Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Charles Hatton Reading Room (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   Whale's past post sets off alarm (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=18597)

ALostTexan 12-09-2007 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious
That is the truest comment in this thread. They absolutely would adjust.

I wonder if Maloney was expecting this to happen and thus was ready to make his wagers after the race had started. I don't know how others do but whenever I'm in line to place my bet, I'm watching the monitor to see how much time I have. Almost without fail, I have a guy in front of me that takes 10 minutes to make a $2 win bet on a horse and I'm yelling out "come on!" When that last horse goes in, if I haven't gotten to the window, I turn away, figuring that I didn't make it. I wonder if Maloney was watching the race, saw that it had started and wagering hadn't closed and THEN went to try to take advantage or if he knew this was something that regularly happens and was already prepared to take advantage of it. My gut feeling tells me that if he or anyone else is still at the windows attempting to place bets up to 15 seconds after the start of a race, this is something that happens at other times and he was in position to try and take advantage.

No. This is absolutely not what happened. He was not ask anything specific about past-posting. He was ask what he felt was the best and worst thing about horse racing, from a whales perspective. He said that the security of the betting pools needed to be changed. When ask by Dave Johnson to expand on that topic, he said, for instance, he was at Keeneland betting this race at the Fair Grounds, and knew enough about the tote system to know that there was supposed to be a beep when the race was closed, and that he never heard it.

So he began testing the system. 1/8 of a mile into the race, he told the teller to punch another ticket, which went through. Then another 1/8 mile passed, and he had the teller punch another ticket, and continued every 1/8 mile until the machine finally did beep, which he claims was well after half of the race was ran. All the while, he was screaming for the Director of Mutuals to get his ass over to the window to see what was going on. There was no conspiracy between Maloney, the teller, or the Director of Mutuals to rig the system. This was simply a whale who was concerned with the system seeing a flaw in the system and showing it to someone who should be concerned, which was the Director of Mutuals.

In his talk, at least what I got out of it, Maloney seemed like this was not an isolated event, and that he at least didn't hear the beep to shut off wagering before. This was just a time that he saw a time that it could be greatly exploited, he had plenty of late tickets punched as proof, and this was a time that he had the attention of the entire racing world as he was at the Symposium on Racing and Gaming.

fpsoxfan 12-09-2007 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ALostTexan
No. This is absolutely not what happened. He was not ask anything specific about past-posting. He was ask what he felt was the best and worst thing about horse racing, from a whales perspective. He said that the security of the betting pools needed to be changed. When ask by Dave Johnson to expand on that topic, he said, for instance, he was at Keeneland betting this race at the Fair Grounds, and knew enough about the tote system to know that there was supposed to be a beep when the race was closed, and that he never heard it.

So he began testing the system. 1/8 of a mile into the race, he told the teller to punch another ticket, which went through. Then another 1/8 mile passed, and he had the teller punch another ticket, and continued every 1/8 mile until the machine finally did beep, which he claims was well after half of the race was ran. All the while, he was screaming for the Director of Mutuals to get his ass over to the window to see what was going on. There was no conspiracy between Maloney, the teller, or the Director of Mutuals to rig the system. This was simply a whale who was concerned with the system seeing a flaw in the system and showing it to someone who should be concerned, which was the Director of Mutuals.

In his talk, at least what I got out of it, Maloney seemed like this was not an isolated event, and that he at least didn't hear the beep to shut off wagering before. This was just a time that he saw a time that it could be greatly exploited, he had plenty of late tickets punched as proof, and this was a time that he had the attention of the entire racing world as he was at the Symposium on Racing and Gaming.


This Maloney cat is a liar and a cheat. I mean come on. Do you honestly believe this story?

Cannon Shell 12-09-2007 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmfhb411
I understand that, if people want to bet and know wagering will be closed a couple of minutes before post time it won't take very long to get used to.
And getting shut out of betting wasn't a problem when I first started playing in the early '90s. Back then the majority of my play was at the NYCOTBs, when guess what ? ............ :D

Even though this should disqualify you from any rational conversation I will try. The problem with the "deadline" of posttime being closed is that the actual posttime is dependant on several things. One being that in cases of long lines at the windows the mutual manager will often add a minute or 2 to the posttime to try to get as much money into the pools as possible. Another being delays due to inquiries, loose horses, bad gate actors, weather, etc. What do you do if a horse gets loose with 3 minutes to post? Make an announcement that posttime will be extended? What about the players at other tracks, simulcast outlets or betting from home? How do you notify them? Or do you just close the betting and let people stand there for 5 minutes with live money in thier pockets? It is not as easy as some people make it out to be, Dude.

