![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
well, yeah, that's true... |
Quote:
Gentlemen was still 5 lengths in front of Skip Away at the wire. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I believe it was Formal Gold and Will's Way who battled down the stretch in the Whitney? That was the summer of great finishes at Saratoga.
|
Quote:
I know Skip Away probably had better mares to start out but his numbers are better than NA, and personally I think SC is a better sire also. Beherns, notsomuch |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
As for Skip Away, he's never had a horse of significance, his AEI (1.32) is below his CI (1.43), and his yearlings and 2YOs sell for next to nothing, so I fail to see how "his numbers are better than" Northern Afleet. |
Quote:
SA has had more graded stakes winners, stakes winners and stakes placed horses than NA and the last few years he has had foal crops of 50 or less. he aint good but it is hard to make a case that NA is better. Maybe I am being elitist but to my thinking you could breed to billy goats and be on the top 100 sire list |
Quote:
|
Where are we getting this 571 foal number? According to the Stallion Register, Northern Afleet has sired 348 horses of racing age, 244 runners, 70 percent winners, and 14 stakes winners. Skip Away's numbers are pretty similar. Considering - again - the mares one probably got versus the other, I'd suggest Northern Afleet has done pretty darn well for himself.
This is a great discussion though as both are sixth-crop sires and it makes for a really good comparison. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:35 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.