Which is your favorite?

I think I like the one that begins with "I like winning" the best.

It's subtle, you know?

I hope you're not talking about me. All I did was ask him three questions. He answered two of them. In the conversation, the only thing left unsaid is whether or not he is currently betting. The onus is on him.

I wanna play poker with him. ;)

:D :p

Yep. Got it.

Aps owner from egypt, right?
Who the heck spelled the horses name? ☺

Read better.

Yep, that went about as expected.

I do like the inference however that since I don't bet, my opinion is invalid.

I guess since I don't bet it invalidates his horrible handicapping of that race.

You mean where you so snidely asked if Upstart had finished the race yet?

Coincidentally, I just had a conversation with a friend about this- in fact, Zayat didn't name the horse, but Justin Zayat did try to blame the Jockey Club for it:

http://www.sbnation.com/lookit/2015/...-wrong-pharaoh

Heh. Props for the Jockey Club's response.

We can only hope that Johnny Weir and Tara Lapinski get to the bottom of this major breaking story.

32 times seems a bit much...

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articl...d-papadopoulos

it worked

I knew they'd had a naming contest, and wondered if that contributed to the error.
you never know tho. I have my last name spelled incorrectly constantly....just gave out two scholarships, and the home office had my name spelled wrong on them! hello, been with you guys four years now.
when youngest was born, I submitted his ss paperwork. his card came in misspelled. I called, they asked if I was sure that it was wrong. er, I'm sure-I know how to spell my name! all they had to do was copy what I wrote....

Husband was watching me with me pointed out down the stretch that the jock was whacking away on Pharoah and the jock on Firing Line wasn't smacking his horse near as much. Kind of hard to explain it really.

I'll explain it for you. Some horses need more urging than others to keep to the task at hand. Let's start a new thread about the "whacking" so those who realize it's part of the game and it doesn't hurt the horses don't have to filter through this crap again.

I didn't offer any opinion whatsoever on your opinion. You, on the other hand, by not betting, have made it clear that YOU have no value for YOUR opinion.

That's all. For all I know, you're a genius. You just don't think so.

Fair enough.


However, my primary reasons for not betting are two. First, I get too wrapped up in it and get nothing else done in life.

Second, I lost too many races by jockey ineptitude and shady training practices.

I internalize that stuff too much.

No need to get snarky. I'm fine with the whip and understand why it's there. What you said - that's more or less what I told him - just that the horse was probably wasn't used to a horse coming up on him and needed extra urging. You can call it what you want, but to someone who is just watching a sport that is very new for them, it's whacking, regardless of if it hurts the animal or not. Visually, it's not something a neophyte likes to see or understands. It IS hard to explain this part (crop/whip) part of the sport when there is a stark contrast in the urging of the two final competitors coming to the wire.

So American Pharoah, who we were told has three or four gears, and can run as fast as need be to win ( essentially ) any race, needed 32 stings of the whip to run ( effectively ) the same race he ran in Arkansas?

American Pharoah got a dream trip to win the Derby by three quarters of a length over a horse that didn't change leads in the stretch. The pre-race BS about this horse was completely exposed.