Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   hillary or osama er bama.... (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=8905)

Danzig 01-18-2007 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by somerfrost
I guess I'm in the minority here cause I like both Clinton and Obama...I think that would be a great ticket in fact! As I've said before, I'd love to see Hillary Vs Condy.

obama--couple years in the senate. what else? what background does he have that would convince me to vote for him?

Danzig 01-18-2007 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GenuineRisk
Omigawd, not you on the McCain I'llsaywhateverwillgetmeelectedExpress, too!

http://www.salon.com/opinion/blument.../01/18/mccain/

Not that I didn't once like the man- I was as duped by the press as everyone else. But actually look at his voting record, and pay attention to where and to whom he's been speaking, and one's opinion does a 180. Maverick, schmaverick.

My thoughts on Hilary-- I think she's incredibly smart, and works her tail off for New York-- for a carpetbagger, she knows more about this state than many natives. She's really hawkish on defense, and back in 1992 she was pushing for an overhaul to our bloated health care system-- years before the rest of the country caught up. All to the good. BUT- I think the nation is tired of "Bush" and "Clinton" and even if she was the ideal candidate it wouldn't matter because America wants something different from the past 18 years. I don't think she can win.

I like Edwards, and quite frankly, if Gore would run and show some of the side of him that comes out when he's not campaigning, I think he'd win, because I think the environment and energy are going to be a major, major issues in the near future for most Americans. The situation in Nigeria isn't getting any better, and there goes our 5th largest supplier of oil. And our biggest one requires us to suck up to the same people who are funding mosques teaching that America is the big bad. I think if Gore would throw his hat in, and campaign on energy independence and renewable energies, he'd have a strong shot.

Well, and he'd have to go on a diet. There's a real streak of fattism in this country, for all that many of us are overweight.

oh no. not edwards. he seems so fake!

somerfrost 01-18-2007 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timmgirvan
Bush didn't say or refer to God as a talisman....that is your take on things. And you are the one who looks down his nose at the deluded Christians!

Who is talking about Bush? You are simply refusing to admit what you posted!!?? Go back and read what you posted...you said, "God help us"...that's evoking the Almighty as a talisman...you, not Bush, not me, not Mickey Mouse...YOU!

somerfrost 01-18-2007 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timmgirvan
While you people are falling all over yourselves in defense of Hillary, God(yeah the Big Guy) help us if this country settles for her!

Here is your original post! "God help us if this country settles for her"...your words!

timmgirvan 01-18-2007 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by somerfrost
Here is your original post! "God help us if this country settles for her"...your words!

"God help us" is a prayer...not a talisman! I'm surprised that a man of your education couldn't ferret that out. Oh well...btw...TAKE A MIDOL!

Danzig 01-18-2007 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timmgirvan
"God help us" is a prayer...not a talisman! I'm surprised that a man of your education couldn't ferret that out. Oh well...btw...TAKE A MIDOL!


you know...i really tire of comments like these.

timmgirvan 01-18-2007 06:36 PM

Why? Was that sexist?

Danzig 01-18-2007 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timmgirvan
Why? Was that sexist?

well, yeah imo it was. happens on here too oftne for my taste. put yourself in a womans shoes, tim. posts on here accusing someone of 'acting like a girl'--things like that are used as an insult. because who would want to be a girl...

or maybe i'm just being too sensitive....

Samarta 01-18-2007 06:43 PM

The next occupant of the white house will either be Biden or Mayor Rudy. Not saying anything about supporting either candidate, I just think that's going to be the way it plays out.

timmgirvan 01-18-2007 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig188
well, yeah imo it was. happens on here too oftne for my taste. put yourself in a womans shoes, tim. posts on here accusing someone of 'acting like a girl'--things like that are used as an insult. because who would want to be a girl...

or maybe i'm just being too sensitive....

