Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Dutrow running one off 2 days rest (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=23647)

sumitas 06-30-2008 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Linny
I have no idea if the horse in question broke down because of the short rest or not. Certainly he wouldn't have done so in his stall, but that means nothing.
He probably would be alive now had he not raced but was he going to break next time anyhow? Can a potentially fatal "pending injury" be fixed with 2 weeks off? Based on the worktab, he was trying to get the horse claimed and kick the broken can down the lane to the next unsuspecting trainer. Now, I agree that that's neither "nice" nor entirely humane but Rick isn't the only one guilty of such stuff. It happens all the time and is done by elite barns as well as modest claiming operations.

This type of activity needs to be eliminated from racing. It is a recipe for breakdowns and cannot be accepted by what I hope will be a new national racing body that will enforce rules for honesty and health.

ArlJim78 06-30-2008 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Linny
I have no idea if the horse in question broke down because of the short rest or not. Certainly he wouldn't have done so in his stall, but that means nothing.
He probably would be alive now had he not raced but was he going to break next time anyhow? Can a potentially fatal "pending injury" be fixed with 2 weeks off? Based on the worktab, he was trying to get the horse claimed and kick the broken can down the lane to the next unsuspecting trainer. Now, I agree that that's neither "nice" nor entirely humane but Rick isn't the only one guilty of such stuff. It happens all the time and is done by elite barns as well as modest claiming operations.

running back two days later does not happen all the time. in my database of 65,000 starters, it happened 5 times.

TheSpyder 06-30-2008 02:10 PM

I was hopeing you would weight in Jim. Any idea how those 5 did?

Spyder
Quote:

Originally Posted by ArlJim78
running back two days later does not happen all the time. in my database of 65,000 starters, it happened 5 times.


ArlJim78 06-30-2008 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSpyder
I was hopeing you would weight in Jim. Any idea how those 5 did?

Spyder

one second, one third, three out of the money.

three came from Leo O'Brien, one from Dutrow and one from Contessa.

Leo O'Brien actually sent out horses after two days rest on consecutive days last winter. so in four days he got 4 starts from two horses.

RolloTomasi 06-30-2008 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArlJim78
one second, one third, three out of the money.

three came from Leo O'Brien, one from Dutrow and one from Contessa.

Leo O'Brien actually sent out horses after two days rest on consecutive days last winter. so in four days he got 4 starts from two horses.

What were the conditions, though?

Leo O'Brien and Allen Jerkens have been known to sprint a horse (assumingly as a glorified workout) in anticipation of a route race a couple of days later (Fourstars Allstar was a good example, I think he ran in the Laurel Dash and showed up a couple of days later in the International).

Its one thing to run a horse on short rest when the initial start could, at least on paper, be labeled as a "tune-up" and a whole other thing if a horse is meant to be all out in both races (which often times is not good for business).

TheSpyder 06-30-2008 03:03 PM

Good points and thanks Jim.

Spyd

ArlJim78 06-30-2008 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RolloTomasi
What were the conditions, though?

Leo O'Brien and Allen Jerkens have been known to sprint a horse (assumingly as a glorified workout) in anticipation of a route race a couple of days later (Fourstars Allstar was a good example, I think he ran in the Laurel Dash and showed up a couple of days later in the International).

Its one thing to run a horse on short rest when the initial start could, at least on paper, be labeled as a "tune-up" and a whole other thing if a horse is meant to be all out in both races (which often times is not good for business).

well i don't know if you would call these tune-ups or what.

My Guarini, trained by O'brien
Jan 9th, debuts MSW at Aqu, finishes last by 44 lengths
Jan 11, MCL15000 at Aqu, finishes last by 36
never seen again

Maps Hope, trained by O'brien
Jan 10th, MDN15000 at Aqu, finishes 3rd by three, best finish for Leo
Jan 12th, MSW at Aqu, finishes 5th by 4,
horse then sent to Duggan and actually just broke maiden on June 18th.

