Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Another Confusing Decision from the NY Stewards (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=11332)

GPK 03-28-2007 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
Coa is his own worst enemy. He is a terrific talent, and has a likely big career ahead of him, but he gets hotheaded and does dangerous things. This MO has followed him for over a decade. I believe it has definitely kept him from riding a lot of more high profile horses.


It is a shame Andy. It's painfully obvious the guy has immense talent, but until he cools his heels and learns to ride without so much wasted emotion, he will continue to go without that high profile horse.

When his head is in the ballgame...hes top notch. When he does sh*t like Sunday...he just leaves you scratching your head.

Cajungator26 03-28-2007 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by paisjpq
actually it does not matter what coa perceived...there is no situation in which it is okay to put horses and riders at risk for injury to settle a score.

Exactly... if he needs to settle it, he can wait until after he has dismounted. It's unbelievable that there are people who believe it to be acceptable for him to retaliate. I don't care if Martin hit him over the head with a sledgehammer... he has no right to put other horses and riders in danger.

GPK 03-28-2007 11:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whodey17
Why do I need to see the replay. BTW did a great job of giving me a visual. Again, I agree that Coa and Martin should be suspended. I think it should have been longer. I dont know what I think this is such a big deal.


I think what we are trying to portray to you is the fact that they both got the same amount of days is what is mind boggling to us. If they want to give Martin a couple days for "careless riding", so be it. But for the stewards to actually think they both deserve the same suspension...it just flat bullsh*t and speaks volumes for their competancy in the job they are doing.

Cajungator26 03-28-2007 11:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whodey17
Why is Coa wrong but not Martin? How do we know that Martin didn't do what he did on purpose?

Who cares at that point? It's up to Coa to be an adult and not take it out on the track! He put other people (and horses) in danger.

blackthroatedwind 03-28-2007 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GPK
I think what we are trying to portray to you is the fact that they both got the same amount of days is what is mind boggling to us. If they want to give Martin a couple days for "careless riding", so be it. But for the stewards to actually think they both deserve the same suspension...it just flat bullsh*t and speaks volumes for their competancy in the job they are doing.


Thank you for clarifying what seems to be being missed by some.

whodey17 03-28-2007 11:23 PM

Ok I understand here.....I am defending the decision to suspend Martin. If Martin's horse never came out to force Coa to check then Coa would never had lost his cool and did what he did. One action caused another action. This is why I think the Stewards suspended Martin as well. So what I am saying is that the stewards prob looked at this and thought that Coa wouldnt have acted like he did if Martin's horse didnt cause him to check. Does this make sense here.

whodey17 03-28-2007 11:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
This right here does it for me. How can you have an opinion on something like this without seeing it?

So a blind man can never have an opinion. That seems reasonable.

blackthroatedwind 03-28-2007 11:24 PM

What is also being lost here are the bettors. It is very possible the outcome of the race was altered by Coa's behavoir.

GPK 03-28-2007 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whodey17
Ok I understand here.....I am defending the decision to suspend Martin. If Martin's horse never came out to force Coa to check then Coa would never had lost his cool and did what he did. One action caused another action. This is why I think the Stewards suspended Martin as well. So what I am saying is that the stewards prob looked at this and thought that Coa wouldnt have acted like he did if Martin's horse didnt cause him to check. Does this make sense here.


See post #84

whodey17 03-28-2007 11:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
What is also being lost here are the bettors. It is very possible the outcome of the race was altered by Coa's behavoir.

Now that is a very good point.

GPK 03-28-2007 11:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
What is also being lost here are the bettors. It is very possible the outcome of the race was altered by Coa's behavoir.


Andy, why do you think they left Ice up for show? I guess they felt the outcome of the race wouldn't have changed had the incident not occured?

whodey17 03-28-2007 11:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GPK
See post #84

I think both should have rec'd 30 days. I do not see where one should have rec'd more days than the other.

whodey17 03-28-2007 11:29 PM

You are the one that said how I can have an opinion without seeing something. If I was blind I couldnt have an opinion on this since I cannot see the video.

GPK 03-28-2007 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whodey17
I think both should have rec'd 30 days. I do not see where one should have rec'd more days than the other.


You are next in line for a stewards job with the NYRA if you actually think that....

