and Congrats to the connections of Slew's Tizzy, who passed up the KD & won a nice Grade 3 race at Lone Star today.

Soapbox? Your reply yesterday??? :confused:

As for that "other" place...I learned the "hard way" ...it must be that "valley" air :D

NO NO NO! I wasn't talking about that...I'm confused :confused:

Is this the post your talking about???

SAME HERE

I have no idea what any of you are talkin about. I thought maybe it was the wine. Now I'm not so sure.

This? :confused:

Hell...it's been a GREAT day, made $375 in the 5th @ Belmont & got the Red Sox in the "13" run baseball pool this week!!!
No problems here! :)

None for me either, had a good Pk 3 at Holly a few times, The Rye Man!

DaHoss, never mind...it's late. I understand your post yesterday, understand the "soapbox" reference on the thread...all is good! :)

I am hoping that someone near her finally sat her down and said"Look,What the F_ck are you doing?" Hopefully someone explained how to read a condition book to her.This horse is getting a much needed rest and hopefully some class relief in his next races.
I think he would be a great sprinter on an easier circuit.

I think it is ironic that the people on this thread who are most critical of Jamie Sanders are the same wizards who ran a 15000n2l filly in an allowance race at Keeneland. At least her horse has won a cople of stakes and his earnings have far exceeded his acquisition cost. People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Members have been suspended and banned for less.

ML,

If you want to question the placement of the filly, you can address me or Chuck Simon. "The people on this thread critical of Jamie Sanders" may or may not be partners in Dee Tee and aren't germane to her record and stock placement. And the 15,000/N2L filly fit pretty well at $50,000 two weeks ago at Churchill in case you missed it.

I have it on good authority that Chuck never enters a horse without consulting Jamie Sanders first.

SB,

My point is merely this: The major portion of the commentary in this thread comes from both yourself and Cannon Shell, bashing Jamie and her management. The point is that she has made several hundred thousand dollars and won some stakes with a horse she paid $9,000 for. Her current overall statistics nonwithstanding, I think it is ethically questionable and somewhat unprofessional for you and Cannon Shell to publically bash her in such a fashion. As for the specific management of your horse, as I am neither charged with her care, nor an investor in her, where or when she races is not my province. However, If you don't appreciate someone commenting on your choices in such a fashion, why do you think it is appropriate to do the same?

58 posts, two that could be construed as critical by steve, and that's the majority?? wow. someone didn't pay attention in math class.