Eclectic, trained by Dutrow
mar 27th, str ALW at Aqu, airs by 5 lengths over a 4 horse field.
Mar 29th, ALW at Aqu, 3rd by 1 1/2
has raced a couple times since

Ease My Mind,
Apr 3rd, CLM 35K at Aqu, finishes 8th by 13, ran for Timothy Hills but claimed by Contessa for Winning Move.
Apr 5th, ALW1 at Aqu, finishes 6th by 8 lens.
raced again June 18th, Clm 12.5K at DEL finishes second

Hoist The Gala, trained by Leo
May 15th, Mdn 35K at Bel, finishes 4th by 5
May 17th, MSW BEL, finishes 2 by 1/4
just raced again last week finishing 5th, still a maiden

ArlJim78 06-30-2008 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
I think what Linny was referring to was the trainer trying to get the horse claimed and not so much the 2 days. At least that is how I read it.

you could be right, and I wasn't sure either. the claiming issue was sort of added on to the main topic about quick comebacks.

Cannon Shell 06-30-2008 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freddymo
I think I could get a deal on Stormy Atlantic at 25 to 30k its a nice match.. Will see

Great selection. She matches well with him and he can help her physically especially behind.

sumitas 06-30-2008 04:56 PM

How about Comeonmom.

Cannon Shell 06-30-2008 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sumitas
How about Comeonmom.

What about him?

Linny 07-01-2008 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArlJim78
running back two days later does not happen all the time. in my database of 65,000 starters, it happened 5 times.

What I meant is that horses who have known injuries or are "ticking time bombs" are run all the time, when rest is warranted. I don't know anything about the horse in question but he looked like one that they knew had a serious issue and they ran this risk of several quick works and a couple of closely spaced races to give the claiming trainers the idea that he was a sound/fit horse, one ripe for claiming.
The other points were that this is not something that only done by "claiming trainers" and that even if this Dutrow horse had been give (say) 2 weeks rest he probably still would have broken down. It's pretty likely that he had something about to blow.

Echo Farm 07-02-2008 02:08 PM

This is heresay, and from the FOB forum, so take it with a whole shaker of salt.

Can anyone verify it?

Quote:

I just talked wit the NJ State Vet - it was determined on Tuesday that Unrequited had a fractured pelvis and he was euthanized.. The vet was aware that the horse had just run the friday before at Belmont Park but said that unfortunately there were no state rules that prohibited that.. these were Unrequited's first races after a one year lay off..
http://forums.prospero.com/alexbrown...s?msg=25843.49

parsixfarms 07-02-2008 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Echo Farm
This is heresay, and from the FOB forum, so take it with a whole shaker of salt.

Can anyone verify it?



http://forums.prospero.com/alexbrown...s?msg=25843.49

I have no first hand information about whether the horse was euthanized but these were not his first two races of the year. He had been away about a year, but before these races, he ran in late May/early June at Belmont and/or Monmouth.

Linny 07-02-2008 02:35 PM

The problem with the FOB board is that while there are alot of orsemen on there, very few have ever read the DRF and couldn't tell as past performance from a pasta primavera. Alot are fans but they are really not well informed about the inside working of the game.
With all due respect to the horsemen here on DT, many don't nreally know that much about handicapping and don't read the PP's regularly.

parsixfarms 07-02-2008 02:36 PM

Confirmation that the horse was euthanzized: http://www.paulickreport.com/blog/du...se-euthanized/

Echo Farm 07-02-2008 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Linny
The problem with the FOB board is that while there are alot of orsemen on there, very few have ever read the DRF and couldn't tell as past performance from a pasta primavera..

you say it well........................:tro:

TheSpyder 07-02-2008 03:10 PM

Maybe he was talking about Iwoman who just won at Arlington?:zz:
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
What about him?


dalakhani 07-02-2008 03:16 PM

I was in Ascot in 2006 and if im not mistaken, they ran Takeover Target on Tuesday and turned around and ran him again on saturday.

I think each horse is different. I dont see why it is such an outrage to have a horse run back if he comes out of a race fine and he is ready to go.

Obviously, Dutrow's wasnt...so im not trying to justify anything. My point is, that we cant blame what happened on the fact that it was two days. We should blame it on the fact that that particular horse wasnt ready.

ArlJim78 07-02-2008 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dalakhani
I was in Ascot in 2006 and if im not mistaken, they ran Takeover Target on Tuesday and turned around and ran him again on saturday.