On reflecting.....you're right... it was sexist...but not putting down women...more like "stop yer whinin"! I hope that clears it up! :)

hoovesupsideyourhead 01-18-2007 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GenuineRisk
Timm, why don't you offer some specifics on exactly why you don't like Hilary, instead of just saying "God help us" if she's elected. I can give you specific things about Giuliani and McCain that I don't like, actions that they have taken while elected officials. Offer the same stuff on Hilary, please- which of her positions do you opposed? Otherwise you come across sounding as though you get your talking points from Rush Limbaugh, and he's not known for his journalistic integrity.

I gots news for ya, my friend- politicians are ALL power-mad schemers. It's how they get elected. I find it very sexist of you that you clearly consider that a negative thing in a woman but not a man. ;)

she was already prez once....just ask bill..

timmgirvan 01-18-2007 07:03 PM

Hooves: thank you...thankyouverymuch!

pgardn 01-18-2007 07:15 PM

Hillary is a doer. She personally called up many of the major employers in NY and met with them and asked how she could help them hire additional folks to expand business. What was and was not getting in the way. She did some amazing work with Corning. Talked with Union folks backed them down on certain criteria and basically made it easier to hire qualified folks that would help companies. She did an amazing job.

She is extraordinarily capable. Her health care plan was a plan. And the Republican plan... nowhere. She is the one Democrat with a definite ability to GET THINGS DONE. Now you might not like her ideas, but she has ideas. I also believe she has made many credible aquaintances with quality folks that can get jobs done. ONe thing George did a pitiful job of was picking people for what he thought were minor posts that were completely inept friends or political contributors. FEMA turned out not to be so minor. The list is deep.

I think she will pick good people in all spots. Loyality only goes so far, you have got to move competent people into place.

And I probably will not vote for her. Obama is a definite no. I see a great orator, and smart man... but my God he just has NO experience.

Mean people with experience also can get jobs done. Abraham L. put some of his most ardent enemies into major posts because he knew they were terribly capable at things that he needed them for. I know politics does not work this way anymore, and it is sad. CAPABLE people may be better than people who talk YOUR game, but cannot get things done.

brianwspencer 01-18-2007 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pgardn
I think she will pick good people in all spots. Loyality only goes so far, you have got to move competent people into place.

And I probably will not vote for her. Obama is a definite no. I see a great orator, and smart man... but my God he just has NO experience.

Mean people with experience also can get jobs done. Abraham L. put some of his most ardent enemies into major posts because he knew they were terribly capable at things that he needed them for. I know politics does not work this way anymore, and it is sad. CAPABLE people may be better than people who talk YOUR game, but cannot get things done.

I like Hillary, but all personal likes or dislikes aside I still don't see how anyone can deny the points you've made, that she gets things done and tries to cross the necessary bridges to get there....some people just don't let her over to the other side because party loyalty seems more important these days then getting things done right for the country.

And as for the end of the your post -- I wish it worked that way. I really do. But it's a pipe dream at this point.

Danzig 01-18-2007 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timmgirvan
On reflecting.....you're right... it was sexist...but not putting down women...more like "stop yer whinin"! I hope that clears it up! :)

sorry, tim...had a mammogram today, so i guess i'm a bit grouchy....

timmgirvan 01-18-2007 08:21 PM

Zeig: I hope everything turns out well on your tests!

Danzig 01-18-2007 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timmgirvan
Zeig: I hope everything turns out well on your tests!

oh, i'm sure it's fine...just routine once a year garbage--you know, like income tax filing. it's a bother, but not fatal...

Danzig 01-18-2007 08:29 PM

and you guys out there have no idea how lucky you are...just imagine your lil buddies getting smooshed flat between two plates. multiple times.

Coach Pants 01-18-2007 08:41 PM

I'm voting for this guy...


GPK 01-18-2007 09:04 PM

this ticket gets my vote

http://cristal.inria.fr/~harley/pics/bnb.experience.gif

GenuineRisk 01-19-2007 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig188
and you guys out there have no idea how lucky you are...just imagine your lil buddies getting smooshed flat between two plates. multiple times.

