Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   Sports Bar & Grill (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Mitchell Report Guessing Game (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=18712)

pdrift1 12-14-2007 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by horseofcourse
Mitchell report biggest waste of time on the planet. Who cares?? I actually feel bad for the 85 players listed as that left off about 500 to 1,000 or so who should also have been in it. It's only a story in baseball. Bonds was talked about daily for 5 years. Shawn Merriman is never talked about. It's a waste of time. This report will not stop drug use in any sport. There is always something better to go on to. All the players in the 60s and 70s were performance enhanced as well with their amphetemine popping non-stop. They immediately went to HGH, and soon they'll move beyond HGH. It's a lot of money involved. People will continue to cheat in mass numbers. End of story.

exactly what i had said in a ealier post.

i'm sick as i think most baseball fans are of hearing about steroids all the time. who cares. its done. time to move on.there will always be newer drugs to use so your not going to stop it just try to control it as best you can

you will never get a handle on this thing, the scope of it is to big, so thier is no way to fairly judge one and leave out the countless others who are going to get away with it

i'm not going to even waste my time reading this report cause i could give a **** less. it was what it was-is what it is . let it go.

put a disclaimer in the front of the record books as costas said(can't believe i even agree with him-hate him) and let people form thier own opinions.

and yes if i had a vote bonds and clemens would be going to the hall of fame

case closed

i'm ready for opening day 2008.

horseofcourse 12-14-2007 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cardus
I heard Costas on ESPN radio this morning.

One item with which I disagree (though this gets into the issue of Hall of Fame voting): Costas said that Bonds and Clemens should be withheld from the Hall on their first ballots. Nonsense. That's not punishment if they are subdequently voted into the Hall.

Either they've satisfied the requirements or they haven't.

That's ludicrous. Who cares...if you really want to get technical you have to ban or withhold everyone for a year who played after 1984 as you have no idea who juiced and who didn't. Very few will admit it openly. I certainly believe Clemens used...but what do you have really?? The testimony of a guy. That's it. flimsy.

Mortimer 12-14-2007 11:56 AM

They should all be shot and replaced with test lab monkeys.

pgardn 12-14-2007 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
This may a big story for the media but they really didn't reveal anything that hadn't already been rumored already. Most of the players named are retired or not any good. There have been plenty of rumors surrounding Clemens already. It is hard to believe that this cost $60 million to produce.

Yes but it will clean up baseball.
How the crud else was this going to happen?
The player's union, the players, the owners, the trainers... hell freezes when they come clean.

bunch of friggin cheaters...

Coach Pants 12-14-2007 01:41 PM

but...what about the purity of the game?

:rolleyes:

whodey17 12-14-2007 02:31 PM

What surprised me the most is that I do not recall seeing Mark McGuire's name on the list.

horseofcourse 12-14-2007 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pillow Pants
but...what about the purity of the game?

:rolleyes:

3 strikes, 4 balls, 27 outs. It's still pure....that won't change!! In keeping with the spirit if I were Bud Selig here is what I would do. Legalize everything and go with 350 pound DHs with aluminum bats..or super ball corked wooden bats...doesn't matter. And allow the pitchers to take tool chests out to the mound as well...vaseline/emory boards/syringes etc. Go to kick ball rules where you can get a guy out on the basepaths by hitting them with a thrown ball. This would induce full body armor uniforms which would enhance marketing for the clubs as everyone gets new uniforms. Go to 2 DH lineups so you have 10 total in the batting order. More offense. Make Manny cut his hair and force the Yankees to allow Damon to play in his Captain Caveman gear. clemens wins his 8th, 9th , and 10th cy youngs with full public moonings on the mound juicing himself and Bonds aproaches 950 home runs as he is already used to the full body armor uniforms. McGwire finally speaks and states how unfair it is Bonds and others get to play under these rules. Canseco fails to latch onto any team.

Then after 5 years you will then have your HGH testing policy in place after the developmental HGH MLB testing team develops their fool proof system to catch all cheaters. And all will be cleansed and we go back to only 1 DH.

After that all the games problems will be solved.

Cannon Shell 12-14-2007 02:43 PM

Is it not ironic that the NFL which surely has the same issues with HGH seems to get a free pass?

horseofcourse 12-14-2007 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
Is it not ironic that the NFL which surely has the same issues with HGH seems to get a free pass?

The NFL is perfect. Just ask Bobby Petrino.

wiphan 12-14-2007 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
Is it not ironic that the NFL which surely has the same issues with HGH seems to get a free pass?


