HAHAHAHAHA !!!!!! Classic !!! :tro::tro::tro:

I hear you. It's difficult to explain but I'll give it a shot. Ladies, chime in if you have something to add here.

For some reason, the guy with the snow ball is believed to be a better catch than the good natured guy that pulls out a chair for you.

Here's my theory:

This dates back to the days when we lived in caves and grunted at each other. Women are somehow programed to think that the guy with the snow ball is going to be a better hunter and provider, (and more fun) than the guy who is good natured that pulls out a chair for you. It's as simple as that.

Regarding the case being discussed = Women with low self-esteem tend to 'settle'. Deep down they figure they are where they should be or belong. Females have to have respect for themselves to envision themselves with the guy that throws the snowball, brings home the fresh kill, protects them, makes strong healthy babies, and makes them happy, and never abuses them.

Just when I thought you couldn't get any dumber...you go and pull a stunt like this...

AND TOTALLY REDEEM YOURSELF!

Who the fucl<gives you your dating advice?

Lloyd Christmas?

Come to think of it, I see a physical resemblance.

Hold onto that girlfriend. :zz:

DrugS's dating tips at work:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2MPvK0nOKI0

Holding out a chair doesn't make a man a nice guy. Most women can tell the difference between the actually nice guy and the one who is merely pretending to be nice because he's hoping to get laid. There are a lot of guys who do the holding out the chair, saying nice things, blah blah blah, but it doesn't matter; we can smell the anger coming off of them a mile away. At least the assh*le is being honest about who he is.

Which is not to say we don't make a lot of dumb choices in our teens and 20s, but most of us figure it out eventually. I have a friend who is a genuinely nice guy who I remember despairing over being single in his 20s. He ended up marrying a 5'9" redhead (taller than he is!) because while she was willing to date jerks, she didn't want to marry one.

You're right that we're a lot more practical about choosing mates than we like to appear, but it's not about some he-man provider; it's about someone we think we'll still like talking to when we both get old and wrinkly and talking is all you have left. A guy who pulls out the chair for us because he's just naturally kind, not because he thinks it'll score points with us, will do just fine. Believe me.

Oh, and being funny. We like that.

I first talked to her commenting on a mutual friends post on Facebook.

Through the magic of GMail's search function ... here is a recap of how I obtained her.

Our first four exchanges ever:

More like pull a $50 bill out of my pocket.

You're silk. I wouldn't be surprised if you could pull off getting a date with a hottie just by being nice. I'm like zero for 84 at that.

I'm going to write a sequel to the famous book "Men are from Mars and Women are from Venus".

It will be titled "Men are from Mars, Women are from another fugging galaxy".

BTW -- maybe the most well-read and guile person I've ever been around -- would over-tip waitresses and lure them into being his bait to attract slightly less attractive waitresses.

It seemed like a good plan I suppose -- but I don't believe in tipping any more than 10% to 15% tops.

IMHO, this exchange "set the hook"... she had already swallowed the bait based on info from your mutual friends or that pic of you with the handsome Roan over your right shoulder.

More importantly, is that not RH1085 asking to dress you up?

That's a great concept but I don't think it happens as often as you think. If I had read your post 20 years ago.....;)

Women have brains a third the size of men. It's science.

I didn't say it happens OFTEN. If it did, divorce rates wouldn't be at 50 percent, right?

Sometimes we're dumb enough to think the cute but boring guy will eventually turn into a good conversationalist if we just wait long enough. I spent two years in my 20s breaking my own heart over a guy, who, every time I actually talked to him, bored me to tears. But in my head, he was the most interesting guy ever! No one that attractive could really be that boring! Yeesh.

Fortunately, he had the good sense not to ask me out ever (probably because I bored him). He eventually married a really nice former coworker and last I heard, they're very happy. I can't imagine what they talk about though. ;)

Thats nice :rolleyes: I think anybody that would date you should have their head examined. Sweet that you can stereotype that all jockey's are the same.

Excellent point. Never underestimate the appeal of a pretty horsie.

So said the exercise girl who is a jockey jumper.

Churchill Downs: Albarado, agent part ways

I hope this is about the agent not wanting to work for a dirt bag and not just because Albarado is suspended.

