Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Zenyatta to the Beldame after Saturday (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=37550)

CSC 08-05-2010 11:02 AM

I've had this discussion before, contrary to belief I have moved on. But if others want to beat this topic to a pulp, this is fine by me.

Coach Pants 08-05-2010 11:05 AM


Dahoss 08-05-2010 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CSC (Post 678528)
I've had this discussion before, contrary to belief I have moved on. But if others want to beat this topic to a pulp, this is fine by me.

Translation: You're right. We both know I have no response, so I'll fake like I'm above the conversation. Hopefully some people buy it.

CSC 08-05-2010 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dahoss (Post 678533)
Translation: You're right. We both know I have no response, so I'll fake like I'm above the conversation. Hopefully some people buy it.

Better luck phishing for a fight with someone else.


slotdirt 08-05-2010 11:15 AM

Oh, and an early deduction from the judges for CSC for using the word "ph"ishing in a sentence. Recovering from that error will prove difficult.

CSC 08-05-2010 11:24 AM

If you are going to correct people here, atleast get the spelling right.

"phishing" also referred to as brand spoofing or carding, is a variation on "fishing," the idea being that bait is thrown out with the hopes that while most will ignore the bait, some will be tempted into biting.

The Indomitable DrugS 08-05-2010 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985 (Post 678470)
Is it because people cant except change, or is it because Beyer people cant make figures the right way for synthetic races?

Unlike your metabolism ... I won't ignore you.

I don't think it's any harder making figures for synthetic than it is for dirt. In fact, it's probably easier at most synthetic tracks.

The supposed "problems" come when the horses change surfaces.

Synthetic tracks make top horses look a little worse than they are - and they make bad horses look a little better than they are. As your facebook homeboy Baffert likes to say.

If you win by 3 lengths on turf or synthetic - it's a full fledged ass kicking. If you beat a field by the same margin on dirt ... it's a more competitive race.

That is why a bunch of horses who would consistantly run 50's on synthetic would not even come close to being able to run that fast when put on dirt. However, synthetic horses at the top end who handle dirt should be able to run faster numbers on dirt because dirt races are almost always truly run.

Danzig 08-05-2010 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 10 pnt move up (Post 678504)
dude thats everyone, other than maybe Christoph clement or James Cassidy.

you're right, which is why i don't understand rock hard tens comments on the surface.

Antitrust32 08-05-2010 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scav (Post 678474)
Its change

Our generation is fine with it, the old cranky people set in their ways just bitch and complain instead of educating themselves on it. It isn't like they can't just avoid it.

Bet you take a poll and people from 0-30 are fine with synthetics, people from 31-40 will be unfavored, and people 41+ the majority will hate it.

I cant stand synthetics.

how old are you again?

ateamstupid 08-05-2010 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scav (Post 678474)
Its change

Our generation is fine with it, the old cranky people set in their ways just bitch and complain instead of educating themselves on it. It isn't like they can't just avoid it.

Bet you take a poll and people from 0-30 are fine with synthetics, people from 31-40 will be unfavored, and people 41+ the majority will hate it.

This is completely unfounded and made up. I'm 23 and I'm not fine with them. In fact, I don't know anybody IRL, of any age, that likes them. There may be arguments for synthetics, but "if you hate them you're probably a geezer" sure as hell isn't one of them.

Antitrust32 08-05-2010 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CSC (Post 678528)
I've had this discussion before, contrary to belief I have moved on. But if others want to beat this topic to a pulp, this is fine by me.

sometimes you are okay.. and sometimes you are so Riot-esque. like now.

Scav 08-05-2010 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid (Post 678574)
This is completely unfounded and made up. I'm 23 and I'm not fine with them. In fact, I don't know anybody IRL, of any age, that likes them. There may be arguments for synthetics, but "if you hate them you're probably a geezer" sure as hell isn't one of them.

Obviously there are strays within data, but if you take some surveys and attached it to age, my belief is you would see that the younger generation has no problem with synthetics, and probably prefers it.

letswastemoney 08-05-2010 01:03 PM

I'm 27 and I don't like synthetics :(

It F's up history and makes people think synthetic winners belong on the list of best dirt horses ever.

MaTH716 08-05-2010 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scav (Post 678591)
Obviously there are strays within data, but if you take some surveys and attached it to age, my belief is you would see that the younger generation has no problem with synthetics, and probably prefers it.

