Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Havre De Grace Retired (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=46428)

Riot 04-23-2012 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RolloTomasi (Post 855086)
Is this your version of Stuart Smalley's Daily Affirmations?


But excuse you, as you digress, since I never mentioned a head nod in reference to Havre De Grace.


Who cares? The examining veterinarian noted a grade 1-1.5 lameness on his report.


I know that now. The horse smells bad and tastes funny.


How are you gonna "show" me? It's not a visual thing. Don't worry, I'll stock up on some palate cleansers in preparation.

But Dr. Bramlage said the mare was lame. You said she was not. Which is it?


I wonder what Dr. Bramlage looks like then...


Sure, as soon as you apologize to Dr. Bramlage for calling him a fool.


Poor Rollo ... no, Havre de Grace is not lame. She is not limping. There is no "lameness" when a lameness exam is rated 1/5. As you found out, when you quickly googled "horse lameness" to find out what I was talking about when I said 1/5 isn't visibly lame or limping.

I'm sorry that you are ignorant of veterinary medical charting, and you have confused the exam findings of " 1/5 lame" to mean she's lame, rather than a score of 1/5 on her lameness exam (you know, rather than "1/5 card ausc" for example)

Because you'll note that the diagnosis section doesn't include any lameness. Just a small technicality.

Good thing we have your internet expertise to correct the professionals! Even though you've made a fool of yourself. Perhaps you should have just gone away when I noted mildly to you that "1/5 isn't visibly limping"? Rather than you doubling down on something you now absolutely nothing about?

No, Rollo. The mare was not limping. I'm glad her trainer found this injury during routine inspection, before she went out on the track again. Some would not.

Now - at this point you started telling me that I was wrong and the mare was lame. If I were you, after all this, I'd just either apologize for being an azz, not being familiar with either lameness scales and what they mean or how to read the "examination" section of a medical report, or just possibly fade away in embarrassment.

I don't care that you don't like me. But when you attack me with your ignorance it's just ... sad. For you.

And I know Dr. Bramlage, I'll be sure and tell him you said hello next time I'm at R & R

The Bid 04-23-2012 11:00 PM

riot. next time u are at r n r tell them they charged me too much for a semen viability.

Riot 04-23-2012 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bid (Post 855090)
riot. next time u are at r n r tell them they charged me too much for a semen viability.

Your own, or a horses?

:eek:

Sorry, couldn't resist ...

The Bid 04-23-2012 11:06 PM

A horse.

I'm like War Emblem

Riot 04-23-2012 11:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bid (Post 855092)
A horse.

I'm like War Emblem

TMI, thanks, I deserved that :tro:

The Bid 04-23-2012 11:13 PM

You had it coming

no pun

RolloTomasi 04-23-2012 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot (Post 855089)
Poor Rollo ... no, Havre de Grace is not lame. She is not limping. There is no "lameness" when a lameness exam is rated 1/5.

Pure insanity. What you are saying is that there is no lameness when the lameness is difficult to observe.

Actually, sounds like denial. And more talking in circles.

Quote:

Because you'll note that the diagnosis section doesn't include any lameness. Just a small technicality.
Is a detectable lameness considered a "diagnosis" or a "clinical sign"? Maybe you can rally some 3rd year vet students to come to your aid on this one.

Just a small technicality.

Quote:

And I know Dr. Bramlage, I'll be sure and tell him you said hello next time I'm at R & R
Do they receive mental patients at Rood and Riddle?

Riot 04-23-2012 11:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bid (Post 855094)
You had it coming

no pun

Groan :D

Riot 04-23-2012 11:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RolloTomasi (Post 855095)
Pure insanity. What you are saying is that there is no lameness when the lameness is difficult to observe.

Yes, imagine that! Sometimes way of going, stride length, leg weighting, arc of limb movement, etc. changes, and there are positive signs on various movement or flexion tests, and yet the horse isn't "lame".