And your insides cramping in on themselves once a month. "Midol" comments give me such a flash of contempt for the comment because I think, "Oh, you SO have no idea, you leetle, leetle man." When I was a teenager, mine were so bad I passed out from them once. God bless the Pill.

(Perhaps, Timm, you want to exchange that phrase for, "Is your jockstrap twisted?" or something like that? Tee hee. )

Though it does give us females a high pain threshold; I'll say that. When the "40-Year-Old Virgin" showed the chest wax I thought, "What? Get your pubes waxed and THEN talk to me about pain. Chest. Ha." (I usually read while they're doing my legs because I get bored)

I had a friend faint during a mammogram, Danzig. Props to you for doing it, and I'm not looking forward to having to start in a few years... every gyno I've had has suggested it earlier, because of my medical history, but they don't follow through and I'm not pushing for it!

GenuineRisk 01-19-2007 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig188
oh no. not edwards. he seems so fake!

He does look like a Breck Boy, I'll give you that. But he ran last time on the "Two Americas" platform and I like that, because I do think the economic divide in this country is growing. And, though I like to think I can ignore where someone comes from and focus on what they do, I like that he grew up poor because I think once you've been poor, you don't forget it. I live surrounded by poor people, and while yes, some are just lazy, most of them are working poor, struggling to keep their heads above water and their kids out of trouble. And our current direction is making their lives harder, not easier.

Though I look forward to the deli that is clearly not a deli near us going out of business, if it ever does... that particular form of employment I'd just as soon not have around us...

GenuineRisk 01-19-2007 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timmgirvan
GR: when you get the time...start with TravelGate! Regarding the GOP..it was elected members of Congress led by the Soul of Congress Liebermann who condemned Clinton for his foolishness,not Party Heads. Hillary came out swinging?..more like a knife in the back or Death threats on enemys families! Any body around you know who's had 60-70 associates meet untimely deaths! They could make a movie about it....but then they'd have to kill everybody who saw the movie!! Ron Brown ring a bell? And I didn't say women...I said Hillary, but I'll throw in Pelosi for you too!:)

Timm, which party was in control of Congress during the impeachment thing? Come on, which party? Lieberman didn't spearhead the thing; he voted for it (and by the way, if you want him, you can have him. Just give us Chuck Hagel in return). Ron Brown? Right. And Senator Wellstone's plane was brought down by Republican agents determined to make sure they kept control of the Senate. You've GOT to get off the conspiracy stuff, at least with me, as I don't think I've ever posted anything to indicate I believe any of them (other than Condi sleeping with Bush, heh heh heh).

So, how many people met untimely deaths? Sixty or seventy? Post their names, please. If you're going to accuse the Clintons of that much conspiracy and murder, you should post all the names of people you believe they had killed. Again, specifics.

As I said, the only powermad people you mentioned were both female. And you mentioned Pelosi the first time. Be sure to reread your posts so you don't repeat yourself and just further accentuate my point- which is that even though it's easy to make generalized accusations, I'd recommend not doing it because it can go both ways. Midolman. :)

(No I don't think you hate women or anything like that. I was just trying to say something about generalizations) :)

GenuineRisk 01-19-2007 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by T3B

And then Aerosmith would play at the Inaugural Ball. Sweeet. I look forward to a chorus of "heh hehs" during the State of the Union Address.

Sigh... I taped the video of them singing "I Got You, Babe" with Cher and watched it until the tape wore out. Ooh! I bet it's on Youtube now!

Maybe Hank Hill for Secretary of State?

skippy3481 01-19-2007 10:34 AM

Homer Simpson for Energy chairmen.

GenuineRisk 01-19-2007 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skippy3481
Homer Simpson for Energy chairmen.

