with this.

skippy3481 08-06-2008 02:00 PM

First time ive ever heard of a horse putting a nifty move on another horse.... well done sir...

RollerDoc 08-06-2008 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid
LOL, you're either a troll or clueless. Either way, I'm done with this.

Aren't you kind.

ateamstupid 08-06-2008 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RollerDoc
Aren't you kind.

Sorry. I tried to be nice for a while, but you continue to argue about greatness even after you admitted that you're unqualified to do so. Carry on, I'm just saying I'm done arguing with you.

RollerDoc 08-06-2008 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid
Sorry. I tried to be nice for a while, but you continue to argue about greatness even after you admitted that you're unqualified to do so. Carry on, I'm just saying I'm done arguing with you.

I hate to sound like Bill Clinton "not having sex with that woman." I did use the word great for Afleet Alex. I said that because I thought the category of "super horse" supercedes great. So to me that means a second tier amongst the all time best. What is wrong with calling him great or at least having an opinion of what i believe to be great?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:40 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.