Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   All time best horses (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=40800)

somerfrost 02-07-2011 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dahoss (Post 749665)
Holy Bull won less premier races? He won the Met Mile and Woodward as a 3 year old beating very solid older horses. Point Given never beat older horses. The only real loss you can put on Holy Bull was in the Derby when he never lifted a hoof. He was injured in his final career start in the Donn and flipped his palate in the Fountain of Youth.

You gotta be kidding with this stuff.

Agree that Holy Bull beat older horses...again, I put a lot of stock in TC races and Travers, especially if horse wins 2/3 in TC...comes down as I seem to keep repeating to personal opinion. Just fyi, I love the Bull but try to leave personal likes/dislikes out of rating.

somerfrost 02-07-2011 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985 (Post 749909)
Its really a shame, because of all the close ones I think he was most deserving. He won The Preakness for fun and destroyed the Belmont.

Yeah, I agree but Smarty Jones and Risen Star would be right there as well. I personally feel that had his connections not been morons, Star would have easily won the TC.

Dahoss 02-07-2011 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by somerfrost (Post 749910)
Agree that Holy Bull beat older horses...again, I put a lot of stock in TC races and Travers, especially if horse wins 2/3 in TC...comes down as I seem to keep repeating to personal opinion. Just fyi, I love the Bull but try to leave personal likes/dislikes out of rating.

Which is fine, but when you stack up what Point Given was beating in those premier races and then compare it to what Holy Bull was beating in the "less premier races", it's not even really close.

I'd rather look at the specific races and see what was actually in them, rather than just looking at the name of the race. But that is my opinion and realize it isn't shared by everyone.

somerfrost 02-07-2011 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dahoss (Post 749916)
Which is fine, but when you stack up what Point Given was beating in those premier races and then compare it to what Holy Bull was beating in the "less premier races", it's not even really close.

I'd rather look at the specific races and see what was actually in them, rather than just looking at the name of the race. But that is my opinion and realize it isn't shared by everyone.

No, I agree but remember how Point Given won the Preakness, Belmont and Travers...awesome horse denied TC by bad ride.

Dahoss 02-07-2011 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by somerfrost (Post 749918)
No, I agree but remember how Point Given won the Preakness, Belmont and Travers...awesome horse denied TC by bad ride.

Yes, he dominated bad horses, other than Congaree. You're stuck on the names of the races. We'll just agree to disagree.

Antitrust32 02-07-2011 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by somerfrost (Post 749910)
Agree that Holy Bull beat older horses...again, I put a lot of stock in TC races and Travers, especially if horse wins 2/3 in TC...comes down as I seem to keep repeating to personal opinion. Just fyi, I love the Bull but try to leave personal likes/dislikes out of rating.

How did you do this and come up with Zenyatta at 11?

Cannon Shell 02-07-2011 02:49 PM

The Triple Crown races are easily the most popular and publicized races. But they are generally far from the best races.

miraja2 02-07-2011 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by somerfrost (Post 749910)
Agree that Holy Bull beat older horses...again, I put a lot of stock in TC races and Travers, especially if horse wins 2/3 in TC...comes down as I seem to keep repeating to personal opinion. Just fyi, I love the Bull but try to leave personal likes/dislikes out of rating.

In that case I find your decision to rank Zenyatta well in front of Affirmed even more peculiar.

somerfrost 02-07-2011 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by miraja2 (Post 749939)
In that case I find your decision to rank Zenyatta well in front of Affirmed even more peculiar.

I knew that would bring a lot of criticism, again nationwide closers win at about 20% of races entered, that compared to much higher rates for front runners and stalkers, imo only a horse of exceptional quality could complile a record like Zenyatta's running as a dead closer. We can debate quality etc forever...it's a decision I feel comfortable with and so....

somerfrost 02-07-2011 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32 (Post 749925)
How did you do this and come up with Zenyatta at 11?

See my 4:15pm post.

Cannon Shell 02-07-2011 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by somerfrost (Post 749947)
I knew that would bring a lot of criticism, again nationwide closers win at about 20% of races entered, that compared to much higher rates for front runners and stalkers, imo only a horse of exceptional quality could complile a record like Zenyatta's running as a dead closer. We can debate quality etc forever...it's a decision I feel comfortable with and so....

