![]() |
Quote:
If you don't think America should be in the 21st century like the other big countries, you might try stating why you don't agree, and you might provide some support for your differing opinion. |
Quote:
It is because they overspend their way out of trouble, ie our current administration. Maintaining services they could not afford. Just like we are going to be. |
Quote:
Cooking the books is not an option. Taxing the corporations into the Earth is not a viable option (especially the way things are in the world). They do not PAY taxes, they collect them, guess from whom they collect them? |
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Also include what the Dems are doing to improve our standing in the first world so we can be like the other big countries. Right now in this country, backwards about 12 years would be just fine. |
Quote:
The first thing you said what that we have more illegal aliens than the population of some other countries, and you've not gotten remotely any closer since. Want to try again: I said, "Obama-Biden 2012, baby. Plus sweep of the Senate and House by Independents and Dems. Pull this country kicking and screaming, out of the hands of the anti-everything loons, and into the 21st century with the other big countries" |
Quote:
Again: I said, "Obama-Biden 2012, baby. Plus sweep of the Senate and House by Independents and Dems. Pull this country kicking and screaming, out of the hands of the anti-everything loons, and into the 21st century with the other big countries" Now: if you want to debate that we are better off now than the "big countries" I explained as being "first world countries", as measured by "first world parameters", go head. Post your data and argument. If you want to argue that the current GOP is not the following, as I explained, and is not intent upon taking us back to the 1800's as a country, go ahead: anti-women, anti-gay, anti-citizens of color, anti-immigrant, anti-education, anti-Medicare, anti-Social Security, anti-religious freedom for others, anti-environmental protection, anti-science, anti-labor, anti-worker, anti-help for poor or elderly, anti-current laws enabling freedom for others they don't like. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Wiki is the definer of first world nations, copy. I will go and check that infallible resource to learn what some guy thinks first world means and where we stand in his opinion. Well played. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I said, "Obama-Biden 2012, baby. Plus sweep of the Senate and House by Independents and Dems. Pull this country kicking and screaming, out of the hands of the anti-everything loons, and into the 21st century with the other big countries" Now: if you want to debate that we are better off now than the "big countries", which I explained I meant as being "first world countries", as measured by "first world parameters", go head. Post your data and argument. If you want to argue that the current GOP is not the following, as I explained, and is not intent upon taking us back to the 1800's as a country, go ahead: anti-women, anti-gay, anti-citizens of color, anti-immigrant, anti-education, anti-Medicare, anti-Social Security, anti-religious freedom for others, anti-environmental protection, anti-science, anti-labor, anti-worker, anti-help for poor or elderly, anti-current laws enabling freedom for others they don't like. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Our standing re: education, homelessness, quality of life, poverty, quality of healthcare, etc. is what it is measured to be among the other "big" countries, and we are behind, and have been for some time. The Republicans have zero intention of advancing this country in any of those matters. That has nothing at all to do with "faith". Your failure to bring an argument to the table against those two statements has nothing to do with my "faith", in the least. |
Quote:
I've said, to the other times you've posted the same, that I don't think you are stupid, nor do I think I'm the smartest person ever, and yeah, I most certainly have admitted I was wrong here. You deliberately ignore that, refuse to acknowledge it, and here you are pushing that very same victim meme again. You're a one trick pony, and that's being an angry victim of those you hate. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Glad to see the neglected daughter who survived the earthquake in Mexico is OK.
Nice spring break. Does she go to one of those 1% schools? How long do they get for spring break? http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics...-are-in-vegas/ |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:42 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.