Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Greatest Living Racehorse? (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=40969)

Antitrust32 02-15-2011 02:47 PM

is Formal Gold still alive?

I'd say Skip Away, but since he's dead... what about Gold?

Cigar is the horse with the best career that is still alive.

Horse with the most talent that is still alive... I'll get crucified for saying this.. Unbridled's Song :)

Indian Charlie 02-15-2011 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32 (Post 752573)
is Formal Gold still alive?

I'd say Skip Away, but since he's dead... what about Gold?

Cigar is the horse with the best career that is still alive.

Horse with the most talent that is still alive... I'll get crucified for saying this.. Unbridled's Song :)

Are you kidding? UBS was freakin amazing.

RolloTomasi 02-15-2011 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid (Post 752545)
...it would've been a lot worse for Roses in May. Assuming that Haskin's story is accurate and that Ramsey heeded Frankel's advice, it was the right move. Roses in May never could have run the race that Ghostzapper did.

That's not the point. Point is that Roses in May and horses of his ilk would always be a thorn in Ghostzapper's side, at least when it came to classic distances.

Fortunately, Frankel avoided running him in such races but twice in top company.

Quote:

Got it, so I can't defend an opinion about a horse's ability without an accompanying desire to get into hours of debate over pretend races.
Didn't say that at all. Miraja brought up the hypothetical Cigar-Ghostzapper matchup that you are so loathe to bother yourself with. I, on the other hand, don't mind wasting "hours" and "pages" on such a debate, so I responded.

I'm still not sure why you involved yourself with it if your not interested in that sort of discussion.

Antitrust32 02-15-2011 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Indian Charlie (Post 752583)
Are you kidding? UBS was freakin amazing.

no I was not kidding about UBS being the most talented of the alive horses today! If #1) he would have had an owner who was not a waste of plasma and #2) been a sound horse... who knows what could have been! Zito still says he's the most talented horse he trained.. and I think Zito only had him for one 7 furlong race.

ateamstupid 02-15-2011 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RolloTomasi (Post 752586)
That's not the point. Point is that Roses in May and horses of his ilk would always be a thorn in Ghostzapper's side, at least when it came to classic distances.

Fortunately, Frankel avoided running him in such races but twice in top company.

Nice job cherry-picking that part of my post. It was an add-on to my original point about Ghostzapper's brilliance. The main point is that had Ghostzapper not drawn the rail, I'm almost positive the Frankel/Ramsey exchange never would've happened (if it happened at all).

Quote:

Originally Posted by RolloTomasi (Post 752586)
Didn't say that at all. Miraja brought up the hypothetical Cigar-Ghostzapper matchup that you are so loathe to bother yourself with. I, on the other hand, don't mind wasting "hours" and "pages" on such a debate, so I responded.

I'm still not sure why you involved yourself with it if your not interested in that sort of discussion.

Because I thought it was pretty funny that Princess Doreen trashed miraja for using 'hypotheticals', then used one of her own in the very next sentence doubting whether Ghostzapper could've run Cigar's schedule. Hope that satisfies you.

RolloTomasi 02-15-2011 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid (Post 752595)
Nice job cherry-picking that part of my post. It was an add-on to my original point about Ghostzapper's brilliance. The main point is that had Ghostzapper not drawn the rail, I'm almost positive the Frankel/Ramsey exchange never would've happened (if it happened at all).

Oh...so it's OK for you to cherry-pick, but not others.

You didn't make much of a defense for the allegedly pace-invulnerable Ghostzapper's near upset in the 2004 Woodward.

Quote:

Because I thought it was pretty funny that Princess Doreen trashed miraja for using 'hypotheticals', then used one of her own in the very next sentence doubting whether Ghostzapper could've run Cigar's schedule. Hope that satisfies you.
Not really. I have nothing to do with Princess Doreen's posts.

You should have given her the "hypotheticals are a waste of my precious time" lecture, not me.

GPK 02-15-2011 05:13 PM

I had no idea how clueless so many of you are. Everyone knows this title belongs to Peppers Pride. She was undefeated!!! DUHHHH

MaTH716 02-15-2011 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GPK (Post 752617)
I had no idea how clueless so many of you are. Everyone knows this title belongs to Peppers Pride. She was undefeated!!! DUHHHH

English Channel is going to be devistated when he hears about this.

GPK 02-15-2011 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaTH716 (Post 752620)
English Channel is going to be devistated when he hears about this.

It's ok....he knows how special he is to me. I tell him every week in the letter I write him and send to Lanes End:o

ateamstupid 02-15-2011 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RolloTomasi (Post 752613)
Oh...so it's OK for you to cherry-pick, but not others.

You didn't make much of a defense for the allegedly pace-invulnerable Ghostzapper's near upset in the 2004 Woodward.

Saint Liam was an elite handicap horse and he basically took Ghostzapper to the outer rail in the stretch. Ghostzapper still won and they weren't exactly crawling home. That hardly proves anything about Ghostzapper's supposed tactical failures.

Ghostzapper was never keen or rank early in any of his route races. He let Saint Liam go early in the Woodward and he tracked Presidentialaffair in the Iselin. He took the lead in the Classic because he drew the rail. He proved over and over when sprinting that as long as you kept him outside of horses, he had no problem waiting for his cue. Suggesting he couldn't rate against top flight speed horses is silly.

Indian Charlie 02-15-2011 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32 (Post 752587)
no I was not kidding about UBS being the most talented of the alive horses today! If #1) he would have had an owner who was not a waste of plasma and #2) been a sound horse... who knows what could have been! Zito still says he's the most talented horse he trained.. and I think Zito only had him for one 7 furlong race.

I know what you meant. I was agreeing with you.