I think each horse is different. I dont see why it is such an outrage to have a horse run back if he comes out of a race fine and he is ready to go.

Obviously, Dutrow's wasnt...so im not trying to justify anything. My point is, that we cant blame what happened on the fact that it was two days. We should blame it on the fact that that particular horse wasnt ready.

we're talking about a two day turnaround with cheap horses, and you give an example of a top horse that ran back in four days.

how do you know for sure when the horse is ready to go? what is the limit? can they come back the next day? later in the same card? I'm sure some horses could do it, the question is aren't you inviting trouble and exposing them to increased risk at some point?

Danzig 07-02-2008 03:50 PM

well, trainers are supposed to know when a horse is ready to go. a quick turnaround on its own may raise eyebrows, but isn't necessarily a reason to call peta--but if dutrow had indications that the horse shouldn't run, and ran him anway hoping for a claim--well, then he deserves all the grief he can get.

dalakhani 07-02-2008 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig
well, trainers are supposed to know when a horse is ready to go. a quick turnaround on its own may raise eyebrows, but isn't necessarily a reason to call peta--but if dutrow had indications that the horse shouldn't run, and ran him anway hoping for a claim--well, then he deserves all the grief he can get.

Exactly!

dalakhani 07-02-2008 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArlJim78
we're talking about a two day turnaround with cheap horses, and you give an example of a top horse that ran back in four days.

how do you know for sure when the horse is ready to go? what is the limit? can they come back the next day? later in the same card? I'm sure some horses could do it, the question is aren't you inviting trouble and exposing them to increased risk at some point?

Your points are valid. I just dont think in this age of treating horses like china dolls we should complain about trainers actually wanting to run their horses.

And what does the fact that the horse is "cheap" have to do with his his soundness. Are cheap horses more or less likely to sustain injury on a quick turnaround?

my miss storm cat 07-02-2008 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Echo Farm
This is heresay, and from the FOB forum, so take it with a whole shaker of salt.

Can anyone verify it?



http://forums.prospero.com/alexbrown...s?msg=25843.49

Found this.

Too bad...

http://www.paulickreport.com/blog/du...se-euthanized/

RolloTomasi 07-02-2008 09:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dalakhani
And what does the fact that the horse is "cheap" have to do with his his soundness.

In some cases, a lot. Unrequited, for example, was a well-meant horse (he was owned by the nationally prominent Jay Em Ess Stable) from the outset, making his debut in 2005 in a maiden special at Del Mar for Ron Ellis. After that race, he was gone for over 6 months before resurfacing at Hollywood and winning a maiden special weight at Hollywood. Despite lining up against future stakes horses such as Sailor's Sunset, he ultimately began dipping into mid-level claiming ranks with some success in 2007 in CA before disappearing again, this time for over a year. He finally resurfaced with the stable's East Coast trainer, Dutrow, who ran him a few times before his fatal injury.

When you consider the fact that this horse had two long layoffs during his career and was steadily dropping in value (where once he butted heads with stakes-calibur horses), certainly, even on paper alone, his soundness (in general--not necessarily at Monmouth on raceday) had to be questioned.

dalakhani 07-02-2008 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RolloTomasi
In some cases, a lot. Unrequited, for example, was a well-meant horse (he was owned by the nationally prominent Jay Em Ess Stable) from the outset, making his debut in 2005 in a maiden special at Del Mar for Ron Ellis. After that race, he was gone for over 6 months before resurfacing at Hollywood and winning a maiden special weight at Hollywood. Despite lining up against future stakes horses such as Sailor's Sunset, he ultimately began dipping into mid-level claiming ranks with some success in 2007 in CA before disappearing again, this time for over a year. He finally resurfaced with the stable's East Coast trainer, Dutrow, who ran him a few times before his fatal injury.

When you consider the fact that this horse had two long layoffs during his career and was steadily dropping in value (where once he butted heads with stakes-calibur horses), certainly, even on paper alone, his soundness (in general--not necessarily at Monmouth on raceday) had to be questioned.

I hear what you are saying. And again, my point was never to defend Dutrow with this particular horse. I dont know enough about the situation to speak to it one way or another.