Cool. I have long wanted to live in a nation powered by doughnuts and beer.

timmgirvan 01-19-2007 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GenuineRisk
Timm, which party was in control of Congress during the impeachment thing? Come on, which party? Lieberman didn't spearhead the thing; he voted for it (and by the way, if you want him, you can have him. Just give us Chuck Hagel in return). Ron Brown? Right. And Senator Wellstone's plane was brought down by Republican agents determined to make sure they kept control of the Senate. You've GOT to get off the conspiracy stuff, at least with me, as I don't think I've ever posted anything to indicate I believe any of them (other than Condi sleeping with Bush, heh heh heh).

So, how many people met untimely deaths? Sixty or seventy? Post their names, please. If you're going to accuse the Clintons of that much conspiracy and murder, you should post all the names of people you believe they had killed. Again, specifics.

As I said, the only powermad people you mentioned were both female. And you mentioned Pelosi the first time. Be sure to reread your posts so you don't repeat yourself and just further accentuate my point- which is that even though it's easy to make generalized accusations, I'd recommend not doing it because it can go both ways. Midolman. :)

(No I don't think you hate women or anything like that. I was just trying to say something about generalizations) :)

GR: I'll fess up..I have been called a bit*h! MidolMan is good,though! You're still projecting,Gr, about my sexist(not) comments. I think Geo Soros is powermad too. But he's not King,yet. Just like them to kick JL to the curb once he's fulfilled his purpose. You can Google like the best of them,GR, so you can look up things pertinent to this. You know that Ron Brown was facing criminal charges, and he told Slick Willie he wasn't going down alone! Bye RB. Have you never heard of the Clinton death list? If you need it I'll post it if I can get the link. And I want to publicly thank DTS for giving me the info on posting a link. He's the BEST!

timmgirvan 01-19-2007 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GenuineRisk
Cool. I have long wanted to live in a nation powered by doughnuts and beer.

Just think of the effects on GLOBAL Warming,though!:eek:

Downthestretch55 01-19-2007 04:03 PM

I have avoided posting on this thread for a reason.
NO MORE!!!
If Midol Man isn't tossing his hat into the ring, though I think he should, I'll go with Chuck Hagel. Might be the first time since Barry G that I vote repub.
If Midol Man decides not to run, Hooves will get the nod.
If not him...Edwards/Obama is the ticket.
HMMMM...anything is better than what we've got.
Can't wait for the trap door to spring underneath Dicky C and his puppet Georgie boy. Good bye...see ya...

timmgirvan 01-19-2007 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Downthestretch55
I have avoided posting on this thread for a reason.
NO MORE!!!
If Midol Man isn't tossing his hat into the ring, though I think he should, I'll go with Chuck Hagel. Might be the first time since Barry G that I vote repub.
If Midol Man decides not to run, Hooves will get the nod.
If not him...Edwards/Obama is the ticket.
HMMMM...anything is better than what we've got.
Can't wait for the trap door to spring underneath Dicky C and his puppet Georgie boy. Good bye...see ya...

DTS: you would vote for me? I'm truly humbled.

Downthestretch55 01-19-2007 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timmgirvan
DTS: you would vote for me? I'm truly humbled.

Yes Timm,
I certainly would!
Now if you want me to manage your campaign, and if you're willing to wear a nice dress and paint up in "black face" on the trail, my guess is you'll get extra votes. Red lipstick even better!
On a side note, have you considered a running mate for VP?
Last I heard, Al Sharpton is available.
It's a can't lose! And to think it all started on the DT!

timmgirvan 01-19-2007 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Downthestretch55
Yes Timm,
I certainly would!
Now if you want me to manage your campaign, and if you're willing to wear a nice dress and paint up in "black face" on the trail, my guess is you'll get extra votes. Red lipstick even better!
On a side note, have you considered a running mate for VP?
Last I heard, Al Sharpton is available.
It's a can't lose! And to think it all started on the DT!

