![]() |
Quote:
Credibility????? You fool! This is the internet....this particular self-proclaimed fact-matron needs no credibility. All she needs is a user ID....that's her credibility. |
Quote:
If NYRA is so great, why can't they do this as a for profit. Why do they need to be a non-profit? Perhaps because it is a little harder when you have to answer to shareholders than corrupt politicians that can be bought off with a few seats at Saratoga. |
Quote:
Really? So the racing that NYRA puts on NET takes money out of taxpayer's pockets? Really? Even for someone as obviously challenged as you this is a pretty stupid thought. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
All things that can be fixed. A non-profit can benefit the game by taking the shareholder equity issue out of the equation. If no money has to go in that direction, it can be funneled back into the facilities, the purses, the game, the state's breeding program, etc. I respect that many believe we're all better off with a for-profit, but I'm kind of perplexed that you find the benefit of a non-profit model hard to understand or appreciate. |
Quote:
NYRA was set up as not-for-profit by the State. The argument for Not-for-Profit vs. For-Profit is an extensive, and actually quite interesting, one. In essense, the feeling is that the most successful model for running a racetrack is not-for-profit as in that model any " profits " are put back into the track as opposed to investors' pockets. The real reason this is such an especially big issue in the case of the franchise for racing in NY State is that enormous profits will soon be generated from Slots. NYRA feels any money the " franchise " ( whomever is running it ) earns from the Slots should be returned to the racetracks ( better purses, capitol improvements, etc ) while those desiring a For-Profit model would like to take that money out of racing. The vast majority of the most successful racetracks in North America are Not-For-Profit. To me one of the most interesting things about this situation is that in the past one of the reasons NYRA maintained the franchise is that there were simply no other bidders. Coincidentally, many other bidders showed up when Slots were introduced to the equation. These same people are also only interested in " running " the franchise if it is changed to not-for-profit. So, look at it this way, whether you like it or not, only NYRA is interested in returning ALL " profits " to racing while others would like to put those SAME " profits " in their pockets. |
Quote:
How it costs me money is by being a non-profit. They lose money and are in the process of filing for bankruptcy. http://www.thoroughbredtimes.com/tod...67377&subsec=1 |
rev stop paying your taxes then you wont feel "cheated"...steve andy..why bother..
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
My guess is the above statement was generated by you as you are someone who looks at everything in such manner. Here's a little help for you ( since you REALLY need it )....how many dollars in revenue for the state are derived through the handle at NYRA and OTBs on races run at NYRA tracks throughout NY State? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Yeah, NYRA is going to return the profits to racing, but somehow they will find a way for there to be no profits. Why can't NYRA get a deal done with MGM? I am sure MGM wants non-profit slots. LOL. Explain to me how NYRA can get in bed with MGM if they are so concerned with profits going back to horse racing. MGM isn't interested in profits I guess. |
Quote:
Remember, ma'am, just the facts. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Have you ever received a check from NYRA for work done for them, or appeared on any NYRA show. FULL DISCLOSURE PLEASE. Facts, the State has approved no deal between NYRA and MGM. If it was a for profit, there would be no need for State approval. |
Quick question if anyone can answer. How many millions is Frack Stronach and his for profit Magna entertainment group in the hole this year? Is it over 100mil? or somewhere around 25mil. All I know is its way more than what NYRA is losing.
|
Quote:
The Facts are simple. If the crooks at NYRA are going to still insist they own the land the tracks are on, they will get nothing and be gone soon enough. Why is a non-profit so concerned over whether or not they own the land or not? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:11 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.