![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I also don't believe for a second that she would have been better on dirt. NT |
Quote:
|
I.. I honestly don't know how to respond to this. This is worse than what Smith said.
:tro: :tro: :tro: |
Quote:
Her lone dirt race: 4 1/2 lengths - then another 3 1/2 back to Ginger Punch. I only have her last 10 races. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Why do you think you know better than Z's jockey and trainer (who also is on record as saying Z is better on dirt) that she is not better on dirt? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I'm done, this is a dead end, someone else can pick it up if they're feeling masochistic.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
rachel won at keeneland at two. so i guess now we should trumpet about that rachel was actually better on synthetics, since she won on it once last year-that having as much to do with any HOY discussion as zenyatta's one race on dirt a year ago. quick, someone get rachels synthetic margin of victory-altho i doubt it's as big a margin as her oaks, haskell, fantasy, etc, etc. :rolleyes: |
she won by 3 lengths at Keenland
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think she danced enough dances. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:32 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.