Nobody in the NFL is on Steroids or HGH and most certainly nobody in the NBA smokes weed.

fpsoxfan 12-14-2007 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pdrift1
exactly what i had said in a ealier post.

i'm sick as i think most baseball fans are of hearing about steroids all the time. who cares. its done. time to move on.there will always be newer drugs to use so your not going to stop it just try to control it as best you can

you will never get a handle on this thing, the scope of it is to big, so thier is no way to fairly judge one and leave out the countless others who are going to get away with it

i'm not going to even waste my time reading this report cause i could give a **** less. it was what it was-is what it is . let it go.

put a disclaimer in the front of the record books as costas said(can't believe i even agree with him-hate him) and let people form thier own opinions.

and yes if i had a vote bonds and clemens would be going to the hall of fame

case closed

i'm ready for opening day 2008.

There is a way to get a handle on it. Ask Marion Jones where her medals are.
Ask Ben Johnson what's going on with his. How about Floyd Landis. If the other sports can help curb it by pulling back awards then why can't MLB.
Why? Players association. But to just say let's not worry about it and let's play is a little ignorant. It's a mess and it's wrong and I believe the Mitchell Report is a step towards weeding out some of the scum that made a choice to use the juice.

Mortimer 12-14-2007 03:29 PM

I wonder if they'll eventually get the the corporate worlds c-level guys?














Nah.

Mortimer 12-14-2007 03:51 PM

That still doesn't explain why Mark McGuire's name is not in the report.

Danzig 12-14-2007 05:56 PM

like i told my kids this morning, if they're all using it, why bother? the playing field is releveled, right?

they're still cheaters. glad i'm not a baseball fan. i'll stick to football, where they're all pure as the driven snow.....:D

golfer 12-14-2007 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cardus
Could there have been any more Mets' catchers on this list?

How did Mitchell miss Jerry Grote?

The ball sure did jump off Al Weis' bat in the fall of 1969 (for one swing, anyway).

pgardn 12-14-2007 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
Is it not ironic that the NFL which surely has the same issues with HGH seems to get a free pass?

The NFL did not personally ask George Mitchell to come in like Selig did. And the NFL has already indicted a number of players for using and selling HGH... Im sure its not perfect. But the NFL turned guys in after testing positive as far back as 1993. So I think the NFL, while not perfect, was at least ahead of the wave.

BTW.
Every High School athlete in Texas is subject to random testing at any time starting next year. Their parents will be notified that they will be tested if chosen, and will have 2 hrs to make it to the school if they choose to be with their child while they are giving samples. They expect to hit about 5% of the athletes. Not enough. But certainly something to think about. They will also target kids who have gained a lot of muscle mass in a short period of time. Strength coaches etc... are required to keep track of the kids. If a coach is known to have any idea that a kid may be involved in the use or selling of a specific group of hormones and they do not report the alleged violation, termination is possible if the player tests positive. Coaches are asked to actively insure the safety of the athletes and seek out suspected problems.
Kind of like we (teachers) already have to do if we have evidence that a kid might be subject to abuse at home.

pgardn 12-14-2007 06:50 PM

Also.
I think Selig, by asking Mitchell to help with this, is leaving wiggling room for the Fed. government to intervene. Mitchell is no longer a senator. But he is certainly a respected arbitrator and investigator. I think the problem is too big for MLB because it has gone on too long and their are too many entities to deal with.

hi_im_god 12-14-2007 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by horseofcourse
The NFL is perfect. Just ask Bobby Petrino.

i love this defense of a completely broken down dysfunctional sport.

how many players has baseball suspended for steroid use?

i'll take the nfl -10 for whatever you want to bet.

the nfl put in enforcement mechanisms decades ago.

is the league drug free? no. did they at least acknowlege they had a problem and try to deal with it before it was so bad they had to throw their hands in the air and ask for help?

the problem with baseball is the fans. you specifically.

you lament the one good thing this sport has done. you're an enabler.

JJP 12-14-2007 08:04 PM

This should make it definitive Clemens is NOT the best pitcher of this generation.

3kings 12-14-2007 08:06 PM

Who is? And how do you know they didn't use,

JJP 12-14-2007 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3kings
Who is? And how do you know they didn't use,

I would say with 99.99999999999% certainty that Greg Maddux never used steroids.

pgardn 12-14-2007 09:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJP
I would say with 99.99999999999% certainty that Greg Maddux never used steroids.

Maddux took the hormone known as guile.
THe wise old owl of pitching.

horseofcourse 12-15-2007 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hi_im_god
i love this defense of a completely broken down dysfunctional sport.

how many players has baseball suspended for steroid use?

i'll take the nfl -10 for whatever you want to bet.

the nfl put in enforcement mechanisms decades ago.

is the league drug free? no. did they at least acknowlege they had a problem and try to deal with it before it was so bad they had to throw their hands in the air and ask for help?

the problem with baseball is the fans. you specifically.

you lament the one good thing this sport has done. you're an enabler.