My point was more in that there are horses that can run back really fast and some of them are stake horses and some of them are cheap. Its the trainer's job to know which ones can and cant.

Obviously, in this situation, Dutrow was wrong in thinking the horse could do it.

blackthroatedwind 07-02-2008 09:40 PM

Dutrow ran The Cuban Hawk in today's 7th race, going 1 1/16th on the turf, off an 11 month layoff. He finished a credible third. He is entered, at 6F on the turf, in Friday's 9th race.

cowgirlintexas 07-02-2008 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
Dutrow ran The Cuban Hawk in today's 7th race, going 1 1/16th on the turf, off an 11 month layoff. He finished a credible third. He is entered, at 6F on the turf, in Friday's 9th race.

Surely he was cross entered and will scratch... Surely...

blackthroatedwind 07-02-2008 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cowgirlintexas
Surely he was cross entered and will scratch... Surely...


He knew he was running in today's 7th when he entered for Friday.

Not to be picky, but this would not be the correct situation to use the term " cross entered. "

cowgirlintexas 07-02-2008 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
He knew he was running in today's 7th when he entered for Friday.

Not to be picky, but this would not be the correct situation to use the term " cross entered. "

Cross entered is only on the same day? Thanks for the clarification.

Hope the horse doesn't run Friday after what happened last week. Has he totally lost his mind?!! How much more bad publicity does he want drawn to him?? Unreal!!

ArlJim78 07-02-2008 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cowgirlintexas
Cross entered is only on the same day? Thanks for the clarification.

Hope the horse doesn't run Friday after what happened last week. Has he totally lost his mind?!! How much more bad publicity does he want drawn to him?? Unreal!!

he's done pretty well with the 3-5 day comebacks.

tiggerv 07-02-2008 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
Dutrow ran The Cuban Hawk in today's 7th race, going 1 1/16th on the turf, off an 11 month layoff. He finished a credible third. He is entered, at 6F on the turf, in Friday's 9th race.

I guess he couldn't find a race on Thursday.

cowgirlintexas 07-02-2008 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArlJim78
he's done pretty well with the 3-5 day comebacks.

I was'nt aware of that.. Kind of a throw back to the old days of training. I know trotters run that way, but I just figured he would want to "lay low" for awhile instead of pushing the envelope. Has this horse run back before on 2 days rest?

ArlJim78 07-02-2008 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cowgirlintexas
Has this horse run back before on 2 days rest?

No, but its not a sure thing that he goes on Friday either.

docicu3 07-02-2008 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
He knew he was running in today's 7th when he entered for Friday.

Not to be picky, but this would not be the correct situation to use the term " cross entered. "


Has there ever been a case of a horse actually running two races in a day.

Is there a rule against such lunacy or is it possible for a trainer to "pull up" a horse early in a race and then race on the same night at a nearby track.

parsixfarms 07-03-2008 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by docicu3
Has there ever been a case of a horse actually running two races in a day.

Is there a rule against such lunacy or is it possible for a trainer to "pull up" a horse early in a race and then race on the same night at a nearby track.

Earlier in this thread we discussed how Dutrow did it with Golden Man, in consecutive stakes, on consecutive days at Monmouth and Delaware, a few years ago.

parsixfarms 07-03-2008 08:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tiggerv
I guess he couldn't find a race on Thursday.

Oscar could have.

Echo Farm 07-03-2008 08:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parsixfarms
Earlier in this thread we discussed how Dutrow did it with Golden Man, in consecutive stakes, on consecutive days at Monmouth and Delaware, a few years ago.

But that wasn't Richard. The trainer was Lawrence Walters at Monmouth, and Tony Dutrow at Delaware. :rolleyes:

parsixfarms 07-03-2008 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Echo Farm
But that wasn't Richard. The trainer was Lawrence Walters at Monmouth, and Tony Dutrow at Delaware. :rolleyes:

Golden Man was Dutrow's horse, for Goldfarb and Dubb. Apparently, this occurred when Dutrow was serving a "suspension." Walters was Dutrow's Monmouth assistant, so the horse ran in his name there, and Tony Dutrow apparently saddled the horse in Delaware for his brother.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:02 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.