Look I'm working on not calling people douches when they clearly are. It's redundant, I know. The whole deal of being phony so the fragile people can feel comfortable to post. I get it.

The problem I have with it is the whole conforming issue. I feel it's the reason why we're in such a global financial mess. We conform. We don't call people douches and we don't call them out for their behavior.

What you said in one of the Paul "controlled opposition/tea party infiltrator/status quo scumbag" Ryan threads is that you're concerned about gay issues and abortion. Not much else.

That's insanity to me. I think you're so asleep and programmed that you don't realize you're a parrot and champion for the destruction of the human species from this planet.

Ok so lets say we make abortion and gay sex legal and allow gays to get married. Then what would the sheep b.itch about next? It obviously won't be important issues like foreign policy and out of control spending by our government.

Will gay rights and abortion lower the rising cost of food? What good is it if you can take it in the ass legally but can't muster the strength to get your dick hard because a loaf of bread costs $20?

You're right..I probably do focus on the social issues too much. But I think those are issues that are most impacted by who we elect and are most impactful to the individual. To me, the economy is an independant entity that just ebbs and flows regardless of who is in office. That is admittedly a very big generalization, but it seems that The President at the time and the state of the economy don't run parallel so I look elsewhere when deciding who to vote for.

And if bread is $20 a loaf it won't be because of who is President..it will be because of the weather:D

Look...I'm not trying to blow you here, but you're a smart dude. I don't agree with most of what you post...at least recently and vice-versa I'm sure, but we both have been here a long time and without divurging (sp?) opinions and even radical opinions, this will turn into Pace Adv or the opposite.

You are partly right that the economy ebbs and flows independently from government. It is controlled by a separate entity that is accountable to no one.

And when called into question at debates the puppets who are owned by them laugh at the man who has the courage to question the beast that is the Federal Reserve.

And, of course, the man who questions the Fed has a complacent stance on abortion and gay rights.

That's where I say it was planned that way. To believe otherwise is naive and that's where I get abusive towards folks who don't see the problem for what it is.

Bob I know you're a smart guy and have been successful professionally. It's understandable that you're supportive of this country and still believe in the process that made you successful.

I propose that you are successful, in part, due to collectivism and the abandonment of your core beliefs for profit. You made a decision for you and your potential future generations that was the most beneficial. That's understandable and I apologize for saying you sold your soul to them.

If put in the same situation I would probably do the same.

It doesn't change the fact that the system is fatally flawed. And the profits you have made overseas have been a small piece to the puzzle of the destruction of this country.

The empty cities in China are telling. Their economy is more than likely tapped out.

About bread...

A decent loaf of bread on the gulf was running $5 at Publix. Not the kind with high fructose corn syrup and other sh.it that kills you.

So yeah it's possible bread could go to $20 in the next decade. I say it only needs to go up 50% for things to spiral out of control.

Comparisons to pace advantage? Well I think that PA doesn't have a liberal quite on the level of Riot. Sure they had that weird Canadian guy but he's not in her league. If you want to make this sub-forum better then I propose sacrificing second tier party tards like dimmy and bigpun.

And if that doesn't work get rid of Riot and the new Bizarro Riot.

:tro:

Also the thread Riot made about the Republican idiot about abortion is clearly a tactic used by shills to bump a thread like this down the line.

What that guy said was stupid...but it doesn't come close to Joe basically singing Wade in the Water to an audience with an abundant number of black folks.

I swear... I have more respect for those brown illegal people then I do for the majority of white and black legal people in this country.

Trust me..I get the China thing and all implications.

Agreed on the rest and thnx.

EDIT: And I really had hoped you were Dispenser because I was kicking myself for not thinking of that first

It's no big deal. It's just Joe...

http://www.theonion.com/articles/the...18444/?slide=1

I :{>: Coach Pants.


You've been missed!

If I were to make a troll it would be a liberal one. It's easier to troll as your polar opposite.

I missed this place too. That was my 15th or so "This is my last post" moment. :D :{>:

welcome back.

I second that.

The problem I had here is that this thread started out as a very valid criticism of Joe Biden for a very distasteful pander in order to get votes for Obama. Riot and Bigrun, as usual, immediately deny the obvious and then deflect the issues over to Paul Ryan.

I am not on here to claim that Romney is the greatest thing in the world. Frankly, I am a big Chris Christie fan and wanted him to be the Repulican nominee. I also do not put thread after thread of nonsense favoring my choice of candidate and complete and utter BS on a daily basis attacking Romney attempting to shove my politics down other people's throats. I am here for one reason. I have grown tired of Riot's constant bashing of everything Republican, cheering of everything liberal and her consistent demeaning of posters which have chased many away. She may bully others, but it doesn't work with me.

I am sorry if you don't agree with what I am doing, but I feel that Riot cannot be allowed to run loose here and just bash anyone who disagrees with her. What I find odd is that you are quick to question my motives as well as an intelligent new poster's, but always ready to give the person whose behavior is clearly worse than any other's around here a free pass because she sides with you on politics.

Welcome back Coach !

Try not to have another one any time soon. :)

Can I ask something and not of you but just in general?

This whole "brown people" expression... is that acceptable in parts of the country cause I'll tell you if either of my kids said or had said such a thing in school (or "speaking Mexican") I would have gotten a call so fast and can guarantee they'd have been suspended for saying such things.

I am not saying anyone is racist or anything but I keep thinking if it were the opposite and one of the no-love-for-Obama types had said it they'd be accused of all kinds of things.

It's amazing to me that you even have to say something so true and so obvious...

You were doing quite well until you admitted that you are completely intolerant and incapable of dealing with anybody who doesn't think as you do - and blaming them for your own failings.

And BTW, if you think I'm a liberal, you are woefully ignorant of the political spectrum in this country.

I'm sure you, and others here, would love to have everyone who doesn't share the anger and hate kicked off this board. Makes it much easier for the haters to self-justify.

Thanks. ;)

It's acceptable if you're a liberal. Liberals are above derision for racist overtones because they're "evolved"

I do quite well the majority of the time. It's novel how you're calling me out for intolerance when you're a blatant liberal who would prefer everyone be the same.

I'm a libertarian, tard-o. It means you can do what you want just stay out of my pocketbook.

You're the intolerant one and a dumb one at that. That quote was partly tongue in cheek.

LOL - no, you are not. You are a "cafeteria" Libertarian, only cutting and pasting the parts you like.

You don't follow the first and main tenant of Libertarianism, which is complete tolerance and allowance for the positions and independence of others. Libertarianism is first about individual freedom and voluntary association.

You demonstrate the very opposite of that. As does Dell, by the way.