How am I an enabler?? I have nothing to do with MLB policy and never have. I root for the cleveland indians to win...that is my involvement with the sport. My guess is more NFL players have had much more post career problems due to steroid use than MLB players. I have no proof to back that up...but look at the massive issue that MIke Ditka is brigning to the forefront with the disabilities of ex NFL players. I honestly think a big part of that is drug abuse (steroids or whatever else) by them masking pain and making them play with it. Lack of care of concussions etc. Rampant steroid use began in the NFL...WAY, WAY before MLB. So of course their time table was different. OF course they'd have a testing mechanism before baseball. Lyle Alzado was great entertainment back in the day just as Sammy Sosa/Barry Bonds and Mark McGwire were.

I make light of it...but MLB does have a policy in place now. I simply don't see the point in going 10-20 years past and digging up only selected names who used. The NFL never did that to my knowledge.

We are all enablers who ever watch a game I guess. So yeah I enable. Sue me. But don't ever tell me that MLB is any more dysfunctional than the NFL. If you honestly think these average 315-325 lb lineman and 255 lb linebackers with 4.5 speed and 230 lb safeties come by everything 100 percent naturally with only good hard work be my guest.

pgardn 12-15-2007 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by horseofcourse
How am I an enabler?? I have nothing to do with MLB policy and never have. I root for the cleveland indians to win...that is my involvement with the sport. My guess is more NFL players have had much more post career problems due to steroid use than MLB players. I have no proof to back that up...but look at the massive issue that MIke Ditka is brigning to the forefront with the disabilities of ex NFL players. I honestly think a big part of that is drug abuse (steroids or whatever else) by them masking pain and making them play with it. Lack of care of concussions etc. Rampant steroid use began in the NFL...WAY, WAY before MLB. So of course their time table was different. OF course they'd have a testing mechanism before baseball. Lyle Alzado was great entertainment back in the day just as Sammy Sosa/Barry Bonds and Mark McGwire were.

I make light of it...but MLB does have a policy in place now. I simply don't see the point in going 10-20 years past and digging up only selected names who used. The NFL never did that to my knowledge.

We are all enablers who ever watch a game I guess. So yeah I enable. Sue me. But don't ever tell me that MLB is any more dysfunctional than the NFL. If you honestly think these average 315-325 lb lineman and 255 lb linebackers with 4.5 speed and 230 lb safeties come by everything 100 percent naturally with only good hard work be my guest.

MLB is more dysfunctional than the NFL.

horseofcourse 12-15-2007 10:04 AM

I'll throw out Walter Payton, Emmit Smith, Jerry Rice as names. I would say it is likely that at least one time one of them took something or shot something into their bodies that wasn't legal. There simply isn't the fascination amongst fans and media of asterisking their accomplishments, eliminating them from the HOF, all this stuff. My initial thought is people still take stuff in the NFL and can pass their drug tests. And that is fine.

MLB baseball has drug testing now. Was it too slow coming about? Absolutely, but go forward and do what you can from this point and onward. To be conducting witch hunts at this point is counter productive in my opinion. Really wasn't the Salem experience enough in that regard in this country?? And that is all this Mitchell report was in my opinion. Of course my opinions are usually wrong, but they still exist. I think the Mitchell report was an attempt by Bud Selig to exonerate himself only for being slow on the draw with drug testing. I think it was a self serving attempt by him to simply make himself look good. It had nothing to do with improving MLB. These crimes committed by the players in question taking these drugs are in essence not harmful to society. It's not like they are going to be put away in prison based on this report. So what function did it serve other than to make Bud Selig look like he really delved into this problem earnestly?? I see no other reason. ( I don't think Selig is satan as commissioner. I'm indifferent to him. HE's done some good things. I just think this Mitchell report was all about him and him alone.)

dysfunctional?? Perhaps...I think just a delayed drug policy is all. IF that makes it dysfunctional fine. You don't have a bunch of Lyle Alzado's Mike Webster's or Andre Waters' type retired MLB players walking around. Or too many tooling around in wheel chairs. The NFL is simply high priced organized brutatlity. That alone makes it more dysfunctional. The fact that they got better drug testing in place first in my opinion does not make the NFL a complete non-"dysfucntional" institution.

It's pro sports, people will always cheat in MLB and the NFL and get away with it more than not regardless of whatever drug testing policy is currently in place.

King Glorious 12-15-2007 10:37 AM

As evidenced by the rising revenues in baseball, the sport is as popular as ever and actually, even moreso probably. This coming at a time when all the public suspects that players are cheating. The point is......noboby cares. We want to be entertained. When I go see a Giants game, I'm looking to see Bonds hit one 500 ft. I wouldn't care if he stood at home plate and put the syringe in his arm before each at bat. Athletes and teams in all sports cheat in one way or another so this is no big deal to me.