But you knew that ;)

Merlinsky 04-23-2012 11:50 PM

If a horse gets a 1/5 on a lameness exam in the middle of a forest, do we still argue about it? :zz:

Riot 04-23-2012 11:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Merlinsky (Post 855102)
If a horse gets a 1/5 on a lameness exam in the middle of a forest, do we still argue about it? :zz:

Naw :D We thank HDG barn manager for finding the heat in her ankle, and regret we don't get to see her run any more. And wonder what's her reserve, and who she'll be bred to to next year.

trackrat59 04-24-2012 05:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig (Post 855014)
i can imagine it...very well actually! she'd buy several good ones.

"several good ones" - If you have money you can buy "several good ones" all you want. Once you put them on the track in a race, try and keep them happy and healthy, well, that takes "several good ones" to another place.

I think it was the owner of Lava Man that said something about why he would not take any of the offers he was getting for LM. Something like, what was he going to do with the money? Try and purchase "several good ones" and come up with another Lava Man?

Same concept with HDG. Just saying, If that were my filly I would hold on to her.

freddymo 04-24-2012 06:40 AM

I know Dr Riot is a Vet it just seems Rollo is a better one and he is an internet nobody.

Danzig 04-24-2012 07:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trackrat59 (Post 855116)
"several good ones" - If you have money you can buy "several good ones" all you want. Once you put them on the track in a race, try and keep them happy and healthy, well, that takes "several good ones" to another place.

I think it was the owner of Lava Man that said something about why he would not take any of the offers he was getting for LM. Something like, what was he going to do with the money? Try and purchase "several good ones" and come up with another Lava Man?

Same concept with HDG. Just saying, If that were my filly I would hold on to her.

as rick porter explained, it's part of his business plan to sell his horses when they're done racing. that money he gets out of them at sales makes up for money he spends at sales. that he can't afford a large broodmare band. he named two horses that he kept because he became attached to them. yeah, hdg gets a lot of press, but rick has other horses that maybe don't do so well at the track-but still cost him money. he's not the only one who does this, and i can understand why. as chuck said a few years ago, whether a horse is fast or slow, it costs tens of thousands to keep just one in training-and that's just for basic upkeep. i doubt most of porters buys get what HDG potentially can earn when he sells them.
he's in racing, not breeding. HDG is no longer a racer...he'll sell her to enable him to remain in the racing game. makes perfect sense.

Coach Pants 04-24-2012 08:03 AM


Calzone Lord 04-24-2012 08:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach Pants (Post 855132)

Who is she?

Antitrust32 04-24-2012 08:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RolloTomasi (Post 855033)
Please, just admit you overlooked the first part of the report and let's move on.

If you're too proud to put it in writing, a consistently observable head nod will be taken as a "yes" instead.

I dont know about this one.. 1 / 5 isnt really lame.

trackrat59 04-24-2012 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig (Post 855128)
as rick porter explained, it's part of his business plan to sell his horses when they're done racing. that money he gets out of them at sales makes up for money he spends at sales. that he can't afford a large broodmare band. he named two horses that he kept because he became attached to them. yeah, hdg gets a lot of press, but rick has other horses that maybe don't do so well at the track-but still cost him money. he's not the only one who does this, and i can understand why. as chuck said a few years ago, whether a horse is fast or slow, it costs tens of thousands to keep just one in training-and that's just for basic upkeep. i doubt most of porters buys get what HDG potentially can earn when he sells them.
he's in racing, not breeding. HDG is no longer a racer...he'll sell her to enable him to remain in the racing game. makes perfect sense.

It all about the money, not the horse. I get it. For some it would be all about the horse. That's my point.

Antitrust32 04-24-2012 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freddymo (Post 855125)
I know Dr Riot is a Vet it just seems Rollo is a better one and he is an internet nobody.

I'm no fan of Riot but she explained what 1 / 5 lame is and she is correct.

freddymo 04-24-2012 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32 (Post 855141)
I'm no fan of Riot but she explained what 1 / 5 lame is and she is correct.

I agree she is a fine Vet. I bet she has neutered at least 100 cats.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.