Maybe he's finally come to the realization that not only is he a bad human being, but a s.hitty jockey as well.

How about, "MEN are virtually extinct, Women are mostly a pain in the ass."

http://sports.yahoo.com/news/judge-a...5193--rah.html


absolutely ridiculous that they lifted this ban.

It's not, actually. He hasn't been convicted yet, and until he is, it's innocent until proven guilty. Essentially the judge is saying you can't take away the man's livelihood on the basis of an accusation (damning as that accusation may be).

Of course, seeing as how jockeys are independent contractors, there's no law saying anyone has to hire him.

Domestic terrorist. Use NDAA on him. :D

I understand that people are innocent til proven otherwise. However, if an enterprise decides they dont want an individual on the premises while he awaits his day in court, shouldnt they be allowed to do so? I believe m gill was banned from tracks without a criminal case.

Albarado Found Guilty of Assault
 

Jockey Robby Albarado was found guilty of fourth-degree assault July 12 in Jefferson District Court after a jury heard evidence about an incident involving a former girlfriend, Carolina Martinez.

The jury recommended that Albarado, 38, pay a $500 fine for wanton endangerment. Albarado had entered a plea of not guilty for the April 30 altercation.

Looks like Willie is gonna have to f.uck that coward up himself.

That $500 fine will teach him to keep his hands off his wife. :rolleyes:

i can't believe that's all they gave him, especially considering his past history. yeah, that'll teach him. :rolleyes:

He hasn't been sentenced yet. The $500 is just the jury recommendation -- he could get a stiffer sentence from the judge. Plus, the new conviction is a direct violation of the probation he's already on, so he could have his probation revoked and then get a new sentence on the old conviction as well.

No shock here. This ******* is a serial woman beater yet it doesn't stop woman from dating him so is it really a surprise when he beats them.
Maybe this womans family or friends need to show him what should happen to a woman beater.

girlfriend.... big difference :eek:

-bt-

oh, ok. well, here's hoping for more than what they recommended. i can't believe that's all they thought it should be. he should have to pay all the medical bills too, since he caused the injuries.



i'm sure he said wife, in reference to his beating of her last year...not really a big difference after all tho, he's an equal opportunity woman beater.

Give me a reality break. A "popular" poster - and a friend - just advocated in Politics that I should hook up with Albarado. I don't appreciate those posters suggestion that I get exposed to getting the shi.at. beaten out of me.

You can't cure dicks - I refuse to call them men, because they are not - that think talking about beating women, or doing it, or laughing about it on an internet site, is okay. And yeah - that mindset is all the same. These men are allowed on this site, that behavior is allowed here, and that's very sad for all the women here.

Your suggestion, of beating the hell out of that type of man, athough satisfying, doesn't change them. You just feel sorry for their wives and girlfriends, and pray they don't have daughters.

Anymore after this one, isn't it basically their choice to be beaten?




Serious question.

I know it's hard to imagine how or why any sane women would voluntarily take up with a known beater, or return to one. The emotions, no self-esteem, all contribute to the woman not being able to just "walk away now", and some are attracted to men that are bad for them due to their own emotional disaster problems.

She can't leave if she doesn't have the emotional support, strength, money, a safe haven, help, protection, ... it's a very, very physically dangerous time for a woman (and kids) who finally gets up the guts to get out of an abusive relationship. They are hunted down and killed sometimes.

If you know a woman in such a relationship, get professional mental health help to help save her, to show her she deserves better, do all you can to save her, and don't get hurt or killed yourself in the process.

Love your daughters fiercely to give them self-worth and strength, and teach your sons violence against women is always wrong.

Edit: Just posted a very interesting piece making the internet rounds re: humor about violence against women in Politics. Hopefully, Hooves, Geeker2 and Witchdoctor will read it.

$500 fine :rolleyes:


http://msn.foxsports.com/horseracing...viction-081412

Sad to say, that even after the incident with his ex-wife and now with his ex-girlfriend, somewhere out there, some woman will start dating him after all this is said and done. This guy will not remain single the rest of his life.

Odds he has a "physical altercation" with the next woman he dates:

Yes -840
No +1160


People, by and large, are stupid.:wf