Cajungator26 03-28-2007 11:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whodey17
You are the one that said how I can have an opinion without seeing something. If I was blind I couldnt have an opinion on this since I cannot see the video.

Actually, no. You'd have to rely on what other people told you, so your opinion would be skewed. :rolleyes:

You're obviously NOT blind, though, so you COULD appease us and watch the replay. :p

whodey17 03-28-2007 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GPK
You are next in line for a stewards job with the NYRA if you actually think that....

You would be the first person I would hire to assist me too.

whodey17 03-28-2007 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cajungator26
Actually, no. You'd have to rely on what other people told you, so your opinion would be skewed. :rolleyes:

You're obviously NOT blind, though, so you COULD appease us and watch the replay. :p

It doesnt matter if I watch it or not. It is simple. Martin's horse came out, caused Coa to check. Coa got pissed and decided to take matters into his own hands. Coa was wrong and should be suspended. However, Coa would never had done what he did if Martin's horses didnt cause Coa to check. Martin didnt intend to do what he did and Coa did. However, the stewards didnt see it that way. I think both should be suspended for 30 days.

whodey17 03-28-2007 11:35 PM

Ok i watched it. Both Martin and Coa should be suspended for 30 days. I agree that both should be suspended.

whodey17 03-28-2007 11:37 PM

Me too.

Cajungator26 03-28-2007 11:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whodey17
It doesnt matter if I watch it or not. It is simple. Martin's horse came out, caused Coa to check. Coa got pissed and decided to take matters into his own hands. Coa was wrong and should be suspended. However, Coa would never had done what he did if Martin's horses didnt cause Coa to check. Martin didnt intend to do what he did and Coa did. However, the stewards didnt see it that way. I think both should be suspended for 30 days.

That makes no sense. One was an accident and the other was malicious and deliberate. With this kind of logic, you would think that someone who accidentally shot a gun and killed someone should get the same amount of jail time as someone who shot someone in cold blooded murder.

Cajungator26 03-28-2007 11:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
Cajun, you are wasting your time.

I know. I think I need to call it quits and hit the sack. Nite DaHoss.

whodey17 03-28-2007 11:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cajungator26
That makes no sense. One was an accident and the other was malicious and deliberate. With this kind of logic, you would think that someone who accidentally shot a gun and killed someone should get the same amount of jail time as someone who shot someone in cold blooded murder.

It isnt about one being an accident or not. It is what the Stewards wanted to do or what they saw what happened. They sent a message saying that you (jock) are going to be held accountable for everything your horse does while on the track.

whodey17 03-28-2007 11:44 PM

Night Cajun and DaHoss. Glad to know people are open to opinions on this fine forum.

Cajungator26 03-28-2007 11:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whodey17
Night Cajun and DaHoss. Glad to know people are open to opinions on this fine forum.

That they are... this is a great board. :cool:

whodey17 03-28-2007 11:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cajungator26
That they are... this is a great board. :cool:

hmmm....I guess being called a Troll or accussed trying to start a fight are words for YES, we welcome all opinions even if they differ from mine or the majority.

Cajungator26 03-28-2007 11:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whodey17
hmmm....I guess being called a Troll or accussed trying to start a fight are words for YES, we welcome all opinions even if they differ from mine or the majority.

Huh? I never called you a troll. I don't agree with your opinion, but you know what they say... opinions are like a$$holes, everyone has one.

whodey17 03-28-2007 11:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cajungator26
Huh? I never called you a troll. I don't agree with your opinion, but you know what they say... opinions are like a$$holes, everyone has one.

Didnt say you did. Sorry if you felt as if I accussed you of doing something. I love opinions. If it wasnt for opinions then things would never get accomplished.

whodey17 03-28-2007 11:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
Oh please. You've spent pages twisting words now. You have to understand that it is kind of suspect that you would spend pages arguing about something, without having the most important piece of information you could have and that was seeing the replay. No need for a pity party.

I didnt twist anything around. I said from the start that both Martin and Coa should be suspended. Yeah, I will let everyone at the Association for the Blind know that you think people cannot have an opinion unless they see it.

whodey17 03-29-2007 12:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
So much for not twisting. Your trolling ways are becoming more and more evident.

Good to know free speech and opinions are perceived as trolling on this board.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.