![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
But who cares about all this. I wanna see athletes compete on the track, not in the shed. Thats why the thread is interesting, but at the same time a bit disconcerting. But I understand the fascination as genetics is a very inexact science. One day someone is going to find the combination of genes that have the highest probability of making good runners. Then all hell will break loose. They are mapping the Thoroughbred genome as we speak. In fact, they may be done. Cornell was coordinating and distributing the work. It will be interesting to see how people take this data and try to correlate it with performance. Its coming. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
With regard to breeding, it's really not that important to me who a horse is by. If I like the way a horse works at a sale, I'm going to be interested in him no matter who he is by. One of the best horses I ever bought was by a sire that I knew very little about. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
You are right. Orientate is a very well-built, classy-looking animal.
|
Quote:
|
Actually, you know the more I look at Orientate, I love his build, but I'm not a huge fan of his legs. He doesn't appear to have a whole lot of bone there and he looks pretty fragile (although he retired sound after a good year of racing at 4.) Of course I've never seen the horse up close, but that's what it looks like to me.
|
I think he has a great column of bone. I know why you said that, but it isn't the problem. The problem is that his cannon bones are too long which makes his legs look thinner than they really are. That would have made him a little more prone to tendon injuries. He also may be just a touch calf-kneed, but his legs are clean enough. He's a lot better than a whole lot of them. He retired sound, and that is good enough for me. Besides, all of his two year olds look like very well built, strong horses, and that is all that matters. Well that and the fact that they can fly!
|
Haven't followed breeding that much, just kinda interested in it lately, but does anyone know how Budda is doing as a sire? I thought I had heard that his babies were beautiful.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
That is great to hear. Horse was my derby pick that year. Loved his fight with Medalia D' Oro in his last prep. LOVED it. |
Quote:
http://www.marylandstallions.com/Bowman.html |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Best inexpensive stallion? Pioneering, who's a 1/2 to Storm Cat. His offspring handle dirt, turf and slop. May have some distance limitations at the classic distances but how many horses are going to run in the Triple Crown?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Thanks for the info let us know when he might start! |
Quote:
|
For one that I think will be big in NY, have a look at this guy, he's #10 on the first sire list at Blood Horse, and his fee is certainly reasonable.
I think he'll make some decent runners.... His name, Thunderello.... http://www.sugarmaple-farm.com/thunderello.shtml DTS |
Quote:
http://www.thoroughbredtimes.com/isd...ion_no=4972146 |
Cajun,
I like him a lot. DTS |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Me!! The Tikalyin Stallion!!!:D :D
|
Quote:
|
Here is the predictions on stallions futures by pedigree consultant George William Smith.
http://www.members.shaw.ca/gwsmith3/...ation2004.html |
Quote:
With all due respect, and I'm sure George William Smith knows whereof he speaks, I'm going to take that list with a "grain of salt". Reasons...too numerous to mention but I'll start with... 1981- Alydar was a much better broodmare sire than Affirmed. 1982- Spectacular Bid, great runner. How many offspring did he pass it on to? 1985- Caerleon, who do you think you're kidding? Thanks for the input. I think there are much better stallions than those cited. DTS |
An incomprehensible list.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:59 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.