Take all the data you want, but I believe that majority of people any age don't care either way. They are pure gamblers that couldn't care less if the horses were running on dirt, poly or broken glass.

Scav 08-05-2010 01:05 PM

The more I think about half the younger generation that actually follows horse racing is probably here so maybe I am wrong.

Call me crazy, most if not all my action is on synthetics. Barely play dirt.

CSC 08-05-2010 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32 (Post 678577)
sometimes you are okay.. and sometimes you are so Riot-esque. like now.

No offence but I don't know who Riot is, I'll try to do better but I have moved on from that dragged out topic. We can revisit it after the BC however.

ateamstupid 08-05-2010 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scav (Post 678597)
The more I think about half the younger generation that actually follows horse racing is probably here so maybe I am wrong.

Call me crazy, most if not all my action is on synthetics. Barely play dirt.

You're ****ing crazy.

slotdirt 08-05-2010 01:21 PM

I really can't wait to see the reaction of our California contingent when the Breeders Cup is in Louisville and Zenyatta's running her 20th race somewhere in Southern California.

10 pnt move up 08-05-2010 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dahoss (Post 678519)
You do know that fillies/mares run against males often.

Can you give me the other fillies besides RA and Zenyatta who have tried to run against older horses in the marquee races on dirt/syn of the past decade or so? Races like the Woodward, JCGC, SA Derby, Hol GC, PC, Clark, Foster, Pim Special, and BC Classic?

I came up with like two. Turf yes its done more often, especially the mile distance.

CSC 08-05-2010 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 10 pnt move up (Post 678615)
Can you give me the other fillies besides RA and Zenyatta who have tried to run against older horses in the marquee races on dirt/syn of the past decade or so? Races like the Woodward, JCGC, SA Derby, Hol GC, PC, Clark, Foster, Pim Special, and BC Classic?

I came up with like two. Turf yes its done more often, especially the mile distance.

Goldikova and Six Perfections?

10 pnt move up 08-05-2010 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CSC (Post 678617)
Goldikova and Six Perfections?

they are turf milers......those are not the american classic races...forgot the Donn in there.

Revidere 08-05-2010 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 10 pnt move up (Post 678615)
Can you give me the other fillies besides RA and Zenyatta who have tried to run against older horses in the marquee races on dirt/syn of the past decade or so? Races like the Woodward, JCGC, SA Derby, Hol GC, PC, Clark, Foster, Pim Special, and BC Classic?

I came up with like two. Turf yes its done more often, especially the mile distance.

I'm going with Azeri (Met Mile, Breeder's Cup Classic) and Island Fashion (Big Cap) and of course Devil May Care

10 pnt move up 08-05-2010 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Revidere (Post 678621)
I'm going with Azeri (Met Mile, Breeder's Cup Classic) and Island Fashion (Big Cap) and of course Devil May Care

how did they do?

Antitrust32 08-05-2010 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scav (Post 678597)
The more I think about half the younger generation that actually follows horse racing is probably here so maybe I am wrong.

Call me crazy, most if not all my action is on synthetics. Barely play dirt.

maybe that is because Arlington is your home track?

Barely play dirt?!?!?! Honey you play everything you can get action on!!

:{>:

Revidere 08-05-2010 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 10 pnt move up (Post 678622)
how did they do?

Ahem....Not well.

Antitrust32 08-05-2010 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CSC (Post 678600)
No offence but I don't know who Riot is, I'll try to do better but I have moved on from that dragged out topic. We can revisit it after the BC however.

lucky you! (it's best to keep it that way also)

just keep working on it.. you'll get there.

slotdirt 08-05-2010 01:32 PM

Didn't Life is Sweet try one of those races? St. Trinians?

Antitrust32 08-05-2010 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 10 pnt move up (Post 678622)
how did they do?

Rags to Riches :)

ateamstupid 08-05-2010 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 10 pnt move up (Post 678615)
Can you give me the other fillies besides RA and Zenyatta who have tried to run against older horses in the marquee races on dirt/syn of the past decade or so? Races like the Woodward, JCGC, SA Derby, Hol GC, PC, Clark, Foster, Pim Special, and BC Classic?

