Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   CONTESSA: "..wanted to throw up" (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=8729)

SentToStud 01-12-2007 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brianwspencer
Whoa. Whoa. Whoa. Whoa. Whoa.

First, I didn't defend anyone in this thread. I didn't "attack" you one bit. I didn't call you names. I didn't do anything but point out that you indulged in a bit of hyperbole in one post. It wasn't a criticism of anything you've said in regards to the entire ride, except that I found it mathematically unlikely that it was one of the worst rides in history.

...for starters, I'd say the stakes on closing day at Turf Paradise two or three years back when the rider misjudged the length of the race by an entire 7 furlongs...

I remember that race. I also remember Desormeaux blowing the finish line on Kotashaan in a race about 10-12 years ago in Japan. And of course, the worst instance was Shoemaker misjudging the finish line in the KY Derby while riding Gallant Man, probably costing him the win.

But the thing is, if you take all the bad decisions jockeys have made in a race over, say, the last 10 years and you make a "Top X" list, yesterday's ride probably has to be included in that list no matter how small you make X. As someone pointed out, those situations often lead to a horse incurring injury.

Frankly watching the race, I was surprised nobody clipped in there and no horses went down.

Jockeys make mistakes all the time. But not like this. For a guy who won 200+ races and $10+ million in purses last year to make that kind of move yesterday, it's utterly indefensible. It was as bad as it gets.

Coach Pants 01-12-2007 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Balletto
Well, since I tend to be the one that garners a lot of ol' blackie's attacks (I almost crave them now... love ya, bitch!), and its throwing the rest of you off kelter (is that really a word?), i'll just add my two cents so he can focus on his favorite target. I think it was the best ride in the HISTORY of the sport, and I happen to know this since i've seen every race ever run and im practically a divine being.

Here kitty kitty kitty... come to mama. Im all wet and waiting for you my big man.



brianwspencer 01-12-2007 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SentToStud
But the thing is, if you take all the bad decisions jockeys have made in a race over, say, the last 10 years and you make a "Top X" list, yesterday's ride probably has to be included in that list no matter how small you make X..

Could not agree more. That is exactly what I've been saying.

To say in all of "history" is hyperbole....it actually embodies the very definition of the word.

I've never once defended the ride, and I've never once said it wouldn't have made a top X list in a given time period.

But "history?"

That is using hyperbole. That's all my entire point was. If that is an "attack," so be it.

ninetoone 01-12-2007 07:48 PM

Yesterday's ride wouldn't even be on the radar screen of bad rides in the last 10 years or 10 months....he thought the hole would open up and it didn't. It happens all the time, every day.

Rupert Pupkin 01-13-2007 12:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ninetoone
Yesterday's ride wouldn't even be on the radar screen of bad rides in the last 10 years or 10 months....he thought the hole would open up and it didn't. It happens all the time, every day.

I totally disagree. It wasn't just a matter of a hole not opening. It was a matter of Dominguez making a move that had no upside but had huge downside. It was an idiotic move. Even if the hole would have opened and he would have won, it would have still been a made.

I saw a jock give a similar ride once on Megahertz. I think it was Solis but I'm not positive. Anyway, I think it was a 6 horse field and the jock was coming from dead-last. He had a ton of horse. There was no way to lose if he went outside. But instead, the jock tried to split horses and ended up checking pretty good. He finally got room and won the race but it was still a terrible ride. He took a huge risk and came close to blowing the race. Nobody made a big deal about it because he won, but it was a really stupid move that had no upside.

Anyway, I don't think you're understanding what we are saying with regards to Dominguez' ride. The hole not opening is irrelevant. That's not why it was a bad ride. It was a bad ride because he made a move that had no upside.

eurobounce 01-13-2007 12:57 AM

I would have to say that Perry Outz's ride in the 8th race at River Downs in Aug of 1997 was the most puzzling ever.

ninetoone 01-13-2007 03:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin
Anyway, I don't think you're understanding what we are saying with regards to Dominguez' ride. The hole not opening is irrelevant. That's not why it was a bad ride. It was a bad ride because he made a move that had no upside.

