Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Blame saved the historic integrity of the sport (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=39324)

prudery 11-07-2010 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by prudery (Post 718785)
You must be naked...


I SEE THE MODERATORS CHOSE TO DELETE SEVERAL POSTS BETWEEN ME AND INDIAN CHARLIE. AFTER THIS POST

THERE WERE AT LEAST TWO MORE EXCHANGES

NO SWEARING OR INAPPROPRIATE LANGUAGE-

THANK YOU FOR THE ALLOWING ME FREE EXPRESSION .ON THE BOARD AND IN PMS

Dahoss 11-07-2010 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by prudery (Post 719172)
I SEE THE MODERATORS CHOSE TO DELETE SEVERAL POSTS BETWEEN ME AND INDIAN CHARLIE. AFTER THIS POST

THERE WERE AT LEAST TWO MORE EXCHANGES

NO SWEARING OR INAPPROPRIATE LANGUAGE-

THANK YOU FOR THE ALLOWING ME FREE EXPRESSION .ON THE BOARD AND IN PMS

OPEN YOUR OWN BOARD IF YOU DONT LIKE THE WAY THIS ONE IS RUN

Indian Charlie 11-07-2010 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by prudery (Post 719172)
I SEE THE MODERATORS CHOSE TO DELETE SEVERAL POSTS BETWEEN ME AND INDIAN CHARLIE. AFTER THIS POST

THERE WERE AT LEAST TWO MORE EXCHANGES

NO SWEARING OR INAPPROPRIATE LANGUAGE-

THANK YOU FOR THE ALLOWING ME FREE EXPRESSION .ON THE BOARD AND IN PMS

I hadn't noticed that.

Perhaps the mods were getting asked by too many women for pictures of me?

I wasn't really naked, by the way.

Cannon Shell 11-07-2010 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dalakhani (Post 718928)
Blame has run 5 times over the surface in his 13 race career. Yesterday was his best race in my opinion. Its safe to say that Churchill downs is his home track for no other reason than he has run more there than anywhere else. Why is this not logical?

His Jockey said it took her a few steps to get use to the track and he said it last night when I was talking to him in front of Jeff Ruby's.

Do I think that there are any valid excuses? NO. I think Blame won fair and square. I just dispute the notion that having multiple runs over a track while and opponent has never run on said track should be considered an advantage. Of course it is. And if you don't incorporate "horse for course" in your handicapping i would be surprised.

The track they ran on yesterday was far different than the track last Sunday. on the scale of 1-100 with 100 being the most important I would rate prior experience over the track about a 3.

Cannon Shell 11-07-2010 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dalakhani (Post 719113)
Thats fair. Why didn't blame ever ship west? No one would ever accuse him of being a speed horse and he was 2 for 3 on synthetics. Why didn't he ever ship out west over the three seasons that he was in training?

The "why didn't they ship west" argument is completely lame. Especially when you know the answer.

prudery 11-07-2010 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dahoss (Post 719174)
OPEN YOUR OWN BOARD IF YOU DONT LIKE THE WAY THIS ONE IS RUN

I don't recall adressing you.

And do YOU run it, or just run off at the mouth excessively ??

Dahoss 11-07-2010 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by prudery (Post 719237)
I don't recall adressing you.

And do YOU run it, or just run off at the mouth excessively ??

I don't care who you addressed. If you don't like the way it is moderated no one is forcing you to post your rubbish here.

Danzig 11-07-2010 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dahoss (Post 719120)
Why would he? He's better on dirt, so why would they ship across the country and over the rockies to run on a surface he isn't as good on?

yeah, he should have shipped and taken on zenyatta in cali.

of course, he's no distaffer, so there goes that.

Cannon Shell 11-07-2010 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig (Post 719265)
yeah, he should have shipped and taken on zenyatta in cali.

of course, he's no distaffer, so there goes that.

Maybe he was scared of the mighty Richards Kid and Rail Trip like the great mare was?

prudery 11-07-2010 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dahoss (Post 719243)
I don't care who you addressed. If you don't like the way it is moderated no one is forcing you to post your rubbish here.

No one is forcing you to intereact with me except yourself .

You DO care who I addressed , and that it was I who did the addressing, otherwise you wouldn't have jumped in to defend collective interests and protect them from "rubbish".

Moderators are big kids, they can take care of themselves...

I do not recall I said I do not like the way the forum is moderated, I said posts were deleted and that is not free speech --of which there is plenty here ..

Left Bank 11-07-2010 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by prudery (Post 719278)
No one is forcing you to intereact with me except yourself .

You DO care who I addressed , and that it was I who did the addressing, otherwise you wouldn't have jumped in to defend collective interests and protect them from "rubbish".

Moderators are big kids, they can take care of themselves...

I do not recall I said I do not like the way the forum is moderated, I said posts were deleted and that is not free speech --of which there is plenty here ..

Take your ball and go home!

prudery 11-07-2010 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Left Bank (Post 719301)
Take your ball and go home!

Both of them ???

Dahoss 11-07-2010 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by prudery (Post 719278)
No one is forcing you to intereact with me except yourself .

You DO care who I addressed , and that it was I who did the addressing, otherwise you wouldn't have jumped in to defend collective interests and protect them from "rubbish".

Moderators are big kids, they can take care of themselves...

I do not recall I said I do not like the way the forum is moderated, I said posts were deleted and that is not free speech --of which there is plenty here ..


You're an idiot. I'd respond further, but it's a waste of time.

prudery 11-07-2010 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dahoss (Post 719338)
You're an idiot. I'd respond further, but it's a waste of time.

You already wasted your time, and mine .

I would love to believe you would never respond further to me, but that truly would be a bad bet '














.

Dahoss 11-07-2010 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by prudery (Post 719351)
You already wasted your time, and mine .

I would love to believe you would never respond further to me, but that truly would be a bad bet '
.

And I would love to believe at some point you will post something intelligent but that truly would be a bad bet.

prudery 11-07-2010 03:27 PM

Handicapped that one right .

Right quick.

prudery 11-07-2010 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dahoss (Post 719338)
You're an idiot. I'd respond further, but it's a waste of time.

To whit

Coach Pants 11-07-2010 03:41 PM

Go to the e-kitchen and make me an e-sammich.

prudery 11-07-2010 03:42 PM

E-sheis

Dahoss 11-07-2010 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by prudery (Post 719362)
Handicapped that one right .

Right quick.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HNvjx...eature=related

prudery 11-07-2010 03:53 PM

Still responding .

DaTruth 11-07-2010 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dahoss (Post 719395)

That cat had better watch it or he will be her next meal.

Duvalier 11-08-2010 07:56 AM

Bwahaha


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.