Derby Trail Forums
Page 3 of 6 < 12 3 45 > Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Couldn't happen to a nicer guy... (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=42524)

GBBob 06-06-2011 07:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by geeker2 (Post 782127)
It would be funny if your room was next to his :p
Even better is that I have a meeting tomorrow at the hotel where the French dude dropped trow...It's a NY Sex tour redboard hotel thread

dellinger63 06-06-2011 07:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot (Post 782163)
He was just a loser jackass.
Was a loser jackass or is a loser jackass?

And should a loser jackass, who lied to his constituents repeatedly, resign or continue in office? :)

And will his wife be OK? ;)

Riot 06-06-2011 07:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dellinger63 (Post 782190)
Was a loser jackass or is a loser jackass?

And should a loser jackass, who lied to his constituents repeatedly, resign or continue in office? :)

And will his wife be OK? ;)
According to you, lying is just fine.

According to me, it is not.

Riot 06-06-2011 08:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GBBob (Post 782187)
Even better is that I have a meeting tomorrow at the hotel where the French dude dropped trow...It's a NY Sex tour redboard hotel thread
Don't do anything to make the maids nervous ;)

dellinger63 06-06-2011 08:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot (Post 782193)
According to you, lying is just fine.

According to me, it is not.
Not sure, not knowing details with your wife's financial affairs is lying? But in Weiner's case it's on tape. So should HE resign?

hi_im_god 06-06-2011 08:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dellinger63 (Post 782200)
Not sure, not knowing details with your wife's financial affairs is lying? But in Weiner's case it's on tape. So should HE resign?
yes.

dems want it more than you do.

dellinger63 06-06-2011 08:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by hi_im_god (Post 782202)
yes.

dems want it more than you do.
we had a guy resign because he sent a pic not wearing a shirt, didn't even lie about it. Personally I'd love to see the lil Weiner stay.

geeker2 06-06-2011 08:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GBBob (Post 782187)
Even better is that I have a meeting tomorrow at the hotel where the French dude dropped trow...It's a NY Sex tour redboard hotel thread
Bob you're a regular Caligula !

joeydb 06-06-2011 08:39 PM
He's not resigning, and he's not making amends with anyone, so what, exactly, does "taking responsibility" mean?

GBBob 06-06-2011 08:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by joeydb (Post 782206)
He's not resigning, and he's not making amends with anyone, so what, exactly, does "taking responsibility" mean?
Umm..he's admitting it's his dick?...:zz:

:rolleyes:

Riot 06-06-2011 09:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dellinger63 (Post 782200)
Not sure, not knowing details with your wife's financial affairs is lying? But in Weiner's case it's on tape. So should HE resign?
Yes, it is lying when there's a spot on the government financial disclosure form where you are required by law to list if your wife has income, and disclose it and the source.

And when you list "none" - five years in a row - when you and everyone else in Washington know damns well your wife works for a lobbyist, that's a bad thing.

Especially when you are a Supreme Court Justice. Ignorance of the law is no excuse for violating it, right ;)

Weiner, unlike Clarence Thomas, didn't break any laws. No, no reason for him to resign. He can certainly get an ethics investigation within the House, and be subject to the decision there.

Riot 06-06-2011 09:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dellinger63 (Post 782204)
we had a guy resign because he sent a pic not wearing a shirt, didn't even lie about it. Personally I'd love to see the lil Weiner stay.
But that guy resigned for no apparent reason - the assumption was that he resigned as there must be much more coming out that he wanted to hide.

Because sending a picture of yourself with your shirt off isn't an illegal thing ;)

slotdirt 06-07-2011 08:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot (Post 782163)
Breitbart (I keep spelling his name various ways, sorry) did try to get ahold Mike Stark, who deleted his Twitter account immediately after all this broke (he forward the stuff to Breitbart), made claims he possessed other stuff, e-mailed he didn't want to get involved, was one of the ones who were stalking Weiner, etc. Alot of weirdness going on there. You can read them on Kos. Yes, their stuff was hacked into and published.

Weiner probably should have apologized to Breitbart, but Breitbart just got lucky with his minions sending him something real. He's still known for being career-destroying by manufacturing lies.

Weiner on day one should have said, "Yeah, it's me, I goofed up, I'm now going home as I owe my wife everything if she'll still have me" and been done with it. He didn't break the law. He was just a loser jackass.
Ok, just to confirm that you understand though, there were no "hackers" involved. Weiner meant to send a message privately, accidentally posted it publicly, and then lied about it for 10 days to anybody who would ask. Stupidity did him in, not some sort of internet fairy.

geeker2 06-07-2011 08:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by slotdirt (Post 782271)
Ok, just to confirm that you understand though, there were no "hackers" involved. Weiner meant to send a message privately, accidentally posted it publicly, and then lied about it for 10 days to anybody who would ask. Stupidity did him in, not some sort of internet fairy.

I bet it wasn't even Weiner's erection. I bet it was Breitbart :rolleyes:

All I know is if you pulled this stunt at most Corporations - you would be gone and gone quickly.

Rileyoriley 06-07-2011 09:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by slotdirt (Post 782271)
Ok, just to confirm that you understand though, there were no "hackers" involved. Weiner meant to send a message privately, accidentally posted it publicly, and then lied about it for 10 days to anybody who would ask. Stupidity did him in, not some sort of internet fairy.
Somehow this must be Bush's fault.:rolleyes:

geeker2 06-07-2011 10:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rileyoriley (Post 782292)
Somehow this must be Bush's fault.:rolleyes:
It was his erection :p

somerfrost 06-07-2011 10:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by geeker2 (Post 782293)
It was his erection :p
A Texas longhorn? Seriously though, gave this guy the benefit of the doubt, especially considering the source...now it's time for him to go! Feel sorry for his wife and the folks who voted for this loser.

Riot 06-07-2011 01:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by slotdirt (Post 782271)
Ok, just to confirm that you understand though, there were no "hackers" involved. Weiner meant to send a message privately, accidentally posted it publicly, and then lied about it for 10 days to anybody who would ask. Stupidity did him in, not some sort of internet fairy.
Yes, as I said, I'm aware of that. I'm saying that Breitbart and Stark (and other friends of Stark) were hacked into subsequent to their screen grabs, during the past week, by AnonyMiss.

Coach Pants 06-07-2011 02:31 PM
The FBI ans CIA have several informants in Anonymous.

Riot 06-07-2011 02:52 PM
I'd believe that about FBI-CIA. I'd believe nothing is private, and nothing is completely secure anymore.

AnonyMiss (women on the internet) and Anonymous are two different internet hacker groups, but work together, apparently.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:33 AM.
Page 3 of 6 < 12 3 45 > Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.