Sometimes that hole opens up....so sometimes there is an upside. Just not on Thursday. Look at Steve's first post w/the Q&A. Dominguez made a split second judgement call based on something he saw & based on his instincts from thousands of rides. He just happenned to be wrong. So you can't say he made a move that had no upside 100% of the time, which is my point.

cmorioles 01-13-2007 06:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eurobounce
I would have to say that Perry Outz's ride in the 8th race at River Downs in Aug of 1997 was the most puzzling ever.

If a tree falls in the forest and nobody is there to hear it...

Rupert Pupkin 01-13-2007 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ninetoone
Sometimes that hole opens up....so sometimes there is an upside. Just not on Thursday. Look at Steve's first post w/the Q&A. Dominguez made a split second judgement call based on something he saw & based on his instincts from thousands of rides. He just happenned to be wrong. So you can't say he made a move that had no upside 100% of the time, which is my point.

There was no upside because he was not going to save ground. There was no advantage to going inside.

An analogy would be if you tried to get into your house by climbing through a window when the front door was unlocked. Why would you go through the window if the front door was open? It doesn't matter whether you have a mishap climbing through the window or not. If you broke the window, the move would be stupid, but even if you didn't break the window the move would still be stupid. There is no advantage to trying to climb through the window when the front door is open.

By the same token, there is no advantage to trying to split horses when you can go to the outside. He wasn't saving any ground by going inside. They had already straightened away.

ninetoone 01-13-2007 12:55 PM

Ramon said that "when they came off the turn he was sure the rail horse was going to float wide and take the other one with him and that he would have the rail to boot home." His plan was not to split horses.

So, Ramon thought he had 2 doors to choose from...not a door and a window. In hindsight, it ended up a door and a window, you are correct. But that's why hindsight is 20/20 I guess. Good analogy though. And yes, the outside was the prudent and safer move, I agree.

Antitrust32 01-13-2007 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
Well, Brian, in the vast encyclopedia of rides in your memory why don't you come up with a few more baffling decisions. Be sure they were simple situations in races that absolutely cost the horses involved victory.


How about that Kentucky derby in the 50's (i think) where the jock stood up at the 1/16 or 1/8th pole and cost the horse the derby... names are excaping me considering i was born in 1983, so I wasnt exactly at the race... but I am sure BTW or Byk knows the horse/jockey.

That may have been a more costly ride...

paisjpq 01-13-2007 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32
How about that Kentucky derby in the 50's (i think) where the jock stood up at the 1/16 or 1/8th pole and cost the horse the derby... names are excaping me considering i was born in 1983, so I wasnt exactly at the race... but I am sure BTW or Byk knows the horse/jockey.

That may have been a more costly ride...

shoemaker on gallant man

Afleet Alex 01-14-2007 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Balletto
Well, since I tend to be the one that garners a lot of ol' blackie's attacks (I almost crave them now... love ya, bitch!), and its throwing the rest of you off kelter (is that really a word?), i'll just add my two cents so he can focus on his favorite target. I think it was the best ride in the HISTORY of the sport, and I happen to know this since i've seen every race ever run and im practically a divine being.

Here kitty kitty kitty... come to mama. Im all wet and waiting for you my big man.


C'mon. Your really a guy just f'ing with us, right?

Kasept 01-14-2007 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by paisjpq
shoemaker on gallant man

1957.. "The year they threw the Derby.."

Cajungator26 01-14-2007 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by byaneck
C'mon. Your really a guy just f'ing with us, right?

No, she's not a guy.

Afleet Alex 01-14-2007 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cajungator26
No, she's not a guy.

Okay. What about kentuckyrosesinmay....dude or not?

Cajungator26 01-14-2007 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by byaneck
Okay. What about kentuckyrosesinmay....dude or not?

Nope, she's a chick too. I'm female too (in case you were wondering. LOL) :D

Danzig 01-14-2007 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cajungator26
Nope, she's a chick too. I'm female too (in case you were wondering. LOL) :D

there's pais, balletto, cajun, sightseek, genuine, pedigree ann, meras, and me...who am i missing??? i know i'm missing several, gonna be in the doghouse.

