![]() |
Quote:
I'm pretty sick of the whining about the graded earnings requirement. Yeah it's flawed, but its objective (or at least its effect) is getting horses to run more often. In a sport with endless kvetching about how top horses never run, I would think it's a good thing that you don't get into the Derby unless you run your way in. And I've yet to see a better alternative. Guaranteeing spots to the first two finishers of the final preps? Isn't that basically already what happens? It's rare that a horse has no previous graded earnings when they run second in one of those races. Like someone said earlier, Pletcher didn't have to run in that allowance. Instead he could've found an easy graded spot if he thought his horse was so great. He made that decision and I don't want to hear now how poor Dunkirk has been robbed by the system. |
Win/In stuff on the Derby trail is a moot discussion as a winner of a prep never gets excluded. The flaw, in my opinion, is that races in July 2008, at 5 furlongs or whatever, are treated the same as the Florida Derby... that just doesn't make sense.
There are some viable alternatives: * Discount 2YO graded earnings * Points system based upon grades, eliminating the $ factor * DerbyTrail.com vote |
Quote:
its more like the fans will be robbed of seeing one of the best horses compete in the best race. I could care less about Pletcher or any trainers unless Chuck or Gary gets a real good 3yo one day. I dont think it would bother me so much if it wasnt for the stupid Kempton Park race rule. Hopefully the horse finished last in the Blue Grass and the owners opt not to run in the Derby. Or maybe he wins and belongs in the race but I SERIOUSLY doubt that. And I think there are flaws in allowing summer 2yo stakes money to be equivalent to major prep money. Maybe they should count half of the 2yo money? That would be more fair IMO. Also, IMO Dunkirk has a serious shot at winning the Preakness or Belmont.. |
Quote:
:tro: I say count half of 2yo earnings. OR Count 100% of Grade 1 earnings... 75% of grade 2 earnings and 50% of grade 3 earnings. May be too much math for the people at Churchill to understand though. |
Quote:
If there was a point system, it could be something like this, with the 3-yo stakes essentially being worth double the 2-yo stakes races. 2-year old graded stakes races Grade 1 1st 8 points 2nd 4 points 3rd 2 points Grade 2 1st 6 points 2nd 3 points 3rd 1 point Grade 3 1st 3 points 2nd 1 points 3rd 0 points 3-year old graded stakes races 1st 16 points 2nd 8 points 3rd 4 points Grade 2 1st 12 points 2nd 6 points 3rd 2 point Grade 3 1st 6 points 2nd 2 points 3rd 1 point |
I'd be genuinely interested in learning how the system mentioned above would guarantee Dunkirk an entry in the Derby, because if my math is remotely right, it still wouldn't.
|
Quote:
It would only make a horse like Big Drama, who won a Grade 3 as a 2-year old, a lot less "automatic" to make the field because of purse money. |
I've tried to smarten up with my picks from yesterday. Not going with Giant Oak(pass the race), and I'm not going with Yano, I'm making a conservative exacta box of Capt. Candyman Can/Gato Go Win.
|
I like Lyin' Heart in the Bay Shore and (gulp) Alaazo in the Excelsior if the track is playing fair. I don't have anything clever for the other stakes.
|
is this gonna be on msg ?
|
Quote:
|
Wow!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
yup, can't say much more then that did he even use the stick? -bt- |
yeah, wow is pretty much all you can say. Derby favorite for sure imo.
|
thats how you do it. wow indeed.
that was a real derby type experience and he showed that he can handle pretty much anything. |
Wow, he just showed in one race everything you want to see, can overcome just about any trouble.
|
I hope someone used Giant Moon, incidentally.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:57 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.