Sorry to burst your campaign bubble, but I'm not a showman, at least not in that sense. Al is pretty much available for anything,actually!

Downthestretch55 01-19-2007 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timmgirvan
Sorry to burst your campaign bubble, but I'm not a showman, at least not in that sense. Al is pretty much available for anything,actually!

Oh well, Timm.
At least I had hopes.
Actually, I really like showmen.
PT Barnum comes to mind..."There's a sucker born every minute."
How can you argue with that?
Al S bet big on Twana, just like Georgie did on Maliki.
Did you ever read about Barnum's signs within the great emporium leading to the "EGRESS"?
Pretty funny stuff. Google it if you get a chance.

Cannon Shell 01-19-2007 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pgardn
Hillary is a doer. She personally called up many of the major employers in NY and met with them and asked how she could help them hire additional folks to expand business. What was and was not getting in the way. She did some amazing work with Corning. Talked with Union folks backed them down on certain criteria and basically made it easier to hire qualified folks that would help companies. She did an amazing job.

I will give you some news about NY states economy during the Hillary era.

www.bcnys.org/whatsnew/2004/0426economypr.htm

In a nutshell it tells how poorly the NY economy was doing in the 1st part of the decade through 2004.

Cannon Shell 01-19-2007 08:32 PM

Here is a bit about the state of Hillary's state in regards to her pet project of healthcare.

www.bcnys.org/whatsnew/2006/1012medicaid.htm

Cannon Shell 01-19-2007 08:41 PM

I would have to say that I am still waiting for Hillary's impact to be felt in NY. Though she travels (campaigns?) extensively as junior senator in NY she has accomplished virtually nothing. She is strictly a politician of the polls and she choose NY as it is the most liberal leaning major state outside of CA where she can maintain a high profile. She has pissed off far left-liberals by moving to the right on issues when the polls say so and is pretty much universally hated by the right no matter what. I personally think that she would be the worst choice by Democrats as she is sure to mobilize the now shaken republicians to a common goal of beating her. Of course Kerry or Gore might be as bad but I dont think anyone is giving them a real chance.

timmgirvan 01-19-2007 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
I would have to say that I am still waiting for Hillary's impact to be felt in NY. Though she travels (campaigns?) extensively as junior senator in NY she has accomplished virtually nothing. She is strictly a politician of the polls and she choose NY as it is the most liberal leaning major state outside of CA where she can maintain a high profile. She has pissed off far left-liberals by moving to the right on issues when the polls say so and is pretty much universally hated by the right no matter what. I personally think that she would be the worst choice by Democrats as she is sure to mobilize the now shaken republicians to a common goal of beating her. Of course Kerry or Gore might be as bad but I dont think anyone is giving them a real chance.

Cannon: thanks for posting the links....Pgardn was right. Hillary IS a doer....and NY was DONE!:eek:

GenuineRisk 01-19-2007 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
I will give you some news about NY states economy during the Hillary era.

www.bcnys.org/whatsnew/2004/0426economypr.htm

In a nutshell it tells how poorly the NY economy was doing in the 1st part of the decade through 2004.

Because, of course, a single senator has complete control over her state's economy, far more than the Governor and State Congress. What party ran NY's Governorship and Congress during 2000-2004? Oh, riiiiiight....

timmgirvan 01-19-2007 10:29 PM

GR: I wondered when you'd come wanderin in!

GenuineRisk 01-19-2007 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
Here is a bit about the state of Hillary's state in regards to her pet project of healthcare.

www.bcnys.org/whatsnew/2006/1012medicaid.htm

News for you Cannon-- Hillary has NO control over how NYState's Medicare and Medicaid is administered. What party has been in charge of NY State over the past decade? Oh, riiiiiight....

Oh, while we're on the subject, which party pushed through the big increase in Medicare with that giveaway to the drug companies? Riiiiiight....

(Which is not to say NY's health care isn't completely f*cked up, but to imply that's Hillary's fault is absurd)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.