I've seen several commentaries saying that Bonds came out the big winner here. Everyone has been so hard on him and cast him as some kind of devil because they say he cheated. Everyone fawns over Clemens and calls him some sort of god and an athletic marvel. Now that his name has been mentioned, he's going to become the new face of the steroid era for a while and take some of the heat off of old news Bonds.

So now, if Bonds deserves and asterisk because he had an unfair advantage by using drugs, does that change if half of the pitchers are using them too?

This report is a joke. It won't clean up anything. Selig won't clean up anything. The owners are making too much money these days to let him mess that up. Does anyone believe that had the Giants owner personally seen Bonds taking drugs that he would have told him to stop? I don't. He was too busy counting his money from all of the sellout crowds Bonds was attracting.

Mortimer 12-15-2007 11:25 AM

I don't really care...how's that?


Pro sports is an incorrigible mess and big time college is trying to catch up.

Buy the tickets and the whatnot.

You can help in so many ways.













BLECH.

pgardn 12-15-2007 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious
This report is a joke. It won't clean up anything. Selig won't clean up anything. The owners are making too much money these days to let him mess that up. Does anyone believe that had the Giants owner personally seen Bonds taking drugs that he would have told him to stop? I don't. He was too busy counting his money from all of the sellout crowds Bonds was attracting.

Say hello to the Federal government getting its foot in the door.
That is exactly what this report has done.

pgardn 12-16-2007 10:08 AM

Andy P. comes clean.
And Roger had the same trainer and this was his workout partner...

And Andy claims that HGH was not illegal the way he used it. The drug policy in MLB is so screwed up and the rules have changed so many times... The NFL has BANNED HGH since way back, at least 15 years ago.

ANd people try to use the NFL to sanctify MLB....hmmmm. Sure the NFL has problems. But the NFL did not ask George Mitchell to come in and give a report. The Commisioner in the NFL has a little more of a grip than Selig.

I think Selig wants government intervention. No reason to ask for Mitchell to come in and investigate if its all hunky-dory.

Cannon Shell 12-16-2007 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pgardn
The NFL did not personally ask George Mitchell to come in like Selig did. And the NFL has already indicted a number of players for using and selling HGH... Im sure its not perfect. But the NFL turned guys in after testing positive as far back as 1993. So I think the NFL, while not perfect, was at least ahead of the wave.

BTW.
Every High School athlete in Texas is subject to random testing at any time starting next year. Their parents will be notified that they will be tested if chosen, and will have 2 hrs to make it to the school if they choose to be with their child while they are giving samples. They expect to hit about 5% of the athletes. Not enough. But certainly something to think about. They will also target kids who have gained a lot of muscle mass in a short period of time. Strength coaches etc... are required to keep track of the kids. If a coach is known to have any idea that a kid may be involved in the use or selling of a specific group of hormones and they do not report the alleged violation, termination is possible if the player tests positive. Coaches are asked to actively insure the safety of the athletes and seek out suspected problems.
Kind of like we (teachers) already have to do if we have evidence that a kid might be subject to abuse at home.

Yeah the NFL was able to fool everybody into thinking that they were doing something. I would be surprised if 95% of the NFL wasn't taking HGH or something close to it

Cannon Shell 12-16-2007 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pgardn
Say hello to the Federal government getting its foot in the door.
That is exactly what this report has done.

I dont exactly know why that scares anyone. Since when does the federal government get anything done?

Cannon Shell 12-16-2007 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pgardn
Andy P. comes clean.
And Roger had the same trainer and this was his workout partner...

And Andy claims that HGH was not illegal the way he used it. The drug policy in MLB is so screwed up and the rules have changed so many times... The NFL has BANNED HGH since way back, at least 15 years ago.

ANd people try to use the NFL to sanctify MLB....hmmmm. Sure the NFL has problems. But the NFL did not ask George Mitchell to come in and give a report. The Commisioner in the NFL has a little more of a grip than Selig.

I think Selig wants government intervention. No reason to ask for Mitchell to come in and investigate if its all hunky-dory.

However they have no way of testing for it so the ban is a total joke initself. The NFL does a much better job of keeping its PR machine working than does MLB. But after personally speaking to a number of current and former NFL players, I have been told that pretty much everybody is doing something.

Mortimer 12-16-2007 10:45 AM

Jamal Lewis=The Hulk

pgardn 12-16-2007 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
However they have no way of testing for it so the ban is a total joke initself. The NFL does a much better job of keeping its PR machine working than does MLB. But after personally speaking to a number of current and former NFL players, I have been told that pretty much everybody is doing something.

Yes they do.
Just not in urine.

Have they also told you there is no way to test for it.
ANd Merriman... why did they even bother?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.