![]() |
Quote:
|
Saratoga needs to step up here... Now that Rachel appears to be back and with big Z likely to win tomorrow... They should make the Whitney $5 million if Rachel, Z and QR show up... Likely if they all came and the purse was that big I am pretty sure Blame, Battle Plan and even Rail Trip would all show up... They could market it as the race of the decade, kind of stick it to the BC for giving it to Churchill again in 2011.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think she would have ran 3rd in the Foster today, the top 2 are pretty good. Lets not compare who Rachel beat to Battle Plan, I doubt Battle Plan comes back to her the way Jessica Is **** did. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Blame ran huge, was there even one horse to win coming off the pace today on dirt? To run down a horse like Battle Plan makes it even more impressive also throwing in his post and wide trip, that was amazing.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I understand by the many comments on here that there were high hopes for Battle Plan. And Blame certainly didnt have the best of trips to run him down, but I just couldnt help but notice, and I saw this watching live, that about 100yrs from the wire BP was looking for a place to lay down. He had everything his own way and basically stopped at the wire. Although it was a solid G1 win for Blame I just didnt see it as awesome. BP put up zero fight at the wire.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I would not be surprised at all to see Battle Plan go on the shelf, or never run again. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
As I said before, I don't know why Castellano didn't switch to his left hand to try to get the horse back on his right lead. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
RA had a nice go as a 3 yo, but I still dont see undefeated in her PPs. |
Quote:
They seem to be willing to take a chance that others will fail and they could simply pick up the remains in the BCC with a fresh horse. |
Quote:
The Mosse's must think that if she goes undefeated and manages to win a 2ond Breeders Cup Classic that gets her HOY. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's amazing hope people just love to hate. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
This was a joke of a field and if Zenyatta beat this same field tomorrow at hollywood park, many would be asking to put an asterisk by the win. I don't think there is any evidence that says this is the "real rachel" and the one that raced a month ago against Unrivaled belle was some type of impostor. She is the same filly. Its what was running behind her today that changed. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
What has the 6 yr old Jessica is Back done outside of Florida? How many graded stakes wins has she won? Her main claim to fame is finishing 2nd in the Gr.3 Sixty Sails. This to you means she is better than St. Trinians, if so I would love to hear why you think so...U-N-B-E-L-I-E-V-A-B-L-E. |
Quote:
I think most people who question her campaign do so out of a respect of Zenyatta's ability. She could be dominating races like the Grade 1s for males all year. At this point, I would take a shot against the Rail Trips and Blames of the equine world before I would run against the fillies and risk Zenyatta getting a terrible trip and one of the other fillies getting a dream trip and beating her. |
Quote:
|
There is no reason why Zenyatta should not be targeting the Hollywood Gold Cup. Ten furlongs, a racetrack she loves... no reason to not be there.
|
Quote:
RA has shown that she was the top 3 yo in the country last year and her campain this year is showing signs that she might not want to keep doing it. That is not the same a undefeated over 16 races. People do love to hate, weather its East vs West, Bush vs Obama or Z vs RA thats the way it is. Enjoy it while you can. |
Quote:
Do you ever stop? What does Distinctive Dixie or Jessica is Back have to do with Zenyatta's ability to handle the Californian field and possible Gold Cup, Goodwood fields? Only you can miss what is actually a compliment of Zenyatta's ability and think it somehow has to do with Rachel. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I still think she should of taken on the Met Mile at one turn. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You can question my race watching ability all you want and no doubt it is certainly questionable (ask youbet!) but what was so much better about that performance yesterday? She faced weaker company than she had previously faced and she was able to draw off in the stretch. In her last race, replace unrivaled belle with jessica is back or that other nag from yesterday and Rachel does the exact same thing. How is this better? Because her speed fig came out higher? I don't want to get deep in to this whole "who is better" thing. I am just saying that Rachel did what she was supposed to do yesterday and she did it stylishly but you aren't going to be able to tell anything about where she is until you put a real horse in there against her as opposed to the claimers she beat yesterday. Is that not a fair statement? |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:57 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.