Your mother always wanted you to be a lawyer

He had a lot of antibiotics but everything else was nothing special. If you take away the antibiotics there really isnt much there.

I may eventually go down the Darrel Vienna route

Save the gastroguard which is over priced (who uses this anymore?) How about the anti inflam stuff? My "wonder pig" needs his ankles done with either acid or cortisone every month just to be able to train..That isn't good. If this horse needed such levels of meds it should have been repped and once it was BUYER BEWARE.. Why is Allday's opinion so different then yours on the subject.. Is he smarter then you also?lol

What are you talking about? Alldays opinion is hardly different than mine of course I dont have 1000s of gallons of lubrysn to sell either.

This "wonder pig" was the fav for the Derby. Should they not bother trying to win? What exactly qualifies you to know what is good or not?

The Wonder pig is what I call my horse not IWR who I thought was a heck of a talent..My horse needs constant anti inflammatory meds .. I noticed the commercial the other day as well for lube a butt.. I have been told be many a trainer gastoguard is good but 3 times as expensive as it competition which is just as good.. Do I know it isnt better NO but I dont even know if the Lipitor isn't killing me either.

Ask your trainer to hop the Wonder Pig. Tell him to use the best hop around


the drop!!!

Whatever beattie wants. She got the pig to win last nite in a MDN 5 I think the BSF was a 12 lol WHOA

I guess there is no drop from there. Try the circus

For him or the horse?

Horse, I am heading for the carnival

They went six furlongs in 1:16.34 in the 1st race. A mere 4.14 seconds slower than the wonder pig at the same distance that day.

If the wonder pig gets a 12 Beyer ... that would mean the winner of race #1 would get a negative 45 Beyer. And the 2nd place finisher in race #1 would get a negative 46 Beyer.

Considering that the horse that just missed had run 25, 54, and 23 in her 3 career starts ... I doubt she will get a negative 46 this time.

I think you have answered your own question about the law by reading this piece about a decision handed down months ago.
As to insurance companies, horses are property-chattel-and that is what title insurance, et al is for.

The first link you brought up included this:
IEAH is simply saying that it bought into a horse -- for a princely sum -- and was not kept informed of the condition and welfare of their living, breathing investment until such point that he was scratched from the Derby and the colt's unsoundness was undeniable. In fact, IEAH claims it asked Lanzman directly about a Derby Eve rumor that the colt would be scratched and that Lanzman was dishonest by denying the rumor, a claim Lanzman denies.
That makes for a good story. Such claims lead one to question the honesty and transparency of the back side at America's racetracks, and whether even the richest owners who have millions invested are really kept up to speed with what's going on with their horses. And actually, the writer does a very good job of detailing the facts and claims that IEAH has presented regarding that aspect of the case.

IEAH is not an entity I am proud to see represent horseracing for the US. But in this case it appears they are right, legally and morally.

All horses are sold without guarantee to their physical condition unless specifically mentioned. IEAH had an opportunity to have a vet of their choosing examine the horse prior to purchasing their portion of the horse. If they did so and their vet passed the horse then what claim do they have? There is no lemon law regarding horses and the vet records that we have seen are pretty clear. Not to mention that IEAH is privy to their own billing records which shows what has been done to the horse. If they want to have a different arrangement with the vet it is up to them to express that.

I would love to see the bill of sale for the purchase.

And there is no title insurance for horses. The only insurance you can get for racehorses is mortality and it seems as though IWR is still alive.

Morally it seems as though IEAH wants to back out of its agreement because it didnt work out for them as opposed to any rightful claim they have.

The moral of this story is be careful with who you do business with....for both sides.

Kind of looks like IEAH wants the same deal they got from Larry Roman...buy into a horse, if it doesn't work out like you thought...just cancel the sale and get your money back.

http://www.thoroughbredtimes.com/nat...oman-deal.aspx

Roman extricated himself from that deal.. if you get my drift.

Got it.

It appears that IAEH failed to perform thorough due diligence in their haste to buy another Derby winner. Too bad for them. I really feel for those jacks and a scumbag like Mullins.

As opposed to their purchase of Patena??

Did they sue then too? Saw old Mike Ivanhoe and his bodyguard today out at Keeneland today.

And he should be very mad his filly did not win there.

No drugs over in Europe...
http://www.racingbase.com/category/R...-200910100004/

Oversight

of course