I came up with like two. Turf yes its done more often, especially the mile distance.

Can you give me the other 17-for-17 bestest mares of all-time? We're led to believe that her success is unprecedented. If that's so, her challenges should be as well.

10 pnt move up 08-05-2010 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32 (Post 678630)
Rags to Riches :)

that was a restricted race, but yup thats one

10 pnt move up 08-05-2010 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid (Post 678631)
Can you give me the other 17-for-17 bestest mares of all-time? We're led to believe that her success is unprecedented. If that's so, her challenges should be as well.

Dahoss does not put her in that group, at least I think thats what he has said.

No filly can consistently run with older colts and win.......you can take that to the bank. Once, twice maybe, but not 3-4 times a year, IMO. It will break them.

slotdirt 08-05-2010 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 10 pnt move up (Post 678638)
Dahoss does not put her in that group, at least I think thats what he has said.

No filly can consistently run with older colts and win.......you can take that to the bank. Once, twice maybe, but not 3-4 times a year, IMO. It will break them.


I think you just changed your argument. Regardless, it happens in Europe all the time. Heck, St. Trinians just tried the boys this spring. Life is Sweet did it last year. Were those restricted races, or are you just ignoring the posts that have been made since you posited this question that completely refute your argument?

Dahoss 08-05-2010 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 10 pnt move up (Post 678615)
Can you give me the other fillies besides RA and Zenyatta who have tried to run against older horses in the marquee races on dirt/syn of the past decade or so? Races like the Woodward, JCGC, SA Derby, Hol GC, PC, Clark, Foster, Pim Special, and BC Classic?

I came up with like two. Turf yes its done more often, especially the mile distance.

Seriously?

Azeri did it. But who cares how many have tried?

Dahoss 08-05-2010 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 10 pnt move up (Post 678638)
Dahoss does not put her in that group, at least I think thats what he has said.

No filly can consistently run with older colts and win.......you can take that to the bank. Once, twice maybe, but not 3-4 times a year, IMO. It will break them.

I don't think even you put her in that group. She's ducked too many races.

ateamstupid 08-05-2010 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 10 pnt move up (Post 678638)
Dahoss does not put her in that group, at least I think thats what he has said.

No filly can consistently run with older colts and win.......you can take that to the bank. Once, twice maybe, but not 3-4 times a year, IMO. It will break them.

Yeah? What if the older colts suck? Does that matter? Or do their genitals supersede their ability?

CSC 08-05-2010 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dahoss (Post 678645)
Seriously?

Azeri did it. But who cares how many have tried?

Yep, and Azeri did great in those races.

Dahoss 08-05-2010 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CSC (Post 678657)
Yep, and Azeri did great in those races.

No one disputes Azeri is not an all time great.

Again, what does how Azeri finished in the races have anything to do with Zenyatta ducking them? Oh I get it. You are afraid she'll lose.

The Indomitable DrugS 08-05-2010 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Revidere (Post 678626)
Ahem....Not well.

Island Fashion was 2nd in the Santa Antia Handicap the first time she ran in it.

Her poor races in the Pacific Classic and Big Cap came when she was off form later on in her career.

CSC 08-05-2010 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dahoss (Post 678670)
No one disputes Azeri is not an all time great.

Again, what does how Azeri finished in the races have anything to do with Zenyatta ducking them? Oh I get it. You are afraid she'll lose.

That is why the Classic will be more interesting than usual, it's on your preferred surface, there is no excuse for other horses to duck it this time around. We will find out if she does win or lose then. I understand why everyone wants to see her tested, the difference with me is I don't care whether it's in Aug or Nov. As long as she does, better then, then never, or to have her run in the Woodward for instance and then have an excuse to duck out the rest of the year.

MaTH716 08-05-2010 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CSC (Post 678680)
That is why the Classic will be more interesting than usual, it's on your preferred surface, there is no excuse for other horses to duck it this time around. We will find out if she does win or lose then. I understand why everyone wants to see her tested, the difference with me is I don't care whether it's in Aug or Nov. As long as she does, better then, then never, or to have her run in the Woodward for instance and then have an excuse to duck out the rest of the year.

She ran an 8 race campaign last year at 7 different tracks against all kinds of company. I wouldn't exactly call not going to a race on a thrid surface ducking out on the rest of the year.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.