Clueless? :eek:

Your holy grail! What above do you not agree with/believe in?

All of it, a majority, a minority or none will suffice as an answer.

A shrink would charge hundreds for what I have just given to you for free.

BTW Great work lately! Love watching implosions.

This part: you know, the very definition, that comes before all you wrote, above: Socialism is an economic system in which the means of production are either state owned or commonly owned and controlled cooperatively; or a political philosophy advocating such a system.

Again: if you think I'm a Socialist, you're even more clueless about what the word means than I thought. A seventh-grade teacher would have made you sit through a history class for what I've just given you for free. Oh, wait - you've supported firing all the evil teachers. That must explain why you couldn't manage to even quote the definition of socialism when required, even using google.

Glad you so clearly see all the ironies involved :tro: Like the one where you hold me to a standard I've never said I met. Ironic, huh?

It's OK you're not lost unless/until you look up. LMAO

Your laughing your ass off that you don't know the definition of socialism? Or trying to cover up for the fact that you are completely wrong, that in no way do I or have I ever advocated an economic system in which the means of production are either state owned or commonly owned and controlled cooperatively - and you know it.

See, I really don't see why you being stupid and silly and wrongly calling me a socialist, while you clearly don't have a clue what a "socialist" is, requires me to be insulted. LMAO, but it's at your ignorance.

Rita....go check the metahs.



Do your job.

When you look up you'll realize you've advocated virtually every government intervention into private business, whether it be economic or by regulation control, ever created by this President, no matter how delusional it may be while at the same time dismissing any attempt at privatization of anything government as an assault on the common man.

Which of the many state intrusions into private business by Obama did you object to?

Really? Which ones, specifically? List them for me.

:D You just said you knew that. I guess you don't know that? So why did you say you did?

LOL - Dell, you are such a loser. You do the above all the time. You make definitive statements about people, then you demand they justify your opinion. You're completely intellectually lazy.

BTW: please point out which "interventions into private business" meet the definition of socialism. Do it for Obama, Bush and Carter. Show us how much you know about socialism, buddy :D

I think you'd better stick to hating Muslims, Dell, rather than demanding that other posters prove to you that they are your uneducated definition of a socialist.

yeah, all those times you've taken people to task for insults and telling them to keep it clean. you evidently hold others to a higher standard than yourself. good for you.

DANNY!!

You vicious beast!

"Be impeccable with your word. Speak with integrity."

Excuse me, I've never pretended I hold to some higher standard. You're the one setting standards around here, and telling me what standards I hold.

Apparently you're mistaken.

Rita:

"Be impeccable with your word. Speak with integrity."



Stop lying.

not true. in the past you've yelped to the high heavens about name calling while proclaiming your innocence in that regard. i think in the past your justification was something along the lines of 'they started it'. you still call out others for 'insulting' you. but hey, if you've decided now that you're not going to dish it out AND take it, yippee for riot.

LOL - what an absurd statement. No, I don't care to "take it" any more, thanks. So I'll dish whatever the hell I feel like.

Rita,you are losing your imeccables and integrity's.

Danny..."yippee Riot" sounds like something out of Mother Mooses Tertiary Crimes.




Stevie,goddamity.....stick Rita in NA along with Tits and Cracklin' Rose.I'm sure you can talk Mr. NA into confining the 3 of them in one thread where they can live in their own image.

What is laughable is when someone posts something that discredits what you have posted, you take that as a personal insult and feel free to use one of three standard Riot responses

1. "Strawman"
2. "Stop twisting what I said"
3. "Stop attacking me/you are a jackass/random personal attack"

4. "Talking points"
It was this one that made me stop debating here altogether.

There NEVER is an admission of guilt or being wrong. This is the #1 cry of the democratic party. When you are wrong dig your heels in further and spin it however you like then blame someone else (i.e. Bush, congress, GOP, etc). Even when Riot was black and white wrong on an issue she could not admit it and tried to continue to spin it.

LOL - oh, please. I wish you would post something about politics. You get the "three standard Riot responses" because that's exactly what you do: change the subject, start making personal comments, or outright lie about what was said.

Start with your post #22. You post one sentence about politics, then go right into personal crap. LOL - I dare you to post only about politics without snarky personal attacks. I doubt you can do it. You've never been able to do it to date.

Really? Which issue was that? Disagreeing with your politics? That's sort of the #1 cry of conservatives: when the facts show your governor to be a liar, dig in your heels and accuse the other side of "being wrong" and "refusing to admit they are wrong" - LOL

I dare you to talk only about politics here, and stop being nasty, insulting, personal. You can't do it, either.