Cannon Shell 12-10-2007 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmfhb411
Or do you believe we need more players complaining about seeing changes in the odds in the middle of watching a race ?
:D

Will that be worse then the complaints of the bets not getting in?

cmorioles 12-11-2007 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
If this is happening all the time why is this issue almost never discussed? If it is such a problem then why dont I ever hear about it happening? I hear all the time about every other bitch that people have in this industry a hundred times over but for such a major problem it seems like it is rarely mentioned.

The thing is, nobody knows how often it is happening. This came up as a fluke. There is lots of suspicion among bettors that there is past posting going on. Check just about any message board on the net. I'm not saying it is happening, but the perception among many is that it does.

SentToStud 12-11-2007 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
Why are you so obsessed with what I say? Do you want me to call them and give them a quote? I will. At least I will state my true opinion on subjects unlike most in this industry. My opinion is that this was a malfunction. Simple. Get over it. If someone comes up with some information that this was done for an advantage or is happening more than once in a blue moon then I will say that there is a serious problem. There are many people here who feel that it is not an isolated incident. Fine that is thier opinion. If someone shows me something that backs that opinion up I will admit I underestimated the problem.

I would say that there are many more fixed races in this country than there are races with past posts. Think about that for a minute. Now there is a real problem.

Perhaps he's obsessed with Hacker Craft? Alas, HC probably wouldn't respond.

Cannon Shell 12-11-2007 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SentToStud
Perhaps he's obsessed with Hacker Craft? Alas, HC probably wouldn't respond.

He can satisfy his HC obsession by adding him to his xmas list. I will send him COD

Riot 12-11-2007 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmfhb411
Maybe the 1st week or two, but after that none of us would hear a peep.

I'd peep. I'd definitely prefer to retain the ability to bet, cover, cancel to break, versus having definitive odds and a closed window 1 minute to post. Too much happens in that last few minutes, too frequently.

The important thing is that no bets are made after the break, period. The odds adjusting to final in the next 10-15 seconds - that I can, and have, lived with nicely, simply through anticipation.

Bobby Fischer 12-11-2007 12:14 PM

Each track has a "stop wagering device"
In a good system this device would be tested, and monitered by a professional :D (seriously) it should be someone's responsibility. Ideally the tracks would be fined when the device malfunctions on/before a live race.

SentToStud 12-11-2007 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cardus
Why does this matter to you?

I'm obsessed with Hacker Craft. I'm trying to stop.

Riot 12-11-2007 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bobby Fischer
Each track has a "stop wagering device"
In a good system this device would be tested, and monitered by a professional :D (seriously) it should be someone's responsibility. Ideally the tracks would be fined when the device malfunctions on/before a live race.

What is the deal now (how does it work) at various tracks. I only partly heard that discussion on ATR ... is it a manual signal from the mutuals manager?

Kasept 12-11-2007 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot
What is the deal now (how does it work) at various tracks. I only partly heard that discussion on ATR ... is it a manual signal from the mutuals manager?

Stewards first.. then Mutuels/Tote Company have backup stop..

Riot 12-11-2007 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kasept
Stewards first.. then Mutuels/Tote Company have backup stop..

Then I'd agree with the dedicated pro vs. a steward, and fines unless a unavoidable and documentable malfunction occurs.

Kasept 12-11-2007 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot
Then I'd agree with the dedicated pro vs. a steward, and fines unless a unavoidable and documentable malfunction occurs.

Stewards ARE 'dedicated pros' and it is part of the responsibilities in the stand.

Riot 12-11-2007 04:34 PM

I'm going back to listen to ATR .... :rolleyes:

SentToStud 12-11-2007 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kasept
Stewards ARE 'dedicated pros' and it is part of the responsibilities in the stand.

Isn't the switch triggered by the starter's button hooked into the mutuels?

Cannon Shell 12-11-2007 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cardus
Obsessed? Surely you don't believe that, or don't know the meaning of obsessed.

Had your "Get over it" appeared in a widely distributed medium, as opposed to a chat room, I doubt that horseplayers would have been thrilled, to say the least, with reading it. Clearly, I'm not the only one here who objected to your take on this issue, though I happen to agree with many of your points. I objected to one part of what you wrote.

Call it whatever you want. And if horseplayers are pissed so be it. It is my view on this one particular race.

If you can find a horseman that speaks up in support of horseplayers more than me, I would like to meet them.

Kasept 12-11-2007 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SentToStud
Isn't the switch triggered by the starter's button hooked into the mutuels?

Can be.. Why it's not installed that way more widely is a mystery.

Riot 12-17-2007 06:52 PM

KHRA & CD to investigate past-post incident
 
The Blood-Horse today:

"The Kentucky Horse Racing Authority will form a subcommittee to investigate an incident in which wagering on a Fair Grounds race at Keeneland remained available while a race was in progress, officials said Dec. 17." ... etc..


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.