IC is the best though :)

Dunbar 02-15-2011 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by miraja2 (Post 752520)
If you include Cigar (in his prime) into the fields of any of Ghostzapper's last six races....how many of them would Cigar would have won?

It is obviously impossible to know, but my guess is zero. Ghostzapper probably still would have won them all.

That's certainly not the only factor one should use in determining "greatness," but I do think its pretty important.

I agree with you. But how about if they ran a race every month for a year? How many would Cigar have won? At least 6, IMO. GZ would have crashed after 4-5.

Durability and consistency are also elements of greatness.

--Dunbar

Dunbar 02-15-2011 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Princess Doreen (Post 752523)
Shoulda, coulda, woulda. If GZ had the same kind of schedule that CIGAR had, how many races would he have won or would have missed because he couldn't have kept up?!~

Oops, I should have read further. I would have seen that you made the same point 6 hrs ago that I just made.

--Dunbar

Princess Doreen 02-15-2011 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid (Post 752595)
Because I thought it was pretty funny that Princess Doreen trashed miraja for using 'hypotheticals', then used one of her own in the very next sentence doubting whether Ghostzapper could've run Cigar's schedule. Hope that satisfies you.

Disagreeing is trashing? I didn't trash anyone, and I'm quite sure Miraja can defend her opinion. I personally find it useless to discuss hypotheticals - they can't be proven. Tearing down one horse's accomplishments to prop up another denigrates them both. I posted a hypothetical in response to Miraja's which prompts another hypothetical, and so on, and so on. It gets ridiculous after awhile.

dalakhani 02-15-2011 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RolloTomasi (Post 752586)
That's not the point. Point is that Roses in May and horses of his ilk would always be a thorn in Ghostzapper's side, at least when it came to classic distances.

Fortunately, Frankel avoided running him in such races but twice in top company.

But why? What I appreciated about Ghostzapper more than anything else besides his utter brilliance was his versatility. He could literally run at any pace from any part of the track. What evidence is there that he was vulnerable to pace at ANY distance?

dalakhani 02-15-2011 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dahoss (Post 752443)
Holy Bull

Ive run into Mike Smith a few times and most notably after the BC this year. I don't know him but he was nice enough to stop and take a picture and chat even after that tough loss. I asked him who his best mount was. I even said "holy bull?"

He said "Zenyatta, in all ways Zenyatta".

It could have been the libations or his emotions speaking a few hours after a tough loss but I swear that is what the man said and there were no reporters or boom mics around.

I know that this is hearsay and I will get my deserved thrashing for posting this. Either way, I took him at his word and if that is the case, I don't think its such a joke that she is mentioned.

If we are judging strictly on what we individually perceive as "quality" in a racehorse, then I think GZ or Cigar are both worthy and I think most would agree that an argument could be made.

If greatness is measured solely in terms of the imprint left on the sport, I think Zenyatta is unquestionably the greatest living racehorse. Thirty years from now, will we talking more about her or Cigar?

Again, it depends on how one defines "greatness".

Danzig 02-15-2011 07:32 PM

for the sake of integrity, i'm hoping people talk more about cigar than zenyatta 30 years from now. since most of her fans aren't going to attend more races since she's retired, i'd imagine talk of her will wither and die in future years. but racing die hards won't forget cigar. nor should they.


i'd have to think holy bull would be the greatest living. cigar close behind.

ateamstupid 02-15-2011 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dalakhani (Post 752690)
But why? What I appreciated about Ghostzapper more than anything else besides his utter brilliance was his versatility. He could literally run at any pace from any part of the track. What evidence is there that he was vulnerable to pace at ANY distance?

He set the pace in one of three route races and there's an anecdote about Frankel asking Ramsey not to send Roses in May early in the Classic. That's enough evidence for some that Ghostzapper was an intractable speedball who'd get burned up by the speed horses of Cigar's day.

Dahoss 02-15-2011 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dalakhani (Post 752697)
Ive run into Mike Smith a few times and most notably after the BC this year. I don't know him but he was nice enough to stop and take a picture and chat even after that tough loss. I asked him who his best mount was. I even said "holy bull?"

He said "Zenyatta, in all ways Zenyatta".

It could have been the libations or his emotions speaking a few hours after a tough loss but I swear that is what the man said and there were no reporters or boom mics around.

I know that this is hearsay and I will get my deserved thrashing for posting this. Either way, I took him at his word and if that is the case, I don't think its such a joke that she is mentioned.

If we are judging strictly on what we individually perceive as "quality" in a racehorse, then I think GZ or Cigar are both worthy and I think most would agree that an argument could be made.

If greatness is measured solely in terms of the imprint left on the sport, I think Zenyatta is unquestionably the greatest living racehorse. Thirty years from now, will we talking more about her or Cigar?

Again, it depends on how one defines "greatness".

No offense, but I'd rather pull my toenails out one by one than have another Zenyatta discussion. However, Smith also said she was the best horse ever. He might be a bit biased and was totally (understandable) caught up in the Zenyattatardness.

RolloTomasi 02-15-2011 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dalakhani (Post 752690)
But why? What I appreciated about Ghostzapper more than anything else besides his utter brilliance was his versatility. He could literally run at any pace from any part of the track. What evidence is there that he was vulnerable to pace at ANY distance?

I only suggested he was vulnerable at classic distances.

As he started just 3 times at 9f or more (and even then only twice around 2 turns), the evidence is certainly scant.

But in the 2004 Woodward, where he was under pressure through fast fractions, Ghostzapper was life and death to edge an, up to that point, unheralded St. Liam.

In 3 of Ghostzapper's last 4 starts, he earned a Beyer speed figure of 122 or more. The only exception was the Woodward, where he recorded at 114.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.