This is really one of the worst arguments that I have ever heard. You treat her style as a handicap when it is simply her style. Her record is what it is because she ran against a bunch of dogs most of the time on tracks that favored her running style. Nationwide stats are not relevant since she was running on unique surfaces 90% of the time.

somerfrost 02-07-2011 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell (Post 749973)
This is really one of the worst arguments that I have ever heard. You treat her style as a handicap when it is simply her style. Her record is what it is because she ran against a bunch of dogs most of the time on tracks that favored her running style. Nationwide stats are not relevant since she was running on unique surfaces 90% of the time.

May be the worst argument you ever heard but it's my point, you disagree so I see no value in further debate.

randallscott35 02-07-2011 06:33 PM

As long as you feel "comfortable" Pete with having a pisspoor list, that's all that matters. :)

somerfrost 02-07-2011 06:36 PM

My best ever list, part 2 (21-40)
 
Got so much love from part one, I figured might as well post part 2:
(21) Dr Fager (1964)
(22) Seabiscuit (1933)
(23) Buckpasser (1963)
(24) Forego (1970)
(25) Cigar (1990)
(26) Risen Star (1985)
(27) Personal Ensign (1984)
(28) John Henry (1975)
(29) Gallant Fox (1927)
(30) Brigadier Gerard (1968)
(31) Round Table (1954)
(32) Pot8o's (1773)
(33) Phar Lap (19260
(34) Tiznow (1997)
(35) Whirlaway (1938)
(36) Hyperion (1930)
(37) Ormonde (1883)
(38) Nijinsky (1967)
(39) Gladiateur (1862)
(40) Sham (1970)

Pedigree Ann 02-07-2011 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AeWingnut (Post 749048)
off the top of my head
zero thought
wait...

but yeah , I agree

Skip Away best Fl bred

Affirmed, all the way. Although I can't argue with Dr. Fager's partisans.

somerfrost 02-07-2011 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by randallscott35 (Post 750059)
As long as you feel "comfortable" Pete with having a pisspoor list, that's all that matters. :)

Pete?? John!

randallscott35 02-07-2011 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by somerfrost (Post 750065)
Pete?? John!

Whatever.

somerfrost 02-07-2011 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by randallscott35 (Post 750066)
Whatever.

Yeah, since when does a name matter.

randallscott35 02-07-2011 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by somerfrost (Post 750067)
Yeah, since when does a name matter.

Not important to your list.

my miss storm cat 02-07-2011 07:26 PM

There are 1,608 Nerdy Trailers of which 907 are considered active.

Can you imagine if everyone did not one but two lists?

Just sayin...

AeWingnut 02-07-2011 07:30 PM

#1 Zenyatta

#2 Awad

#3 Silky Sullivan

Danzig 02-07-2011 08:10 PM

any all time list going back to the era of kincsem can't be taken seriously with zenyatta at number 11. that's a lot of horses in those centuries, and she's in the top 20. preposterous nonsense.

she won once ever in open company. tried open company all of twice in all her years of racing. gimme a break.

randallscott35 02-07-2011 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig (Post 750103)
any all time list going back to the era of kincsem can't be taken seriously with zenyatta at number 11. that's a lot of horses in those centuries, and she's in the top 20. preposterous nonsense.

she won once ever in open company. tried open company all of twice in all her years of racing. gimme a break.

:tro:

Danzig 02-07-2011 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell (Post 748895)
I understand why you posted this so I will bite. Zenyatta at 11? I am not sure she is the 11th best filly of all time if we are going to include horses from the 1800's. I'm anxious to hear why she is better than Kelso or Dr Fager who doesnt even make the top 20????

forego, john henry, round table...left off, but the pretender is number eleven all time.
this thread should be moved to esoteric under 'heard any good jokes lately?'

miraja2 02-07-2011 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig (Post 750103)
any all time list going back to the era of kincsem can't be taken seriously with zenyatta at number 11.

Your point is well taken but if you look carefully the list actually goes back over 150 years before Kincsem.

Danzig 02-08-2011 06:19 AM

i didn't look that carefully; it's not a list to be taken seriously.

OldDog 02-08-2011 06:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by my miss storm cat (Post 750084)
There are 1,608 Nerdy Trailers of which 907 are considered active.

Can you imagine if everyone did not one but two lists?

Just sayin...

Watch for my top 500 horses list, coming soon, sure to provoke many discussions about why I placed #426 ahead of #469. It's gonna blow this place wide open.

dagolfer33 02-08-2011 08:49 AM

There is an obvious bias against LA breds in this list as well, I see no mention of Happy Ticket or Costa Rising on this list.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.