Coach Pants 01-14-2007 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by byaneck
Okay. What about kentuckyrosesinmay....dude or not?

She's a female if you follow the tuck rule. :D

Danzig 01-14-2007 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pillow Pants
She's a female if you follow the tuck rule. :D

:eek: :eek:

looks like i'll be sharing that doghouse with pillow.


nice avatar btw, that trait would come in handy at oil changing time...

Afleet Alex 01-14-2007 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pillow Pants
She's a female if you follow the tuck rule. :D

I checked her website.it's too over the top to be a real chick

paisjpq 01-14-2007 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig188
there's pais, balletto, cajun, sightseek, genuine, pedigree ann, meras, and me...who am i missing??? i know i'm missing several, gonna be in the doghouse.

honu, buffy, MMSC, Largo, antitrust, bystander, rileyoriley...off the top of my head

Danzig 01-14-2007 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by paisjpq
honu, buffy, MMSC, Largo, antitrust, bystander, rileyoriley...off the top of my head

duh, shoulda remembered riley--she and i are both debs..

and honu, been reading her posts for years.

i will use my sinus meds as an excuse....

Coach Pants 01-14-2007 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by byaneck
I checked her website.it's too over the top to be a real chick

Balletto or kyroses?

brianwspencer 01-14-2007 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by byaneck
C'mon. Your really a guy just f'ing with us, right?

On the phone with Al right now.....if she's a guy, she does a really really good job faking the voice and the laugh. :D

Balletto 01-14-2007 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brianwspencer
On the phone with Al right now.....if she's a guy, she does a really really good job faking the voice and the laugh. :D

haha Shutup Brian. This is my chance to capitalize on my case of "penis envy"! :rolleyes:

brianwspencer 01-14-2007 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Balletto
haha Shutup Brian. This is my chance to capitalize on my case of "penis envy"! :rolleyes:

gross.

Balletto 01-14-2007 02:30 PM

Coming from you... I just dont believe that statement. :p

By the way, 24-21... :D

kentuckyrosesinmay 01-14-2007 03:10 PM

Balleto or I not a girl? This has got to be the most hilarious post of the new year!

Dunbar 01-14-2007 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by paisjpq
honu, buffy, MMSC, Largo, antitrust, bystander, rileyoriley...off the top of my head

add Phalaris, if I remember correctly.

--Dunbar

Balletto 01-14-2007 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kentuckyrosesinmay
Balleto or I not a girl? This has got to be the most hilarious post of the new year!

Dont worry kentucky... shrugg it off, grab a beer, reposition the package and ask the person next to you to pull your finger. :rolleyes:

Cannon Shell 01-14-2007 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by paisjpq
If I had that horse I wouldn't ride him again, if for no other reason than to make a point to him that he is given instructions for a reason...we all know that things happen in a race that force jocks to abandon the best laid plans but that is not the case here...and I believe the owner feels the same way.

If we didn't ride every jock who fails to follow instructions there wouldn't be many left to choose from.

GPK 01-14-2007 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
If we didn't ride every jock who fails to follow instructions there wouldn't be many left to choose from.


*note to self....lose 40-50lbs and learn to ride horses..*:cool:

paisjpq 01-14-2007 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
If we didn't ride every jock who fails to follow instructions there wouldn't be many left to choose from.

ahhh but the one you did have would listen:D

Cannon Shell 01-14-2007 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by paisjpq
ahhh but the one you did have would listen:D

T3B if I can get him a little lighter

Cannon Shell 01-14-2007 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by paisjpq
ahhh but the one you did have would listen:D

I hate to admit this but.....sometimes we give bad instructions.

paisjpq 01-14-2007 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
I hate to admit this but.....sometimes we give bad instructions.

well thats no fun, cause then we wouldn't have 10 page threads dedicated to stupid rides...but I guess we could just focus on bad instructions

GPK 01-14-2007 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
T3B if I can get him a little lighter

Then I could autograph my own hat instead of Byk having to get Vernon Bush to sign it...:D


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.